
Kevin Rudd
When you think something is common knowledge, when you think absolutely everyone knows something, it’s a bit of a shock to the system to find out you’re wrong.
“What do you mean you didn’t know He-Man’s pet tiger was called Battlecat? What’s wrong with you?!”
“You don’t know every word to the Full House theme song? For shame.”
In much the same way, the ALP was not prepared for the public backlash when they rolled Kevin Rudd in 2010.
They thought it was common knowledge that Kevin Rudd was not performing. The polls had been sliding. He’d been lampooned as the Rudd-bot, reciting phrases like “programmatic specificity.” The party was paralysed, policies were failing or going nowhere and it seemed that everyone knew it.
At least everyone in Canberra knew it. And that’s the problem. Canberra is a very different place to ‘The-rest-of-Australia’.
Kevin Rudd has always been very good at appealing to the people. And when he stood in front of all those TV cameras on June 24, 2010 with tears rolling down his face, the country got behind him. He was “our” Kev and that woman stole his job.
The ALP made a mistake. They never really articulated to “The-rest-of-Australia” why they needed to make the change. Phrases like “Moving on” and “a good government had lost its way” did not resonate with the public. Not nearly as much as a grown man crying over his broken dreams.
Julia Gillard kept quiet, not wanting to rub salt into the wounds, ripped open by what looked like a callous, heartless, unprovoked attack.
As they prepare for Monday’s Spill, they need the public to know why they did it. They’re desperate for the public to understand. But it could be too late.
Journalist and ex-speechwriter for Kevin Rudd, James Button has written about his experience from that time:
“Rudd’s prime ministership failed, and the failure was above all his own. The story of his government, and of its end, has still not been fully told. The consequence has been deep damage to Australians’ faith in politics and in government.
The truth is, Rudd was impossible to work with. He regularly treated his staff, public servants and backbenchers with rudeness and contempt. He could be vindictive, intervening to deny people appointments or preselections, sometimes based on grudges going back years.
He made crushing demands on his staff, and when they laboured through the night to meet those demands, they received no thanks, and often the work was not used. People who dared to stand up to him were put in “the freezer” and not consulted or spoken to for months.
His staff’s prodigious loyalty was mostly not repaid. He put people down behind their backs. He seemed to feel that everyone was always letting him down. In meetings, as I saw, he could emanate a kind of icy rage that was as mysterious as it was disturbing.
…. Vital decisions were held up while he struggled to make up his mind, frequently demanding more pieces of information that merely delayed the final result. The fate of the government seemed to hinge on the psychology of one man.”
Button writes about the bottleneck of policies in early 2010, caused by Rudd’s refusal to listen to advice and his pre-occupation with media events and picture opportunities.
“It was in these circumstances, with the polls tumbling and mining companies’ anger rising, that Gillard took the decision to mount a leadership challenge.
The deed was murky and brutal, and we still don’t know quite how it happened, but we can be clear about why. If it was only the act of faceless men, as Rudd has said, why was the caucus majority against him so overwhelming that he did not even dare to stand?
….In 2009 it was Canberra’s best-kept secret that his dysfunctional personality was damaging the government. “I wake up every morning waiting for the headlines,” a senior official once told me but, with one or two exceptions, the headlines never appeared.”
But, in February 2012, it might be too late for the ‘insiders’ to start screaming, “We know him better than you do! We can’t go back to those days”
Julia Gillard was never able to fully articulate why he had to go. She wanted to spare him from the humiliation, and spare the ALP from the scandal. But the public never understood.
The public still sees the warm, smiling Kev from Queensland and thinks he was treated appallingly.
Lauren Dubois is a freelance political reporter and Canberra correspondent for Mamamia. For all thing politics, you can follow her on Twitter here

Kevin Rudd wins office during the November 2007 Federal election.






Comments
161 Comments so far
RxV2Or Really informative blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…
loading...
When a Manager starts wielding power against employees in a negative way it upsets workflow and business outcomes. This is when Eexecutive Management steps in and the Manager is demoted.The Australian Labour party is no different from any other workplace. Mr. Button’s is describing a workplace that was no longer functioning due to poor leadership. The rest of the Labour party had no choice but to step in and nominated a new face – Julia Gillard. Given the controversy I feel Julia has brought some stability to the party. Rudd is once again threatening this stability and its making the party look incompetent. Meanwhile Abbot is sitting back watching the mudslinging while the polls rise in his favour. I see one solution in order to rectify the integrity of the Labour party- get rid of Rudd all together! If he’s out of the picture then Labour may have chance in the next election.
loading...
“When a Manager starts wielding power against employees in a negative way it upsets workflow and business outcomes.”
You have an MBA, don’t you?
loading...
I read Button’s piece on the weekend, & I thought this was very significant:
“Each was a massive operation. Each required months of parliamentary and public battle. It was like trying to land four jumbo jets at once on the same runway. People said it could not be done.
“Some of these people were in a position to say these things to Rudd. But he had stopped listening. He shut them out.
“As a result, policy was neither properly prepared nor argued. Rudd focused obsessively on the health reforms, which turned out to be unimportant, and too little on the CPRS and the mining tax, which mattered immensely.”
That’s beyond just being ‘demanding’ – that impairs effectiveness in doing the job.
loading...
Ive had brilliant bosses who treated me like crap.
Steve Jobs was a horrible boss but an amazing man who changed the world.
If you can’t handle the heat of a brilliant leader, get out of the kitchen.
loading...
When *everyone* leaves the kitchen because the chef’s impossible to work with – maybe, just maybe the problem is with *the chef*.
loading...
I think the problem is that he’s not a brilliant leader. Much can be forgiven for the brilliant, but Rudd is not brilliant. Except in his own mind.
loading...
Steve Jobs is a great example of someone who was (apparently) very difficult to work for – but his business continued to make billions. I think he is an exception.
