Prime Minister Gillard’s speech yesterday was a triumph for feminism. It was a game-changer. It had me dancing in my car, prancing down the corridors with glee, and fist-pumping in the office whenever the video was played on the news. It had me yelling “Julia Gillard has arrived! This is what leadership looks like, amigos! Our first female Prime Minister has done us proud!
Since taking office, Gillard has been careful and deliberate not to cry sexism. By doing this, her opponents have been able to get away with some appalling behaviour. But yesterday, after Tony Abbott’s gob-smacking and highly provocative use of the Alan-Jones phrase “died of shame”, she let rip.
I watched the full 15 minute speech twice yesterday, and again first thing this morning. I woke up with a smile on my face.
But when I read the news, I felt like I’d seen an entirely different Question Time yesterday.
Either Peter Hartcher’s television is broken, or he dozed off and missed the part where our Prime Minister BROUGHT IT.
Hartcher wrote in his Sydney Morning Herald column this morning: “If Gillard won’t defend respect for women, what will she defend? Just another politician indeed.”
And this: “Gillard’s judgment was flawed. All she achieved was a serious loss of credibility.”
WHAT NOW? Defending respect for women is exactly what she did yesterday – with a fiery eloquence I’ve never seen from her before. Her judgment, like any other politician, is often flawed. But not this time. This time, she made a courageous choice to be honest and to be publicly angry, and I will not have any columnist take that away from her. Or from me.
Peter Hartcher says we should have expected more from Gillard. To be honest, I expected less. I haven’t been proud of the Labor party like this in so long. I didn’t see this glorious political smackdown coming at all. Neither did Abbott – just watch his face.
My favourite feminist blog Jezebel called Julia Gillard a “motherfucking badass” and celebrated her speech. Feminist Caitlin Moran tweeted in support.
Buzzfeed have even created this brilliant list of GIFs with the best bits of Gillar’d speech that’s current going viral.
And The New Yorker has also praised her, claiming that Barack Obama could learn a thing or two from Julia Gillard.
The Feminist Ladies and Gentlemen of Twitter have united in praise for our PM.
Many are saying this speech will be an iconic one in the history of Australian politics and international feminism.
So why are so many of our local mainstream journalists denying the significance of yesterday’s events? Why have so many of them missed the reason why so many people were impressed?
Yes, PM Gillard’s speech began as an argument against Tony Abbott’s motion to expel Peter Slipper from his position as Speaker. But it turned out to be so much more than that. Anyone who characterizes yesterday’s speech as a defense of Peter Slipper is pitifully mistaken.
It was an erudite, honest speech on the sexism that has repeatedly been levelled against her by her opponents, led by Tony Abbott, with language including “ditch the bitch” and “make an honest woman of her”. To miss that is to completely miss the point.
The Prime Minister’s speech had about as much to do with Peter Slipper as a superb double-twist-summersault dive does a diving board. The Slipper case was nothing but a catalyst for a more important debate. It was, frankly, long overdue.
Yet almost instantaneously, Gillard’s behaviour in parliament was described as “aggressive.”
I prefer words like strong, fiery, resolute, honest, brave, and wonderful.
Dennis Shanahan from The Australian called it “a ferocious personal attack.”
I prefer “triple-awesome political smackdown.”
Deputy Opposition Leader Julie Bishop said PM Julia Gillard has “let the women of Australia down.”
I think not. I think she’s given us hope, and for that I am so thankful.
Columnists and politicians have warned the Prime Minister that she will rue the day she took Tony Abbott to task.
I, for one, hope she will be eternally proud. I will always, always, remember the day she stood up and spoke out about the incorrigible trend of sexism towards her. And I will be breaking into my Feminist Victory Dance for days, if not weeks, to come.








Comments
538 Comments so far
Great post. I am shocked that that media are not covering Abbott’s use of the phrase “died of shame” used against Gillard yesterday.
I thought it was a massive own-goal and even he looked a bit mortified by it. Madness.
loading...
