Image via iStock.
By: Rick Kausman , Deakin University and Christopher Scanlon , La Trobe University
A recent study of patient data from Melbourne’s eastern suburbs published in the Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) showed GPs are not checking their patients’ Body Mass Index (BMI) or measuring their waist circumference. The article’s authors interpret this as a shortcoming but these doctors may actually be avoiding the trap of thinking simplistic measurements help patient health and well-being.
RELATED:We’re in an obesity epidemic, yet doctors aren’t doing this one obvious thing
The paper’s authors assume – as does the National Health and Medical Research Council – that if GPs weighed and measured their patients, they’d be better able to address weight-related health problems.
But there are good reasons to be sceptical about whether scales are an effective weapon in the so-called “war on obesity”. In fact, weighing people may do more harm than good by giving an unreliable picture of the complex realities of health and weight.
Poor indicators
RELATED:Women don’t know what ‘healthy weight’ looks like
Take, for example, Body Mass Index (BMI), which is calculated by dividing weight (in kilograms) by the square of height (in metres). BMI was originally devised to determine the “average” person in a given population. While a population is obviously made up of individuals, the two are clearly not the same thing and BMI is a blunt instrument when it comes to the latter.(Post continues after gallery.)
Rebel Wilson
The actress said on Twitter; "I'm not trying to be hot. I'm just trying to be a good actress and entertain people." Image via @rebelwilson
Lady Gaga
After the media focused on her alleged weight gain in September 2012, Gaga hit back at critics by baring her body in photographs, sharing her struggles with an eating disorder, and inviting her fans to join her in a "body revolution"/ Image via @ladygaga
Ashley Judd
After the March 2012 frenzy around Judd's "puffy face" the actress fought back in 'The Daily Beast', calling the media out for making women's bodies "a source of speculation, ridicule, and invalidation, as if they belong to others". Image via @ashley_judd
Christina Aguilera
"I am always in support of someone who is willing and comfortable in their own skin enough to embrace it," the singer said in a recent interview. Image via @xtina
Lena Dunham
At the 2012 New Yorker Festival, the magazine's TV critic, Emily Nussbaum, asked Lena Dunham, producer, creator and star of the hit HBO show 'Girls' why Dunham is naked in so many scenes. Dunham responded; "I realised that what was missing in movies for me was the presence of bodies I understood." She said she plans to live until she is 105 and show her thighs every day. Image via @lenadunham
Alexa Chung
Chung responded to critics who suggested that her slight frame made her a bad role model for young women, saying: "Just because I exist in this shape doesn't mean that I'm, like, advocating it." Image via Twitter @alexa_chung
Beth Ditto
This five-foot-tall, 200-pound singer spoke openly about her weight to 'The Advocate' saying, "I feel sorry ... for people who've had skinny privilege and then have it taken away from them. I have had a lifetime to adjust to seeing how people treat women who aren't their idea of beautiful and therefore aren't their idea of useful, and I had to find ways to become useful to myself." Image via @marybethditto
Consider this 2008 article in Internal Medicine that found just over a half (51.3 per cent) of people in the overweight range (BMI of between 25 and 30) and almost a third (31.7 per cent) of those considered obese (BMI of between 30 and 35) are metabolically healthy. That means they don’t have raised blood sugar levels, raised cholesterol, or high blood pressure, all of which pose a risk to good health. The study authors also found nearly a quarter (23.5 per cent) of people in the so-called “healthy” range, that is, with a BMI between 20 and 25, may have these risks to their health.
Related: Zoe Foster Blake: “I would be a total dickhead not to use this magical goldpass.”
Waist circumference is similarly inaccurate. Pulling a measuring tape around someone’s waist simply won’t tell you if they’re healthy or unhealthy because health is far more complex than a certain number of centimetres.
In fact, one number — be it BMI, waist circumference or whatever comes next — will never tell you about any one individual’s health and well-being. If we’re looking across a population, then we may see some associations between increased BMI and an increased risk of diabetes, for instance, but that’s completely different to assessing any one person visiting a doctor.
Numbers aren’t a map
Even supposing you could reduce something as complex as health to a number, how this might help someone make positive changes to their well-being and health is another question entirely. Doctors have been weighing and measuring patients in an effort to get them to lose weight for over half a century. But there’s nothing to suggest this approach has been remotely successful.
Many GPs are also time poor and, in many cases, through no fault of their own, poorly equipped to discuss health-related weight issues. There’s virtually no training for GPs and other health professionals in how to help people be the healthiest they can be, or the healthiest weight they can be.
RELATED:“Why deciding to stop weighing myself was the best thing I’ve done.”
In many cases, this lack of training results in insensitive discussions about weight. A 2012 study in the journal Obesity, for example, found 69 per cent of women reported experiencing weight-related stigma from a GP on at least one occasion; 52 per cent said it had happened on multiple occasions.
Such comments can lead to worse health outcomes as people start to avoid seeing doctors for other health-related matters for fear of being judged and weighed. A 2005 study published in the Californian Journal of Health Promotion found:
Of course, there will be GPs — some of whom will be reading this article — who will say it’s their duty to give patients the unvarnished truth. But this misses the point. Our argument is not that doctors ought to remain silent about the relationship between health, weight and well-being. Rather, that research shows weight is an extremely poor proxy for health.
A better approach
Before giving any advice, doctors need to find out whether a person is likely to be above their most healthy weight or not. That means taking an appropriate history, and asking questions such as the amount of physical activity they may be doing, whether that particular person is doing a significant amount of “non-hungry eating”, whether he or she is a fast eater, and so on. You can’t determine all this simply by looking, or measuring anything.
RELATED:A week’s worth of healthy breakfasts that you can actually stick to
And if blood pressure or blood tests reveal some areas the patient would be willing to discuss further, it’s vital to talk about them in a non-judgemental and supportive fashion. This doesn’t mean sugarcoating the message; it means doctors should opt for neutral language, which does not
Author
No Comments
Be the first to leave a comment