I think a boss needs to work *with* their staff. The better you treat your team the better the result. In the example of Kevin Rudd, he started off as a great thinker who saved the Labor party. But he just didn’t have the people skills to run the government. The Prime Minister can’t be responsible for every single decision. That’s impossible. They need to delegate and trust their team. He wasn’t able to do that and business came to a complete halt. I don’t think that was his team’s fault.
A “brilliant leader” is quite different to a “brilliant person”. A brilliant leader knows that their team is just as important as they are. They inspire their people to work hard and succeed. Brilliant people…. they don’t necessarily make good leaders.
loading...
Can we outsource our Prime Ministerial duties to Obama? People like him.
loading...
To balance the negative press KRudd is getting, I will share a story of his good humour and humility. I happened to be walking through the marble hall at Parliament house a few years back and saw Prime Minister Rudd briskly coming the other way, on his own. 2 Japanese tourists intercepted him, and evidently not knowing who he was, asked him to take their photo. He cheerfully obliged, wished them a good day, and continued on. I think that says something good about the man.
loading...
Classic!
loading...
Each to their own opinion, but I live in Canberra, work for DFAT (so does one of my siblings), have had dealings with KRudd professionally and have always been extremely impressed by him. It doesn’t bother me that he has a ridiculously amazing work ethic and expects that of his staff as well. There are a many (MANY) hard working public servants and there are also many lazy ones that get away with murder. I’ve dealt with the Ministers office and 100% would love to have him back as PM although I know, sadly, there is no chance of that happening tomorrow.
Has everyone forgot the whole mining super tax thing and how big a part that played in his ousting in 2010? I think it is very narrow-minded of the Australian public to judge someone they have never met or worked with. How naive of us to not think how big a role the media plays in controlling our opinions. Including the lovely Mamamia site and the article above. Do you think James Button isn’t trying to make money out of this book he is writing? This whole thing is so frustrating.
loading...
100% of the Ministers office want him back? Sorry, but you clearly have no contacts in the Ministers office – that claim is nonsense.
loading...
Ah “Anonymous” you clearly canNOT read as I said ‘I’ have dealt with the Minister’s office and [I] 100% would love to have him back. So you are telling me I can’t have my own opinion because I am quite sure that ‘I’ know how I feel. Thanks for your lovely comment.
loading...
I certainly can read, but your grammar was way off – I apologise for the confusion.
loading...
I didn’t have any trouble understanding what she meant. She started that sentence with a personal pronoun followed by a clause, followed by a conjunction, followed by another clause. The conjunction ‘and’ ties the first and second clause to the personal pronoun.
loading...
I honestly cannot comprehend why your so defensive when it comes to other peoples statements. I feel so sad for you.
Kind Regards
loading...
Erm, how is saying something is nonsense defensive? Slightly over the top reaction don’t you think! Perhaps you shouldn’t waste your time ‘feeling sorry for’ people on blogs! Bit of a waste of time me thinks
loading...
I do not consider myself to be very politically savvy. I voted for Labor way back when, and I’ve voted for Green ever since. The thing that’s getting me with Mr Rudd is that he’s been denying that he wanted to go back to the PM job for ages, even at times when clearly he was planning this move. I KNOW politicians change their minds, in fact I think it’s a good thing, but this seems more like out and out lying. Not pretty.
loading...
He may be lying about wanting the job back till now but they did worse to him and now they are carrying on about loyalty, they didnt have any!
And dont forget, Julia has been caught lying many times about policies that are very important to Australia.
loading...
sorry sue
that is incorrect
the trigger was kev snding out one of his staff to check on his ( and her) numbers
i believe it is written somewhere that hell hath no fury like a woman scorned
loading...
I live in Canberra and it is true that anyone who dealt personally with the PM spoke of his rage and cruelty, his outrageous demands with no care for anyone else’s life circumstances, his vitriolic language and constant swearing, and so on. It was regarded as pretty much, as written above, the big secret that everyone knew about. I know two people personally who told me about their interactions with him and I was shocked – I voted for kevin and had no idea – it took hearing it from multiple sources to believe it. the video recently released is just a glimpse. So sad!
loading...
Exactly why this man does not deserve to be back in any leadership position. To really understand someone watch how they treat people “less powerful” than themselves.
I also really object to Jessica Rudd tying to urge some people power movement to put pressure on MPs to support her father – it’s not about giving voters power its a PR stunt to get dad promoted knowing full well he is deeply unpopular with MPs. Trying to link this to the lack of political rights in China is just cynical – and by the way I live in China too.
loading...
I blame the media for the current situation in Australian Politics, in the last 18 months I have seen very few balanced reports on anything political. I am a believer that the media should report the facts and that includes the shock jocks as well however we only ever seem to get a radical right wing view (i.e. Alan Jones etc) or a very biased Liberal party view.
I take the case of climate change the likes on Lord Monkton (no sure I have the spelling correct) got more air play than scientists who genuinely know what is happening, he appeared at a function in Wagga with less then 200 people in attendance and our local rag made it sound like it was 75% of the population who hung off every word.
What we need is accurate and fair reporting by our media.
loading...
When Lord Monckton came to Mt. Gambier they charged $20 admission so I gave him a miss, I would have spent $5.
loading...
I realise it wasn’t the point of the article, but I hate it when people give me the “I can’t believe you don’t know “. I have a bachelors degree and work in the news. I’m no fool. I have pretty good general knowledge and am often called on to join friends trivia teams. One person simply can’t know everything.
I find the only reason people use this phrase is to help themselves feel smarter and you feel dumber. And, I find it’s a phrase mostly used by baby boomers who cannot cope with the fact that they are getting old and you may have missed some obscure event they experienced in their lifetime… because you weren’t born yet. That doesn’t make a person dumb, just younger.
loading...
I can see that it might be irritating but I find it hard to believe that there was anything in Button’s article that came as news to anyone who has read a newspaper or listened to the TV or radio in the last couple of years let alone worked in the media (as someone who holds several degrees I don’t see their relevance to whether someone is or is not intelligent and well informed). What’s new now is that names are going on the record with Rudd stuff but there’s been a steady stream of info about this character and interpersonal skills going back to the infamous reducing a 19 year old RAAF stewardess to tears because the right sandwhiches weren’t available (defended by some on this site I remember on the curious grounds that ‘politics is a rough game’).
loading...
