Finally, it’s official. A dingo was responsible for Azaria Chamberlain’s death.
That’s the finding of a Darwin coroner who today delivered the results of the fourth inquest into how 9-week-old Azaria Chamberlain died on the 17th of August, 1980.
If Azaria Chamberlain was still alive, she would have celebrated her 32nd birthday yesterday.
But instead of watching her daughter blow out the candles on her cake, today Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton and Michael Chamberlain walked into a Darwin courtroom to hear what they hoped would be legal confirmation that a dingo killed her child – a finding which would allow the cause of death on Azaria’s death certificate to be altered from “unknown”.
Lindy cried and hugged her family as Coroner Elizabeth Morris read her findings:
- Azaria died at Uluru on the 17th of August, 1980. The cause of her death was the result of being attacked and taken by a dingo.
- She told the court: “In considering now all of the evidence… and excluding all other reasonable possibilities.. what occurred was that a dingo or dingos entered the tent, took Azaria and dragged her from the immediate area.”
- She told Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton and Michael Chamberlain, “Please accept my sincere sympathy on the death of your special and loved daughter, Azaria. I am so sorry for your loss. Time does not remove the pain and sadness of the death of a child… a certificate of death will be available for each of you which reflects the findings i have made today.”
The findings have been a long time coming for The Chamberlains who have been fighting for recognition that a dingo stole their Azaria since 1980.
Some history into the case, according to news.com.au:
The first inquest in Alice Springs began in December of that year. In February, 1981, in an unprecedented live telecast, the coroner returned a finding that Azaria had been taken by a dingo and that her body had been disposed of by persons unknown. Northern Territory police continued their investigations, which led to a second inquest later that year. The court heard evidence from a British pathologist that Azaria’s jumpsuit, found at the base of Uluru a week after her disappearance, bore the imprint of a bloody human hand, had cut marks consistent with incision by a knife or scissors, and bloodstains around the collar. The Chamberlains were charged with their child’s murder and in October, 1982, Mrs Chamberlain was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment. Her husband was convicted of being an accessary and given a suspended sentence.
Media coverage of the trial was extraordinary and much of it was unsympathetic to the Chamberlains.
A stony-faced Mrs Chamberlain making her way to and from court, her hair cut in a severe fringe and heavily pregnant with her fourth child, are burned into the collective memory. There were even rumours of ritual sacrifice.
Over the next two years, appeals to the Federal and then the High Court failed. Then, in 1986, there was a startling discovery. Azaria’s matinee jacket – which her mother swore she was wearing when she disappeared – was found at Uluru and positively identified by Mrs Chamberlain.
She was released from jail and a royal commission was called. In June the following year, the commission cleared the Chamberlains of all charges, and in 1988 the NT Court of Criminal Appeals overturned their convictions. Still, the cause of Azaria’s death remained open. In 1995 a third inquest concluded that the cause and manner of her death was unknown.
IN this latest inquest, the court has heard detailed testimony about dingo attacks. A former police detective, Anna Lade, hired by the court to investigate, testified that there had been 239 dingo attacks since 1990 and that three children had died since 2001.
Has your view of this story changed over time?







Comments
125 Comments so far
My opinion was then and never changed that she was innocent, I have followed this story with interest over the years as my daughter was born in the same year as Azaria and I felt the press found her guilty before she had even gone to trial and just because her grief was not as the public or the press expected then they seemed to make it their mission to publicly try the Chamberlains through the media and as time has proven both she and Michael never killed their daughter.
loading...
As a teenager I was horrified by the vilification of Lindy Chamberlain back in the 80s. But then a lot of things distressed me in the 80s: the music, the shoulder pads, the pouffy hair, the greed is good ethos, it’s hard to name them all.
loading...
A classic case of bogan Australia believing the idiot tabloid press and commercial TV/radio. I am guessing there would be an enormous correlation between the people who actually think tabloid pap such as ACA and TT are actually news being the same people who would jump to a guilty conclusion with someone like Lindy Chamberland. These are the same people the Libs scare with stories of boat people invading the country into voting for them-these people actually get to vote!!!
loading...
ACA and such like programmes were not the tabloid stuff we see these days. Nothing like it.
Yes, all Australians get to vote, people vote on what they do and don’t like, that’s their right and perogative.
I doubt it has much to do with who watches ACA! or the fact that a baby was killed by a dingo.
loading...
