Private emails show Syrian leaders with little care for nation’s violence
The escalating crisis in rebellion-torn Syria, in which thousands have died, appears to have had little effect on the upmarket lifestyle of its leaders Bashar al-Assad and his wife Asma al-Assad.
Private emails obtained by the Guardian show a life still filled with excess and distracted by shopping, even as the rebel city of Homs remains under heavy fire.
The first lady in particular has used emails to purchase finely crafted furniture, hand-made jewelery and high-end shoes to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars.
One pair of shoes, crystal-encrusted Christian Louboutins heels, would cost more than AUD$4000 even though one friend emailed the first lady saying: “I don’t think they’re going 2 b useful any time soon unfortunately.”
The President, on the other hand, alternated between being apparently torn and dismissing the state of the nation. He emailed country and western song lyrics to his wife: “I’ve been a walking heartache? I’ve made a mess of me / The person that I’ve been lately / Ain’t who I wanna be.”
In July last year when she emailed that she would be finished at 5pm, her delighted-sounding husband replied: “This is the best reform any country can have that u told me where will you be, we are going to adopt it instead of the rubbish laws of parties, elections, media…”
The Syrian uprising began last March and has grown to include hundreds of thousands agitating for more freedoms, and a democracy in action. More than 8000 have been killed, many more detained and stories of torture and brutality at the hands of the regime which most recently included images of children and babies being killed.
The rebels have taken hold in the city of Homs, which has become the epicentre for the violence as Government forces fight back.
Hollywood star travels to Sudan, reports back to Washington on horrors
George Clooney might be better known for his blockbuster movies and ladies-man-attitudes but the actor has also thrown himself heavily into humanitarian work, having recently returned from a trip to the troubled Sudan on the continent of Africa to see firsthand the horrors of the civil war.
“What we’re looking at is a real disaster,” Clooney told reporters before testifying at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing in Washington.
Travelling with John Prendergast, co-founder of the advocacy group the Enough Project, Clooney filmed the hardship for a video shown to the committee and posted online just before his testimony.
The country voted on a split last year, forming Sudan and South Sudan but violence on the border and over oil pipelines has persisted. Clooney witnessed an nine-year-old boy with his hands blown off, and dodged a rocket attack himself.
Please be warned, this video contains graphic content:
Woman jailed after she was raped, appeal to overturn conviction refused
A British judge has refused to overturn the conviction of a Welsh woman who was jailed in 2010 after she was raped by her allegedly violent and abusive husband and later falsely withdrew the allegations against him.
The woman, who lawyers said was in a state of post-traumatic shock withdrew the allegations of rape (even though she had been raped) after pressure from her husband and his sister. It was her later acknowledgment to police that saw her charged and sent to jail, of which she served 18 days followed by community service and a two-year supervision order.
Edit: She was charged with perverting the course of justice.
Even though her husband was never convicted (due to the withdrawn testimony) the prosecution admitted there was no question about the facts of the matter. The prosecution said it: “…unreservedly accepts the factual background to this case. It’s plain that [the woman] was subjected to a lengthy period of domestic violence and it’s implicit in the plea that she was the victim of rape.”
The woman’s lawyer Niall Quinn QC, acting for free, said told the lord chief justice, Lord Judge, Mr Justice Silber and Mr Justice Maddison in an earlier hearing that, as well as repeatedly abusing Sarah, her husband had forced her to work in a massage parlour, providing sexual services for other men. “He drove her to the premises, to this brothel, waited for her and took her home again, took the proceeds and then proceeded to attack her emotionally for doing what she had done at his insistence and for his gain,” he said.
The team added the decision was: “…one of most important judgments to come out this year on women’s – and thus human – rights.”
Tony Abbott’s youngest to become racing ambassador
The youngest daughter of Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has been named the brand ambassador for the Sydney Autumn Carnival. Bridget Abbott, 19, studies radiography usually but said she was looking forward to a different challenge.
“I’m very excited, a little bit nervous, but I guess that comes with the job,” she said.
She said her father had not given her too much advice for her role but both her parents were supportive of her move into the media spotlight.
“Dad’s supportive of everything I do and so he was really excited with this opportunity, he’s urged me to jump at it.”
Prince Harry just wants to be normal
He’s been touring the Caribbean for 10-days and in an interview granted with CBS, Prince Harry admitted he just wanted to be normal.
