Do You Like This Story?

Last week, 23-year-old Australian model Robyn Lawley was named as the new face of a British lingerie brand. At the time of the announcement, there was cause for celebration.

The brand (Boux Avenue) replaced their size 10 ambassador with size 16 Lawley. Hurrah! Three cheers for diversity! Wasn’t it great to see a fashion label mixing it up a little and trying to promote healthy body image?

Apparently not.

Only days later the conversation has turned. It’s now become a debate over whether Lawley is really the size she says she is. Which is a shame, really. Sometimes it feels like a fashion brand takes one tiny step forward and then because they haven’t quite got to the diversity finish line yet – we tear them down.

News.com.au reports:

Daily Mail readers were outraged, some of them criticising the label for airbrushing the images and others saying Lawley must be smaller than she claims.

“It’s all very good picking a size 16 model, but then airbrushing her until she looks about a 12 kind of defeats the point,” one reader wrote.

Robyn Lawley models for Cosmopolitan Australia

Lawley hit back when contacted, saying she certainly is a plus-size model.

“I embraced my size years ago and just because I’m tall doesn’t change the fact that I am a size 16,” she tells us via email. “And like everyone in my size range still struggle to buy high street and designer wear in my size as they usually stop at 12-14.

“Airbrushing is in everything these days – it is the client’s decision about those things, sometimes it’s also just the lighting and angles on the day.”

Mamamia has previously reported that:

Twenty-three-year-old model Robyn Lawley doesn’t think of herself as “plus-sized”. She prefers to use the term “normal sized”. And given the average Australian woman is a size 14-16, that’s exactly what Lawley is. Normal.

The Aussie model is making headlines this week because she’s just been signed as the face of a UK lingerie line – Boux Avenue is replacing their size 10 ambassador with size 16 Lawley.

This from The Huffington Post:

In a move to appeal to a curvier demographic, Boux Avenue replaced their former size 10 model Ola Jordan with the size 16 Lawley. And we couldn’t be happier with their choice.

The 23-year-old cover girl first made waves when she graced the over of Vogue Italia last year, but she’s continued to be a source of inspiration for aspiring models (and women in general) by encouraging them to have healthy body images — no easy feat in the modeling world.

She also runs her own food blog called Robyn Lawley Eats (hurrah!) where she uploads pictures and recipes her favourite meals – which is focused less on celery sticks and more on cupcakes.

What do you think of the criticism that Lawley is not the size she says she is?

 

Comments

Comment Guidelines : Imagine you’re at a dinner party. Different opinions are welcome but keep it respectful or the host will show you the door. We have zero tolerance for any abuse of our writers, our editorial team or other commenters. So if you’re rude, mean-spirited, snarky, aggressive, defamatory or bitchy, your comment will be deleted (so will any replies to the original comment – so don’t bother arguing with rude people, instead just hit the ‘alert moderator’ button).
And if you’re offensive, you’ll be blacklisted and all your comments will go directly to spam. Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That’s how we’re going to be – cool. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation…

Use your profile to comment: Or, comment as a guest:
(Max file size is 150kb & jpeg's only - if you need help resizing go here »)

183 Comments so far

  1. Anonymous

    This woman is just over 6’2. size 16 on her is the equivalent to a size 6 on a short woman. This does not mean that short woman who is size 16 is attractive or remotely healthy. Its irresponsible for companies to promote plus size as a good thing this way. It lets people justify terrible life choices about their health. Pretty disgusting.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  2. Not anorexic and drugged

    My friend was plus size model for clothes made for size 16 and above. However she was size 12. She had to be plus size model as she is a healthy looking woman and not anoexic think, not skin & bones. Yes as usual with all the tricks designers, womens magazines and similar use, she was photo shopped looking totally different but looking even less than size 12.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  3. Nic

    I’m a size 8-10 at 5’9 and most people assume I’m a size 6-8. It’s all about height and proportion. My mum is 6′ tall and at her thinnest, which was TINY model thin, she was a size 10-12. At 6’2 being a size 16 is not the same as being 5’2 or 5’6 and a size 16. She would probably be a perfect, curvy 10 if she was average height. She’s gorgeous!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  4. snarkle

    Dress size is about measurements, not about weight. This is why clothing size charts have cm/in numbers on them instead of kg/lbs. But you already know this, so why do so many of you insist that her size must be about how much she weighs????