Her daughter would be the same age as me.Lindy, you are such a rock, with everything you have had to go through and the suffering with the loss of your daughter on top of that.I am so happy you have finally received the justice you deserved all those years ago.
loading...
I remember being at the beach with a friend when the story broke. My friend was utterly convinced that a dingo would never take a baby. Today, we would say that the story went viral. I felt a bit stupid compared to everyone else and the strength of their convictions because I kept thinking the opposite … why wouldn’t a dingo take a baby when they hunt for their food? The fact that Azaria was taken was shocking but the weird and instantaneous reaction of people and how it gathered momentum just shocked me more.
loading...
We were on holidays, I was lying on a beach towel at the beach watching my small kids building sandcastles, when the news hit the radio.
I turned it up and the story went for ages, then they had a vet come on and she said it was impossible for a dingo to open it’s mouth wide enough, or it’s jaws strong enough, to carry a baby as Lindy had said.
I wonder who that vet was, I took her at her word and so did most people in the very full caravan park that day.
I think it was the first thing we heard that made a lot of people minds up..there were lots more stories re blood etc. to follow. Also lots blamed her for leaving such a small baby alone in the wilderness (it really was the wilderness back then) with 2 little boys.
We really heard damn all else for weeks and weeks, on the telly and radio, everyone was talking about it.
I can’t remember one person who didn’t think she was guilty..and Michael involved as well.
A few years later, 2 Airdale (I’d never heard of that breed and vowed never to own one! the name stuck.) dogs dragged their owners baby out of a cot, I think it was Sydney way, and began eating it and then I did have doubts re her guilt and thought…. well maybe. That poor women looked out the window and wondered what her dogs were doing with that bundle. Awful!
If domestic dogs would do it, a dingo surely could.
loading...
Evil Angels is one of the best books I’ve read chronicling the disappearance and then the court case and opinion in Australia, the media and why we accused an innocent person of this crime. The scenes of journos getting and filing their stories and cops and lawyers sitting around in Darwin pubs and details of the court case are riveting. I was living in Sydney during this and remember vividly the front pages of the tabloids with one sensational story and photo after another. Human sacrifice, the black dress, the blood spray, the weird name, the handprint, the brothers, the body in the camera bag, the religion and even the fact that as Seventh Day Adventists they didn’t eat meat… we were divided as a nation- yes she did it no the dingo did it…
loading...
I’ve read a lot of the comments tonight. It’s the first news in ages I’ve really wanted to watch, and watch again. We grew up with the story, with siblings Azaria’s age or around her age. It has taken so long – over the decades we’ve all gone from being kids ourselves, to trying to comprehend the grief of the parents and family, as parents and adults.
loading...
My daughter was 1 week old when Azaria was taken. It tore my heart to know that they would never enjoy their daughter growing up. I have never doubted that a dingo took their child.
My daughter will be 32 in a few weeks – she is beautiful, married , and has a wonderful life. I remember the Chamberlain family every year on my daughter’s birthday,
I pray they will now know peace.
loading...
Bless you Lindy… I never ever doubted you. So glad that finally justice has been done. RIP Azaria. x
loading...
I was 18 at the time and Australia was a very different place back then.
Multi-culturalism was still in its infancy and the generation of adults at the time had grown up with Sir Robert Menzies, the white Australia policy, chops and peas for tea and mainstream Christian faiths. And Uluru was still known as ‘Ayers Rock’.
Then suddenly on the news they see this family who are Seventh-Day Adventists and appear to show no emotion on the disappearance of their baby. The suspicion and finger pointing started almost immediately. A kooky religion, a weird name for the baby, no tears….. and the nation judged.
I think the Chamberlain case is not just an outrageous miscarriage of justice – it is also a reflection of a very insular, suspicious country. I know many of my family judged her as guilty.
I hope this can somehow bring some relief and even peace for the Chamberlains.
loading...
The White Australia policy was created by Labor, so I hope you are not insinuating Menzies was responsible for that? Btw, Uluru is still called Ayers Rock by most people. It doesn’t mean anything unlike you seem to be sinisterly suggesting.
loading...
I still call it Ayers Rock and so do most people I know. And yes..white Australia was a Labor legislation.
