Do You Like This Story?
royal humane society He beat his wife & won this bravery award.

This is is royal humane medal won by Paul McCuskey

 

 

 

 

Paul Francis McCuskey kicked his wife in the head after dragging her out of bed, he mopped blood from the floor but not from her face.

On one occasion he kicked her her so hard that she was left permanently blinded in the left eye.

On another occasion he hit her, dragged her from a car and kicked her pregnant stomach – she later miscarried.

Clearly Paul McCuskey is a wife beater but he is also a firefighter and in 2009 he was among a group of other firefighters who braved extremely dangerous conditions to get to an elderly woman living alone. The conditions were treacherous, life threatening even and McCuskey and his colleagues used handsaws to clear burning trees from their path. An act of bravery so true that everyone involved was recognised by the Royal Humane Society of Australasia for their bravery that night.

McCuskey could  not receive his medal because he was in jail serving a five and a half year prison sentence. A year after the fires he pleaded guilty to continued brutal attacks on his wife. He was in jail for beating a vulnerable woman. Repeatedly. An act of extreme cowardice.

When McCuskey’s award was first questioned, the Royal Humane Society president said the organisation was not aware of his criminal history. Last week a review committee decided the award should stand.

A society spokesperson says “The main criterion of the society is to bestow bravery awards on those who risk their lives to save the lives of others. It has never been the role of the Society to judge award nominees on their probity either prior to or after their act of bravery.”

Jordan Baker news editor at The Australian Women’s Weekly writes

If we’re honest, most of us can be both brave and cowardly. But McCuskey’s actions went beyond cowardly.

He assaulted someone more vulnerable than him, someone unable to fight back, and someone he professed to love.

He hit her, dragged her from a car and kicked her in her pregnant belly (she later miscarried). He has left her, in her words, embarrassed, ashamed and fearful of going out in public alone. Not to mention blind in one eye.

When you weigh McCuskey’s lone act of bravery against his many of cowardice there is little ambiguity. He is a coward.

The decision suggests the Humane Society is not taking his crime as seriously as it should, especially as its gold medal for bravery went to a man who was stabbed eight times while saving two women from domestic violence. I wonder whether McCuskey’s citation would have been upheld if he’d been convicted of paedophilia or murder.

Domestic violence is at epidemic proportions. A woman is killed in Australia almost every week by a partner or former partner. A third of women who have had a male partner have experienced violence. But Australians still don’t take domestic violence seriously enough and the Royal Humane Society’s decision to uphold the certificate of merit only confirms this.

Domestic violence will never be treated with the gravity it deserves until this mask of respectability is torn off, and the men who perpetrate it are treated like low-life criminals rather than upstanding citizens with a tragic flaw.

Awarding a bravery award to Paul McCuskey insults his victim, every other victim of domestic violence in Australia, and the firefighters who deserve to enjoy their bravery award without the taint of McCuskey’s cowardice.

Do you think a man can be considered brave if he beats his wife? Should an award for bravery ever be given to a person who is guilty of acts of violent crime?

View more posts on:

Comments

Comment Guidelines : Imagine you’re at a dinner party. Different opinions are welcome but keep it respectful or the host will show you the door. We have zero tolerance for any abuse of our writers, our editorial team or other commenters. So if you’re rude, mean-spirited, snarky, aggressive, defamatory or bitchy, your comment will be deleted (so will any replies to the original comment – so don’t bother arguing with rude people, instead just hit the ‘alert moderator’ button).
And if you’re offensive, you’ll be blacklisted and all your comments will go directly to spam. Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That’s how we’re going to be – cool. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation…

Use your profile to comment: Or, comment as a guest:
(Max file size is 150kb & jpeg's only - if you need help resizing go here »)

178 Comments so far

  1. Ash

    What’s wrong with giving an award for his good deeds… He was a bad person in one aspect of his life and a hero in the other aspect. He was punished for the bad part and awarded for his good deeds. If he were not punished because of his award then that would have been wrong.. How can we judge his good deeds because of his misdeeds in the past.. Cut him some slack!!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • healthychick

      A woman was left blinded and a baby dead. I think that negates the bravery he displayed in his job. I guess people are saying that you can’t separate domestic violence from the person that you are – if you perpetrate it, you are not a hero in any respect. Thats the attitude we want to cultivate. Its not OK, and if you want bravery awards, then you have to show bravery in every area of your life. Beating weak vulnerable people is not brave, its cowardly, and criminal

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Mrspowell

      Ash, you’re a moron!!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Sam

      Are you a bloke Ash? I don’t know of any sane woman that would agree with you. Go back to the dark ages

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  2. Joshua Zambrano

    We had the Born Alive Infant Protection Act passed here in the U.S. to stop children who survive late-term D&E abortions from being callously left to die. To my knowledge the physicians who did this have not been punished at all. The women who were involved were not punished. This guy is serving a 5.5 year prison sentence, we still haven’t heard his side of what happened, and he’s being punished far above the regular sentence for alcohol-induced mistakes he made over a short period.

