Do You Like This Story?
Screen shot 2012 08 13 at 2.10.25 PM Cheat sheet: why everyone is talking about asylum seekers.

Asylum seeker boat on its way to Australia.

As our politicians return to Canberra for the next session of Parliament, at the top of everyone’s mind is the asylum seeker issue. The last parliamentary sitting week basically left Australia at an impasse – with neither side of politics being willing to negotiate a solution that would deter asylum seekers from making the dangerous journey to Australia by boat.

How did we end up at this political roadblock?

There was passionate debate on the floor of the Parliament, that made absolutely clear that all sides of politics are anxious to see a system that will prevent more deaths at sea.

But with the Coalition determined to maintain the political advantage they have with the electorate in this policy area and the Government desperate to claw back some ground – the political deadlock was never going to be broken.

Unable to legislate as it wished to, the Government established an expert panel, who have spent the last 6 weeks coming up with 22 key recommendations which – taken together – are intended to address Australia’s asylum seeker challenges.

What is the Expert Panel on Asylum Seekers and why does it matter?

The panel was chaired by former Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston, who is respected on both sides as a hard-working, intelligent and fair minded man.

Screen shot 2012 08 13 at 2.09.46 PM Cheat sheet: why everyone is talking about asylum seekers.

Former Air Chief Marshall, Angus Houston

The panel’s report was released today and Air Chief Marshal Houston described their approach as “hard-headed but not hard-hearted. realistic not idealistic,” and “driven by a sense of humanity as well as fairness.”

What does the report say?

In their report, the panel has set out to do is to re-balance the incentives that currently exist, that are driving desperate people to make the dangerous journey to Australia, in order to achieve an orderly and better managed system.

The panel’s recommendations are guided by a principle of ‘no advantage’, that is, an asylum seekers’ chances of being resettled in Australia as a refugee should not be improved because of they have arrived by unauthorized boat.

The key recommendations are:

1. That Australia’s humanitarian program be immediately increased to 20,000 people each year, with 12,000 places allocated exclusively to refugees (which is double the current refugee intake). Australia should also commit to increasing its overall humanitarian intake to 27,000 per year by 2017.

2. That a regional cooperation framework be established, which would see Australia working more closely with other countries throughout South East Asia to address the asylum seeker issue in a more integrated way. In particular, Australia should seek too immediately improve our cooperation with Indonesia in regards to law enforcement and surveillance.

3. That the Government should introduce legislation to allow for offshore regional processing to be reintroduced as a matter of urgency. This would see countries like Nauru and Papua New Guinea (both signatories to the Refugee Convention) re-emerge as options for the processing of asylum seekers.

4. There would be no different status at law for those who arrive in Australia’s excised territories (for example, Christmas Island) to those who arrive on the Australian mainland.

5. That right to sponsor family members to come to Australia for refugees who arrive here by unauthorized boats would be restricted. This was a key element of the temporary protection visa scheme that existed under the Howard Government.

What happens next?

While the panel’s recommendations fall closer to existing Coalition policy than it does to Labor’s, the Government has accepted all 22 of the report’s recommendations. With broad support from the Coalition for the report as well, it appears that there will be fast action in the Parliament to begin legislating for a new policy position.

The Greens are concerned by many of the recommendations made in the report – calling it a return to the Howard era approach to immigration – but have confirmed they will maintain their support for the Labor Government.

We will keep you updated through the day.

You can read the recommendations in full here.

And here is are some of the questions and concerns of the Twitter world in response to the release of the report:

Screen shot 2012 08 13 at 2.19.42 PM Cheat sheet: why everyone is talking about asylum seekers.

Screen shot 2012 08 13 at 2.21.57 PM Cheat sheet: why everyone is talking about asylum seekers.Screen shot 2012 08 13 at 2.22.18 PM Cheat sheet: why everyone is talking about asylum seekers.

 

 

 

 

 

Do you think this report will break the political roadblock on this issue?

View more posts on:

Comments

Comment Guidelines : Imagine you’re at a dinner party. Different opinions are welcome but keep it respectful or the host will show you the door. We have zero tolerance for any abuse of our writers, our editorial team or other commenters. So if you’re rude, mean-spirited, snarky, aggressive, defamatory or bitchy, your comment will be deleted (so will any replies to the original comment – so don’t bother arguing with rude people, instead just hit the ‘alert moderator’ button).
And if you’re offensive, you’ll be blacklisted and all your comments will go directly to spam. Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That’s how we’re going to be – cool. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation…

Use your profile to comment: Or, comment as a guest:
(Max file size is 150kb & jpeg's only - if you need help resizing go here »)

