Do You Like This Story?
tony abbott Tony Abbott: I have never opposed IVF.

Tony Abbott

 

 
By TONY ABBOTT

Just before the caretaker period began on the eve of the 2004 election, I established a new Medicare item for the management of pregnancy.

Obstetricians’ fees would largely be covered by the safety net and mothers-to-be would be vastly less out of pocket for having a baby.

Although this move was made in consultation with the prime minister’s office, it led to one of my few serious disagreements with John Howard, who thought it would be a burden on the health budget.

In the run-up to the 2005 budget, more concerned than ever to rein in Medicare costs, the government proposed to increase safety net thresholds and to limit older women’s access to IVF. It’s a matter of record that I considered resignation over the safety net decision. Perhaps not going ahead with the IVF restrictions was my colleagues’ way of atoning for a decision I deplored.

My attempt to excuse the then-government’s misguided intention, once it had been leaked, has given rise to the persistent myth that I’m against IVF. In fact, during my time as health minister, the number of women accessing IVF and Medicare support for IVF rapidly increased.

I have never opposed IVF. How could any pro-family politician not encourage people to have children and make it easier for them to do so?

A minister’s job is to implement the policy of the government and to administer departmental programs. It is not to make moral decisions for people. Governments should do what’s best based on expert advice and keep prudent control over expenditure, as taxpayer dollars are not inexhaustible, but otherwise leave people to decide what’s right for them. Contrary to myth, as health minister I never sought to restrict access to the morning-after pill, never sought to prevent the importation of RU486 and never sought to limit access to abortion.

Peta Credlin 380x214 Tony Abbott: I have never opposed IVF.

Peta Credlin, Tony Abbott’s chief of staff

Australia is a pluralist democracy. It always has been and it always should be. The values that political parties and governments should uphold in a country like ours are those that can be justified on the basis of human reason and are potentially accessible to everyone.

After the 2010 federal election, my chief of staff told me she was going to start a family and needed to use IVF. I felt honoured that she had chosen to tell me and to ask for support.

I had some inkling of what IVF involved but hadn’t really grasped the multitude of appointments, tests and, above all, injections: big needles, small needles, this drug, that drug. Then there was the roller coaster of raised and dashed hopes, month after month. Peta Credlin managed this while maintaining her decision-making, priority-juggling and tension-massaging role that’s been a critical part of the Coalition’s success.

There are many types of bravery, including the courage that’s found close to home. It’s brave to persist with IVF. To do so while shouldering the burdens of a difficult job is extraordinary yet there are thousands of women in this position. They deserve our admiration and support.

This article was originally published here and has been republished with permission.

Tony Abbott is the Leader of the Opposition and the Federal Member for Warringah.

Comments

Comment Guidelines : Imagine you’re at a dinner party. Different opinions are welcome but keep it respectful or the host will show you the door. We have zero tolerance for any abuse of our writers, our editorial team or other commenters. So if you’re rude, mean-spirited, snarky, aggressive, defamatory or bitchy, your comment will be deleted (so will any replies to the original comment – so don’t bother arguing with rude people, instead just hit the ‘alert moderator’ button).
And if you’re offensive, you’ll be blacklisted and all your comments will go directly to spam. Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That’s how we’re going to be – cool. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation…

Use your profile to comment: Or, comment as a guest:
(Max file size is 150kb & jpeg's only - if you need help resizing go here »)

56 Comments so far

  1. Barbara Dean

    I am amazed at how Tony Abbott has been treated re Abortion, RU486 and IVF.

    RE: ABORTION
    Abortion is a State Law not a Federal Law and varies from State to State. I wonder how many young women realise this.

    RE: RU486
    On 9 February 2006 the Senate debated as to whether to leave the power re RU486 in the hands of the Health Minister, or transfer the decision making to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). This Bill was called the THERAPEUTIC GOODS AMENDMENT (REPEAL OF MINISTERIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR APPROVAL OF RU486) BILL 2005.

