Subscribe to our daily updates

Make sure you don't miss a single post
with the MM daily update direct to your inbox.

Follow Mamamia RSS

So I guess that parenting book by Britney’s mum is on hold for a bit…..

Do you like this story?

Britney’s little sister Jamie Lynne is pregnant at 16. She was born in 1991. Are you feeling old yet?

This is so many shades of wrong I’m really unsure where to begin. Deep breath. Let’s go.

How about with the fact that the Spears family chose to tell the world about Jamie Lynne’s pregnancy VIA A PAID MAGAZINE DEAL. Have they not yet learnt that a life lived very publicly through the media from a young age leads to…I don’t know…THE TRAINCRASH THAT IS BRITNEY SPEARS?

She's pregnant OK! .... Jamie Lynn Spears appears on the cover of OK! magazine.

 

I’m trying hard not to be moral about this. The kid is 16 and I believe I too was having sex, ahem, around that time. But there’s just something a bit yuck about the way the tawdriness of La Mess Britney is spreading genetically.
According to the extensive interview in OK magazine, the father is her teen
boyfriend, Casey Aldridge. Sounds like a perfect start for a new baby to me!

"It was a shock for both of us, so unexpected," she says. "I was
in complete and total shock and so was he."
Spears is 12 weeks pregnant, and initially kept the news to
herself when she learned of the pregnancy from an at-home test and
subsequent doctor visit, she told the celebrity magazine.

"As soon as I found out for sure from the doctor, I took two
weeks to myself where I didn’t tell anybody,"
she says. "Only one
of my friends knew because I needed to work out what I would do for
myself before I let anyone’s opinion affect my decision. Then I
told my parents and my friends. I was scared, but I had to do what
was right for me."

Spears apparently broke the news to her mother, Lynne, just before the
Thanksgiving holiday on November 22, the magazine says."She was very upset because it wasn’t what she expected at all,"
S
pears says. "A week after, she had time to cope with it and became
very supportive."

So suportive that she was able to organise a quick magazine story to break the news to the world, thus ensuring her youngest daughter’s place on the cover of gossip magazines for the next five year cycle. Lucky us!
Will Lynne Spears (the dad’s name is Jamie – hence the youngest daughter being called Jamie-Lynn – so clever, that) have to build an extension on her house to make room for all her gran-babies whose own mothers aren’t able to take care of them?

And what happened to the idea of privacy? This kid is 16 and in the very early stages of pregnancy. Why on EARTH would anyone think it was a great idea to open the tabloid floodgates? Welcome to the latest installment of Celebrity Traincrash.

You might also like:

 

Share This Post:

Digg This Bookmark with Delicious Stumble Upon This Submit to Google Submit to Technorati Email This
Comment Rules Imagine this is a dinner party. Differences of opinion are welcome but keep it respectful or the host will show you the door. If you're rude or abusive, your comment will be deleted (so will comments responding to other rude comments because they won’t make sense - so save your breath). And if you’re offensive, you’ll be banned. Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That's how we're going to be - cool. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation...

Comment as a Guest, or login:

Connect with Facebook

8 Responses to “So I guess that parenting book by Britney’s mum is on hold for a bit…..”

  1. lu says:

    I think her employers should sack her even though sacking a pregnant woman is a legal hot potato. Surely there must be a morality clause in her contract. Being 16 and pregnant and employed to entertain young girls is just a bit on the nose to most parents of young girls.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    Alert Moderator
  2. Thanks for your keen insight Karen, I can’t speak for anyone else but I don’t buy them.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    Alert Moderator
  3. angela says:

    golf claps for Karen.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    Alert Moderator
  4. Karen says:

    And you know people … the reason stories like this get sold is because the magazines will pay for them … but who buys the magazines? Ponder that one while you’re reading the latest copy of Who at lunch time!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    Alert Moderator
  5. Fiona says:

    Hi Mia,
    Just wanted to say thanks for your posts throughout 2007- I love reading them at lunch time. Merry Christmas!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    Alert Moderator
  6. One of the reports I read said the father was “long standing boyfriend Casey Aldridge” She’s 16!!! How Long standing can he possibly be? Dating since they were 12?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    Alert Moderator
  7. Dreamqueen says:

    Apparently they did meet in a church, but what type of example does this set for other teenagers? He should be charged and if he’s not once again celebrities operate under a different law. The mother is an absolute nightmare … here comes another trainwreck … you’ve gotta feel for those grandkids don’t you?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    Alert Moderator
  8. KATE says:

    The father-to-be is actually 19-years-old. Isn’t the age of consent in California 18? Doesn’t that mean he could be charged with sexual assault?
    I read in another report that they met at church, ironically enough.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    Alert Moderator