There was a standing ovation at London’s Olympic stadium on Wednesday night. But it wasn’t for one of England’s own countrymen or women. And it wasn’t for the guy who broke his pole while vaulting.
It wasn’t even for the woman who won heat 6 of the 800-metre event. It was actually for the woman who finished last in that same race – and she finished 45 seconds after the winner crossed the line.
Sarah Attar was the first woman from Saudi Arabia to ever compete in a track event at the Olympics. In fact, London is the first Olympics in which Saudi Arabia has allowed women athletes to compete at all. Last night the 19-year-old – who was born and raised in California but has dual nationality because of her Saudi father - competed in the 800 metre race wearing a white hijab with long running pants and long-sleeved top.
They’re calling Sarah the ‘Eric the Eel’ of the London Games because the beauty of her race had nothing to do with her speed and everything to do with what she represents.
Here’s an interview Sarah recorded in the months before her race.
And Sarah isn’t the only Saudi Arabian woman at the Games this year. Last week, Wodjan Ali Seraj Abdulrahim Shahkrhani competed in the Olympic judo competition.
It’s a great achievement for the women of Saudi Arabia. A huge step forward.
The is the first Olympic games in history where every country has had both male and female athletes competing.
But while the Western World is celebrating, let’s remember that neither of these female Saudi athletes are legally allowed to drive in the country they’re representing. They’re also not allowed to travel abroad without permission from a male guardian. Women have recently been told they’ve been given the right to vote – but not until 2015.
And according to media outlets, both women were forced to walk behind the male Saudi athletes during the opening ceremony as “a symbol of an ultra-conservative country in which women are actively discouraged from participating in sport”.
This from the Washington Post:
“The participation of Saudi judo player Wojdan Ali Seraj Abdulrahim Shahrkhani had raised the scorn of the kingdom’s ultraconservative Islamic clerics, who said she was dishonoring herself by fighting in front of men, including the male referee and judges. And the match Friday was a swift defeat for Shahrkhani: The teenager was thrown by her Puerto Rican opponent in just over a minute.”
We can only imagine the bravery that it took these two young women to push through the harsh restrictions of their home country’s laws – the restrictions that tell them that they are not ‘full people’. As spectators we got to watch them at the pinnacle of their achievement but let’s not forget what they would have gone through to get there.
Saudi Arabia continues to take ever so tiny and slow steps towards modern standards of gender equality. But let’s stay ever mindful of the fact there is a long long way to go.




Comments
30 Comments so far
The hijab & long clothing would have slowed her down a lot! lol
I think she is brave for running in a race against competitors much better than her with the whole world watching!
loading...
As an Australian living in Saudi Arabia I am in awe Wodjan Shah. I live in the Eastern Province where there are more expats, however, I think she is very brave to have done, what she has done. She should be proud of herself. They both should.
loading...
These girls have my respect
According to ‘The Telegraph’ Wojdan Shaherkani has never left Saudi Arabia before and is coached by her father in Mecca. What a brave girl and family!
Sarah Attar may have lived a significant part of her life in the USA, but (in my opinion) her inclusion in such a high profile sport brings world attention to the restrictions on women in Saudi Arabia.
Well done girls
loading...
C’mon, She was born in the US, and has lived there all her life, so she has dual citizenship because her father is a Saudi citizen.
So she can vote in her own country, and it’s only through a quirk of law and rules of the olympics that she can represent Saudi Arabia. The headline is misleading and downright untrue. Her country is the USA, not Saudi Arabia.
Having said that, I’m in no way belittling the lack of equality in Saudi Arabia and in other countries that use the piss weak excuse of religion to hide behind discrimination and bigotry.
loading...
Extremely well said. Every single word !
loading...
Interesting that she chose to represent Saudi, and more importantly the women of Saudi, I salute her.
loading...
She probably had too much better competition in America. I doubt she had much to qualify for the Saudi women’s athletics team.
loading...
I hope that they, especially the young judo girl as the other one appears to live in America, will not have to deal with any repercussions of competing at the Olympics when they return to Saudi Arabia? So sad. Good on them, hopefully in 2016 we see even more Saudi women competing.
loading...
That was my thought. As soon as Sarah Attar steps foot back in Saudi she is going to be a target. Very brave.
loading...
Since she was born in the US and has lived there all her life it’s highly unlikely that she’ll be a target of anything.
loading...