49 Comments so far

  1. Anonymous

    Surely Indonesia must play a larger part. Refugee seekers are legally arriving in Indonesia with passports on visitor visas and then getting on boats. People smuggling is a multi-million dollar industry. More intelligence needs to be put into finding out who is profiting and organising the boats on the Indonesain end. The Indonesian government must be more pro-active. Perhaps government officials in Indonesia are taking kick-backs and are therefore reluctant to do anything.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      The Indonesians don’t care about the boat people. They are happy that the asylum seekers are leaving their country! I’m sure they are getting paid a lot in bribes!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  2. jo4peace

    there is so much said and so much opinion…all normal…but I have to say this..all we have to do is place ourselves and our kids in the same situation as those who seek asylum…what would you do? I’m a bit tired of the ( not so well) veiled redneck, rascist feel that underpins so much ‘debate’ and discussion. Actually….? I have had a gut full….I’m going to maintain my little hippie mind until I die…where is the love? I’m not seeing it….and thankyou Malcolm Fraser ( even though I wasn’t keen back in the day) for saying it how it is..x

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  3. Siobhan

    There is no easy answer to this, we are talking about humans, real people, and I think this gets forgotten in the policial points scoring and debate.
    The argument I hear so often is that these people are “queue jumpers”. From what I understand, there is no “queue”, no effective system for people claiming asyulm. Instead, they feel so desperate they would prefer to jump on a rickety boat and make the perilous journey to our shores. They are desperate, and feel there is no other way.
    Instead, why don’t we, in conjunction with other nations, create a system of processing. Create a system where they have hope for asylum in another country, and are discouraged from making such a dangerous journey. Its not perfect, I know, but neither are any of the other options.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  4. Caz Gibson

    I don’t give a rats about which solution was best and who suggested it…..
    Now is what’s important, and the fact that more lives could be lost with every day Australia delays proper action.
    This is a worldwide problem and it’s naive to think that Australia can effectively “stop the boats”.
    Lets hope that none of us become Asylum Seekers in our future – and if we do, just hope that our neighbours are kinder to us than some Australians have been recently to people in such extreme need.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  5. selwyn

    The public gushing of tears for vulnerable refugees,from both side of parilament, prior to the winter recess was in my mind nauseatingly gratuitous; predicated on political point scoring rather than seeking a genuine larger picture solution. It was a good look to enunciate outrage at the loss of life and the exploitation of defenseless people of no fixed abode.
    These are real people with real feeings being kicked from pillar to post in a vote grabbing game of polictical football. There seems to have been pandering to the lowest common denominator as opposed to seriously addressing the extreme needs of desperate people from various countries. Yes I am sure that it would not have been near the issue if these people had been escaping a potato famine.
    The proposal from the Governmnt appointed panel appears, on the surface anyway, to have some promise for the people with the need. Many of the proposals would seem to be long term and with a view to be a part of an integrated regional framework. This would be a step forward as this implies a proactive approach rather that the current reactive bandaid responses. There would appear to be included an integrated medical support framework as well cover not just the physical but also the psychological well being.
    Australian territory will be Australian territory without strategic areas be excised for the purposes of pedantic polictical expediency. If refugees needs are addressed prior to them making the perilous journey then the definition of Australian territory is irrelevant.
    There are some very big assumptions in this proposal if it is to go some way towards improving the holistic plight of refugees but at least there has been some form of political bipartisianship initially. After all it is people’s lives at the end of it. Ultimately though a start has to be made rather than more competing rhetoric
    It will be interesting to see where this proposal goes to from here and what actually happens on the ground for the people involved. I have my fingers crossed – if only I wasn’t hearing more political point scoring continuing to flood the airwaves.Lets rise to the need of others. There are nearly 50 million displaced persons world wide so the very few who are heading to Australia constitute a very small percentage.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  6. KAteateight

    The thing that really gets my goat in these discussions is the heartlessness. The things people think and say, I can’t believe it!

    Could any of you people saying these heartless things, look into the eyes of these people, and tell them – stay in your country, fight your own wars, don’t come here and take our benefits?

    It’s as if you think they aren’t real people.

    Some people want the best for their families! Some people want them to be safe and happy! What is wrong with you people?!

    Also – I personally think a lot of these comments come from a place of typical prejudice. If these people were arriving from the UK, Ireland, Scotland, Canada, the US, NZ – I’m sure the comments would be a lot different. You would probably be more likely to see them like you, like ‘people’.

    These are people you morons! Actual people JUST LIKE YOU.

    And you are heartless, heartless people.