An interesting piece but I must take to task one comment. “At least everyone in Canberra knew it. And that’s the problem. Canberra is a very different place to ‘The-rest-of-Australia’.” What Lauren actually means is that ‘everyone in parliament, on Capital Hill, knew it…’ We mere people of the ACT were no different to all other Aussies.
It was more the manner of his deposing rather than the fact that it happened that upset people. “Julia Gillard was never able to fully articulate why he had to go. She wanted to spare him from the humiliation, and spare the ALP from the scandal. But the public never understood.” The way he was deposed offered nothing but humiliation, and scandal was bound to follow ‘back-room deals’ and planned challenges. The fact that Ms Gillard will not answer some questions about those days honestly is what still rankles voters. Her actions since then have left the door open for Mr Rudd. If he was so bad, and had to go, then he should have gone altogether, not given a very senior ministry from which he could just bide his time and work behind the scenes until he coud have another tilt at the leadership.
Personally, I wish neither of them could win tomorrow.
loading...
janes, I don’t live in the ACT, I live in NSW.
The way I see it, Kevin 47 was traipsing across the World, leaving Julia do his dirty work, as “acting Prime Minister”. We all loved what she was doing then, didn’t we??????
Why wouldn’t she want to take the reigns, given that Kevin wasn’t home?
This is a point people have missed in the “respill”.
loading...
And, given his obvious preference for working overseas, *why* wouldn’t Julia give Kevin the Foreign Affairs portfolio?
loading...
Nicki, I didn’t mean to infer that everyone lives in the ACT, merely that “everyone in Canberra” were no better informed than anyone else.
And to answer your question, I didn’t like what she was doing then anymore than I liked what he was doing.
The whole affair is sad for the country, and there will be no winners, just those who will lose less.
loading...
I’m admittedly one-eyed about ‘it all’ – to put it simply, Julia has had the guts/insight/sense/intelligence to introduce the NDIS (National Disability Insurance Scheme) which nobody else has done – yet!.
I ‘don’t care’ who is in power so long as they keep up support for the NDIS… and about 20% of Australians are with me.
loading...
We will NEVER see this scheme introduced under Labor. They’ve spent all the money and they’re borrowing more for the NBN.
And remember the NBN is off budget and has no business plan, no forward projections, no pricing – nothing. BUT it had to be rushed through IMMEDIATELY. Why?
On the other hand the NDS, which has the backing of the vast majority of Australians, has to be scrutinised and costed to within an inch of its life and won’t be ready for at least 7 years.
Emblematic of the lunacy that controls Labor in general and this Government in particular.
loading...
The NBN has no business plan or pricing? How do you know this? What you’re implying is impossible in government. NOTHING happens without forward projection, planning and pricing.
Honestly I know it’s not the done thing to stick up for government but sometimes I really feel for them. Put plans through a substantive consultation period and they’re stalling, try to cut costs and limit consultation and they’re pushing it through.
I could never be a politician – people’s armchair politics would drive me nuts.
loading...
Good article – finally something to counter the Jess Rudd campaign material!! Kevin Rudd’s alleged abusive and obnoxious behaviour towards staff including tantrum on an aeroplane indicate to me the real character of the man. I do not support him being anywhere near the Lodge again.
loading...
I’m not really fussed, the reality is in 18mths neither will be prime minister so for the time being I’m enjoying show…
loading...
I find It disturbing that some commenters can throw around terms of mental disorders of Rudd without being qualified to do so and/or without examining him as his doctor.
loading...
Thanks for this article. The whole Kevin Rudd scenario just didn’t make sense to me and knowing these details now fills in all the gaps for me. Rudd seems to be driven by self gain alone. His egomaniac ways were evident in his press conference address when he was talking about his flight home as if it were air force one. I think the back bench is the best place for him if he must remain in politics.
I’m amazed that his family don’t seem to see this control freak side of his personality. Glad mamamia
loading...
Yeah I know if I was his daughter I’d be sooo embarrassed and glad to be living in China! I think his wife by the look on her face and body language really wishes he’d just shut the ….. up I actually feel bad for her .
loading...
It is a fact that the most dangerous thing in the world is a weak man in a position of power. A weak man is vindictive, scheming, find it very hard to focus on important matters outside their own personal desires and are always bitter, they are very dangerous lifeforms and should never be trusted by anyone at all. they will bring everything down and they dont care.
loading...
Bravo J Richards!
And to make matters worse, the media knew about this and they knew BEFORE he was elected and STILL they failed to protect the Nation.
Without the protection of our media we may as well live in a communist country.
The Greens are determined to shut down free speech and Rudd wants the internet censored.
Heaven help this country if we don’t get rid of them all soon.
loading...
How exactly are the greens shutting down free speech?
loading...
And Tony Abbott wants to make abortion illegal and take away a woman’s right to have control over their own bodies, so whoop dee doo, all our options suck. In situations like this, we obviously have to go for the lesser of all evils. Unfortunately, that will never be Tony Abbott.
loading...
Tony Abbott?
loading...
James Button’s piece was very well written and important at this time. Annabel Crabb’s feature in The Monthly – dating back to August 2011 – is even better:
http://www.themonthly.com.au/why-one-year-after-election-voters-still-don-t-know-who-gillard-prime-minister-interrupted-annabel-c
Be prepared – it’s long – but read it and realise the complexity of the reasons behind Rudd’s ousting as Prime Minister, the damage he was doing to the country through subversion of the government’s decision-making processes.
For all those people who believe the hokey ‘people power’ line being peddled by the Rudd family over the past few days, know this – the government decision-making process under Rudd subverted the democratic power of the people to have their elected representatives make decisions on government policy. By-passing Cabinet, that authority was passed to a newly-formed committee – comprised of Rudd, Gillard, Tanner and Swan, to be sure – but also a floating feast of advisers, senior bureaucrats, and hangers on – ‘sometimes up to 40 people in the room,’ as the article reports. With Rudd as the ultimate decision-maker.