    In Feb 2006, there were many speeches from Senators and Members. Senator Nick Sherry said in his speech to the Senate “…………to some extent this issue has turned into a de facto debate on abortion and the parameters on which abortion should be allowed in Australia.”

    There was a conscience vote on 9 Feb 2006 in the Senate 45 in Favour and 28 Against handing over the to the TGA. Senator Stephen Conroy voted against. On 16 Feb In the House of Reps the vote was 95 in Favour 50 against. Tony Abbott voted against handing over to the TGA as did many ALP Members.

    The TGA didn’t okay RU486 until August 2012 when it was put on the Therapeutic Goods Administration’s register. I believe they wanted to make sure it was safe as they didn’t want a repeat of the THALIDOMIDE problem of the 1960′s. I was against RU486 to start with, as I came very very close to taking two Distavil tablets (which contained Thalidomide) while pregnant in 1961. How lucky was I, and also my daughter who is now a healthy 50 year-old. Check out all those around 50 year of age who have deformed and missing limbs. See, back then we blindly believed doctors, the government and pharmaceutical companies, when they told us the tablet was SAFE.

    RE: IVF.
    Well, Tony Abbott isn’t on his own there, that has been a continuous learning curve for many of us, as we learn more about what happens. There is an interesting article in The Australian http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/ivf-is-not-a-treatment-but-provision-of-a-commodity/story-fn562txd-1226249710890

    it is headed “IVF is not a treatment but provision of a commodity” written by Angela Shanahan in The Australian 21 January 2012. Makes for interesting reading.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  2. Felix

    Of course, Tony supports anything that involves women having more babies. While no one actually has any objection to women having babies or IVF if they want to, do we need to know about an individuals personal struggle to conceive?

    What Tony fails to understand is that there are other women who may not be interested in babies at all or who may actually be interested in other things in life as well.

    He focuses SO MUCH on babies and motherhood (singing the praises of having children just like a person who almost became a Catholic priest would be expected to do) I really wonder whether it’s quite that necessary for a politician to be quite as big a spokesperson on that particular subject as he is.

    Why else would Tony have thought that “Australian women were having too many abortions” (at the rate of 100,000 per year) and that “this was a legacy of unutterable shame”. Given the number of women in the country of childbearing age, how many times a year they may have sex and the number of unintended pregnancies that result, how many abortions do you think is a reasonable number, Tony? You say they should be “rare” so is it that you think only 5 should be performed each year? If so, which of the 100,000 women that decide to terminate an unintended pregnancy each year would you give that permission to? Or is it you just want them pummelled with guilt trips over their decision first before they are permitted to proceed with the hope they change their minds.

    Tony these women are adults and don’t need you to interfere in nor guide them in their decision making on personal matters such as this. It’s a “personal decision” that a woman makes in consultation with her doctor, it is not a decision that needs the interference of nor views of a politician (including Catholic politiicans like youself and Pyne) to guide.

    I think your adverse reaction to RU486 being legalised is well on the record and you didn’t get the nickname of “The Mad Monk” for no reason nor attract slogans such as “keep your rosaries off my ovaries”.

    Why did you remove all the Liberal Party front benchers that voted for RU486 to your backbench when you became Opposition Leader and all your anti-abortion mates to the front bench.

    You are just a tad transparent on this one Tony and frankly I think an Image Makeover is too little too late.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • susan

      Transparent?

      I think Abbott could turn the streets into gold and you’d still blast him. The mad monk and the budgie smuggler thing is really just so boring now.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Barbara

      I am amazed at how Tony Abbott has been treated re Abortion, RU486 and IVF.

      RE: ABORTION
      Abortion is a State Law not a Federal Law and varies from State to State. I wonder how many young women realise this.

      RE: RU486
      On 9 February 2006 the Senate debated as to whether to leave the power re RU486 in the hands of the Health Minister, or transfer the decision making to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). This Bill was called the THERAPEUTIC GOODS AMENDMENT (REPEAL OF MINISTERIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR APPROVAL OF RU486) BILL 2005.

      In Feb 2006, there were many speeches from Senators and Members. Senator Nick Sherry said in his speech to the Senate “…………to some extent this issue has turned into a de facto debate on abortion and the parameters on which abortion should be allowed in Australia.”

      There was a conscience vote on 9 Feb 2006 in the Senate 45 in Favour and 28 Against handing over the to the TGA. Senator Stephen Conroy voted against. On 16 Feb In the House of Reps the vote was 95 in Favour 50 against. Tony Abbott voted against handing over to the TGA as did many ALP Members.

      The TGA didn’t okay RU486 until August 2012 when it was put on the Therapeutic Goods Administration’s register. I believe they wanted to make sure it was safe as they didn’t want a repeat of the THALIDOMIDE problem of the 1960′s. I was against RU486 to start with, as I came very very close to taking two Distavil tablets (which contained Thalidomide) while pregnant in 1961. How lucky was I, and also my daughter who is now a healthy 50 year-old. Check out all those around 50 year of age who have deformed and missing limbs. See, back then we blindly believed doctors, the government and pharmaceutical companies, when they told us the tablet was SAFE.

      RE: IVF.
      Well, Tony Abbott isn’t on his own there, that has been a continuous learning curve for many of us, as we learn more about what happens. There is an interesting article in The Australian http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/ivf-is-not-a-treatment-but-provision-of-a-commodity/story-fn562txd-1226249710890

      it is headed “IVF is not a treatment but provision of a commodity” written by Angela Shanahan in The Australian 21 January 2012. Makes for interesting reading.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  3. O's Mum

    Why is Tony Abbott not allowed to have a personal view?
    His personal view cannot and will not change legislation, so what is he demonised because he actually has a religious belief and faith?
    I actually think his view is quite balanced regarding abortion – it should be safe, legal and rare.
    Rare because as anyone who’s ever made that decision would know, it can have a devastating emotional impact.
    Julia Gillard has plenty of personal opinions and personality traits that may offend large segments of the electorate, but she’s not constantly grilled on her beliefs – or lack thereof.
    Mr Abbott cannot and will not change the status of the law as it applies to abortion and this relentless attack on him being anti-woman is just a pack of rubbish and a convenient way to attempt to side track the electorate from the real disgrace going on in this country – the appalling performance of the current government and mind boggling lack of judgement on the part of the PM.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      I don’t have an issue with him having a personal view, I do have an issue with him trying to push it on us.

      Leave it alone tones

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • O's Mum

        I find that odd – the thought that TA’s pro IVF policy is being ‘pushed’ on you Anonymous.
        Geez – the man is damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t on MM.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Meghan B.

          O’s Mum, it’s not a “personal view” when he is Health Minister and using his personal view to determine whether our country will have access to a form of contraception. It’s not a “personal view” when just a few years later, he tries to lie to women about how he voted on his ability as Health Minister to restrict access to RU486.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
    • valentina

      I couldn’t agree more O’s Mum. He has personal opinions instead of going with whatever the pollsters tell him is popular at the time. I call that personal integrity actually.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Felix

      O’s Mum, why do you think abortion “can have a devastating effect”. I’ve know women of various ages who have spoken openly about their experiences and none claimed it “devastated” them to have one. In fact most were relieved. Having children is not a trivial decision and for those who have unintended pregnancies and don’t wish to proceed with the pregnancy it, it is not something that haunts them whatsoever. In fact it would be “rare” for a woman to be devastated by her own decision which is most likely to have been well thought through.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • susan

        Statistics do say otherwise Felix. Look them up sometime.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  4. rebecca

    I’m actually getting a bit sick of hearing how ‘pro-women’ Tony Abbot is. I really couldn’t care, I just want to know policies. I’m sure over the years there have been plenty of sexist Labor polis or polis with whom I wouldn’t have agreed with their personal views on a range of topics. I’m not sure if this latest IVF support article is in response to Labor spin doctors or a preemptive strike but I didn’t think he was against IVF, and really couldn’t care. I wish both parties and the media would stop making governing our country about an individuals personality. I want policies!!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  5. Anonymous

    Totes sorry Tony but I’m just not buying it. I can’t get past the comments you’ve made in the past re women and women’s issues.
    Also the whole Catholic thing doesn’t work for me. It’s too out there for you buddy and I worry about your religion influencing your decisions about the running of the country.
    I hold out hope that PM Gillard will come to the party on gay marriage but I know you never will soooo…she gets my vote.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Nerryl

      How dare this man have a personal opinion! Much better to poll it and then come out and agree with the polls!

      Have we come to this – man versus woman as being an issue? I would have thought it more about real issues not beat ups. Why is abortion an issue? Why is IVF? These issues have not been issues for 30 years!

      I wonder if Tony Abbott would try to take cataract surgery off the medicare list like the incumbent government tried to do (they forgot to poll it first and hence the backflip), which could have resulted in older people (women too for those of you who think we should be a homogeneous society) going blind?

      Frankly I am ashamed of our first woman PM. She is so divisive that I cannot stand it anymore. I have gone from joy to stark horror, this government panders to mediocre thinkers and in doing so has set women in politics back 10 years.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  6. Bon

    I never thought that Tony Abott was against IVF, so I’m afraid that this article doesn’t change my views of him one bit. I still would never vote for the Liberal party while he leads it. If Malcolm Turnball came back as leader, it would be a different story.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  7. Guest

    Actually, I feel completely comfortable with someone who personally is against abortion, IVF and the morning after pill. I think it is really important to have people who speak up for the values they believe in. And I think they are good values. If there were more men that had these values, and a true respect of the worth of women, then I think we would have far fewer women being put into distressing situations. There are many older men out there who, through life experience have gained wisdom and understanding about how wonderful and precious women are and realise that this should be appreciated and they should be protected. Certainly having daughters has taught many men the real lessons of life. Just as many mums have developed a deeper understanding and appreciation of others and the need to protect those around us through raising our own children.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  8. A Friend

    With all due respect, Mr. Abbott needs to make a decision: whether he’s Catholic or not. The Catholic Church does not support IVF or Abortion. To find out about what the Catholic Church REALLY teaches, check out this site. http://www.catholicscomehome.org/moral-issues/

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Jenny

      I’m catholic & I’m pro choice & very supportive of ivf. Unfortunately there are ALOT of Catholics like myself who feel the church has not kept up with the modern world and changing times. Those of us who feel this way are still catholics still believe in its fundamentals ie the commandments, faith all of that jazz. We are ashamed of sum of the actions of our church but like a government it’s run by man and man is not perfect and will not always get it right. As a catholic & the respect to no know not everyone is catholic and things like this should not be based on one religion I don’t think wether he is catholic or not makes a difference at all.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  9. A Friend

    With all due respect, Mr. Abbott needs to make a decision: whether he’s a Catholic or not. Catholic teaching does not support IVF or Abortion.

    Check out this site to find out more about what the Catholic Church REALLY teaches on these issues. http://www.catholicscomehome.org/moral-issues/

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  10. guest

    What no one who has painted this as a biased view by his chief of staff has pointed out; is that had Peta been successful in starting a family, he would have been without his most senior staff member going into the most important election of his career. Not something either person would have done if “win at all costs” was their main concern.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  11. ash

    I should point out that I’m a sit on the fence uncommitted voter right now, but this whole campaign feels too contrived for me. Sorry Tony, I’m still not seeing you as a genuine, trustworthy Liberal party leader yet; and I’m still struggling to trust you with women’s issues like abortion. The liberal party still has a chance to get my vote, but this is not what’s going to swing me.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  12. SuzMac

    The only piece of writing one needs to read re Tony Abbott & “women’s issues” is from his own website, where he clearly states Abortion is the easy way out: http://www.tonyabbott.com.au/LatestNews/ArticleswrittenbyTony/tabid/87/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/3653/RATE-OF-ABORTION-HIGHLIGHTS-OUR-MORAL-FAILINGS.aspx

    This collection of quotes sums it all up nicely: http://www.abbottisms.com/quote/1

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  13. neola

    As someone who works in marketing, I’m just wondering what kind of message the photographer and spin doctors were trying to project when they set up that spooky photo of Peta Credlin?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Zepgirl

      I asked myself the same thing. I’m in no way passing comment on the woman herself, but that photo is kinda creepy.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Bella

      I think you will find that the photo here is a file image used from a interview with Ms Credlin from 2009

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  14. ReadingAround

    Further recommended reading:
    Anne Summers has written an excellent piece about the Peta Credlin interview over at The Drum today.
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/thedrum/anne-summers/3319798
    It addresses much of the spin (and falsehoods!) in this piece by Mr Abbott, and also addresses the vitriolic and unfair responses to the article that have been directed at Ms Credlin.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  15. Crackerpants

    Very timely for me, just finished reading this over at The Punch –

    http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/abbotts-women-problem-is-with-what-they-think-of-him/?from=scroller&pos=2&referrer=home&link=text

    “And people wonder why a large chunk of the Mamamia crowd think the guy is a dangerously retrograde pro-lifer.

    Tony Abbott might not have a problem with women, but clearly a lot of women have a problem with Tony Abbott.”

    Make of it what you will. Unfortunately we all have our biases, and some of us have more difficulty in overcoming these than others.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • jamilarizvi

      I’ve heard of this Mamamia crowd. They sound delightful… :D

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • r

        Jamila, are you going to cover the ashby affair??

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • O's Mum

        Hi Jamila
        Are you going to cover the latest Slipper scandal?
        Back to court for him in February with 3 more corruption charges.
        Such amazing judgement again by the PM… :-)

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Tink

          About as amazing as the Liberal Party’s judgement to let him be a part of their party…

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
        • Meghan B.

          He was a representative of the National Party for three years, a representative of the Liberal Party for 18 years and the Liberal Party’s choice for Deputy Speaker for one year before he was an Independent Speaker for eleven months, O’s Mum. You have a very selective memory.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
  16. lol

    was anyone else kind of repulsed with the use of Peta Credlin to prove his ‘I’m so nice and understanding’ point? Isn’t it possible to sympathise/ empathise and support all the couples out there undertaking IVF without going:

    1) here’s an example.
    2) I understand “big needles, small needles, this drug, that drug” are involved.
    3) therefore I’m awesome.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  17. Sharon @ funkenwagnel

    Oh, look at that! He knows someone who had IVF! He can’t be all that bad.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  18. Anonymous

    What is that saying about he who doth protest too much?

    If I was an Abbott advisor I would suggest he stop trying to make people believe he doesn’t hold conservative views on women’s health issues. He does, he always will. There are enough people who will support him with those. You will never get my support abbott. Not if you say you support abortion, not if you let someone store medication in your fridge (I would not have mentioned that, that is basic human kindness, not any sort of amazing gesture).

    Seriously work on those people who will support you no matter what. There are big percentage of the population who you will never win over. Give up trying. It is starting to get embarrassing….

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      Does that saying extend to ‘SHE who doth protest too much’, about misogyny and sexism, every day in every way no less. Those in glass houses.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Anon3

        Hey now, the original Anonymous didn’t say they were pro Gillard either. This isn’t an article about Gillard v Abbott, no one is saying either one is better – if anything, it’s more about the Liberal leadership.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  19. Tink

    An interesting read however one point Mr Abbott made that struck me was the following: a Minister’s job is “not to make moral decisions for people. Governments should do what’s best based on expert advice and keep prudent control over expenditure, as taxpayer dollars are not inexhaustible, but otherwise leave people to decide what’s right for them.”

    So how is gay marriage any different to the above?? If IVF and abortion and the morning-after pill are all ok, because they are personal decisions, then surely Mr Abbott should then also support gay marriage?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • becharristar

      I don’t hear our PM supporting it either …..so who is worse?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Tink

        Why does it have to be a choice? Tony Abbott was the one who said it, not Julia Gillard…stay on point my friend, this article is about his opinion and position and I am questioning it.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  20. Aussiedoc

    To be fair – restricting access to IVF to women over 42 is not a bad decision. Most clinics won’t do it anyway as chances of success are much less than 5%.

