by KATE HUNTER
The theory went like this: Our cave dwelling ancestors were hunter-gatherers. The men went out every few weeks to kill bison and some of them would come back – bison hunting was a dangerous business – the greater the risks , the bigger the bison they’d drag back to the cave.
Meanwhile, the women sat around digging up edible rooty things and gossiping about that flighty woman a few caves over; the biggest risk women took was being overheard by the flighty one.
But has this carried over into the way we live today? Conventional wisdom would say it has, writes Helaine Olen in The Atlantic:
Read almost any article about personal finance for women and you’ll find variations on the idea that the ladies find investing scary, intimidating and won’t take chances. It’s a “Men are from the Stock Market, Women are From the Passport Savings Account” view of life.
A study by Prudential Financial recognises that “Women focus on the family, but their risk aversion may be putting their families’ financial health at risk.” A solid majority of women, the report adds, “See themselves as savers rather than investors.”
But there’s new research emerging post GFC showing an almost equal proportion of men see themselves as savers rather than investors; so either that whole bison-hunting thing has been bred out of us, or it had nothing to do with whether or not women can be bold investors:
According to Julie Nelson, the chair of economics at the University of Massachusetts, the idea that men take more risks and women are more conservative is pervasive. It’s one of the reasons many people believe the financial crisis could have been avoided if more women were in charge of Wall Street banks. “The belief is so strong, that people don’t question it,” Nelson said.
But there are real consequences to insisting women lack the ability to take on risk. This false belief downplays the main reason women have less money in the bank than men. It’s not because they view themselves as savers rather than investors: It’s because they live economically more precarious lives than men.
So maybe we’re conservative with money simply because we have less to play around with. That makes sense, and it’s an empowering thought.
When my Pop died, Gran had no idea about their financial situation. At age 71, never written a cheque. They’d been married nearly 60 years and he’d always given her ‘housekeeping’ money, which she managed carefully – always knowing how much a pint of milk cost, putting some aside each week for Christmas. It was Pop though, who bought the shares, took out the home loan, planned their retirement.
I remember Gran saying, ‘Your grandfather was so much cleverer than me with money. He made sure I never wanted for anything.’ The inference was Pop was good with money because he was a man. But in truth, it was because of how he was educated, how he worked and ran his business.
If women are lacking anything, writes Nelson, it’s confidence, not smarts. Gran was typical of many women of her generation – she’d never earned much money, so she assumed she was no good with it.
Women who did earn a decent salary, however, are just as likely as men to invest boldly:
Nelson refers to a study called “Gender Differences in the Investment Decision Making Process,” published more than a decade ago. High-earning women were more likely than other women to put their money in the stock market. The issue is that women were less likely than men to be high earners in the first place.
More recently, Mariko Chang found the same thing when she quizzed men and women for her book Shortchanged: Why Women Have Less Wealth and What Can Be Done About It. The men were more willing to take risk than women, not because they were men, but because they have more faith in their ability to make up any losses through their future earnings women did.
Would the Global Financial Crisis have happened if there had been a little less testosterone on Wall Street? Would Lehman Brothers have collapsed if it had been Lehman Sisters? Olen says no – they couldn’t have afforded the gamble.
Do you think men and women approach investing and saving differently?








Comments
6 Comments so far
My husband is far more carefree with spending than me!!
loading...
Perhaps historically it was gender divided but I’d say less so now.
In my relationship, its me that manages our money – not just paying bills and following a budget, but also managing our savings and working out how much we can afford to borrow when we buy a house next year. My partner couldnt tell you how much is in our savings account where I know the balance and can tell you what it will be come June next year.
loading...
Surely what this research actually tells us is:
Gender is irrelevant. People with less money take less financial risks.
(A side issue is that women have less money to take less risks with – and the whys and wherefores of that constitute a separate argument/story).
loading...
I think there is a definitely a generational difference in the way that women approach money matters. For my Aunt at least, her husband was the one to manage finances as he was the main breadwinner and she was happy for him to have that role in the house. He never controlled her spending but they only had shared accounts and he took care of bills and investments. When they briefly separated a few years ago, it came as a huge shock to her that because everything was in joint accounts, she had no credit rating under her own name. It just piled humiliation on top of heartache – despite the fact that she’d been working too, there was no recognition of her in the financial relationship.
They are back together now but the lesson that I took from it is that you have to be smart and independent to a degree when it comes to savings and investments. I’ll always hang on to my own savings account and ensure that I have my own investments on top of anything that I share with a partner/husband. It’s not particularly romantic but I think we all need to be able to stand on our own financial feet when it matters.
http://thegoogleyear.blogspot.com.au/
loading...
I have a seperate savings account to my husband and manage my own (rather small) investments. He has no access to them and it’s understood that this is my liferaft if things go pear-shaped and he’s fine with that. I hate it when people say ‘oh, it’s so unromantic’, as if by doing it I’m willing my marriage to fail. WTF? No one accuses people of buying life insurance of wanting to die, or people getting income insurance as wanting to get fired.
loading...
I think that might be true but I don’t really understand why it has to do with gender??
I’m lucky in that my father is very entrepreneurial and really into the business/investing side of things and educated my sister and I to buy shares, invest etc. He taught us about calculated “good risk” and all that jazz from a young age and I’m so happy I have his advice whenever I need it. Because of this I would say I’m a little more “ballsy” with investment etc but that’s not because of my gender, it’s just what I have been taught.
loading...