I for one am shocked that democracy was belittled to such a degree, that democratically-elected representatives – the Cabinet Ministers – were passed over and had less say in government decision-making than non-elected advisers.
The only conclusion I can see is that Rudd doesn’t truly believe in the power of the people, except as it allows him to continue to exercise the power of Rudd.
loading...
Thanks for that link, excellent piece. Annabel Crabb is fantastic.
loading...
Fascinating. Well worth the extra time to read this thought- provoking article.
loading...
Enlightening article, well balanced, not hysterical just laid out for all to see. Thank you for the link.
This is a telling snippet:
“The story Julia Gillard cannot tell is a long and complicated one, involving a party that spent so long in opposition that, by its tenth anniversary there in 2006, it was ready to enlist Kevin Rudd – a brilliant, disciplined, persistent workaholic whom barely anybody in the party could stand – to its leadership.”
loading...
I so agree – many people are currently questioning why KR was ever chosen to lead the party but to answer that you only need to look at their 10 years in the electoral wilderness. A certain desperation had crept in, and along came someone with a shiny public persona and undeniable public popularity. They had a chance to crush Howard after the failed Mark Latham experiment of 2004, and restore the ALP to power.
loading...
It was all those Sunrise appearances he did with Joe Hockey. It made him seem bi-partisan and normal. Plus doing the Kokoda trail helped his profile immensely.
It was a very smart move to endear himself to the public in the way he did. When he ran in 07 everyone all ready knew who he was and liked him.
He is so very very good at PR and campaigning.
loading...
Correct. In our dumbed down world, Kyle and Jakie O and Sunrise were all he needed to suck in the voter.
He never went anywhere near Alan Jones.
Wonder why?
And wonder if anyone is going to admit that he’s called it right for four years.
loading...
Very interesting. Doesn’t reflect well on the Party
loading...
It’s the media that has made Rudd popular with the people because they actually know how good Julia is. The media has boosted his ego.
Rudd is ruining the Labor party, he’s got to go.
loading...
I can’t wait for this to be voted on by Cacus tomorrow………… then to wake up on Tuesday and have it all still going on. Kevin won’t go away til he’s expelled from the party and there as an independent, or out of parliament altogether. I think thats sad.
I also think one of the reasons Rudd was elected in 2007 was because we were all so sick of Howard and the Liberals that anyone would have appealed enough to get in (maybe not Lathan though)
And Rudd saying he wants another chance to finish the job he was elected to do in 2007…..?? We’ve have had another election since then so I am happy to go on from here. With Gillard, as the Prime Minister who was leader of the party at the last election.
Thats all for now.
loading...
I know this has been talked about below but I don’t want to argue with those commenters, I just want to make a comment to Lauren.
I’d love it if you went against the grand tradition of political reporters and didn’t refer to government as ‘Canberra’.
Canberra is just a city full of totally normal people (and a few crazy ones) who have nothing to do with the government. It’s also the capital city and where parliament house is, so naturally there are also a lot of people who do work for the government. Basically, it’s the name of a city, not a term to be used interchangeably for parliament house, federal government, the labor party, or whatever you happen to be talking about. Be more specific.
It’s just a little nitpicky thing but I’d love to see less of it.
loading...
Thank you, I agree!!!!
loading...
Thank you!
I am a Canberra girl, born and raised, and have moved back to the region after several years in Qld. Canberra does not just consist of elected politicians; who, for the most part, come from everywhere *but* Canberra. We are an increasingly cosmopolitan, growing city of nearly 500,000 and, while a good portion of us are employed by the Federal Government in some capacity, most of us have no bearing on what happens on, or comes out of, ‘The Hill’.
If only another term was coined to spare our fair city from daily scorn and blame for the actions of those who merely visit for Parliamentary sitting weeks.
loading...
“Basically, it’s the name of a city, not a term to be used interchangeably for parliament house, federal government, the labor party, or whatever you happen to be talking about. Be more specific.”
Language is dynamic and ‘Canberra’ has come to mean ‘government’. This issue is settled. Like vagina and vulva. People can moan about technicalities all they like, but in a practical sense people used certain words to mean certain things and it becomes accepted.
It is referred to as ‘Canberra’ by all serious news sources. For Lauren to write something else would be odd. This happens all over the world with industries and cities (Hollywood, Silicon Valley, Washington). People are smart enough to recognise the context of the mention as being political. I doubt anyone is at home is thinking negatively of ordinary Canberra citizens when the city is used as a reference for government on the news.
Funny also that this gripe only comes up when Canberra is having issues. Wouldn’t have heard a peep of complaint on say, the day of the apology to the Stolen Generations.
loading...
I agree with you that using ‘Canberra’ to refer to, variously, the Commonwealth, the government, the public service isn’t going to change. As a former Canberran, though, I can tell you that lots of people think negatively of ordinary Canberrans because of their dislike for politicians. I’ve had people tell me that they hate all Canberrans, they hate Canberra, that everyone in Canberra (yes, *everyone* not just politicians) are stupid, lazy, overprivileged fatcats. Someone once said to me that they hated all Canberrans until the Canberra bushfires where hundreds of homes burnt down and people died. After that they decided we weren’t all bad. Well, gee thanks. Glad we could provide that death and destruction for you to challenge your small-minded stereotyping.
So, yes, the use of the word Canberra as a substitute for government won’t change. But it does have an effect on the people who live in Canberra, going about their lives, and I think it’s a bit churlish for that to be dismissed out of hand (not suggesting that’s what you’re doing, btw, but lots of people do).
loading...
Gosh. What rampant silliness. I’m sorry you have had to listen to such rubbish as a Canberran,
loading...
My parents went on a European tour and then a cruise a few months ago and they said they learnt very fast NOT to say they were from Canberra when people asked where they were from in Aust. They fibbed and just said Melbourne.