    In the same way that you can line up ten women with the measurements for size 16 in the same dress and they will all look different according to height, distribution of mass (i.e. long torso, short legs/short torso long legs, etc) and skeletal width (narrow or wide shoulders and hips). No other size 16s are going to have the same look to their body as Robyn if they aren’t built EXACTLY the same way.

    Get a grip. And MM editors – as long as you still have ‘Best/Worst Dressed” and photoshop disaster posts enabling critical review of how women look – you are no better than the worst of the commenters.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  5. The Sage Stylista

    I think she’s gorgeous, but you can’t tell much about a person’s true health just from appearances. The same goes for smaller/slimmer people.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  6. Tallulah Alice Mae (@Luvagoo)

    Who cares, HAVE YOU SEEN HER FOOD BLOG??? D8 #deathbyfoodlust

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  7. Susan

    More importantly than size:

    She looks healthy.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  8. Karen

    At 6 foot 2, I guess she could be a 16, but having the extra height to spread her weight over is obviously better!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  9. ali

    At the end of the day she’s a model, which are all phenomenal looking creatures, regardless of their size. Sure she doesn’t look like my size 16 sister but then you know, she hasn’t had three children. She looks fit and fresh and rather normal for a stunning model.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  10. Michelle

    the criticism over Robyn’s size… proves something i’ve long thought to be true. The body image debate isn’t about size at all…
    Women will critique fit, toned and pretty women of ANY size.
    when women say they want more ‘normal’ sized women represented in fashion, what they really mean is they want society to make them feel better about their lack of self esteem without having to go to the gym and eat healthy food.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Ponykid

      Absolutely agree

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  11. beee

    I think she’s just really well-proportioned and toned. She very well could be a size 16 but unless she’s standing next to another person/model to compare it’s hard to tell. Sizes always surprise me. One of my good friends is fit trim and toned but is quite tall and she’s a size 12. If I hadn’t been dress shopping with her myself I wouldn’t have believed it. I would have told you she was an 8-10 max. I wouldn’t even call her curvy, she’s just bigger in proportion.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  12. seaghan

    From where I’m sitting, I see a drop dead gorgeous woman who I would (if I was 20 years younger) walk over broken glass to get to.

    Who cares what size she is in the UK or USA? The simple facts are that she is a beautiful woman and she’s nopt a stick insect.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  13. Caz Gibson

    I’d like to see examples of women wearing interesting clothing, who look like me………..short, plump, over 40…….very few would, I admit – I’m not supposed to exist after all.
    The fact that I look like a pre-historic fertility symbol carries no weight at all with fashion gurus and teenage girls. I’m sure most of them feel horrified when I comment that I used to look like THEM – before life happened.
    No, I’ll never see me on the cover of Vogue.
    I doubt I’ll ever grace the cover of Women’s Weekly without a severe air-brushing and a careful hairdo.
    Size 16 for a woman over 40 is pretty average in this country, so at least we’re beginning to stop kidding ourselves.
    At least those size 16′s on the floor of my wardrobe form a major part of my incentive strategy , meanwhile, our cats love them.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  14. nonie

    I don’t care about what size she is, it’s just refreshing to see a model who looks healthy.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  15. Anonymous

    Robyn Lawley…is gorgeous. She has got va-va VOOM curves!! Of course a 16 is going to look different with THAT height (meant in a good way!!). My 16 looks miserable next to hers….and I’m no shorty….! I think she looks great…ppl need to stop worrying about how others look and STOP JUDGING everyone!!!!!!!!!!!!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  16. D

    Gees, people are never happy with articles like these. She’s either too skinny, or not big enough. Who cares ! She’s larger than the typical model pics we see and she’s beautiful, that’s it.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  17. Robyn