    This is to me hypocrisy. There are people who’ve committed murders who are ignored without punishment at all, yet this guy is being punished above the norm already and Double Jeopardy is still pursued because hypocritical feminists want him demonized. Sorry, I’m not going along with this one. He needs to be punished, he is being punished, I’m not going to support more punishment for a heroic act he was involved in unless you start holding women and those guilty of worse crimes accountable. Because to me, this looks pretty hypocritical, just wanting him destroyed off the face of the planet just because he’s a guy, and not holding others accountable likewise.

    I concluded the following occurred, given the below sources:

    Paul McCuskey and Jeanine Blackburn lived together but separated in 2004. After this, McCuskey began drinking alcohol and physically abused her over an 8-month period from November 2006 to June 2007. There were 3 violent incidents. Injuries to Jeanine Blackburn reportedly led to loss of sight in her eye and miscarriages; she stated: “The miscarriage of my babies was bad enough, but the worst of these injuries was the total loss of sight to my left eye.” He also reportedly kept her from seeking medical treatment for 2 weeks.

    McCuskey performed a heroic rescue of an elderly woman and is known in the community for service work. Ordinarily the maximum sentence is 15 months for violent crimes, but Judge Wilmoth found McCuskey’s crime heinous enough that she sentenced him to 5 years and 6 months of prison. Blackburn said she forgave McCuskey, stating “If I don’t forgive him, I can’t move on, but I can’t just forget this either”.

    The Women’s Rights movement is trying to make an example out of McCuskey apparently and despite his lengthy prison sentence wants his award removed as well.

    MOST INFORMATIVE:

    http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/wife-beaters-our-terrifying-shame/story-fn56b2fi-1226069371058
    http://www.starnewsgroup.com.au/mail/mountain-views/242/story/88980.html
    http://www.starnewsgroup.com.au/mail/mountain-views/242/story/88994.html
    http://www.starnewsgroup.com.au/mail/mountain-views/243/story/89273.html

    NEWS:

    http://www.cfaconnect.net.au/news/bravery-awards-for-cambarville-fire.html
    http://aww.ninemsn.com.au/news/newsstories/8431836/has-australia-gone-soft-on-domestic-violence
    http://www.cfaconnect.net.au/news/bravery-awards-for-humevale-fire.html
    http://bigmedicine.ca/wordpress/2012/02/victoria-bravery-awards-for-cfa-firefighters/

    OPINION:
    http://www.mamamia.com.au/news/paul-francis-mccuskey-beat-his-wife-he-also-got-an-award-for-bravery/
    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/standing-by-the-dubious-bravery-of-a-wife-beater/story-e6frezz0-1226292528930

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Lauren

      Way to score cheap political points off people’s misery, champ.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • redballoon

      Go away troll.

      Hi-jack someone elses blog.

      We like the ladies here.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Catherine

      Sorry, but your comparison is not exactly valid. Late term abortions are generally only up to 24 weeks. Fetuses are not viable to live outside a woman’s body at this point. The difference between termination of an unwanted pregnancy, which will no doubt help the mental and physical health of a woman who is seeking the termination, and prevent thousands of unwanted children growing up in families that cannot mentally or physically support them, is vastly, vastly different from intention to harm a woman and her wanted child, blinding a woman, and then awarding the same man who inflicted this violence, an act of ‘bravery’. I find it offensive you say ‘alcohol induced’ mistakes, it seems to me you are somehow trying to diminish his crimes by blaming alcohol. Domestic violence is never a ‘mistake’, there is never an excuse for domestic violence. You call us hypocritical, I call you anti-choicers hypocritical, because you are the same people that never want to put money into government support services for single mothers, who have never fostered a child, and don’t believe in welfare. You only seem to care about children before they are born.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  3. Joshua Zambrano

    We had the Born Alive Infant Protection Act passed here in the U.S. to stop children who survive late-term D&E abortions from being callously left to die. To my knowledge the physicians who did this have not been punished at all. The women who were involved were not punished. This guy is serving a 5.5 year prison sentence, we still haven’t heard his side of what happened, and he’s being punished far above the regular sentence for alcohol-induced mistakes he made over a short period.