    But Tony – I was in the medical profession when RU486 occurred. You ARE LYING. It’s ON RECORD.

    I’m pleased that you want to return to the days of backyard abortionists – but you won’t be the one cleaning up the mess – I and my colleagues will be. Until contraception is 100% effective – termination must be safe and legal.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Dasha

      Freely use of RU486 is equivalent to backyard abortion.

      You take the pill and you abort the fetus at home. There were cases of maternal death reported overseas.

      Ideology-driven feminism has no real regard for women’s health and safety.

      I agree with Mr Abbott that abortion should be safe, legal and rare.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Bored of Burwood

        “Freely use of RU486 is equivalent to backyard abortion. ”

        Is it really????

        Dearie me. I think your bias is showing. Either that or you have significant gaps in your knowledge.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • Aussiedoc

        Actually it’s prescribed by doctors not unlike myself and monitored closely with strict protocols and timely follow up in clinics.

        But you go on and educate me more about “idealogy driven feminism” as opposed to “actual medical facts”. I’m listening.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  21. Bradley

    The article was an interesting read. Now I’m waiting for the Abbott bashing to start….just because you know that it will.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • For crying out loud

      Nice one Bradley – love the way you just prematurely dismissed anyone who dislikes Tony Abbott or writes anything to the contrary or dares to disagree with you / him. So passive aggressive of you, and yet so blatant. :D

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • funsize

        I don’t think he dismissed anyone, just merely stating that the Abbott bashing will start and we all know it will.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Dav Normal

          Is he still opposition leader? The libs need a new chief strategist :-)

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
    • umm

      Bradley, people are allowed to dislike Abbott and to disagree with what he says and to think a lot of it is nonsense. Others are allowed to feel the complete opposite. That’s the beauty of a democracy.

      Sometimes it’s not ‘Abbott bashing’ for the sake of it. Belittling those of us who think this is media contrived bullshit is unnecessary.

      Every news site has a target audience. If the comments here which may invariably support Gilliard annoy you so much then don’t come to this forum. It’s not that I don’t think your arguments or comments aren’t hilarious/ valid in other posts, but there is NOTHING wrong with us commenting negatively on Abbot if believe it is a valid point.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  22. redqueen

    “Contrary to myth, as health minister I never sought to restrict access to the morning-after pill, never sought to prevent the importation of RU486 and never sought to limit access to abortion.”

    Liar, liar, pants on fire!

    I still won’t vote for you Tony.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Bradley

      So ? Which liar will get your vote, then ?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Anonymous

        Neither – Turnbull will get my vote! So… ha!

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • redqueen

        Not one of them, I’d rather cop a fine.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  23. Meghan B.

    Mr Abbott, this is actually a nonsense. “as health minister I never sought to restrict access to the morning-after pill, never sought to prevent the importation of RU486″ – you voted against the Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of RU486) Bill. How much more black and white can prevention of importation of RU486 get than a vote recorded in Hansard? Your vote is recorded here, Mr Abbott: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s494 and there is an article explaining the impact that had on your ability to override the importation of RU486 here: http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/mps-strip-abbott-of-ru486-veto/2006/02/16/1140037811387.html. But I suspect you haven’t forgotten the way you voted on RU486 – you’re just lying to the women of Australia when you say you never sought to prevent the importation of RU486.

    And please, please stop dragging out your poor advisors and female Shadow Ministers every time you have a problem with women voters. If you really supported Peta Credlin maintaining her privacy over this very sensitive and personal information, you never would have accepted her going to the press with it. I found the article in the Herald Sun yesterday very uncomfortable and I find you continuing to talk about it now on Mamamia, even moreso. Your Chief of Staff’s private life is not a public relations exercise.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Rebecca

      Not everyone who goes through IVF has a problem talking bout it openly. I have a couple of friends who are more than happy talking about it.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...