Dad said they started feeling really nervous whenever they said Canberra everybody had an opinion on our politics and Dad suddenly felt like he was the spokesman for what was happening in Gov. Even other Aussies they met OS would say, “Oh Canberra huh, can’t you keep those bloody bastards in line?” like we’re all living side by side with one another. !
loading...
You do raise a good point, but (as ‘Guest’ has mentioned above) like Washington and Hollywood, it is (unfortunately perhaps?) accepted to also mean the seat of power in this country.
But when I say Canberra in this article, I do actually mean a broader community than just politicians. I (as a Sydney girl, born and raised) have found Canberrans to be much more informed and interested in politics than those outside the capital. I could just be generalising here, but it seems people in this town do seem a bit more switched on to what’s happening up on the Hill… probably because it’s a bit harder to escape it and a lot of people have ties to the government in some way or another.
Can I also say, that in the past two and a bit years of living here, I have found that I love this place. In my opinion, anyone who says Canberra is boring must be a boring person… this place is great. I have a far better social life down here than I did in Sydney. No joke. So I would never try to speak badly about my new home. To me, Canberra will never have negative connotations because I love it.
loading...
One of the commercial stations ran a competition a few years ago to come up with a new name for “The Hill” because they too were sick of people talking about “Canberra” when they meant The Hill. One of my favourite suggestions was Polly Waffle Hill
.
I’ve just moved backed to NSW after years in Canberra and I agree that it is different there in terms of the general awareness of politics and government. If you don’t work for a government department or body, your best friend/mum/sister/cousin/friend-from-church/neighbour/soccer-coach etc does and people talk about what’s going on and what people are like.
I agree with you, Lauren, that it’s not boring there and I used to get annoyed when not in Canberra by either those accusations or the being lumped in with whatever the government had done that week to piss people off.
I’m looking forward to the coverage and commentary tomorrow – but I watch coverage of elections in states I don’t live in so I’m a bit of a nerd!!
loading...
*commercial radio stations
(can’t edit my post)
loading...
Thanks for replying, Lauren. It’s a shame that this has become the norm but as I said above I’d love to see a few journalists go against the flow. The fact that you had to clarify that you actually were referring to the city, not the government, kind of illustrates the problem!
loading...
I live in Canberra and I have to say it really doesn’t bother me at all, it’s just an expression.
I can understand why it may annoy some though, it just doesn’t bother me. Perhaps because I grew up in Hobart and am used to the dull and predictable things people can say about cities
loading...
Great article, I’m so pleased you’ve published it Mamamia.
My main problem with Kevin Rudd (I will freely admit I voted for him in 07 and was very excited to have him as a leader) is that he is, at the heart of it, two faced and therefore lacks integrity. On one hand he’s portrayed himself as a sweet ‘fair shake of the sauce bottle’ kind of man, and behind closed doors he’s been a hellish man to work for and with – he puts his ego above all else. I’ve heard this personally from friends in parliament, and I’ve read it. We heard about the tantrums on airplanes, in meetings and we even saw it on youtube the other day.
Further to this, I read this morning that he, at a function, called the Prime Minister a “childless atheist communist” and ranted about her to everyone who would listen. There are even government officials who have stated they will sign a stat dec outlining the above behaviour.
It’s also the worst kept secret in Canberra that he was behind the damaging leaks last election campaign, and then after ALL this he tries to say there’s been no stealth attack and that he hasn’t been personal and he’s just a ‘good bloke!’?
He was ousted because no one could work with him – Julia Gillard mounted a leadership challenge and he didn’t challenge because he knew he didn’t have the numbers.
Best of luck to the Prime Minister tomorrow, she deserves to win after reuniting a party that Rudd had split.
loading...
I don’t agree with how he was ousted but at the same time, I can also look at him and see that the side of his personality that this article (and many others I have read) speaks about, could totally exist. You sometimes see that side of his personality. If you read between the lines of his recent speeches, it’s quite easy to see how cold and calculating he could be, how mean or nasty he could easily turn when the moment required it.
loading...
Everyone has an agenda in politics. Great article, but I am also considering what Buttons might be. After all he is working on a book, talking up his experiences with a senior boss he only met 4 times! Smells a bit like a jilted employee looking for vindicatio after not making the cut.
loading...
I thought it was pretty restrained, articulate and polite compared with a lot of other stuff out there. If she hasn’t already, the PM should consider taking him on.
loading...
Given that James Button is the son of John Button, former Labor minister in the Hawke/Keating governments (and a much loved and missed figure in Labor circles) I’m inclined to think he has access to lots of people that most speechwriters might not even though he only met Rudd a few times. I think that’s what informs most of his article and makes it so interesting.
On the topic of John Button he wrote a brilliant Quarterly Essay in 2002 Beyond Belief: What Future for Labor? Well worth getting hold of second hand for anyone interested in politics. He and his son have similar writing styles.
loading...
Kevin Rudd lost his job immediately after vowing to institute a tax on windfall profits for large corporations – he upset big business and that was the end of him.
loading...
Yes, I was waiting to hear the information about how much the mining industry paid to lobby against the tax that was going to mean they paid their share (very simplified and uninformed here, but you get the idea). I vaguely remember reading that this was the price they paid for getting Rudd knifed. And yes, the government has done a pathetic job of explaining why this happened, as Rudd was popular with the masses. I don’t think Australians like backstabbers be they male or female.
loading...
totally agree Brian, you couldn’t be closer to the truth!
loading...
Rudd has a narcissistic personality disorder and suffered an injury to his ego when ousted. A true narcissistic responds with anger to such things and so has been attacking what whom he sees to be the source, gillard. He is also desperately trying to restore his ego via becoming pm again and truly believes he is brilliant and everyone must realise this. Google narcissistic injury.
loading...
exactly, he wont stop,ever.
loading...
You may be right Sue but I would want more than a quick google to diagnose something like that.
loading...
Spare a thought to those labor candidates whom lost their seats during the 2010 election due to K Rudd’s treason and consequently our hung parliament.
