parents

Parents investigated for neglect after letting children walk home alone

A couple in the United States are being investigated for neglect after allowing their 10 year old son and 6 year old daughter to walk home from the park alone last year.

On 20 December 2014, the children, Dvora and Rafi, walked home alone from the park, which was approximately 1.5 kilometres from their home. The children only made it half way before police picked them up.

Their parents, Danielle and Alexander Meitiv say that they haven’t been neglecting their children – they just believe in “free-range” parenting.

“The world is actually much safer than when I was a kid.”

Rafi and Dvora are no strangers to wandering around the neighbourhood, to the 7 Eleven or the library. “They’ve proven they are responsible. They’ve developed these skills,” Danielle said.

The opposite of the much discussed “helicopter” hyper-vigilant parenting model, the notion of behind “free range parenting” is that children can learn to be responsible by taking care of themselves, and testing their own limits out in the world.

As Danielle puts it, “I think it’s absolutely critical for their development – to learn responsibility, to experience the world, to gain confidence and competency.

The world is actually safer than when I was a child”.

When police picked up the children, 10 year old Rafi told police that he and his sister were not doing anything illegal and were allowed to walk home by themselves.

ADVERTISEMENT

While he wasn’t carrying it that day, the children normally carry a laminated card that says “I am not lost. I am a free-range kid.”

“I am not lost. I am a free-range kid.”

The Meitiv say that their parenting philosophy is about risk management.

“We’re not saying parents should abandon all caution. We’re saying parents should pay attention to risks that are dangerous and likely to happen.

Abductions are extremely rare. Car accidents are not. The number one cause of death for children of their age is a car accident.”

Local child protection services are now investigating the family – but the Meitiv’s are resisting any attempts at meetings, formalised agreements about supervising the children or home inspections.

Alexander says that the current conflict between child protection services and their family simply the case of a different approach to parenting:

“I think what CPS considered neglect, we felt was an essential part of growing up and maturing.
We feel we’re being bullied into a point of view about child-rearing that we strongly disagree with.”

What do you think? Is this “free range” parenting or courting disaster?

Tags: