The first four seasons of Annabel Crabb’s Kitchen Cabinet aired on ABC to warm reviews, but with the fifth, which began screening in late October, the response hasn’t been as sweet.
Here are some of the headlines about the fifth series of Annabel Crabb’s ABC TV show. Junk Food Journalism: Why Annabel Crabb’s Kitchen Cabinet Is Toxic; Recipes for racism? Kitchen Cabinet and the politics of food and; What’s on TV Wednesday: Kitchen Cabinet is good but may not be good for you.
SMH columnist Ben Pobjie has her “acting as a bonus PR arm for Australia’s parlimentarians”.
Amy McQuire of New Matilda is convinced Kitchen Cabinet promotes the “insidious spread of propaganda, soft interviews with hard-line politicians who wield enormous power over the lives of the most vulnerable, is sold as a fun, light-hearted look into the lives of the people we elect” and labels her a “sycophant”.
Crabb’s is a “ridiculous, sickening show”, writes McQuire.
For the uninitiated, the program features Crabb visiting politicians in their homes, homemade dessert in hand, and talking with them as they prepare a meal. The format shows politicians in their home environment and the questions seek to uncover who they are as opposed to what they do.
Critics of the show don’t appreciate the way Crabb’s show humanises politicians, as though somehow they are not human, or that their experiences as humans do not shape their political decisions.
It’s never been about hard journalism or asking the hard questions — her mate Leigh Sales covers that aspect on 7:30.
Much of the criticism came with the first episode of the new season, in which Crabb dined with former Immigration Minister Scott Morrison who, we discovered was a child actor and a Tina Arena obsessive. He’s also a man whose policies pertaining to asylum seekers were called “the most inhumane, the most uncaring, and the most selfish” of all developed countries, by former PM Malcolm Fraser.