Everyone ive spoken to here seems very proud of the Olympic team and all the competitors & pleased that there were female competitors representing. Hopefully in future years we will have some real female contenders rather than just this years “Eric the Eel”.
loading...
Lets be a little clearer about something: women have not really been given the right to vote in Saudi Arabia… they have been given the right to vote IF their father or gaurdian ALLOWS them to vote. So i think there is a big difference between giving someone the right to vote and allowing someone to make a decision for them to vote.
Regardless, its still amazing that a couple of saudi women have finally been allowed in the olympics. However, that said, i believe both of them were pretty much raised outside of the country.. so, its probably more for show than a geniuine act of equal opportunity.
loading...
Has this article been fact-checked? Or is this based on common prejudices about Saudi women etc? I don’t know what to believe anymore.
loading...
why don’t you go do some research and get back to us
loading...
I wondered which country/countries hadn’t previously let female athletes compete. I guess it’s no surprise to find out Saudi Arabia was one of them.
loading...
This is the first story from the Olympics which has engaged me.
loading...
What an uplifting story – amazing chicks!!!
loading...
Totally agree.
loading...
What a great Olympic moment. Really very beautiful.
loading...
Nice of the australian commentators to continually refer to her as pakistani last night
loading...
There was also a Pakistani woman, I think.
loading...
It’s worth remembering that Saudi is probably the most backward country in the world when it comes to women’s rights, a primitive theocracy that makes the Taliban look like hard core feminists. The rest of the Arab world are generally not exemplars for women’s rights but if women don’t have the vote it’s because hardly anyone else does either.
Interestingly enough it’s widely thought that the King is in favour of a greater if still limited set of women’s rights but has to tread very carefully because of the influence of the mullahs. Still this is a very small step in the right direction and is a good example of the sort of positive social change which the Olympics can deliver and which would be denied if we kept out these unsavoury type of regimes. Incidentally, voting is probably irrelevant to any Saudi, male or female, the right to drive though would be a great thing as it would mean women could get jobs without the need for a driver.
loading...
I think your comparison between the Taliban and the KSA government is very inaccurate & offensive. We may have a long way to go here when it comes to woman’s rights and equality but I am sure you must know that saying the Taliban is more in favor and supportive of women’s and human rights in general is an out right lie.
loading...
I’ll confess to a bit of hyperbole but as far as I am aware the Taliban did not ban women from driving so while both are medieval primitives I’d rate the Taliban as slightly higher as I have a view that an absolute ban on women moving from place to place is probably the most fundamental womens’ rights breach there is. If you inform me the Taliban also banned women from driving then I will rate them as equally appalling and apologise for the misrepresentation.
loading...
We cannot legally drive within the kingdom but we have a right to move around as we wish. The taliban also banned women for driving but even if they allowed women to drive i do not consider this the barometer for a womens rights comparison. Unlike the Taliban we do not have a policy of brutality against women or keep them under virtual house arrest. We have policies that encourages the higher education of women rather than the edicts of the Taliban which forbade women from being educated. We do not legally require women to cover their head or wear a burqa unlike the Taliban. We do not ban women being employed like the Taliban in fact we have many policies in place to encourage Saudi females to enter the workforce. I guess if you consider being able to operate a car (bizarrely we do have women pilots!) to be more important a human right above education, employment opportunities, and general freedom from the brutality and ritual public beatings women under Taliban regimes face than i guess the Taliban is a shining beacon of feminism in comparison to what i face here in the Kingdom. But i cant help but be a little disheartened by your comments.
loading...
The Taliban didn’t ban women driving because they didn’t need to. Women weren’t allowed out of the house except in the presence of a male guardian.
loading...
This is one of those stories which keeps bringing me back to MM. People who actually know what they are talking about debating something important.
loading...
Any quick Google search will confirm that the oppression experienced by women under the Taliban is far greater than that experienced in Saudi Arabia. Adding to missophelia’s comments the restrictions under the Taliban of watching TV, playing music, dancing, women seeking medical assistance (including to give birth), wearing make up etc and being able to drive is the least of their concerns!
loading...
Members of the taliban murdered a woman 2 weeks ago because 2 blokes couldn’t decide which one could have her, and not being allowed to drive is the biggest issue for you?
Spare me.
loading...
A small step in the right direction, good on them.
loading...