The only doubt I ever had was the jacket found 4 years later. Really it just looked in too good a condition to have been chewed off by a dingo and left blowing around, or even stuck somewhere, in the weather for that amount of time. It’s very hot out there and can rain for days in the wet.
http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/chamberlain/Matinee-jacket.jpg&imgrefurl=http://law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/chamberlain/chamberlainimages.html&h=274&w=423&sz=115&tbnid=JyoJ_0LJ0Vm8RM:&tbnh=90&tbnw=139&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dazaria%2Bchamberlain%2Bmatinee%2Bjacket%2Bpic%26tbm%3Disch%26tbo%3Du&zoom=1&q=azaria+chamberlain+matinee+jacket+pic&usg=__Y-DmSP7UGgS_8poRsUHI7JGvUy4=&docid=Z-iuKQj97b4tgM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=4z7XT9-nC6GsiAfsiZ2VAw&ved=0CFcQ9QEwAQ&dur=567
loading...
No it isn’t and yes it does. People who refer to Uluru as Ayers Rock are demonstrating either ignorance or disregard for the traditional owners of Uluru. I’m not ‘suggesting’ that, I’m saying it loud and clear.
loading...
Ayers Rock is correct as well. It can be called both or either.
Not only are you ignorant, you’re wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uluru
loading...
And you site wikipedia? Yah. Got me there.
loading...
Oh and btw – other than in the opening sentence (your justification I presume?) the article CONSTANTLY refers to the place as Uluru.
loading...
Ummm … ‘cite’
loading...
*blush* Would you believe I was being ironic? site/cite? No? Ok.
loading...
Almost every article one can find on Ayers Rock refers it as both.
Both or either is correct.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ayers+rock
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=uluru
loading...
Perhaps you should ask the Pitjantjatjara and the Yankunytjatjara people what you should call it. They own it after all.
loading...
No really, I have to reply to that.
We were not an insular or suspicious country at all. We had very little crime, people were way more friendly and children played in the streets with hopscotch and skipping and marbles in the gutter.
Now there are shootings every day, parents killing their children because of pressures we hadn’t even heard of, suicide rampant, people up to their ears in debt, confusion amongst us with the gay issue, the paedophile thing, the muslim thing… and the children rarely play in the streets anymore.
Better days? I don’t know but we are far more insular, (most barely know their neighbours) and way more suspicious now than we were back then. We took people at face value a lot more…now we don’t.
The world came to us and we changed..not always for the better.
loading...
What is the gay THING? What is the Muslim THING?
I think you’re living in a fantasy-world Susan. Australia in the 1970s was a different place – it was still law to discriminate against someone because of their gender and sexual preference. There was no equal opportunity and domestic violence went unreported. I could go on but I think I’m talking to a troll, so I’ll just leave it there.
loading...
The gay and muslim thing? it’s what people discuss now, they’re very big and interesting topics. Topics we knew nothing, or very little about, back then. They are important issues and they do confuse people. I offered no opinion about them, I merely said they are things that have caused a lot of angst.
I believe gays should have full equal rights, I have mixed feelings re some religions, as do lots.
There were lots wrong back then of course, there are lots wrong even now..but they’re different wrongs. Different pressures and way more of them.
Suicide and domestic violence is on the increase, so whether it’s reported or not doesn’t really matter does it. Nothing has changed sadly, these things are getting worse.
There was equal opportunity to a degree back then, there were women doctors, lawyers, dentists, uni professors. There is still an unequal ratio in a lot of professions in favour of men. Having a law is a good thing, but hasn’t made that ratio a huge deal better or different.
I do not come to troll, I come to talk with other women, hopefully, to agree and to disagree even. My heart goes out to the modern woman..you have pressures we never even thought of.
More importantly to offer an opinion, if people didn’t have opinions no-one would want to talk at all on forums such as these.
loading...
I’m crying at the moment. That poor, poor family. I was ten at the time and totally remember it. I remember the image above on the cover of my mum’s Woman’s Weekly and remember feeling so sad for Lindy and her baby. I think I was influenced by my parents who believed her innocence and can remember feeling so shocked about her going to jail.
As a mother now and being reminded about the tragic event now, all I can think of is that awful, awful feeling Lindy must have felt when she went and checked on Azaria and she wasn’t there. And that absolutely tragic image of her little grow-suit and matinee jacket.
loading...
It concerns me that 30 years on we still allow trial by media (or Facebook, or Twitter). Is it ever possible to have unbiased news reporting?
loading...
Genuine question: why is this “finally over” now? what makes this 4th inquest the final outcome? it’s changed three times now…
loading...
