Fourteen years ago, Australian Idol judge Ian ‘Dicko’ Dickinson broke a young woman’s heart on national television.
Not because of her performance of Destiny’s Child’s ‘Survivor’, but for the way her body looked in a figure hugging gold dress that skimmed her thighs and caught the light.
For those who erased the moment from their memories, Dicko shocked the country when he told a then 21-year-old Paulini Curuenavuli on national TV she should “choose more appropriate clothes or shed some pounds”.
In an era before Twitter feedback and wars, the fat-shaming comments marked one of the first times we heard a woman’s appearance openly criticised on Australian TV.
But can you imagine that happening in 2017? The answer is no, because it wouldn’t.
Top Comments
Dicko by name and dicko by nature. His own hair is very "mutton dressed as lamb". If a middle aged woman had fashion travesty hair like that, she would not get on air screen time. Having thrown that shade, I will say what I thought back in the day when this WAS entertainment news: At that point in the competition, contestants were made up and dressed by the production company, surely, so it never made sense why she had to be personally criticised for an ill-fitting dress, which is all it was. Nothing wrong with her body. She should never have felt the need to defend her body or made to feel humiliated. If Dicko's attempts to still stay relevant involve his current throw backs to his own crap comments from a decade ago, that is pretty saaaaaaad.........
Unpopular opinion, Dicko was right. The dress looked terrible on her. She was (and still is) a gorgeous girl with a fabulous figure, but that gold dress made her look considerably bigger in the hips, and tinier in the boobs. Not at all flattering. In fact I don't think that dress would flatter anybody.