Spare a thought for Julia Gillard who has shown more tenacity than any other leader I recall whilst battling K Rudd’s and LNP’s influence over our mainstream media – the blatant sexist bias in particular from the shock jocks (Alan Jones/Ben Fordham) at 2GB is astonishing, so too The Telegraph, The Australian and the ABC.
Everything happens for a reason, I do believe because of the hung parliament & strong influence of The Greens in the Senate, the reforms achieved are less politically and more socially inclusive and thank goodness Bob Brown has the media inquiry underway. The revelations forthcoming would be timely sooner rather than later. Please hurry!
loading...
I still stand by my opinion that the problems with Kevin Rudd’s leadership style were not secret…case in point, David Marr’s essay from 2010: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/we-have-to-talk-about-kevin-20100602-wxi0.html
This wasn’t the only article written soon after Rudd was toppled…
I do agree with Lauren that there were good reasons why the Labor party was shy of really being 100% open about these issues after Rudd was toppled…it was a difficult situation and nobody felt comfortable putting the boot into someone who is down…who does…
The real problem is still Kevin Rudd. He has had almost 2 years to get over the hurt and forgive his party for taking action against him, but instead it seems he has let his grudges simmer and fester inside him. This alone makes him unsuitable to lead the country. I can’t blame his colleagues for becoming frustrated with him and telling it like it is…we all have people in our lives who are like this – people we try and be tactful with, people who we try a softly softly approach with…but eventually you need to call a spade a spade…and quite often in blunt terms…
Gillard, on the other hand, to me has never looked more Prime-Ministerial than she has over the past few days…I honestly think this will be the making of Gillard…I think now the real reasons Kevin Rudd was toppled are being articulated, she can finally own the Prime-Ministership…
loading...
I agree. I recall reading a lot in the media about the problems with Kevin’s leadership style in the months leading up to Julia’s challenge and afterward. I find it odd that so many people say that they didn’t know.
loading...
I always look for your comments in the threads John James. Your opinions are always well articulated and informed. For the record I agree with your summation of the Gillard/Rudd struggle.
loading...
Sorry, that was not meant to be an anonymous compliment to JohnJames!
loading...
I agree re: Gillard. She has lost that infuriating smug smirk that constantly lingers on her face, which gave her that air of untrustworthiness. It’s because she’s finally speaking some truth from the bottom of her heart. If she can work out how to keep that smirk gone forever, I think this stoush will be the best thing that’s happened to her.
loading...
I wish she was always like she was in that press conference on Friday afternoon. She came out guns blazing with a refreshing honesty. She was speaking from her more than the usual boring old lines drafted by her people. I too voted for rudd back then but have Problems with him now, i Truly belIeve he Is two faced and volatile. I think Julia will be ok though but would be worried if it was up to the public as I don’t think they know the real Kevin – they still see the fake, crying ” good bloke” that he is not.
loading...
I really agree, but I think unfortunately this will see the liberals come back in the next election. Australians can largely never see the bigger longer term picture.
loading...
Oh and what would that be?, because from where I sit the Liberals are the only answer to lead us out of this embarrassment and restore some dignity to he Australian image.
loading...
sorry tracey but abbott and joyce are the real enemies here
julia is not hamstrung by belief in fairytales
abbott is just a Rupurt Murdoch sock puppet
loading...
I think someone has been reading too many fairy tales. Bring on the next election.
loading...
and tracey that is why the independants went with julia
can i recommend David McKnght’s new book
” Rupert Murdoch An Investigation of Political Power”
loading...
“Gillard, on the other hand, to me has never looked more Prime-Ministerial than she has over the past few days”
I agree JJ, her speech to the NSW members yesterday made me want to stand up clap – she was so impressive under what must be the most extraordinary pressure of her career!
loading...
I am another one who agrees that this whole debacle with “The Revenge of the Rudd” maybe the making of the Prime Minister. She may be finally able to, as JJ put it, “own the Prime-Ministership”.
loading...
cant get to ….. the …. point
loading...
Did they really not explain their actions to the public just to save k rudd from humiliation? Or did they realise their chance of winning that next election without him was pretty much nonexistent. I have a lot of respect for Julia Gillard and they way she has lead a hung parliament but I wonder that she let Kevin Rudd be our Minister for Foreign Affairs if he really is as dangerous and incompetent as they would now have us believe.
loading...
Thank goodness , that we do have a system where a Party votes for the best person to do the job as Prime Minister . Kevin Rudd was a fantastic foreign Minister he simply couldn’t handle the job of Prime Minister . If he had of stayed in the team and been supportive and honest instead of trying to hold onto power the ALP could have won the next election . Instead he has destabilised the party and created great animosity .We are fortunate that the truth is now being told . I also read Jess Rudds article . i have always really like Jess and see her as incredibly intelligent , however i believe that in this situation it shoud be the caucus that decides .
loading...
There is this amazing misconception in Australia that we vote for our Prime Minister. Nothing could be further from the truth. The only people who vote for the Prime Minister are the standing politicians in the Government of the party in power, and by pure coincidence the people of that individuals electorate.
Despite is profligate use of spin (much better at it than Gillard) Rudd has been exposed as a self aggrandising glory hunter. When the most neutral and respected political journalist in the country, Laurie Oates, publishes a a document from a cabinet insider that makes this apparent it is very hard to believe otherwise.
loading...
Giving us further insight into Kevin Rudd’s other self, (his ‘not for the general public’ persona) this article might be of interest to the many who, like myself, have a strong desire to get as big a picture as possible from a variety of sources.
I have provided a few extracts but the whole article really is worth a read,
http://www.news.com.au/national/kate-ellis-tells-of-disgust-at-kevin-rudd-pub-rant/story-e6frfkw9-1226281606132
“KEVIN Rudd described Julia Gillard as a “childless, atheist, ex-communist” at an Adelaide pub as he plotted a political comeback a year ago.”
“For the first time, Labor frontbencher Kate Ellis and other witnesses have revealed the full story of the night of bizarre behaviour at Adelaide’s Stag Hotel in February last year.”
