“Stop the boats”.
It was the catch-cry of Coalition MPs every day for three years. Opposition Leader Tony Abbott was barely seen in public without promising that his Government would stop the boats. Stop the boats and turn them back where safe to do so.
The current Government’s promise was that their policy would be unshakeable. They would be firm. Decisive. Authoritative. There would be no caveats. No special circumstances. The best way, nay the only way to stop the boats was to intercept them before they reach our shores and tow them back, they insisted.
They would decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come…
But fast forward 7 weeks? Turns out stopping the boats isn’t quite that simple.
Over the weekend, Australia agreed to bring 63 asylum seekers to Christmas Island after a three-day standoff with Indonesia about who would take the desperate people. The asylum seekers were rescued only 80km from Indonesia’s shores and yet the ‘turning the boats back’ promise failed to eventuate.
Want to know more? So do we.
But we’ve got little more to report. Because during the stand-off and in the days following, the Government has been decidedly silent about what’s going on. This comes on top of their earlier decision to cease issuing a press release whenever an unauthorised boat was intercepted and instead hold bi-weekly press conferences where limited information would be released.
PM: Israel Launches Missiles At Iran, Male Violence A Priority Says Attorney-General
The Quicky
Taylor Swift & The Birthday Card Relationship Test
Mamamia Out Loud17-Year-Old Fletcher Crowley Became Paraplegic Six Months Ago
No Filter
Top Comments
Consider this:
More than 32 times the number of asylum seekers arrive in Australia by plane than do by boat.
Australian Government statistics from the first quarter of 2013 showed more than 90 per cent of asylum seekers who arrived by boat were found to be genuine refugees.
In comparison, those who arrived by plane - despite being eligible for release into the community and not having to face years of detention on Nauru or Manus Island - were almost twice as likely to be rejected as refugees.
Remind me again why the majority of voters wanted a PM who doesn't believe in foreign aid, humanitarianism,women in parliament (or losing their virginity before marriage) equal rights for the gay community or science? (you know, the small matter of him not believing that global warming is real) What on earth justified that in the minds of the masses I'll never know. It's shameful.
Zoe, many voters and those who voted for Abbott are purely concerned with themselves and their families. Their view end at the front gate. They are easily led by the nose by cynical shock jocks such as Jones and the Bolta who reinforce their fear and bias especially about boat people who all happen to be muslim and not white. This focus on race and religion is pathetic but effective which is why the Liberals have played since Howard. It is all really a matter of education and politics. Until we get people to higher level of understanding of global issues we will get nowhere. The populalist politics that are now so prevalent is a really sad reflection of our society.
I'm not a fan of Abbot or his government but most of what you are saying is wrong.
The government still distributes foreign aid, some of that aid is used for humanitarian purposes, Abbot spends his free time working for humanitarian causes, there are women in parliament and Abbot has made no moves to disallow this, Abbot believes in science enough to support the same green house gas emission reduction target as Labor.
The only thing you got right was his opposition to equal rights for gays. It should be mentioned that Gillard was on his side.
The government has just given $10 million in aid to the Philippines (one of the largest donations to the Philippines during this crisis of any country thus far), and said that they are willing to give more if necessary. Not that I would expect that to be reported on on this site.
Nothing irritates me more than people who dismiss those who vote differently to them as not having a social conscience or not caring about others. People say things like "he's cutting foreign aid!" without acknowledging that the very reason this cut was necessary is because of the crippling debt into which Labor had plummeted the Australian economy. The best way to increase our capacity to give foreign aid in the future is to return the economy to surplus. No matter which government is in power, foreign aid will not be increased while the budget is moving further and further into debt. People like you seem to just look at things from a very short term point of view and feel within their rights to dismiss Liberal voters as selfish because of this view. When, in fact, many Liberal voters just realise that all generosities flow from a stronger economy, and the Labor government had no hope of providing that.
What an absolutely outrageous collection of unfounded generalisations. True to form, sipper.