A newborn baby in court.
A sick newborn baby.
With his mother and father fighting to keep him in a country that will give him a basic right to decent medical care.
A Government determined to send them back to hell.
The fight to keep an asylum seeker family and their newborn baby in Australia continued in a Brisbane Federal Circuit Court court yesterday.
The newborn, Ferouz (or Faris) remains weak, has trouble breastfeeding and his mother is recovering from a caesarean birth and suffers from diabetes.
His 31-year-old mother, Latifa is an asylum seeker from Myanmar who is currently living in a detention facility called Brisbane Immigration Transit Accommodation. Before coming to Australia, Latifa spent almost a third of her life living in a refugee camp in Malaysia.
Mamamia previously wrote on the plight of Latifa and her husband Niza.
When she initially gave birth to the premature baby at Brisbane’s Mater Hospital she was separated from him and sent back to the detention centre. To much community outrage it was reported that she was only allowed to see her baby for six hours a day.
At the time Mamamia said:
“Latifa and her family came here seeking our country’s help.
But instead they have been met with seemingly inhumane treatment. For political purposes, to prove a point that they are ‘tougher’ on border protection than anyone before them, this Government have separated a distraught mother from her sick child.
The Coalition’s Immigration Minister Scott Morrison has defended the Government’s decision to keep the mother and her newborn son apart. According to a statement released by a spokesperson, it is “common practice” for mothers to not stay overnight in the hospital when a child is sick.
The horrors that this family have already been through are unimaginable.
And today our Government has not aided their suffering, they have added to it.”
In court yesterday the family’s lawyers, who are acting pro-bono, said they should not be sent back to Nauru because their baby boy was born in Australia and the mother and baby are not well.
Lawyers for the Federal Government say there is no question the family will have to leave but no decision has been made about the timing.
It comes at the same time that the United Nation’s High Commissioner for Refugees released a report calling on the Federal Government to stop sending asylum-seeker children to the detention centres. It singled out the Nauru centre in particular, saying it is rat-infested, cramped, and very hot.
“It’s not appropriate for families and children to be transferred to Nauru or Papua New Guinea,” Richard Towle of the UN refugee agency said.
The newborn has since been moved from the hospital to the Brisbane detention centre with the rest of his family. Latifa has two other children – aged four and seven.
Top Comments
No, I for once agree with the lawyers that the Australian born baby
should be kept in Australia. However, I disagree that the baby should be
attached to a birth mother who is an illegal alien and has no rights to
be in Australia. I believe the Australian born baby should be brought up by a childless
loving Australian family, instead of a selfish Muslim family who have
deliberately brought a child into the world that they can't afford as a
tool to try and bribe their way into a country they have no rights being
in. It may come across that I am being a right bitch on this subject, but this case is being used by the pro-lefties as a legal precedent to allow any illegal refugee who's pregnant (either in transit or in detention) and who is allowed to give birth on the Australian mainland, the opportunity to live in Australia permanently, bringing in tow her whole entire family. This form of bribe has to be halted in its' tracks.
Beside the point here, but how on earth could she consider having a baby while living in such dire circumstances? Did she perhaps think it would help her case for residency in Australia? As a parent I dont understand how you could have another baby knowing your prospects are so dreadful.