Asked if royalty lived up to the fairytale, Harry told the US broadcaster: “No, not at all. As any girl would ever tell you.
“It’s sort of, ‘Oh my God, he’s a prince’. But no. The job that it entails – I mean look at me, I’m 27 years old, and not so much searching for someone to fulfill the role, but obviously, you know, finding someone that would be willing to take it on.”
“There’s a lot of times that both myself and my brother wish, obviously, that we were just completely normal.
“We’ve been born into this position and therefore we’ll do what we need to do to people and to kids that need it.
“It really is that simple for us.”
- Prince Harry and William do have a special bond. Remember when they might have been roomies with Kate?
Here’s a gallery of the Prince throughout the years. Normal life? Yes and no.

How it all started for Prince Harry.
The Encyclopedia Britannica is no more
After 244 years in print, the Encyclopedia Britannica’s last paper edition has run off the press. Well, it did in 2010 but the decision was only taken this week to abandon the hard copy version. While 7 million sets of the encyclopedia were sold over the years, only 15 per cent of the company’s revenue comes from its reference business (which is now mostly online with apps and subscriptions). But don’t shed a tear just yet. As The Guardian reported:
“The company’s websites, which include Merriam-Webster dictionaries, attracted more than 450 million users over the course of 2011, according to internal numbers.
Wikipedia English has 3.9m articles. The comprehensive Britannica has about 120,000. Wikipedia is free. The DVD Britannica, which includes two dictionaries and a thesaurus, costs $30 on Amazon. Individuals will also be able to sign up for an annual $70 subscription (universities will be charged about $1 per student).
“We may not be as big as Wikipedia. but we have a scholarly voice, an editorial process, and fact-based, well-written articles,” the company said. “All of these things we believe are very, very important, and provide an alternative that we want to offer to as many people as possible. We believe that there are 1.2 to 1.5bn inquiries for which we have the best answer.”
- Speaking of things that are out of fashion, how about the top 15 worst (best!) songs of the 1990s?










Comments
63 Comments so far
Asma Assad needs to pray that Madame La Guillotine never finds it way to Syria.
loading...
DON’T WORRY HARRY, I’LL MARRY YOU!
loading...
Happy birthday, Rick
loading...
Assad is torn? An estimated 8000+ people slaughtered by his troops & his outright lying & denials of what is happening, disallowing journalists into the county and killing those that do make it in to report. this seems pretty decisive and not at all torn about what his stance is on things. The massacre continues daily
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/12/45-women-children-killed-in-homs-massacre-syrian-opposition-says/
loading...
Love George, loath celebrities putting their names to causes. It irks me.
We have a plague of Embassies, Ambassadors, Ministers, Military and Diplomats who should be all over these situations.
Not to mention the United Nations who never seem to get much done. Too busy trying to whip the world into handing them billions to control the climate.
loading...
You say that we have heaps of other people who ‘should be all over this’ and the UN who do nothing yet you begrudge celebrities who want something to be done and actually have the power to make themselves heard and bring these situations into light.
loading...
a, the ‘heaps of other people’ are trained professionals. They are able to assess situations and deal with them in as non-emotive and strategic manner as possible. They are also in possession of intelligence information that actors aren’t.
Most people who keep abreast of world events are already aware of the horrors in Sudan and other countries. We don’t need ‘celebrities’ putting on their ‘serious and compassionate’ faces to rally the ill-informed to the latest cause celebre.
The dumbing down continues – the question shouldn’t be ‘why can’t George do this if he wants,’ it should be, ‘why is the United Nations clawing in billions of dollars and where is it going when, decade after decade, nothing changes. What are they doing and why isn’t it working.’
Do you know that out of every dollar donated to UNICEF only a handful of cents goes to the coalface. The rest is used to fill the coffers of the fat cats. Does the same happen to the money we give to foreign aid? You bet ya.
loading...
Ill informed or not, a lot of people don’t actually realise what is really happening to the rest of the world. We don’t all watch SBS and read the world pages in the Australian.
Celebrities putting on their serious faces gets people involved via their emotions and that’s better than nothing. Philanthropy used to be a responsibility of being rich. Don’t knock people for doing just that.
loading...
Why? Celebs have power! Why shouldn’t they use it for good?
loading...
Instead of evil. Like Snooki.
loading...