    Despite some clothing labels with AUS/UK (size), an Australian size 16 is NOT the same as a UK size 16. An Australian size 16 is in fact a UK size 14.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Vanessa

      Actually, an Australian 16 is equivalent to a UK 18.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  18. Melo

    My guess is that Lauren Jackson and Liz cambage would both be size 16. Taller girls will always equal bigger sizes if not they will look ‘skinny’ just as girl that stands at 5 ft prob should be a size 8-10 to be in proportion to their height in a healthy weight range. Personally at 5 ft 10 and 65 kgs and fit and healthy I can’t wear a size 8 that would fit my waist bc I need the length of a size 10 – 2 in most labels. She doesn’t have a big flabby waist – major type 2 diabetes indicator, she looks like she keeps herself fit so accept that she maybe a 16 in other areas of her body

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • anon

      I agree. I have an overweight friend who is short and in some brands she can fit into size 10. Me,on the otherhand, I’m taller and slimmer but cant fit into the clothes she can. When we go clothes shopping together we have some laughs about it thats for sure

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  19. green trees

    perhaps the problem is that for some a size 16 = fat.
    this is not something i believe. and robyn doesn’t look fat. so therefore she must be lying.
    she’s tall and broad across the shoulders and hips. add some fat to your backside (i mean that in a nice way) and there is your size 16.
    i think she looks great.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  20. spot on daily mail

    The Daily Mail readers are dead right. Yet another example of the lack of reality of the fashion world. Should we really be surprised? They’ve been fooling us for years. And if I read one more article from a stick thin model saying she eats whatever she wants I think I will puke.It’s not Robyn’s fault. It’s the whole corrupt fashion world.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  21. shanny

    god, she is unbelievably gorgeous.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  22. Linda

    Stunning! Clearly a 6ft2In size16 is going to look different to a 5ft5in size 16. She is tall, healthy and stunning. Makes me feel great in this moment to be a much shorter size12. Love it, just brilliant!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  23. Nic

    Yep – She’s a size 16. Her body looks like mine before I had two kids. She might be a 12/14 on top and 14/16 on the bottom.
    Everyone is built differently. I see some girls that say ‘Im a size 10′ but to me they still look like they could be size 14. Its so hard to tell.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • anon

      I agree, dress size can be very selective. I have a friend who claims to be a size 10 but it must be a generous size 10 brand because she’s not slim.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  24. Dkmum

    I actually took part in the questioning of sizes when the original article about Robyn was published. Not that I think Robyn or anyone else is lying, I just wondered if the sizing they might go by is different to what the average Aussie can get at the shops I frequent (Cue, Saba, Kookai).
    I’m 6’1, 72kg when not pregnant and a size 10-12 bottoms and 8-10 tops. My hips look similar to Robin, my waist slightly smaller and I have no boobs, but wide shoulders. If I put on a size 14 anywhere it hangs off me.
    I just don’t get it??
    Am now off to read some comments as I’m sure someone will have enlightening words below.
    In the meantime, I don’t really care what size Robyn is, I think she’s drop dead gorgeous, and seems a healthy role model!!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  25. Aishie

    She looks amazing! Size is about frame as well as body mass and you can see she is tall! I love that there is this diversity and a good example of a model who isn’t tiny.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  26. Lucy

    I want to see her size 16 against my size 16. I’m 178cm tall.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  27. Stephie

    Some of these comments are really critical. She is a stunning, tall, exception of a woman. That is why she fronts vogue, & we do not. I think her size 14/16 is believable. I have a similar body shape, just no where near as well maintained, i think she is relatable, positive and beyond attractive. Keeping herself in shape is her livelihood. It is her career. Let’s not be mean to a girl who has a PT, lights, mirrors, hair and makeup, and all the things that go alongside professional modeling. Just because you don’t look like that, doesn’t mean that the woman who is the exception, not the rule, can!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  28. Anonymous

    I’m sure she’s a size 16! she seems to lack a couple of small bulges I have, but the bulges are too small to change the size. The fact is, clothing for women is NOT made to contain large breasts or wide shoulders. A woman who is muscular and have the right sort of proportions has to buy plus size clothing, even if she is not fat. I am DELIGHTED to see a model who has the same issues as me: CURVES and strength look good but aren’t “average”. Look at her full hips, her thighs, her upper arms. She’s not small, but she is beautiful. It is an inspiration.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  29. shellystone

    I love Robyn and I think she is doing great things with her curvier non-ano figure. I love it, but I don’t think she’s a size 16. She might be in real life, and the airbrushing as a lot to answer for, but if she was a true size 16, she’d have to be 12 foot tall.