“A lawyer – who was present that night and said he was prepared to sign a statutory declaration over the details of the evening’s events – said: “He was just on a rampage . . . I was gob-smacked. It was out of control.”
Read more: http://www.news.com.au/national/kate-ellis-tells-of-disgust-at-kevin-rudd-pub-rant/story-e6frfkw9-1226281606132#ixzz1nOvTxYWC
Read more: http://www.news.com.au/national/kate-ellis-tells-of-disgust-at-kevin-rudd-pub-rant/story-e6frfkw9-1226281606132#ixzz1nOuwrcI3
loading...
Ah I just wrote about that above. Absolutely shocking behaviour…but apparently he hasn’t been personal at all!
loading...
I am very pleased to see this piece. For anyone that’s interested, James Button’s full article can be read here:
http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/we-need-to-talk-about-kevin-20120224-1ttxx.html
loading...
It’s easy to see that James Button would be a wonderful speechwriter. This article was a pleasure to read.
loading...
It’s obvious now that Mr Rudd is more popular with the general public as leader of the ALP than Ms Gillard, but it’s worth keeping in mind that we need a functioning government until the next election.
If Mr Rudd wins the spill, then a lot of the front bench will be drastically altered and it’s fair to say that there will be a good deal of bloodshed as he selects his cabinet. Do we need that? We need our parliament to work.
A Rudd government may well provide better photo opps and a feel-good factor, but what if it is as dysfunctional as before and the ALP still gets wiped-out at the next election? Then we have Mr Abbott as PM and an even bigger mess to clean up.
Even if there’s a landslide victory for the Liberal Party at the next election, I’d rather we had a working government in place beforehand. Ms Gillard’s government is more effective at this point in time. I think she is far more serious about what it takes to get the job done than her rival.
Popularity contests are just that — we need co-operation and I can’t see that happening under a Rudd government mark II, as much as I disliked the way he was dealt with in 2010.
loading...
I believe that Julia Gillard will eventually be judged on what she has achieved whilst in office like all the other Prime Ministers that have come before her.
Despite the public vitriol being slung at her at the moment, she will ultimately be regarded as a PM that pushed through important reforms like many other Labor and Liberal PMs have done in the past. Many of these reforms will ultimately help everyone in society and have wide reaching and long term benefits.
The legacy that she is creating is what history will remember about her time in office (even if we all loudly bitch and moan about the short term pain and consequences).
I have come to the conclusion that there will always be people that want to pull others down and complain rather than be problem solvers and solution focused.
I’m hoping that as a society we will eventually cringe when we remember all the sexist crap that she has had to endure as our first female PM.
And what I admire about her is that she keeps her eye firmly on the prize without resorting to populism. Her goal is to improve the quality of life for ALL Australians. Of course she gets it wrong time to time but there is this earnest and way about her that I really respect.
I keep thinking about all the CEO’s that I have worked for. I would much rather they create harmonious and respectful workplaces rather than trying to be every customers friend and not actually getting on with managing and leading the company. Their decisions may not be very popular at times but by getting the most out of their staff huge achievements can occur.
In the past I have reported in to a CEO that was so detailed focused opportunities continually passed us by because we were stuck in inertia and big decisions never got made. We never really progressed as a company, not to mention the bad morale it bred. We always had too much on our plate and everyone was stretched too thin.
This whole debacle reminds me of my favourite saying – Things that matter least should never be at the mercy of things that matter most.
Kevin, photo ops and self promotion matter least in the larger scheme of things, getting the job done, making the hard decisions and enabling people to do their best work is what matters most.
loading...
Nicely put!
loading...
Bravo!
loading...
Well said!
loading...
So how did he become leader in the first place? Because I knew about some of this (long hours, demanding) before he was elected and I lived in NZ!
loading...
“Correspondant” needs to be “correspondent” in Dubois’s author info — just pointing it out because it’s a piece of text that will be republished many times.
This is an interesting article. I am not au fait with our politics, and I never had an inkling of this.
loading...
Please Mamamia, hire a sub-editor soon.
loading...
Stupidly, I made a typo in my own message about a typo. “If” should be “of”.
loading...
Typos in comments aren’t the problem!
loading...
Get over it.
loading...
Thanks guys, fixed
loading...
Fantastic article by Button. I am glad it has been shared.
I voted for the Labor party not for Kevin Rudd the individual. No one is entitled to the position of Prime Minister because they think they are more popular. It really bugs me when i keep reading that “the people” prefer Rudd. No we don’t. Who are these “people” in the polls? Are they “faceless’ too?
loading...
For me, this is the thing: Rudd’s opposition to marriage equality was annoying but had internal logic, Gillard’s makes no sense at all. And on top of that, Jess has now made her father see sense on that issue.
loading...
I really hope I’m not alone in being very concerned that a potential leader would prefer to take advice from his daughter than listen to the wishes of the people he represents.
loading...
62% of Australians are in favor of marriage equality: unlike Gillard (and Abbott) on this topic Rudd is with the majority.
loading...
Jessica should have advised her dad that revenge is bad for the soul and to take the ousting gracefully and be satisfied in doing the job of Foreign Minister!
loading...
What the hell does all this have to do with gay marriage rights anyway!
loading...
See, I really don’t understand this. In the months prior to his being ousted he was very unpopular. All the sheen of Kevin 07 was gone, and it was seemingly inevitable that Labor would lose the next election. Rumours of his tyrannical behavior had been around for a lot longer than he had been PM. You didn’t have to be a public servant to know he was an extremely difficult and angry man. The Labor party PR machine managed to sweep all that under the carpet whilst he was campaigning in 07, but as soon as he was PM stories started coming out again. Not in niche political blogs either, but in national newspapers. The reason’s he’d been ousted had been front page news for months.