    (The big laugh is that most of you will never, even meet an asylum seeker or be impacted by them in any way)

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • J.K

      I know they are people just like us. That is why we have to stop the boats.
      The Greens claim they won’t be a party to any policy that is cruel.Part of being an adult is to know when you have to be cruel to be kind,especially when it endangers hundreds of lives.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Kateateight

        Of course – I’m just talking about the things people say (in real life, on forums, in the news, wherever), which are so dehumanizing and selfish.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • Chris

        Except that stopping the boats doesn’t necessarily make them safer. They just die or suffer in camps out of our sight. With the exception of increasing the refugee quota, this policy is primarily about making us feel better, not actually helping the refugees.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • J.K

          With the doubling of our intake from these camps, hopefully we can make many families stays shorter. My cousin is married to a lovely young guy whose family lived in one for 11 years,so I know they are not ideal places for families to live but they may get here quicker.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
  7. Lulu

    Spending some money on application processing in Indonesia would cut down the number of people who feel the need to get on boats.

    But that would be too logical.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  8. Lil

    Thanks for this I have missed news and cheat sheets.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  9. bec

    can someone explain point 5 to me please….

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Jen

      At the moment, once one person is approved as a refugee they can apply to bring other family members ie. wife and children. This is one reason why there are so many men on the boats – the father takes the dangerous trip and applies to bring the others later. It looks like they are recommending that this cease for people who come by boats which should work as a disincentive – as the family will never be reunited. Although there is some concern that it may put more women and children on boats in the future which is what the tweet by Jenny Brockie is alluding to above.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • jamilarizvi

        Hi Bec – I was about to respond to your question but Jen has said it far more articulately than I could! Sorry if we were a little unclear.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  10. Valentina

    Sensible findings. Basically back to the Coalitions Pacific Solution, with a few years, a lot of money, and many lives squandered playing politics in between.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      There is a key difference. The coalitions pacific solution never included an increase in overall refugee/asylum seekers taken!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Meow

        No, but I believe the Lberal Party were the ones who suggested the increase during the last week of parliament 6 weeks ago under the “Morrison Amendment” to Rob Oakshot’s bill that Labor wouldnt support.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  11. amandarose

    It is in everyone’s best interest to follow the policy- Their is no right solution but discouraging dangerous boat arrivals can only be a good thing especially if the legal entry numbers are greatly increased.

    Just do it politicians- Peopleare drowning

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • May

      So right!!!! Unfortunately it annoyes me when politicians use legal and illegal in their termonolgy they know very few people are aware that under in convention people can arrive into a country by any means with or without relevant paperwork or passports it is not illegal to seek asylum and a country can not turn away an asylum seeker once entered into our waters they can however choose to process them by any means.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  12. May

    Lara
    No they do not jump any que what so ever I know this for a fact they have to apply and wait in line like every one else. Once a asylum seeker is allowed within the community most end up on private rentals they get jobs willingly and happily something our dole bludgers could learn from. They have to get a drivers licence the exact same way as every one else living in this country of anything it is harder for them to get these things for obvious reasons. I have met some asylum seekers oh my what they did to save their children and give them freedom I know nothing was handed to them.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Stef

      These are mainly young men. Able bodied men with ten thousand dollars to pay for their fare and more in the safes at Christmas Island. do you know that 10 grand Australian is the equivilant of 200 thousand in Afghanistan? Who are these men? I’m not an idiot and I’m sick to death if being treated like one. I know what immigration is and I know what loss of border security is. Either the government sorts this out or let them get out of the way and let the Coalition do it.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Jen

        Are rich Afghani’s not allowed to try and evade death and torture as well???? Did you know that in many cases the extended families often pool their monies to pay for a relative’s escape because they would prefer to spend their money rather than watch their family member DIE!!! Also in many cases it is young men who come because they are the ones who are often agitating against the Taliban!!

        Did you also know that as recently as the 70s in Afghanistan was a totally different country, especially in Kabul. Girls wore short skirts, there were nightclubs, restaurants, universities where women could attend. It was a much more modern country. Many of the people there lived through these modern times and have had the fundamental regime forced upon them, where executions, torture & corruption occur with frightening regularity. Can you imagine lviing like they used to and then having all those freedoms taken from you?? I know the continual border protection issues are frustrating for Australians but spare a thought for the Afghani’s who did not want this for their country either!

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • restless pilgrim

          Unfortunately the Hazaras never knew the freedom that you speak of!

