Subscribe to our daily updates

Make sure you don't miss a single post
with the MM daily update direct to your inbox.

Follow Mamamia RSS

Photos of kids on the internet: what’s your position?

Do you like this story?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/06/Photographer.jpg

Co-incidentally I found myself having to answer this question twice this week. The first time was in a note from my son's school about having his photo taken for something to do with the MS Read-a-thon.

The second time was when I took Coco to a music/dance class at a local community hall and the teacher was asking all the mothers to sign a release form because she had a photographer there taking some shots for her music class website. Immediately, I felt uncomfortable. The words "photo" "children" and "website" have instant ALERT implications, don't they? Well, they do for me.

I finally got around to reading David Marr's fantastic book about the Bill Henson controversy recently and one of the most salient points he makes is that in past decade, with the proliferation of the internet into our lives, as a society we have become so suspicious about the photography of children. A cloud of suspicion and fear hangs over the whole IDEA of photographing children.

As I stood there with the other mothers (some of whom were happily signing while others wanted to check that no names would be used) my gut instinct was to say no. Then an argument broke out inside my head.

Me: "Come on, just sign. You're being ridiculous and paranoid."

Me: "You don't know what these shots can be used for. Don't do it."

Me: "But it's a MUSIC class. And her name isn't going to be anywhere attached to them."

Me: "It's not just about her name. It's her image. Once it's in cyber space, you have no way of knowing what it's going to be used for or who is going to see it."

Me: "But can shots of some kids playing with musical instruments and dancing around waving scarves possibly be used for unsavoury purposes?"

Me: "There are weirdos out there. You never know. Besides, even if it's not a weirdo, you don't know where the shots could end up. Coco could be used to advertise something in another country! You'll never even know!"

Me: "But if I don't know, does it matter?"

Me: "Of course it matters! As her mother, aren't you responsible for protecting her? Doesn't that also mean protecting her image from potential exploitation?"

Me: "I have a headache."

In the end, I somehow managed to stay for the class without signing anything. I'm sure the photographer was a lovely man but I was instinctively suspicious and wary and tried to block Coco whenever I could. The amusing part is that Remy, who was also with me, got hungry so I had to breast-feed him while I sat on the floor with the other mothers. So in actual fact my boob could end up on the Internet. Lucky Internet.

How do you feel about this issue? Is it just me? Have we become too paranoid or are we right to be suspicious and protective of our children and their images?

You might also like:

 

Share This Post:

Digg This Bookmark with Delicious Stumble Upon This Submit to Google Submit to Technorati Email This
Comment Rules Imagine this is a dinner party. Differences of opinion are welcome but keep it respectful or the host will show you the door. If you're rude or abusive, your comment will be deleted (so will comments responding to other rude comments because they won’t make sense - so save your breath). And if you’re offensive, you’ll be banned. Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That's how we're going to be - cool. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation...

Comment as a Guest, or login:

Connect with Facebook

56 Responses to “Photos of kids on the internet: what’s your position?”

  1. zoe says:

    Years ago I had a conversation with an ex. He has a young son and stated that he was never going to let him walk to school because ‘there are so many weirdos out there’. I found the idea of all these kids being overly coddled by their parents sad. The joys of discovering the world with your peers and alone are wonderful.
    I have read that we actually live in the safest era of history but we have such a surplas of information that it insights fear. Once we would have lived in ignorant bliss if something nasty happened in the next villiage but now we are aware of what is happening on the other side of the world as it happens.
    In saying that, whenever I take my ten year old sister out I look through slitted eyes at every potential preditor and hate myself for it.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    Alert Moderator
  2. Ciradi says:

    I think that we over react too much on these issues. Lets face it if someone really wanted a photo of your child they could get it. I have two daughters and to be honest I have not even thought about the possiblity of someone taking their image and using it for something so vile.
    Where do we stop? Do we stop having kids in the pumpkin patch catalogue because someone could scan it and use it inappropriately? Do we stop giving our film or photos on a disc to the local dry cleaners to print for us because we are frightened of them using the image somehow? Of course not. Maybe if we as mothers retain the innoncence of things such as a simple photo then maybe society would expect no less. It is the constant fear of a behaviour that lends it credibility. (the behaviour becomes one that is then shared by others – for example if you are a user of drugs and you are in a room full of people who are non drug users, then you are certainly not going to confess or partake in drugs in that moment are you? But if you are aware that others might be taking drugs then you feel less fearful to admit that you do as well and more likely to partake in that activity. My point is that yes there are devious, ill and disturbed people out there who will do these things, but lets not let our fear trick us all into believing (and then sharing that belief with others) that these types of behaviours are the norm rather than the behaviour of the isolated, disturbed and 0.0000001% of society. By recognition of the behaviour through our fear of it, we in fact normalise it.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    Alert Moderator
  3. Corinne says:

    When we had our first child in 2001 our son had his own website full of photos and videos and open to all. Some soul searching was done after discussions with family members. So we moved them into a restricted password protected area for famaily and friends who live around the world. We do the same with Facebook now with only friend/family accessing. Facebook users, be careful when you add a new album, it defaults to show everyone.

    What’s my position of photos of kids on the net? Be selective of your photos and the websites, blogs you share them on.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    Alert Moderator
  4. zelicat says:

    Hi Mia,

    Without being graphic, think “innocent” photos of your child’s photo being discussed in graphic sexual terms- in the worst possible language, “fantasy’ of exactly what they would like to do to your child, and what they would do if they could get their hands on a child.In the most awful way. I don’t want to scare people, but unfortuately the people who do this are people you TRUST. They are Parents, family memebers, police officers, teachers,etc. you only have to look at the papers to see that every day people are in prosecuted over this- and these are the ones they catch. Remember too that on your face book page or what ever you give away a lot of personal information… like where you live etc.

    There was a case in Canberra recently where a guy was filming two little girls (under 4) playing in the nude in their own back yard, and then using it for his own purposes, and sending it on to other people. Horrific.

    I really am not trying to scare people, but you are not paranoid.There is a real ‘threat” out there, but lets’ not forget statistically, it is more likely to happen in your own home, or another “safe” place.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    Alert Moderator
  5. Bec says:

    Zelicat – Yes, with out going into too much detail, some real examples would help us to make a more informed decision about this. Thanks

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    Alert Moderator