Do You Like This Story?
Screen shot 2012 10 31 at 5.03.54 PM Can women with PMS be trusted to vote?

DANGER: This woman has PMS.

By JAMILA RIZVI

So. It turns out that one of America’s largest and most influential news networks thinks PMS is going to make me vote conservative.

PMS gives you cramps. Sometimes you get a bit of a headache. Occasionally it means an additional pimple (or several) on your nose. And yes, now and then it makes you a tad more emotional than you might otherwise be.

But will PMS make me wake up tomorrow morning suddenly willing to get over the relentless sexism and socially regressive policies of, say, the Republican Party and dream of getting a Green card just so I could cast my vote for Mitt Romney?

Not. A. Chance.

But that’s exactly what a recent CNN story out of the United States is claiming. Here’s what the SMH had to say:

If they weren’t angry before, they are now: Women – and the internet – have reacted to a CNN story that claimed that women’s votes are influenced by their menstrual cycles.

In an eyebrow-raising about-turn, the corporation published, then retracted, a news story that claimed that women’s votes were governed by their menstrual cycles, triggering an avalanche of criticism.

Based on unpublished research, the news piece stated that a woman’s voting behaviour was affected by whether she was ovulating on election day.

CNN writer Elizabeth Landau, responsible for the story, received a torrent of criticism following its publication and subsequent removal, but defended her position: “For the record, I was reporting on a study to be published in a peer-reviewed journal & included skepticism. I did not conduct the study.”

Screen shot 2012 10 31 at 5.01.08 PM Can women with PMS be trusted to vote?

CAUTION: PMS Zone.

Let me put on record an important disclaimer: I am not a PMS skeptic.

I am a full-on, don’t-mess-with-me, ‘this be the truth ya’ll’ PMS believer.

My belief in the existence of PMS is immovable. When 99% of the scientific community (or, you know, female friends of mine) believe something is true, then you’ve just got to go with it and not give into a climate of fear created by the skeptics and deniers.

I may not know the science. I may not have conclusive proof. I am IN NO WAY an expert on this (and given that I got rather bad marks in year 10 science and a note from Mrs Castle that said ‘student struggles to understand basic scientific concepts’, I’m definitely not) but I know this: PMS happens.

But what I did not realise – and thank you CNN for your ridiculous article – is that my vagina could make me unpredictable and unreliable.

That my vagina makes me a risk to society. A risk to order and good governance. A risk to DEMOCRACY.

Just imagine what might happen in those little voting booths, if I were left alone in there. Me, a female with a pen (hopefully this pen) and a ballot paper. I might, quite possibly be… pre-menstrual.

Heaven forbid that as I pick up my led pencil, I am suddenly struck by overwhelming emotional instability, such that I cannot prevent myself from putting that little number one in the wrong box.

And that’s to say nothing of the possibility that PMS could cause my flighty lady-like nervousness and PMS induced mental incapacity, to escalate out of control so I just scribbled all over the inside of the voting booth in an effort to express my feminine rage.

OR WORSE. I might just take my own pink highlighter along, so I could draw love hearts and leave kisses on the ballot paper next to my preferred candidate (who I had chosen purely because his opponent’s surname sounded a little like my ex boyfriend’s).

For the record, CNN have now removed the offending article on this completely ridiculous piece of ‘research’.

In fact, according to news reports:

In place of the original article at CNN, a notice now reads: “A post previously published in this space regarding a study about how hormones may influence voting choices has been removed.

“After further review it was determined that some elements of the story did not meet the editorial standards of CNN. We thank you for your comments and feedback.”

Well. That’s good to know. I’m feeling a bit calmer about the whole thing now.

And sorry if my reaction was a little bit angry or over the top. It’s that time of the month.

Are you a PMS believer or a PMS skeptic? Have you ever acted differently because of PMS?

View more posts on:

Comments

Comment Guidelines : Imagine you’re at a dinner party. Different opinions are welcome but keep it respectful or the host will show you the door. We have zero tolerance for any abuse of our writers, our editorial team or other commenters. So if you’re rude, mean-spirited, snarky, aggressive, defamatory or bitchy, your comment will be deleted (so will any replies to the original comment – so don’t bother arguing with rude people, instead just hit the ‘alert moderator’ button).
And if you’re offensive, you’ll be blacklisted and all your comments will go directly to spam. Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That’s how we’re going to be – cool. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation…

Use your profile to comment: Or, comment as a guest:
(Max file size is 150kb & jpeg's only - if you need help resizing go here »)

29 Comments so far

  1. Anon

    Jamila, you’ve got it wrong.

    PMS will make you vote for the ALP…

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  2. Allie

    Its hard to judge, not having read the full article, but from the article extracts it sounds as though the study was suggesting something more along the lines of womens’ voting preferences could vary with their HORMONE LEVELS, not about whether they were PMS’ing or not… (ie, they didn’t set out to test a group of overly emotional women – they would instead have likely measured the preferences of a group of women across multiple time points in a month or more).

    This is not nearly as controversial as it sounds – there is quite a bit of evidence suggesting that our preferences for many, many things vary as our hormones fluctuate. Perhaps not an issue for those with long-held political convictions, but for swinging voters I think its not impossible.