“a plague of Embassies, Ambassadors, Ministers, Military and Diplomats who should be all over these situations.”
Who *should* be – and yet they obviously aren’t, as these situations keep happening. From that list, who do you believe is responsible for Darfur? What have they been doing about it?
loading...
Awareness Cazz. If people know, then people care. If George Cloony knows and he makes a video about then millions more people know and millions care. Seems pretty simple to me…
loading...
Please research this issue before being critical of George Clooney. He has been pushing for action in Sudan for years. He gave an incredible speech outside the Un a couple of years ago attempting to shame the world into action. Unfortunately much of the mainstream press and media do not cover these issues without someone like George clooney there. He is not just putting his name to this issue rather he knows what he is talking about and has enough influence to prod some action out of government.
loading...
The rates of retraction are incredibly high, for those who are victims of sexual assault. Even the Children’s Court in Victoria understands that (well, most magistrates and barristers do anyway). This is an appalling outcome for this individual, and for many other women who may choose not to disclose in the first place as a result. Shocking outcome.
loading...
Your “The brothers do have a special bond” sentence with links to story of rooming with Kate implies to me that they have a special bond with her in a nudge nudge wink wink kind of way.
Was that intentional?
loading...
Ha, not at all! Only in the sense that Will was (seemingly) prepared to live with his bachelor brother as a newly married man!
loading...
Agree! And its not roomies (I seriously doubt there was ever a chance all 3 would share a room!) but rather housemates!
loading...
That poor woman. The mind boggles. We still have a ways to go.
I wonder if prince Harry will get some offers as a result of this.
Oh, and thanks for the reminder of those awful songs. I’m really going to have to make an effort to keep them out of my head.
loading...
I remember being so proud in Grade Two when I mastered spelling the word encyclopaedia. What a rush!
loading...
I just love pic 1. William is being a typical 2-year-old, cheeky and cute, and you can see every single person there smiling and indulging him. Adorable and happy.
loading...
I remember when my grandma gifted us her complete set of encyclopedias. I looked up penis and vagina. I was also in primary school.
Oh, memories.
loading...
It was last week really, wasn’t it . . .
loading...
Since when do we say “gifted”??
loading...
Since a very long time ago. Granted, it is a much less popular verb, nowadays!
loading...
I find this article so confusing, if the woman went to jail then why was the decision a victory for women’s rights? and why are you copying articles from another journalist especially when it is confusing?
loading...
No, they were saying it was an important case for human rights … but not a victory. The complete opposite of a victory!
loading...
I agree, it was a very confusing summary – I had to go to the article to work out what actually happened.
Made me think it wasn’t you today, Rick. So you’re obviously not yourself
loading...
I’m sure you’ll grant me an off day. It made sense in my head in the wee hours
loading...
Of course!
What are you doing still at work?? It’s cocktail time!!
Have a great night
loading...
Oh I just saw someone say it’s your birthday. Happy birthday!!
No wonder it was confusing, you’re too excited by all the lovely things your colleaguesm family and friends are no doubt doing for you today
loading...
Harry is hot!
loading...
Man, I remember using encyclopaedias for school projects. And Encarta! How much fun was Encarta?! I miss the days of CD-ROMS.
loading...
Me too!
loading...
Sorry guys, but I found the rape article really badly written and difficult to follow.
As much as many around here might wish otherwise, the legal system still applies to rape and sexual assult cases. I therefore dont know how you can state in brackets “(even though she was raped”). According to the law, that was not established. As much as those in here might wish otherwise, the legal system still assumes innocence until proved otherwise.
loading...
Ditto. We dont even know what she went to jail for .. ?
loading...
I’m a little confused too, but I assume she went to jail for perjury!
loading...
MAYBE prostitution? I thought it was just because I hadn’t had my morning coffee….
loading...
She went to gaol for perverting the course of justice. It says that quite clearly at the end of the article.
loading...
I was about to write the same thing. Why was she jailed? I don’t understand.
loading...
I am so confused by it too and I’ve read it twice to try and figure it out!
loading...
Yeah sorry Rick but I agree. You are usually good at summarizing the news but I’ll have to read a real article on this one. I take it she was charged with perverting the course of justice or something? Quite confusing…
loading...
Unfortunately, the Guardian article (hit the link) is about as clear! It’s a very complex set of circumstances but I tried to distil it down to a few paras, the companion of brevity is sometimes clarity!
loading...