But it seems it only took a week for people to forget all this. The same people who’d been talking about how useless he was and how he had to go were now shocked and horrified on his behalf. I think the main thing this whole circus has taught me is that the Australian public is extremely fickle. I fully expect the same people who are baying for Gillard’s blood right now will be saying the exact same things about Rudd in the following weeks if he somehow manages to win the challenge and Labors polling doesn’t suddenly go through the roof.
loading...
Why is he so angry? I keep hearing people refer to his anger. What’s that all about?
loading...
Yes we love our PMs most after they’re gone. No doubt everyone will love Julia once she leaves office too
loading...
Not everyone.
loading...
My husband met Kevin Rudd in Iraq just before Christmas 2007. There were photos of him and Rudd on the front page of every newspaper in the country. The new PM jetting in to meet the troops. Only thing was he had no interest in talking to them. They asked him questions, he brushed them off. All he cared about was smiling for the cameras. Clearly that was a sign of things to come!
loading...
That is terrible!
loading...
To provide an interesting point of comparison, I was at a charity launch at Parliament House several years ago, heavily pregnant, when JG & her entourage swept into the room. She physically pushed me aside to get to the front of the room for her photo op. And stalked past me again on her way out.
In a room full of politicians & media types, she was noticably the only one who did not stay to speak to any of us common folk, nor was there any apology for her brusque behaviour. Several other pollies popped their heads in, had a photo snapped, & apologised for not staying. Many others took the time to mingle & to hear our stories.
Just pointing out, from personal experience, that she’s no saint herself when it comes to common courtesy.
loading...
Anon I have no doubt there are many stories of JG treating people badly. She had an affair with her married colleague – Craig Emerson, that ended his marriage. She clearly has no regard for families, nor did he. Both J G and KR disgust me. Bring on the election!
loading...
As I said in another thread, this is like watching a divorce. The kids (the electorate) woke up one morning and dad (KG) was gone. No explanation from mum (JG) other than “we’d grown apart.”
DIdn’t cut it. Mum thought dad should still be part of the kids’ lives and gave him the Foreign Ministry and avoided badmouthing him (Divorce 101).
But dad didn’t give up. Wanted full custody. The kids still thought he was ace even though he promised Disneyland every year and didn’t take them. Meanwhile, mum got on with the job – meals on the table, washing done, school runs done. That wasn’t sexy enough for the kids, they wanted Disneyland.
Finally after getting jack of the kids saying how ace dad was, mum told them how it was. Dad was a dickhead in the marriage and there’d never be a Disneyland.
Problem is, the kids STILL think dad’s ace while mum’s done all the hard work.
loading...
Yes!! Brilliant analogy. But don’t the kids come to their senses eventually?
loading...
They have to go & live with Uncle Tony because Mum’s in bed with Bob….& Tony & Rob & Andrew.
loading...
Yes Snap, I believe kids do eventually see the bigger picture. But that’s often after a LONG time when they grow up and realise how hard it is to be the “practical” parent rather than the “fun” parent. I’m sure often they regret all the crap they dish out to mum too. And they wish they’d been told the truth from the very beginning because they can actually handle the truth.
loading...
Well written – you’ve nailed it there and i think highlighted that K Rudd is like those stalkerish men who can’t believe the relationship is over despite the woman saying it over and over and who eventually turns really scary and violent
loading...
Best analogy yet! Thanks for the Sunday morning smile.
loading...
I just don’t get the cries of surprise now from people saying they had never heard what he was like.
I remember it being all over the papers and news at the time that he was impossible to work with, a slave driver, and so on.
Are people really only just hearing about this now? I’m genuinely confused, I thought it was common knowledge. And I’ve never been to Canberra.
loading...
Agree. It’s like collective amnesia – relying on the hyperbolic media to rewrite our memories for us. It was obvious he was autocratic with poor self-knowledge and little understanding of how to keep your own people on-side. He may have been well-intentioned but that way was never going to work unless he actually was a charismatic genius. Which he isn’t.
loading...
Um, I’m ready to talk about something different now. Anyone else?
loading...
Not me! It’s interesting and important.
loading...
Perhaps we could wait until it’s over before talking about something else?! It’s still rather relevant seeing as the spill hasn’t even happened…
loading...
Excuse my ignorance, but I thought this was a post about the ‘real’ Kevin Rudd and the Labor Party spill, stupidly not realising it was meant to be an update on Kim Jong Kardashian’s hang nail. My bad.
loading...
Gillard, Swan and the rest of their cronies have worked hard since the 2010 election to give us the exact opposite impression of Rudd. Gillard’s agenda is clear…keep Rudd as quiet as possible by giving him the FM Portfolio (at the expense of the very capable and lovely Stephen Smith) and say as many complimentary things about him as it takes to hang onto power. Did we not deserve the true and honest story right from the start? Just another power grabbing at all costs exercise from her. And just another act of deceit from her.
loading...
Stephen Smith lovely? You must have him confused with someone else!
loading...
No, I’m not confused. Stephen Smith is calm, considered, clear and impressive. Traits sadly lacking amongst the majority of his colleagues on the front bench.
loading...
I like Stephen Smith too! The only Labor minister I have respect for atm.
loading...
I live in Canberra and had heard all of these stories, I hate to admit it but until this week I didn’t realise they were a Canberra secret. I don’t work in the APS so it certainly wasn’t just insider knowledge.
There are many talented public service officials who had their family lives stretched to the brink because of the demands being placed on them. The relief when Gillard took over was huge!
Thanks for reproducing the article.
loading...
I would class myself as an ‘average working class Australian’ and it was only after Rudd was outed that I heard a few suggestions that he was like this to work with. I guess my problem is with HOW it was done.
Surely these things were known about Rudd before he was made party leader, and as the decision to knife him and put Julia in place of him was a party decision then I can’t help but wonder if there wasn’t a better way to handle it.
The way that it was handled was always going to alienate people and generate support from him from various quarters.
loading...
Thank you. I have always wondered why Rudd was ousted in 2010.
Has he changed? Why does he seem to think he can win back the leadership? Won’t history just repeat itself?
It doesn’t sound like he has many friends in Caucus. I will be very surprised if he wins on Monday.
loading...