My understanding is that there has never been a final cause of death. Until today, they didn’t have a death certificate for her because it had never been officially decided. Straight after the decision was heard, they were able to get the certificate.
loading...
I think before today the death certificate would have recorded the death as cause unknown, because the previous coronial enquiry had recorded an open finding. The family wanted the cause of death to be recorded as being caused by the dingo so there was no lingering doubt or implication that it could have been them, and considering the history, fair enough too…
loading...
Thanks!
loading...
I know someone who was camping at Uluru when Azaria disappeared. He will tell anyone who will listen that no one who was there that night is in any doubt that a dingo took Azaria. I have always felt that Mrs Chamberlain was punished because she was not a hysterical mess after her baby disappeared. Similar thing happened when Peter Falconio disappeared and his girlfriend refused to speak to the media.
Hate to say it, but I think this just might be, in part, a feminist issue. If we women do not behave the “proper way” we are in big trouble!
loading...
And Madeleine McCann’s mother.
loading...
Three years before Azaria Chamberlain went missing I was in Year 10 and camped with other school kids in the same camping spot as the Chamberlains at the base of Uluru as part of a ten day excursion through central Australia. We got there late afternoon, erected tents and then proceeded to cook some chops over at the communal barbecue.
It was about 7pm and dark and we were all sitting around a campfire with our backs to the surrounding scrub when two dingoes slunk in looking for scraps. They were clearly used to humans enough to chance their luck. A couple of boys threw their chop bones to them before the teacher discouraged them and shooed the dingoes away.
And that was that until three years later Lindy Chamberlain shooed a dingo away from the barbecue area a few hours before her baby was taken. And I’ve never forgotten it.
I was a uni student when the case was first tried and well remember that Lindy Chamberlain was the only conversation in town. The assumption and nastiness of the debate was horrific. It wasn’t the dingo jokes that were so offensive to me, it was having to listen to so-called educated legal minds base their opinions around circumstantial evidence.
I for one am bloody relieved this is at long last over. I hope the Chamberlains can live their life in peace but somewhow I doubt it. They can never live a normal life and no compensation can be enough for that. What a terrible terrible waste of thirty years.
loading...
I am happy for the Chamberlains. I never believed they could have murdered their tiny baby.
Does anyone else find it odd that Azaria is standing in that photo supported only by her hands at 9 weeks or less?! My 4 month old can barely do that. I would have thought the baby’s trunk would need support! Just an aside.
loading...
i thought the same thing when i saw the photo. she looked bigger than 9weeks.
loading...
My baby has been doing that since 7 or so weeks. He’s 13 weeks now. He has had a very strong neck since birth, and has been pushing up in his legs since about 3 weeks, so I can definitely vouch that some babies can stand supported only by their hands at 9 weeks or earlier (and indeed, my baby gets frustrated that he can’t do more!).
loading...
I would love to see all the journos who wrote appalling headlines and stories about the family over the years now come out and publish apologies to the family. Bet they will all remain silent on this issue.
I did however notice that Wendy Harmer said sorry for making the family part of her stand up routine.
loading...
I grew up believing that Lindy had been wrongly convicted. As I was only 3 when Azaria was taken and 5 when Lindy was convicted, I assume that that was the view of the main adults in my life (parents and grandparents).
I hope that the outcome of today helps them get some peace.
loading...
To Lindy and Michael: I hope that this finding, while giving you vindication and closure, can serve as an apology from the Australian public for the way you were treated. It was a shameful time in our history. Congratulations on this finding. RIP Azaria.
loading...
My heart goes out to this family.
But the baby in the photo is NOT 9 weeks old. Is that a typo?
loading...
Not a typo.
That is a photo of her and she was 9 weeks old.
loading...
All because Lindy wasnt a blubbering mess, all because she held it together. We never saw her in private times, we didnt see her and her husband comfort each other, all we saw was a woman not crying in public there fore she was a heartless bitch and must be guilty.
What a great decision today, pity about the timing.
loading...
Yes I think that was exactly why she was so vilified. That she seemed staunch and cold. Poor, poor people. At least this is some small way to close the chapter for them in a way that is dignified.
loading...
Finally.
May the Chamberlains now be able to have some peace.
loading...
Finally a great outcome for this family after one the greatest miscarriages of justice this country has seen.
Hard to believe Azaria would now be 32.
loading...
