We begin with the best couple of the series.
Clare and her charismatic French Bulldog, Dutchie. Dutchie is infinitely better looking and more affectionate than Clare’s experimental partner, Jono, and has significantly higher emotional intelligence.
It’s quite silly really that Clare has gone on this very complex, scientific dating show when the love of her life has been beside her the whole time. HE IS RIGHT THERE CLARE. WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT!?
The love of your life was in your suitcase all along. Image courtesy of Channel 9.
But the cameras rudely take us away from Dutchie to show us Jono, lying in bed, under a doona that has no cover - which I think we can all agree, says a lot about a person.
At the end of last weeks episode, Jono moved his stuff out of Clare's house, because he couldn't deal with her 'baggage'. Now he is pretty much ghosting her, which is awkward given that they are both being followed around by cameras and got fake married three weeks ago.
Look, you know when your husband has moved out and won't text you back that things aren't looking great.
The 'psychologist' (show us the degree and we will stop using inverted commas) explains that Jono and Clare have "plenty of compatibility" which we are certain is a) grammatically incorrect and b) fundamentally untrue.
'Psychologist' John Aiken says they have a 'negative fight style', as opposed to a positive fight style, where Clare just giggles while Jono swears and breaks blood vessels because he is scared of crocodiles.
Like your typical Aussie bloke, Jono seeks comfort in his mates who all, deep down, know him to be a bit of a d*ckhead. While recounting the situation to his friends, Jono makes yet another joke about Clare not being "what he ordered". This seems to be Jono's only joke, which is very awkward given that it's not funny.
Top Comments
The thing that fascinates me about reality TV is the sometimes huge gap between how the contestants see themselves and how they appear to other people. The commentary and discussion that follows further highlights some fascinating psychology, not necessarily of the contestants, but of the people commenting. The way people form judgments and allocate particular roles to particular contestants is fascinating. The need to have clearly assigned heroes/villains, the points of importance/what is irrelevant or secondary, how people watching the same scene will not actually be hearing the same story. The Claire/Jonno story line seems to be particularly divisive, people seem almost compelled to label one of the two as 'the problem' and the other as 'the victim', as if we are resistant to the idea that sometime things can turn ugly without one or both parties being irredeemably bad people. It is fascinating to hear reality contestants with strong personalities complaining that they have been edited, and talking about giving "the real story", the real story is that the vast majority of people would be gobsmacked at the way their personality/behaviour can be interpreted by others. For some people Claire is funny, to others her humour is based on humiliation. For some people Jonno is bad tempered, to others he is an ordinary man who is overwhelmed by a woman who plays mind games. The actions remain the same, but the narrative different people assign can be as different as night and day. The psychological insights from this show can be pretty profound, but they are the insights that come from how people narrate the story in their heads and what this indicates about them rather than the 'psychology' of perfect match making.
Turn it off guys, the ABC and quality viewing await