couples

When is it time to let go of your kids?

“’There’s so much chance of bad stuff happening along the way,’ he continued. ‘Like, what if there’s a snake or something?’”

I asked our 9-year-old son if he thought he and his 6-year-old brother were old enough to walk the two kilometres between our home and the neighbourhood community pool without me or Mum.

He shook his head “no” before I finished the question.

“Maybe in one more year,” he said. “But right now … it’s two kilometres.”

He paused to marvel at the magnitude of the words, the vast distance it represents for a kid in year three, the incomprehensible here-to-thereness of it.

“There’s so much chance of bad stuff happening along the way,” he continued. “Like, what if there’s a snake or something?”

Yes. Exactly.

What if the mean streets of our suburban neighbourhood were over-run by an army of hungry Burmese pythons, on the hunt for new meat?

Or something?

Something like aggressive, stinging fire ants, which can swarm up a small child’s leg in an instant and inflict dozens of painful wounds.

“'There’s so much chance of bad stuff happening along the way,' he continued. 'Like, what if there’s a snake or something?'”

Something like reckless high school-age kids tearing around the neighbourhood like idiots on modified, rocket-propelled golf carts.

Something like a careless driver flying along far too fast to see two little boys alone crossing the road.

ADVERTISEMENT

Something like open bodies of water – retaining ponds, drainage creeks and golf course lakes.

Something like the crocodiles that frequent those bodies of water. (Seriously. They’re everywhere. See photo.)

Something like a bad person looking for an unprotected kid to take.

Something like an over-zealous “good Samaritan” watchdog poised to place a panicky phone call to an over-zealous law enforcement agency that stands ready to over-zealously protect the children of the world from parents who have the gall to allow their kids to walk alone on a public footpath two kilometres from home.

It’s a jungle out there, right?

No. No, it’s not. Not here.

"Actual alligator sunning itself near the sidewalk connecting our house and the community pool. It looked hungry to me."

It’s a pleasant, 15-minute stroll, with broad sidewalks attended by shady trees the whole way. Wide strips of low-cut grass form a green, well-tended barrier between the walkways and the occasional passing minivan.

It’s a nice neighbourhood. It’s a safe neighbourhood. It’s the kind of place where friends respond gladly to neighbours in need. Crime is low.

This is home.

Yet, even in this idyllic setting, danger lurks behind every swaying tree. The seemingly tranquil stretch between our driveway and poolside actually is a battle scape.

In my mind, at least.

Listen, we trust our sons. They have proven worthy of that trust time and again. They are growing up well and confident.

ADVERTISEMENT

But they’re kids, and we’re parents. They don’t yet possess the capacity to deal with crises — or even minor conflict — without adult supervision. It’s our job as their parents to help them learn those skills, and part of learning means failing at it. We understand that, but we’re not going to be irresponsible about it, either.

"One day, he won’t look back to make sure I’m there. I need to be ready for that day. I’m glad it’s not here yet, though."

So, when they play outside, they must do so within shouting distance of the front or back doors. If they plan to go inside at someone else’s house, they must let us know where they’ll be and for how long.

When they want to go swimming, we take them to the pool. One day soon they’ll ride their bikes or walk that two kilometres alone, but not yet.

Does a cautious approach make us Thoth-Amon? Are we over-protective? Too risk-averse for the healthy emotional development of our sons?

No. We aren’t over-protective. We are risk-averse, admittedly, but who in his right mind is risk-agreeable when it comes to their own kids? We aren’t Free-Range parents, either.

We are, simply, parents.

My wife and I are doing everything we can to prepare our kids to live life well. We also are doing everything we can to make sure they enjoy a happy childhood, and we’re in no hurry for that to end.

Confession: My greatest fear is that something catastrophic will happen to one of my sons, and I won’t be there to help them.

ADVERTISEMENT
"No. We aren’t over-protective. We aren’t Free-Range parents, either."

I’m not paralysed by this fear. I don’t sit in the dark and rock back and forth, contemplating the horrific potential of the havoc rendered by the forces of darkness.

But the fear is there. I can’t deny it.

Still, I want to protect them. I need to protect them. It’s more than a sense of responsibility or duty. The compulsion is visceral. It’s fierce. It’s real, and it’s not going anywhere soon – if ever.

This urge to shelter them from the harshness of the world is something I’ll have to work through as a father. As they grow, so too will I.

Part of being a parent is learning when and how to let go. It’s gradual, sometimes imperceptible, but eventually – they let go of their need for reassurance. They no longer feel the urge to look over their shoulders and make sure we’re still there. They let go and move on, alone in the world but ready for what comes.

When that happens, I’ll have to be ready to let go, too.

Not yet, though. Not just yet.

Maybe in one more year. But right now … it’s two kilometres too far.

What sort of parent do you consider yourself?

This post originally appeared on DadScribe.

Want more? Try these:

In defence of free range parenting.

Is it time to leave our kids alone?