    Soz.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  30. Leah

    I don’t think anyone should be attacking Robyn because there’s no reason for her to lie about her size. But there’s always the possibility that the magazine has adjusted her photos so that she doesn’t actually look size 16. Looking at those images I would have guessed her more as size 14 but you really can’t know until you see someone in the flesh. Height affects size just as much as width does.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  31. Caitlin J

    She is absolutely stunning, and anyone questioning her weight or size has completely missed the point. Women come in all shapes and sizes and it’s so refreshing to see brands finally recognising that!

    Myself and 19 others are in the running to be the face (&bod) of Curvy Kate Australia, another lingerie company that is dedicated to using real women with real curves. Again, we are all different ages and sizes, but that’s what makes this competition so great.

    Voting is still open and I know we would all appreciate everyones support – Curvy kate Australia – https://www.facebook.com/curvykateaustralia/app_301860283236887

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  32. Jil

    I want to have her body! Wow what a stunner!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  33. tracey

    I’m a size 14, and I’m a decent height, I’m not bagging my size, but I’m bigger than she is, she is not a 16 in that pic. If she was airbrushed to look like about a 10, then there’s no point to taking the pic in the first place.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  34. Cordeline

    It’s a shame that even Robyn herself calls herself ‘normal sized’. If the average woman is size 14-16, then she should be referred to as ‘average sized’.

    ‘Normal’ is not a good word to use.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  35. Sara

    I just think she looks stunning. Love those purple bathers.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  36. kelly

    she is tall….of course she won’t look as big as me. I am a 16 and barely make it past the 5ft mark so my size 16 looks a lot bigger than someone taller than me.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  37. Anonymous

    Wow, she is beautiful! I can’t take my eyes off her and just had to get scrolling through the slide show. And I’m straight!

    Stunning girl!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  38. Emily

    I would try to steer away from referring to any woman’s size as “normal”, as you did in the article, even if she is a healthy 14-16. Seems to work completely against your message of body diversity as much as the term “plus-sized” does. Isn’t the message you’re trying to send that everybody is normal – whether they’re a 6 or a 16? I’m a healthy size 6 and completely “normal”!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  39. sharoncello

    The thing is, she is incredibly tall (186cm or 6′ 2″). With that extra height also comes extra width in the shoulders and larger chest, waist, hip, arm and leg measurements – but these are proportional to her height so we don’t notice in these photos.

    Her bust, waist and hip measurements are size 16. If she was standing next to a shorter woman with size 16 measurements the shorter woman would “appear” to be fatter.

    BTW, isn’t she gorgeous – you go girl :)

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  40. Anonymous

    She’s a size 16, she should look alot fatter than that!!

    That’s the message I took from that title, and that is most definitely not the message that needs to be sent.
    I think it’s great to see some variation in the size of models in magazines. I dont advocate for one magazine for “us” (thin people) and one for “them” (bigger people). I think it’s great that a small change has occured, because it’s still a step in the right direction, but until the biggest designers make clothes for all women, then we just wont see them represented in the advertising. Well dressed is well dressed, it’s not size dependent.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anna E

      That was me, not sure why it says Anon?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  41. Shannon

    The way we pursue positive body image can be so damaging. We just can’t win.

    It’s still about comparing women, talking about what is desirable or not, what *looks* healthy or doesn’t (rather than about who actually is), who deserves to represented and who doesn’t.

    If we cut the “look” out of this altogether and focussed purely on aiming for health but being able dress our bodies regardless of health status we would all be so much happier.