Yes, agree! Brevity sometimes does bring clarity…
I think that first para just needs to say that her acknowledgement that she had lied when she withdrew the rape allegations resulted in a perjury charge. I think that is what most people aren’t clear on.
loading...
I’ve edited the copy.
loading...
It’s about as simple as I can make it, sorry.
1. She was raped.
2. She later withdrew the allegations she was raped.
3. Then she admitted to police that she really was raped and that she had lied when she withdrew the allegations.
4. She was sentenced to jail for the lying part and had a conviction recorded, even though the prosecutors recognised the facts of the matter in that she had been raped and was most likely traumatised and her husband had a history of abuse and violence.
This is what I wrote: “The woman, who lawyers said was in a state of post-traumatic shock, would go on to withdraw the allegations of rape (even though she had been raped) after pressure from her husband and his sister. It was her later acknowledgment to police that saw her charged and sent to jail, of which she served 18 days followed by community service and a two-year supervision order.”
It’s a difficult one to lay out.
loading...
That’s how I read it. In other words she got screwed over by her husband (repeatedly) and the system. The whole thing is a travesty since she committed perjury and she was the only one that suffered as a result of that perjury and the offender received no punishment at
all.
loading...
Exactly. The prosecution should never have brought the charges even though she *technically* did break the law because … compassion! She was shocked, presumably under duress, traumatised … and they hang her out to dry. The mind boggles. As her lawyers said, justice was not done and it was not seen to be done.
loading...
The prosecution themselves admitted to the facts of the matter. Her husband wasn’t convicted but the rape was never in question.
loading...
So her conviction was for perjury?
Or for making a false allegation?
Sorry, it’s not quite clear to me either (or I need more caffeine, that’s highly likely too)
loading...
Perverting the course of justice.
loading...
Ok, thanks, understand now.
loading...
It’s a pity that he and his faily weren’t kept away from her totally so she could have just maintained her claims. She gets out, heis still free, I don’t understand how her life would have improved at all.
loading...
I’m sorry people, I must have reading a different article! I got what you were saying first read thru. I think everyone needs a trip to optometrist! Thank you Rick… Maybe its a case of ‘Great Minds Think A Like’, well written, providing valid info’ compressed Into a neat few paragraphs.
loading...
Agree- I read it at 7:30am this morning and understood completely. Don’t know what the issue is.
loading...
Encyclopaedias….I remember using them. I remember someone coming over to talk to my parents about buying a set. I remember them being in our libraries. It’s hard to believe that that was the main source of information for assignment research. We’ve come a long way, but it’s kind of sad that they are now in the past. I know so many people don’t even know what they are – makes me feel quite old!!
Princes Harry and William are refreshingly down to earth (as much as they can be).
loading...
I still have my collection of world book encylopedias and a full set of btitainia. I will share them with my kids one day when they are a bit older although a lot of the information will be out of date some things do stay the same!
loading...
I’m not clear on what she went to jail for. What was the charge? Was it because she withdrew the allegation and then later admitted she was raped?
loading...
Yes. If you read the original article she was charged with Perverting the Course of Justice by withdrawing the allegations.
It seems really wrong!
loading...
Yes, was wondering about that too!!
loading...
Slightly out of the square but maybe they put her away for a rest and some clarity. The supervision order so the authorities could keep an eye on her while she continues the toxic and abusive relationship – so she is not lost and forgotten. I’ve no experience with abusive relationships but maybe they are doing her a favour?
loading...
Perhaps, but there are better place than jail for that. A domestic violence/abuse centre possibly.
I also found the article confusing to read and a bit weird, not what I would usually expect from this site. Won’t stop me reading though! Everyone has an off day
loading...
I’m sure there is a better place than jail for her but in order to keep her ‘in the radar’ and ‘on the books’, so to speak, maybe this is somewhat of a solution. I read the full article and it really bothers me that she has four small children living within this environment. What is happening to them? – terrible for the kids to be living in this environment.
loading...
Absolutely agree about the kids and I get what you’re saying about keeping her on the radar, but judges can refer to community mental health organisations (and others that would be appropriate for her), they don’t have to put her in jail. It seems like this judge was following the letter of the law when they had the capacity to be lenient given the circumstances. I freely admit to having not read the full article yet, but I plan to at some stage today. The poor kids and poor woman.
loading...