I have watched this coverage all day today on ABC news 24 and I have been in tears as I watch. This case always stands out for me as so so sad for everyone involved.
I was 10 when Azaria was taken, and distinctly remember being at BBQs where adults and kids were gossiping saying “Azaria means “sacrifice in the Wilderness” and that Lindy always dressed Azaria in black or that one of the brothers did it..or that Lindy didnt show enough emotion…just an awful modern day witch hunt.
The saddest thing for me, that I have seen over and over today, is when LIndy and Michael unroll a poster of a photograph of Lindy holding Azaria – as they roll it out – and LIndy looks at her little baby girl, and her lips and chin quiver and she really struggles to hold it together.
This woman and this family have been through the most horrendous ordeal. Not only to have your 9week old baby taken, but then to be ACCUSED of murdering her, being found Guilty and spending time in jail. This will never be over for them all, but hopefully it helps.
Australians were a nasty bunch towards the Chamberlains at that time, it was not our finest moment…
loading...
I will always be ashamed of my fellow Australians and my country for that era. Shame on everyone who judged this woman based on nasty and vicious spiteful gossip. If any of those cowards and worms went through what Lindy (and Michael and family) went through, they wouldn’t have held up one hundredth as well as her.
loading...
About time!
loading...
Just a note, Lindy didn’t lose just one daughter – her second was taken from her at birth within the prison system… wasn’t it years before they were reunited? can you imagine this…. so sad…. her marriage was ripped apart, her religion was held in suspicion, the two boys were whispered about being ‘not quite right’ & that maybe one of them had ‘done it’….. it goes on & on – it wasn’t folklore – this family lived this nightmare whilst Australia looked on & judged.
loading...
Very true. Not our finest moments.
loading...
This sad sad story breaks my heart. It is impossible to imagine how this family has survived this witchhunt.
I wonder where the jurors are who made the guilty finding in the first place? I’d like to know how their lives turned out. It all boils down to them.
loading...
The jury should only make their decisions on what information they have before them at the time. Any particular reason to think they didn’t do this? If we are going to have a jury system I don’t think it’s fair to hold them responsible for not taking into account that wasn’t presented to them.
What’s your alternative to the jury system? Any system designed by humans will go wrong sometimes (which is one of the reasons why I’m not over keen on the death penalty) but our system is usually pretty good in not convicting the not guilty and indeed usually errs in the other direction – see Simpson OJ.
loading...
I don’t pretend to know the particulars, I’m just curious. They ARE the ones who returned the verdict.
I’ve read accounts where the jurors read the newspapers in the Jury room daily because they couldn’t follow/properly comprehend the lengthy and complicated forensic evidence presented in court (so they got their “evidence” from reporters not the courtroom), and that they had to completely discard the eyewitness testimony of the people who were there on the night to return a guilty verdict.
I do challenge the fairness of a jury in this particular instance. It was a witchhunt of epic proportions. The right to a fair trial was infringed in my opinion.
loading...
The problem wasn’t the jury – or not primarily, anyway. So-called experts paraded a whole raft of “evidence” about “fetal blood”, “hand prints”, “scissor cuts” etc. that built a circumstantial case, but which was all later shown to be false.
One or two people have been willing to come out today and still say they believe Lindy Chamberlain did it. But there is not a single shred of evidence: no motive, no crime scene, no weapon – nothing left but the evidence (such as the lost matinee jacket) that fully supported the Chamberlains’ version of events. Because their version of events was what happened. Because they told the truth, and continue to.
It amazes me, although it probably shouldn’t, that people can simply ignore every scrap of evidence in order to cling to a discredited “opinion”.
loading...
The jury made their decision based on the evidence they were given during the trial. At the time, forensic policing was very very new and not as well understood as it is now. People also tended to believe the police and the experts without question. Something that does not happen so much now days.
I imagine that most of those jurors are living with terrible guilt and having uninformed people make anonymous comments about them on internet forums is neither helpful or nice.
We are all human and are all fallible, perhaps you would be better served to show compassion to EVERYONE involved in this case instead of vilifying some, after all it was uniformed public opinion that help to convict the Chamberlains in the first place. Perhaps you could have learnt from that?
loading...
Hi Jackson,
You seem to think I was launching an anonymous attack on the jurors. I was/am not. On rereading my comment, I could have phrased it better.