    As some commenters might have seen, I’ve always been very self-conscious of how skinny I am and my lack of “curves”. But I have decided to focus on changing how I feel inside: I am trying to eat healthy foods and exercise, make my body strong.

    And you know what? If, when I am as close to peak health as I can get, I am still a “stick insect”…so be it. I’ll have a healthy, functioning body that is at its natural equilibrium and I’m not going to beat myself up about the way nature made me.

    Same thing goes for anyone larger. If you are still larger despite a healthy diet and exercise regime (and absent medical issues) then don’t stress.

    In the words of the girls from Beauty Redefined: you are more than something to be looked at.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • carla83

      great comments. And thanks for the tip on ‘Beauty redefined’.

      i agree with what you’ve said entirely.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  42. amyspeak

    I think it would be good to include details about Robyn Lawley’s height in articles like this one, so that people can get a better perspective before giving their opinion. Not everyone will read the comments (below) that include that info…I know in her statement that she mentions she is tall, but if the size is significant enough to mention, then her height should be too.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  43. Kate

    She is a stunning woman and the positivity in my eyes in that she is recognised as such even though she may not be a size 6/8 (which is also beautiful, but overrepresented in modelling/media/advertising).

    I really don’t understand a lot of the concerns voiced below. Ok, so she doesn’t look like every person who’s a size 16, but that’s why she’s a model – she has an exceptionally beautiful figure.

    The key message I’ve taken from this is that women of many sizes can be physically beautiful in the typical sense, but it’s about being healthy, toned and proportional moreso than what your dress size, weight/height or BMI might be.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  44. Jules

    Robyn Lawley is 6″2 (186 cm).

    For some perspective re her size…

    Let’s say she weighs about 84kg. Using BMI as a comparison (which I know is fraught with inconsistencies but let’s debate that another day) a girl of a different height with a similar build and muscularity (proportionate to their height) as her would weigh (very, very roughly) as follows:

    183cm (6 ft) – 79kg
    173 cm (5ft 8) – 71kg
    163cm (5ft 4) – 63kg
    153cm (5ft) – 56kg
    143 cm (4ft 8) – 49kg

    I can’t stress enough that these are only very approximate/rough estimates but it might help give all those saying ‘she can’t possibly be a size 16′ a better idea of what it means to be that size at her height. If she was 5″9 or 5″10 like many other models then she’d probably weigh about 75kg and would be an AU size 12.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Natski

      Jules, your estimates sound about right.

      I am 180cms and if I was around the 79kg mark I would look exactly like Robyn as we have almost the same body shape – except I am a B-cup and not a D-cup. I estimate that I would be about a size 14.

      Shrug. I am happy to see her in the ads because she is beautiful and appears to be a healthy weight for her height and frame.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Jules

        Totally agree Natski. I should have added to the end of my comment “Not that any of it matters, she is stunning, it’s refreshing to see someone who looks a little different to the average model getting some coverage, she looks fit, toned, healthy and beautiful. Good on her.”

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  45. Vodka&Lime

    I’m 175cm and 105kgs.

    Before you judge me I play rugby union 3 times a week, I workout (intensely) another 3 times a week. 

    I am NOT FAT.

    I wear size 16 clothes because like most rugby players we have use the strength in our quads and glutes. You guessed it – thunder thighs and a booty a rapper can reminisce about.

    I went into a clothes store to find some nice clothes, (with the
    training I go through I am usually seen in trackies and rugby jersey from obscure country) the shop assistant branded me fat when I asked is they had a bigger size. 

    I walked out quite miffed knowing I worked hard for my body, & I put a lot of professional men to shame with my dedication on being a perfectionist in a goal I am achieving.

    This happens to me all the time. If I want to wear nice clothes I look like mutton dressed as lamb saying it nicely.

    I’m not a size 6 nor do I want to be. I’m not much of a princess girly girl. I’ll never be Paris Hilton’s physique and I don’t ever intend to be.