Hi Mia,
In Queensland they did – particularly on the ABC, it was noted that it was a poor choice of phrase and one that he would be, and should be highly embarrassed about. But they did seem to suggest that was the only thing he would or should regret from his speech.
I bet that’s the #1 thing he’s kicking himself for today. Was not a great moment for him!
loading...
I agree re the ‘die of shame’ comment. What rock has he been living under to think that was by any stretch acceptable! Mamamia!
loading...
I’m in total agreement Mia, I expected Abbott’s quote to be headlining the news, but instead they reported on QT getting dirty, and said that it was disgraceful. To quote Rove- What the? That was not the QT I saw.
I was heartened this morning when on Mornings a female guest, who was being interrupted and bullied by a (surprise surprise) male shock jockey, put her foot down and said that she had the right to speak and he would listen to her point of view before putting it down. The male co-host (I’m shocking with names!) agreed and likened it to Q&A’s atrocious example of sexism this week.
What a great week for women in Australia- let’s not stand for it anymore! I’m not usually very vocal on feminist matters, but I am proud of my fellow Australian women (and actually many men) this week.
loading...
I totally thought I was missing something with that not getting front page news. I mean, WTF?? After the previous week, how could he get that so wrong?
loading...
it might of had more credibility if she hadn’t then voted to keep in power a man clearly a misogynist in his position. actions speak louder than words and her actions show that political expediency will trump principles everytime. it is not sexist to point out when a woman is doing a bad job. it diminshes real sexism when a woman plays that card when it isn’t true. i find labor’s personal attacks on Abbott appalling.
loading...
It was not parliamentary procedure to sack him. I’m not saying it didn’t help the Labor party, but the PM was following correct procedure. Abbott was making a blatant grab for political points.
‘died of shame’ and actions condoning calling her a bitch and calls to ‘make on honest woman of herself’ are BLATANTLY sexist.
loading...
Really? Defending sexism, she was defending Peter Slipper who has written the most terrible text messages; she was defending someone who is a sexist. She wanted to keep Slipper even though he’s done and said the most terrible things. Actions speak louder than words and Julia’s actions are that of a desperate woman. Let’s remember who raised more than $100,000 for a women’s shelter last year, that’s so sexist, give me a break. I bet Julia has never even heard of the shelter’s name.
Don’t cry sexism! Julia don’t bother speaking on my behalf, you are not someone I aspire to, perhaps your position, but not your character. Tony Abbott or anyone else for that matter can criticise Julia’s performance and it’s not sexism. I’m happy for people to critique my performance in my job, and it’s not sexism! Don’t devalue the word sexism; don’t make it difficult for people to make judgements about her performance, by crying sexism every time. If you hadn’t noticed Tony Abbott says every week, the government should be ashamed, yesterday’s comment was nothing new. I’m glad that yesterday we saw some emotion, but that’s the extent of it. In the past I enjoyed the stories on mamamia, however now it’s so Labor focused I’ve lost interest. I know in the past you’ve shown stories from the Liberal party, however now it’s become so one sided I can’t be bothered. I’ll get my political news somewhere else.
loading...
Oh FFS, can you all please go and watch (or read Hansard for) her response to the Opposition before YET ANOTHER PERSON says that she and Labor were defending Peter Slipper? She wasn’t doing anything of the sort. They all condemned him. Unreservedly. It’s poor clutching at straws attempts at discrediting such a brutally eloquent speech from the PM.
loading...
Regardless of what the PM said, she and the ALP and two independents voted against the Opposition, straight after the PM’s speech, to keep Mr Slipper as Speaker. They voted in support of Slipper to stay on as Speaker.
Actions speak louder than words.
loading...
In other words, Abbott motives were genuine and his new found love of respecting women is a deeply, deeply held belief. All that stuff he said for his career is just a smear campaign.
Soooo… today Abbott called Slipper to beg him to vote the Coalition’s way…
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/in-depth/after-calling-for-him-to-quit-as-speaker-tony-abbott-seeks-peter-slippers-vote/story-fndckad0-1226492602026
How does that action speak to you?
loading...