    I think to make this article solely about PMS is a little bit sensationalist…

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  3. Not One

    How about we all agree that PMS in not an acceptable excuse for the sort of behaviour that would be considered abuse if it were men dishing it?

    How about we also agree that everyone chooses the science that backs up their beliefs and ignore the science that doesn’t?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      If your last statement was true, no one would ever change their opinion.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  4. Dubious

    Given how many women I’ve heard admit they voted for Gillard purely because she WAS a woman, I’m not sure we can be trusted to vote full stop.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Faybian

      Really?? People vote who they vote for, for all sorts of reasons. I’m sure there was an equal number of men who voted for the coalition because Julia Gillard is a woman too, but no one questions their ability to vote. I think their is a grain of truth in the saying that the electorate often votes someone out, as opposed to voting someone in. This may have been part of the reason we had a hung parliament.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Namis

      I’m positive there are many sexist men who vote for Tony Abbott, simply because he’s a man, too.

      The double standards are astounding.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  5. laurenrae

    It’s got to make you wonder who commissioned such a study, right? And how did they manage to get any over-emotional, PMS-suffering women to participate at all? They must have made payment in chocolate, lavender wheat bags and romantic comedy DVD’s. :)

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  6. Caz Gibson

    Apart from a screaming migraine and some “bloatiness” – I’m not aware of PMS affecting my judgement.
    I’d say that most Americans will factor in their experience with this hurricane at this time and it might just be that Obama’s handling of these issues might sway voters either way.
    The unreliability of women is usually an extreme right-wing perspective so maybe this study with it’s “scientific” proposal is timed to unsettle the confidence of Democratic female voters, ……”Dang – I just know we shouldn’t have given those darn females the vote !”….lol.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  7. Renae

    Have I ever acted differently because of PMS? Absolutely. It turns me into a completely different person behaviour wise. But it doesn’t affect my long held beliefs or convictions.
    I’m not going to leave the decision of who to vote for until polling day. It’s a decision that will be carefully weighed, measured, and decided in advance. However, if I hadn’t decided before polling day, and I had PMS, then it probably would affect my vote.
    My vote would go to whoever pissed me off the least that day…

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  8. Kate Hunter

    PMS wouldn’t make me change my vote but it would make me extremely cranky if my husband didn’t change his.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Jen

      I love your comments Kate. Very very funny (and true)

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  9. becsparrow

    When is the US election? Does everyone else think it’s going to be close? I do. I’m not confident for Obama, sadly.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Megs

      Bec, it’ll be on our TVs on Wednesday November 7, so Tuesday the 6th in the USA!!! So excited :)

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Kate Hunter

      Bec, do you still have your Obama t-shirt? I have mine. It’s a bit ratty but I’ll be wearing it on Tuesday.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Misskate

      I am trying to remain optimistic for Obama. Crossing fingers, toes whatever it takes :)

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • MissKate

      Bec,
      I’m trying to remain optimistic for Obama (or as hubby and I refer to him as Barry). I’m crossing, fingers toes and anything else I can find!!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  10. Ali Flint

    Well, I reckon this indicates that there has been some serious, I say serious (?) thought in political circles about the power and importance of the votes of half the population being us females and about how exactly that vote can be predicted. The conclusion appears to be that only hormones can predict accurately. Comic stuff.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  11. Tea Bag

    Jam Jam. That photo! You’re so method.

    I actually didn’t realise that much of the pain from PMS was centred around the head. ;)

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  12. Avi Vince

    If I had PMS while voting I would be more likely to vote Labour as I would be thinking about my reproductive rights and fear Abbott would take them away as he has previously threatened to do.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Caz

      If I had PMS I would be more likely to vote exactly as I already intend to vote. Liberal.

      The only noticeable change is that I’d scream ‘Are you F*CKing joking’ to anyone who tried to hand me an ALP or Green how to vote card.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • jess88

        Caz, I laughed out loud at your comment and the mental image I had of a disheveled, bloated woman in her tracky pants and partners T-shirt screaming ‘Are you F*CKing joking!!’ at those damn pamphlet pushers. Haha, thanks for the laugh!

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • Rach

        As I was nodding sagely in response to your comment Caz, thinking how well you described me, I realised I don’t ever actually get PMS…

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
    • Merri

      Would you kindly provide the link where Tony Abbott threatens to remove women’s reproductive rights.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  13. Lucy Ormonde

    The only thing my PMS affects is my penchant for chocolate.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  14. shelikestowrite

    Sounds like a good way for Victorian ladies to get out of a fine for not voting last weekend’s election.

    ‘Sorry, I was unable to place my vote due to being pre-menstrual. As I’m sure you can understand, this means I was unpredictable and likely to vote according to the wants of my vagina. I feel it would have been irresponsible to vote while not in my right mind.

    In fact, instea of issuing me with a fine could you just send some chocolates and a heat pack? We ladies find they help.

    Sincerely,
    Responsible Femal Citizen.’

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  15. ashmutimer

    Dear Jam,
    Love your work.
    The end x

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

So, we have $1000 to give away... oh, would you be interested? Well step right this way.

To go in the draw to win, just LIKE us on Facebook, enter your email address and tell us in 25 words or less why you love reading Mamamia.

Close this popup



Full Terms & Conditions