This case has had an effect on many people, not just the Chamberlains. I was posing the question from that point of view. They are the ones who reached the verdict. Pure and simple fact. No vilifying here.
loading...
You cant blame the jurors. The evidence against her at the time seemed compelling. We studied the case at law school (late 80s/early 90s) in relation to the use of scientific evidence.
At the time it was very early days of DNA testing and it showed (we now know, incorrectly) that there was fetal blood in the family car and various other places. It just made the whole “dingo” story not add up.
Years later it was shown that the DNA testing methods used were not as bullet-proof as it was made out to be during the trial, but Lindy had already spent years in gaol.
loading...
No shit Sherlock.
So glad its official.
I was 7 and this story feels more folklore-ish now rather than something that actually happened.
loading...
I was in my early 20′s living in Sydney during the trial, but had grown up on a farm. I had many conversations explaining to city folk who believed a dingo incapable of dragging a baby that dingos have the ability to kill and drag animals ten times the weight and 100 times the strength of a baby, and do so regularly on farms nationwide. I was regarded with disdain by those who wanted to believe that stoney faced Lindy was guilty. I also sided with Lindy on being unemotional when under such intense scrutiny.
I am glad acknowledgement has at last been given to the Chamberlains, though their lives can never be free of the pain and havoc the guilty verdict wrought.
loading...
Oh this is so true. My dad (who lived near Uluru for a year) always said that it was a dingo because he had seen what dingos’ could do to other animals and how they could destroy campsites. The idea that one couldn’t take a small baby was…silly, really. One of the reasons the government was reluctant to believe it was dingo was because of fears for what it would do to tourism at Uluru.
This is a really sad case of gossip and misinformation running so wild that ended up putting an innocent woman in jail.
loading...
Compensation is one thing. An official pardon is another.
They haven’t ever been officially pardoned for their innocence.
R.I.P Azaria.
loading...
They were when Lindy was released from gaol. I don’t think she accepted it however until their conviction was quashed.
loading...
Don’t you only get a “pardon” when you are guilty of a crime, acknowledge it, and plead for clemency? Michael and Lindy didn’t do anything that needs “pardon”ing.
loading...
Which is why Lindy wouldn’t accept the pardon until the conviction was quashed. Even though some pardons are given when a person is wrongfully convicted, Lindy didn’t want to accept the pardon on it’s own as it could be seen as an admission of guilt.
loading...
She wouldn’t accept a pardon anyhow because she isn’t eligible for one.
loading...
I am so glad that the family have now got the closure that they require. Although you would never get over losing a child 32 years is a long time to have to keep fighting for the truth to be known.
What is sad is that the shameful trial by media that the family went though at the time of the wrongful conviction still happens today. There are cases currently happening over 30 years later where the media has decided who is and who is not guilty. It seems we have still not learned from that shameful episode.
loading...
I was 8 years old the day Azaria was taken. We had just left Sydney on our way to Uluru for a camping trip. I was terrified of being taken and while my parents camped at the base of the rock (you could then), I insisted on sleeping on the roof of the car.
loading...
Oh my goodness. Cannot imagine how terrified you must have been.
loading...
Finally some closure for the poor family. I went to school with the kids after the event and they were spread amongst extended family. Worst thing ever.
loading...
Has anyone else heard of the Graham Stafford case? There are similar themes of accusations of incorrect forensics false information presented to court.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Stafford
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/my-father-killed-leanne-holland-20100408-rtxh.html
loading...
While they’re at it, could someone explain to me how a family of five could have gone on a camping holiday from Townsville to Central Australia in a TWO DOOR TORANA? Now THERE’S a mystery.
loading...
We had a 2-door Datsun…120Y or 200B? Can’t remember the exact model. It was orange. And our only car for our family of 4 until I was 8. Then mum got her own car, a 2-door Toyota Corolla. We didn’t have 4 door car until I was about 12!
I remember family holidays involving me sitting on top of a half-height esky in the back seat as we ventured to our chosen destination. My younger brother always got to sit on top of the linen and sleeping bags. the food was under our feet.
loading...
… and who could be arsed to go camping when they have a 9 week old baby?! I’d rather punch myself in the face!
loading...
Ive always thought this too! Camping doesn’t light my fire at the best of times, let alone with a nine week old baby!
And, looking back, does it make ANY sense that they would go on a camping trip to kill their baby? Totally bizarre line of thinking.
loading...