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Jen

            And they continued to be persecuted by the Taliban, so I’m not sure of your point.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Anon

              Its so easy to forget that our soldiers are trying and dying to help these people . Why are these men fleeing instead of fighting for change while they have the chance and the help to really make a difference.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
  13. Anonymous

    It is in abbott’s best interests to disagree with whatever is said and continue the fighting and dog-whistling.

    i wish this would end this debate, but until he is gone i don’t think there will be a resolution.

    this probably isn’t as humanitarian as i would have liked but i think anything that takes this fight away from the shock jocks and racists is a good thing.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Enough

      Rubbish. The reason Abbott wouldn’t support the ludicrous and vile Malaysia NON-solution is because the safety of those send there could not be guaranteed. Let the Greens support the useless government they helped put in power instead of Sarah Hanson- Young smacking her head like an overgrown child.

      As Gillard said – Another boat, another policy failure. About the only thing she’s ever got right.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Faybian

      I remember the Howard govt got regularly crucified by the media over offshore processing and the pacific solution. It was almost inevitable that to make themselves look a lot different to the coalition as far as refugee policy, the labor party would go for onshore processing. Of course the outcome is increased numbers and the media etc crucifies the govt still….

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  14. Bradley

    So….John Howard’s “Pacific Solution” was right after all ?

    Makes you wonder why the Rudd government scrapped the policy.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Enough

      Why? The same reason Rudd does everything – to promote his own self interest. In the case of Nauru it was to make sure the UN noticed what an outstanding humanitarian he proclaims to be. He made the mess, Gillard promised to fix it when she knifed him, the Greens won’t let her and it’s all Abbott’s fault.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Bradley

        Er….I didn’t want to be the first to say that ! :)

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  15. Lara

    Where Are we housing these people i ask.? I wonder if they get first priority on the waiting list, whilst Australians already living in this country wait up to 15 years for public housing, some of them residing in tents.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • sparkie

      In NSW certainly until the 2011 state election (policy may have changed since then) refugees did not get priority over others purely on the basis of being a refugee. Permanent residency was a key criteria for applicants.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Faybian

      In the private rental market.
      They don’t get extra centrelink benefits either.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Kylie L

      Many are housed through organisations like the Hotham Mission and other church or humanitarian groups. Refugees awaiting an outcome on their application are not eligible for public housing OR Centrelink- which makes it bloody hard to find somewhere.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  16. redqueen

    and is infrastructure building/spending going to increase to accommodate all these extra people? I’m guessing not…

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      These people will be consumers and workers too, contributing to our economy in the same way as everyone else, generating and stimulating growth. Refugee does not equate to dole bludger.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Anonymous

        I love how they get a furnished house, a car, welfare. We are so kind.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Ms Molly

          Oh lordy. I don’t love how you are so ignorant.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Ml

            Maybe we should use freedom of information and get the facts then. In the mean time, seeing as how you’re not ‘ignorant’ maybe you can explain the trolley loads of home goods that tax payers buy from KMart every day and why I can’t get emergency or permanent accommodation for single Australan mothers in desperate need? Look forward to your answer Ms Molly.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Jen

              The facts are refugees who are waiting for their applications to be processed and are not in detention can apply for support of about $400 a fortnight. Refugees who have their applications approved are entitled to the same range and conditions of Centrelink payments that all Australians are. THAT IS IT! There are no cars, no fully furnished houses etc…. Please do not confuse the work that charities such as the Refugee Claimants Support Centre do with the work of the Government.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Ml

              Incorrect Jen. I can guarantee it.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Jen

              I can’t reply on your latest comment – but I would love it if you would spell out how you know this in real facts.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • FFS

              I would rather my tax payer money house refugees who have had no chance in life rather than ignorant, lazy Australians who have had every opportunity handed to them and still whinge that they’re hard done by.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
    • Sam

      I hope none of them want to live in Sydney. There’s already way too many people there! The traffic is horrendous, I don’t know how Sydney people stand it!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  17. Guest

    Reasonable recommendations. Wait from the squealing from the left on off shore processing.

    They will still come though. It just makes it a bit harder for them. If they come by boat eventually most will still end up here. Just means a bit of time in Nauru, which they think woth the price of admission.

    What is missing on the numbers is how the unexpected arrivals impacts on others. One unexpected person on a boat is one less family reunion place for the people who came via a refugee camp and the proper process. That is unfair on those people.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  18. Bradley

    Will the deadlock end today ?

    No. Parliament isn’t sitting today. Any recommendations made by the committee will have to be put to the parliament…let’s say tomorrow at the earliest…and then be voted on.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

So, we have $1000 to give away... oh, would you be interested? Well step right this way.

To go in the draw to win, just LIKE us on Facebook, enter your email address and tell us in 25 words or less why you love reading Mamamia.

Close this popup



Full Terms & Conditions