    Give me rugby boots over stilettos anyday.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  46. sara

    To all those people saying she can’t be a 16 because you are & you’re bigger that that, it’s probably because she’s very tall & you’re not so the weight you carry is different. She is a healthy and fit, tall & broader/ bigger framed which is why she although she is a 16, she doesn’t look like a 16 who is shorter with a smaller frame and is therefore a 16 because if carrying more fat. Obviously there is going to be a difference in appearance. That doesn’t take away from the fact that she is not a Miranda & the like stick insect & is a beautiful HEALTHY weight ( she is not a stick but she is still fit & not over weight) & exactly the kind of body role model I want my daughter to see more of growing up.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Chelsea!

      “Stick insect” What a demeaning thing to say.
      I’m a size 6, incredibly petite (probably what you’d call a stick – as many people have said to my face) and guess what?? I”m entirely HEALTHY.
      Your comment is just infuriating.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Really

        Agreed Chelsea. It’s not ok to say someone is overweight, but it’s fine to call us slimmer people stick figures and then go on about body acceptance etc. Incredibly hypocritical!!!!!!!!

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  47. Emma

    I don’t care if size 14-16 is the average size for Australian women. Just because it is “normal” doesn’t mean it is healthy. I know for a fact that if I was a size 14-16 I would have some serious weight issues.

    NORMAL DOES NOT EQUAL HEALTHY.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • wdidn

      I agree. The use in the article of the words healthy body image isn’t too smart.
      Size 16 may be the most common, it may be the average and it may be reality, (and I get that that is what they were trying to do – reflect or represent society) however they really should be careful not with the use of the words healthy body and normal.

      Carrying extra weight is not healthy. Being fit and well (that doesn’t mean rail / model thin either) is the best condition for women’s bodies. I should know, I am sized 14 the last two years and trying to take action on it currently. I accept my current state and don’t let it get me down. But I aspire to images presented of healthy fit sized 10-12 women. I find it motivating to be reminded of what I should be like.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Anonymous

        You can’t judge someone being healthy by their clothing size. I’m 6ft tall and a size 14 (some brands 16) & I’m considered weight-wise to be within the healthy weight range. It depends on her height. If someone was 5ft tall & size 14-16 that might be a different story. What size was Marilyn Monroe? Not exactly what you’d call fat…

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
    • Jess

      Emma, I agree with every word. I can’t believe we now live in society where size 16 is considered “normal” and like you said, just because it’s “normal” doesn’t mean it should be.

      Has anyone else noticed that the average Australian woman seems to be getting bigger every year that goes by? It seems that only recently the average Aus woman was a size 12 and when my grandmother was young, size 10 was considered plump, what is going on?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • wdidn

        It is the Americanisation of our society – too much convenience!
        We are literally required to do less physically then in your grandmother’s era – think of all that we do on the internet rather than in person (banking, shopping, socialising etc). Even in the office, where we once got up out of our chairs to retrieve paper for typewriters, faxes from the fax machine, delivered took memos and invoices to people in person, we now use email.
        Kids also used to go outdoors to play in their neighbourhood – bikes, cricket, billy-carting, tree climbing, now most are indoors on Xboxes, Playstations, PCs, watching DVDs, on Facebook etc.
        I am not sure that the size 10 was considered plump though if you look back at swimsuit shots of the old days (except in the flapper era 1920s where rail thin flat chests were the look). The 1940s, 1950s and first half of the 1960s in particular were all about curvy shapes. Marilyn Monroe was around a 12 (Austalian) most of the time, and was generally considered an ideal body type in her day.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Jules

          I agree with most of your comment but I don’t really see how technological advances should be described as “Americanisation”…. ?

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • wdidn

            Our society has become more like, and more aligned to, the US in style, interests, culture, values and politics. Whereas in the “good old days” England was still thought of by many as ‘home’ – not so much our parents’ era – more grandparents’ and great grandparents’ life times around WWs I and II)
            The rest of my comment is general western society. So I guess my comment is two-parts which are intra-related?!?!?! Ah, stuff it – it’s 3.38pm Monday. I’m off to get a coffee. :)

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Jules

              I agree that we are becoming Americanised.