I judge no one for their camping choices. We camped with a 12 week old. About a bazillion times easier to camp with a tiny baby than a toddler.
loading...
Not judging! In awe! As I am of anyone who camps at all, let alone with small children. I am such a wuss!
loading...
Back then that was part of the public`s conviction of Lindy, the camping trip…. who would do that, how could they travel like that. It just added more fuel to the premise that something sinister had already been planned.
loading...
I had the honour of meeting Lindy, Michael, Kahlia and Aidan in 1987 and Lindy couldn’t have been friendlier or warmer. The trial by media that Lindy endured is not Australia’s proudest moment. Rest in peace Azaria.
loading...
No my view has never changed. My aunt married someone who was at the first trial – it was the private view held by many but there was no evidence to support the Chamberlains, until the matinee jacket was found.
loading...
The problem was that much of the evidence at the trial was false. The bloody handprint? The fingers had four phalanges each. Unless Lindy evolved into a new super human with extra knuckles, then it wasn’t correct. Similarly, the “blood spray” inside the car was found in just about every car of the same make and model; it wasn’t blood, it was some part of the manufacturing process of the car.
loading...
I’m sorry but I don’t think that’s fair… It “boils down” to a decision made basd on evidence given within the courtroom at the time of trial. I don’t think it serves a purpose to balme the jurors now. (if that’s what your suggesting ?)
loading...
What was the private held view? That she was innocent or that she was guilty? Your post is a bit ambiguous.
loading...
I remember the night she was convicted very clearly. I was at a swimming carnival in QLD in my early teens and my mother announced to the other women around in the stands that ‘the bitch did it – and she got what she deserved’. I remember being horrified at the time by the tone of nastiness and vitriol in my mother’s voice. And I also remember being very worried how everyone seemed to hate this poor woman. I always suspected she was a victim of a media frenzy and lynch mob. I’m glad things worked out for her and her family in the end. No one should have to go through the agony of losing a child like that but also then being wrongfully imprisoned.
loading...
In 1992 Lindy Chamberlain received $1.3 million compensation from the Australian government for wrongful imprisonment.
Finally Lindy, Michael and her children can have closure.
loading...
What do you make of people (usually, non-Australians who probably don’t know the full story) who make ‘a dingo stole my baby’ jokes? It kind of rubs me the wrong way, but perhaps I’m being too sensitive.
loading...
When I was in Cambodia – all the kids ask where you are from. Once they know you are an Aussie, they say – Gday mate and then Dingo ate my baby.
Who teaches them this stuff?
loading...
I got those same comments from kids in Cambodia when we lived there. The real irony? I’m a Seventh Day Adventist & Michael & Lindy were our church pastors before Azaria was born.
loading...
That is a crazy coincidence…. And, I grew up SDA too… Did you go to the Salt ministries orphanage in Siam Reap while you were there?
loading...
We make that joke too – but it’s to laugh at Meryl Streep’s horrendous accent when she portrayed Lindy in the film, not to laugh about a dead baby and a family’s torture.
loading...
Oh, I never thought of it that way, but then, I’ve never seen the film.
loading...
Not to mention being referenced in the same light (eg bad accent) in Seinfeld. Not that I’m excusing it.
loading...
I’m in the US at the moment and somebody actually stopped and asked my friend today: “Oh you’re Australian? Did a dingo steal your baby too? har har har”
loading...
To lose a baby is in itself horrific, then to be accused of murder, then to be locked up, and then to be the subject of national hatred….
Does anyone know if the Chamerlains received – or will receive compensation from the government for what they went through?
Ipomen Scarlet
loading...
I’m pretty sure they received about $1m when the conviction was overturned. Not enough in my books! But I suppose no amount of money could ever be enough.
loading...
From wikipedia: In 1992 Lindy Chamberlain received $1.3 million compensation from the Australian government for wrongful imprisonment.
loading...
Thanks, Lana and Cat.
Nothing could ever make up for their suffering, but at least they don’t have financial worries on top of everything else.
And it’s a formal acknowledgement that the authorities got it very wrong.
Ipomen Scarlet
loading...
Sadly, I don’t think the money came anywhere near covering the cost of the trials and expenses incurred by the family throughout this whole debacle.
loading...
That’s really horrible.
loading...
So glad to see the family finally has some chance of attempting closure after such a long time.