@ Kris2040 “Oh FFS, can you all please go and watch (or read Hansard for) her response to the Opposition…”
Oh what, you want them all to, wait for it, actually *read* something — oh the effort! — and then do crazy stuff like make an informed conclusion?!
As Mal Turnbull said recently (words to the effect), opinion is cheap. It is far easier to watch a seven second sound grab on the lowbrow TV news broadcasts and go off half cocked with a hypebole laden strawman on teh innerwebz than to actually stop for a whole 15 minutes and listen OR to read and then comment with true insight.
loading...
“Anyone who characterizes yesterday’s speech as a defense of Peter Slipper is pitifully mistaken”.
If not sexist, how would you describe Abbott comments and actions? Or would you prefer to play the Christopher Pyne card, LIE (yup, Liberals lie too) and deny that Abbott ever said any of those nasty things.
BTW I don’t have any political allegiance and I vote on the policies at each election. I am, however, a feminist.
loading...
Amen.
I read Hartcher’s article this morning and wondered whether he’d watched what I’d watched.
The speech I saw was one where Gillard called ‘bullshite’ and pointed out that Abbott’s motivation was more political – doing what he can to erode the slender margin that the ALP has in parliament, over any real concern with Slipper’s comments.
She said nothing that would indicate that she felt that Peter Slipper’s comments were anything other than disgusting and offensive. I can’t remember her saying a single word defending Peter Slipper at all. I don’t think that one can even mine the silence between words for that defence.
And Dennis Shanahan’s comments about her speech being a personal attack – i guess that’s one way of putting it – if by ‘attack’ you mean ‘confronting a person with their own track record – from the public record so as to show that they haven’t a leg to stand on.’
loading...
Shanahan is a personal friend of Abbott’s
loading...
Great article!
loading...
Have you noticed that none of the media is carrying Tony Abbott’s distasteful speech? Under no circumstances did JG defend Peter Slipper. She just said that there is a court case pending judgement and nothing can be done until after.
It should be known that Tony Abbott was Peter Slippers friend for 20 years. Went to his wedding. Approved his pre-selection for his seat. But twisted the knife in Peter’s back.
loading...
I found Tony Abbott’s speech on the ABC website also
loading...
Yes, TA’s mateyness with Slipper was gone over on 7.30 last night. Leigh Sales took Albo to task about the whole Question Time and he acquitted himself well and stood up to scrutiny. It was excellent but kind of surprising to see the line of questioning after such an awesome smackdown of a QT.
loading...
i was really impressed by the parts of her speech which directly called abbott to task for sexism and misogyny, especially as she provided the evidence that abbotts supporters always say is lacking. The catch was, that she was saying slipper should not be stood down for being sexist as that is hypocrisy. Yes, it is hypocritical of abbott to call slipper or anyone, for that matter, sexist, but if gillard wants to appear truly anti sexism, she should accept none. If she felt slippers actions were sexist, she should condemn him too. But with that said, im so happy to see abott called out on his appalling behaviour and was very impressed that she did so, and so thoroughly!
loading...
Here here, Kate. It was a seriously good (and thoroughly deserved) arse whooping for Mr Abbott. Go Julia!
loading...
Well said Kate. I like you was so excited when I watched it and have also watched it in it’s entirety three times through. I made my fiance watch it when he came home and we talked together about what a huge ‘game changer’ moment it was…he likes to use sports analogies wherever possible!
I have since been dismayed at the SMH coverage though. I feel like the media watched an entirely different speech to the brilliant one I saw yesterday.
loading...
Maybe the paper has their money on the liberals in the next race, and so it’s editorials will defend them no matter what, all the while missing the point and accuracy of the speech … It’s not the first time the papers or punters have been wrong. We all know how cosy politicians and press get, to further inflate their own ego’s and positions with absolutelly no respect for the australian population … the people who give them their punting money.
loading...