SELL: The Today Show host asked Education Minister Simon Birmingham why we need to test children two years before NAPLAN.
Sell: “A lot of parents might be concerned that these, let’s call them a skills check, could be stressful,” the Today Show host told Simon Birmingham.
SeLL: “Once you identify children who are having problems what’s the plan then?”
Proposed literacy and numeracy testing for grade one students will be more of a “skills check” than a traditional written test, says Education Minister Simon Birmingham.
Mr Birmingham was on the Today Show to explain the federal government’s new proposal to introduce mandatory testing for students in grade one – two years ahead of their first NAPLAN sitting.
Host Lisa Wilkinson was straight to the point, asking the MP why he believed six-year-olds needed these tests.
He explained existing NAPLAN results show one in 20 children are not meeting the minimum literacy standards or skill sets when they reach that point in their schooling – and it’s important to identify who that “one” is.
“So it’s essential that we ensure children in those first few years of schooling are getting the extra help they need, if they’re falling behind, if they’re not responding appropriately to the type of teaching practices used.”
Mr Birmingham clarified that it would not be a test, but an “in-school, in-classroom skills check” that wouldn’t be publicly reported and would simply allow parents and teachers to know if their child is meeting standards expected for a child at that age or falling behind.
Wilkinson told the minister that a lot of parents might be concerned the skills check could be stressful, to which he replied the check was “very simple” and something many schools were doing already.
"It's Just Porridge" - A Doctor's Thoughts On Oat-Zempic
The Quicky
Top Comments
There are a number of issues with this testing model. 1, it has been adopted from the uk where (like NAPLAN) it has failed to increase literacy outcomes. As stated in previous comments literacy is already tested at those levels. The issue then is one of resources. Some kids grow up in homes where books are encouraged and parents read to them. Others grow up in homes with no books, with parents who don’t value education or have poor education and literacy themselves. Cutting support resources in the form of it, speech pathology and additional literacy support is the problem. Throwing even more money into another easily quantifiable test will not help anyone, and certainly not those kids who are struggling. Give teachers the resources and time to do their job without continuing to burden them with additional data driven testing.
My opinion will be an unpopular one and is completely anecdotal based on my own experiences so I'll accept criticism of it as I know this isn't "evidence" per se.
I believe one of the reasons why students are academically not performing is because parents/guardians don't value education and learning. Social media is a perfect example of this. Mostly uneducated dummies who cannot even spell shouting down professionals on everything with no qualifications to back up their claims.
There is a reason why children from ethnic families (Asians including Indians, Sri Lankans etc) and European families perform better. Their families value education.
I completely agree that kids need to be kids, they need to play sport, be involved in extra curricular etc. I don't think it's healthy for children to be studying all day every day, but there's a major problem when we start discrediting people who have bothered to educate themselves (doctors, scientists etc). It teaches our children that education isn't to be valued.