To those who firmly believe Lindy Chamberlain is guilty; how wonderful it must feel to be the all-knowing armchair judge and juries you are. You have some special insight into the evidence that no one else has?
loading...
It’s about time. Imagine being Lindy Chamberlain, grieving, in jail, pregnant and accused of murdering her baby. Nothing will ever heal her pain, and give her back the years she missed. If there was human involvement, I think it was someone else not the Chamberlains. That poor little girl, what a terrible death.
loading...
The trial by media of Lindy Chamberlain in the 1980s was a shameful chapter in Australia’s history. I’m glad that this is (hopefully) finally over.
loading...
I remember gossiping like mad about Azaria’s disappearance when I was a schoolgirl. I feel bad about it now. Whatever happened (and now we know), we forgot very quickly that Azaria was a real baby and the Chamberlains are a real family. I don’t think Australians are any better or worse than anyone else the death of a child happens in unusual circumstances. I shudder to think how much worse a similar case would be now with social media going nuts.
loading...
That’s a really good point, Kate – they are a real family who went through an enormous experience. No matter where Lindy, and to some extent her former husband, goes, she will forever be associated with that and people will pre-judge her because of it.
loading...
When I was in Cambodia – all the kids ask where you are from. Once they know you are an Aussie, they say – Gday mate and then Dingo ate my baby.
Who teaches them this stuff?
loading...
sorry – this was supposed to be in response to another comment….
loading...
I found this too! I’m a Kiwi but when I was there with lots of other Australians, they would say nothing to me about being a Kiwi but it was always “G’day mate, Ozzie ozzie ozzie, oi oi oi, dingo stole my baby” to the Aussies!
loading...
They would probably say something like – how dare the mother be so selfish and put her baby in danger for a lifestyle choice?
loading...
I was exactly the same as you. I always said I believed she did it. Until I had children of my own. Watching her tell the story as a mother, listening to all the evidence. There’s no way she killed that baby. I feel terrible about things I’ve said. I hope this brings them some closure and may Azaria finally RIP.
loading...
I went to school with the Chamberlain kids and there is no doubt in my mind that a dingo took the baby. It’s terrible enough that they had to lose a child this way but the vitriol of the Australian public that they’ve suffered for three decades (not to mention Lindy being wrongly imprisoned and blamed) is even worse. It’s about time the family received this verdict. They have suffered a great deal.
loading...
My view on this story has never really changed – Lindy did it.
loading...
Even though there’s not a skerrick of evidence to back that claim up?
loading...
The babies blood stained jumpsuit found neatly folded is enough evidence for me
loading...
It wasn’t found folded, it was found scrunched up. The man who found it swore this in court.
loading...
Um that was proven to be the idiot who found the jumpsuit. He picked it up and moved it around and then when the cops had to come and photograph it for forensic evidence, they laid it out and pretended that is how they found it. This has been documented quite clearly in recent years, confessed to by those present.
loading...
False. The person who found it never moved it, it was proven that the investigators folded it after they ‘investigated’.
loading...
It wasn’t blood, it was red dust. The initial findings were that a dingo did it. The subsequent evidence produced by the “experts” has all been disproven. The Chamberlains were pardoned and the conviction quashed back in the early 80s. How can you still say that she did it?
loading...
Just a glance at the wikipedia page for the case shows they had plenty of evidence for the defence (against nothing more than speculation and bias for the prosecution) – it was all ignored or rejected.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azaria_Chamberlain_disappearance
Thank goodness they found that matinee jacket, I shudder to think how long Lindy would’ve been falsely imprisoned otherwise.
loading...
Evidence never seems to make any difference when there’s a good old fashioned witch hunt going on.
loading...
I’ll say! It’s shameful.
loading...
Thankfully, MM, it doesn’t matter much who (or what) you or I think killed Azaria.
loading...
Can you even begin to imagine what it would be like to lose a child in tragic circumstances and then be blamed for the death in what was a shameful trial by media and flawed investigation? I certainly couldn’t even begin to think what it would be like. RIP Azaria, and I hope that this finding brings a degree of peace to Lindy and her family. They have been through what no family should ever have to endure.
loading...
Finally. What a huge relief that must be for all involved to have reached an end point in this saga. I can’t understand why it took so long.
loading...
I was touched by the genuine emotion shown by the judge. I hope now the Chamberlains can have some closure.
loading...
Me too Katie! I lost it and I was crying. She genuinely showed empathy to the family. RIP baby Azaria
loading...