              I also agree that our ‘western’ advancements are (in part) contributing to our bigger frames.

              I didn’t quite make the connection between the two though… having said that, it’s now 3:53pm and I’m in dire need of a cup of Earl Grey, enjoy your coffee!

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
    • Bedizz

      For some reason my comment disappeared, I’ll try again…

      I am a size 14, healthy weight. To provide more info, my BMI is in the healthy range, my body fat percentage is low, blood pressure good and low cholesterol. I am considered normal according to the charts and the population, and I am healthy. I am sure there are other people my size are not as healthy, and surely some smaller than I.

      So your shouty caps comment may be partially correct (normal can equal healthy, and it can not… depending on how “normal” is measured). You could have made the same point without the rude tone, but hey – it’s easy to hide behind a computer screen. I doubt you would shout that at a dinner party.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Tallulah

      -rubs temples- but it’s healthy for some people, that’s the point, goddammit.

      You know your body and its limits; where it’s unhealthy, when it’s not. You know that at size 16 you should rethink some of your habits, damn well good for you.

      Everyone else knows THEIR body just as well. You cannot judge people’s health by your own bloody body standards.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  48. Gen

    So mm you are saying that at size 14-16 lawley is “normal”
    What you must also be saying is that anyone out side that size must be abnormal, right?
    See how confusing the body image message is on this site.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • wdidn

      Agree. I am size 14 right now and while this may be the *average* size and not obese, I don’t consider it all that “normal” or healthy. I have no desire to be skinny, but slim and more comfortable at size 10-12. It would make exercise a little easier, plus I’d be happier shopping for spring & summer clothing. I’d have more confidence for sure. But that’s my own personal situation and feeling about my own size – it may be different for other women of course.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Lucy Ormonde

      Not at all. It was Robyn who used the word normal. I think we said the *average* size of an Australian women is a size 14-16.
      Meanwhile, just about every model you see on the pages of a fashion magazine is closer to a size 6. And that’s why I think it’s worth taking note when companies do something like choosing an ambassador like Robyn Lawley. And that doesn’t mean we’ve won the battle for diversity, but a least it’s a step in the right direction.
      If there’s one thing I’ve learned from working and Mamamia and reading everyone’s comments here every day it’s that there’s no such thing as “normal” when it comes to our bodies. We’re all different and that’s something we try really try and showcase.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  49. vivacious

    I can understand how it might be difficult to equate how she looks with a size 16 if you are not tall. I’m just a few centimeters shy of Robyn’s height and while I’m a 12 up top, 14 down bottom, if I had curves like hers I would easily be a 16. At a 12, I look quite similar to my friends who are an 8 and are shorter. In fact I can often fit into an 8, but it isn’t long or broad enough to allow for the fact that at nearly six foot tall, I’m just bigger all over.

    What always amazes me is when I hear about all the models who are my height but are size 6 or 8. I just can’t work out where they put their internal organs!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  50. Anon

    It would much easier if the size 16 10 or whatever had a US or UK or AUS or whatever next to it. There is no point describing someone by size if we don’t know what version we are talking about. As many commenters have pointed out there is a massive discrepancy between a US 16 and an AUS 16.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Sommer

      Dress sizing is the same in the UK and Australia. Since she’s signed to a UK brand I’d say we can fairly assume she’s a UK 16, which is also an AU 16.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • amyfizzer

        It’s not actually Sommer.

        A UK16 is an AU18.

        This website helps the conversion (is fab for when you’re buying online!)
        http://www.onlineconversion.com/clothing_womens.htm

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Caro C

          Not sure where that info comes from, but as someone who shops regularly in both the UK and Australia (I currently live in Asia but visit both places each year) I can tell you that I wear the same size in both – I am a fairly standard size so don’t vary between sizes except for things like bras. And that hasn’t changed in the last 20 odd years.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...

So, we have $1000 to give away... oh, would you be interested? Well step right this way.

To go in the draw to win, just LIKE us on Facebook, enter your email address and tell us in 25 words or less why you love reading Mamamia.

Close this popup



Full Terms & Conditions