    This is to me hypocrisy. There are people who’ve committed murders who are ignored without punishment at all, yet this guy is being punished above the norm already and Double Jeopardy is still pursued because hypocritical feminists want him demonized. Sorry, I’m not going along with this one. He needs to be punished, he is being punished, I’m not going to support more punishment for a heroic act he was involved in unless you start holding women and those guilty of worse crimes accountable. Because to me, this looks pretty hypocritical, just wanting him destroyed off the face of the planet just because he’s a guy, and not holding others accountable likewise.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Sue

      Totally agree with you Joshua. This event is being ‘leveraged’ by feminist organisations to further their extremist agenda i.e. its always women who suffers domestic violence and its men who are always the abusers.. Down with anti-male agenda.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Gob smacked

        Sue you’re a bigger moron than moron Joshua.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
    • Sam

      Holding women accountable? Hearing his side of the story? What is wrong with you? There is NOTHING that I can imagine that she could say or do to deserve that amount of violence. You’re a total moron.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  4. Anonymous

    I disagree with the movement to remove his award given the following:

    1 – If this were a woman committing a wrong, would there be a sweeping effort to have her punished further? It bothers me how people want the book thrown at men who commit crimes, but I never hear about what gets done wrong by women, even though more women than men now murder their young children. And often, divorce is initiated by them, and they win 90% of custody cases, taking possession over houses, children, and belongings, plus receiving child support. Unless a woman who committed a crime is likewise spotlighted as necessary for additional punishment, this seems to me hypocritical demonization akin to racial prejudice by only focusing on the wrongs of one gender, and not holding the other side accountable.

    2 – McCuskey is already serving a 5 and a half year prison sentence, far more than the ordinary 15-month sentence for violent crimes. To remove his award seems similar to Double Jeopardy, trying to punish beyond what the law has already determined. If he had gotten off scot-free without punishment I’d be all for ensuring he was properly punished, but that is not the case. He appears to be getting punished more severely than usual for such crimes.

    3 – I still haven’t heard McCuskey’s side of things. I never like hearing from just one side and would want to know the legal evidence involved to make a further decision. I don’t know whether any wrongs were committed against him. As horrendous as his actions look, I also find unfaithfulness by women horrendous as well, which occurs with regularity. I don’t know what led to his drinking. To my understanding there’s too little knowledge about what occurred. Perhaps because he’s serving his sentence he’s not here to defend himself, but I don’t believe in trying someone without letting them defend themselves, and this rush to public condemnation without hearing his side of things disgusts me.

    4 – Jeanine claimed she forgave him. I think she should be involved in this discussion of whether to remove his medal or not. Obviously McCuskey made some serious mistakes over a relatively short time period and alcohol changed his behavior – which by the way suggests the alcohol manufacturers who made the alcohol he drank should also be equally punished and demonized, not just McCuskey. But Jeanine seemed to have some insight into his character that’s not being much mentioned here that led to forgiveness, and I wonder, really, whether this demonization of McCuskey truly even has her support.

    As I understand it, given the following sources, this is what happened:

    Paul McCuskey and Jeanine Blackburn lived together but separated in 2004. After this, McCuskey began drinking alcohol and physically abused her over an 8-month period from November 2006 to June 2007. There were 3 violent incidents. Injuries to Jeanine Blackburn reportedly led to loss of sight in her eye and miscarriages; she stated: “The miscarriage of my babies was bad enough, but the worst of these injuries was the total loss of sight to my left eye.” He also reportedly kept her from seeking medical treatment for 2 weeks.

    McCuskey performed a heroic rescue of an elderly woman and is known in the community for service work. Ordinarily the maximum sentence is 15 months for violent crimes, but Judge Wilmoth found McCuskey’s crime heinous enough that she sentenced him to 5 years and 6 months of prison. Blackburn said she forgave McCuskey, stating “If I don’t forgive him, I can’t move on, but I can’t just forget this either”.

    The Women’s Rights movement is trying to make an example out of McCuskey apparently and despite his lengthy prison sentence wants his award removed as well.

    MOST INFORMATIVE:

    http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/wife-beaters-our-terrifying-shame/story-fn56b2fi-1226069371058
    http://www.starnewsgroup.com.au/mail/mountain-views/242/story/88980.html
    http://www.starnewsgroup.com.au/mail/mountain-views/242/story/88994.html
    http://www.starnewsgroup.com.au/mail/mountain-views/243/story/89273.html

    NEWS:

    http://www.cfaconnect.net.au/news/bravery-awards-for-cambarville-fire.html
    http://aww.ninemsn.com.au/news/newsstories/8431836/has-australia-gone-soft-on-domestic-violence
    http://www.cfaconnect.net.au/news/bravery-awards-for-humevale-fire.html
    http://bigmedicine.ca/wordpress/2012/02/victoria-bravery-awards-for-cfa-firefighters/

    OPINION:
    http://www.mamamia.com.au/news/paul-francis-mccuskey-beat-his-wife-he-also-got-an-award-for-bravery/
    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/standing-by-the-dubious-bravery-of-a-wife-beater/story-e6frezz0-1226292528930

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      There are no excuses for domestic violence. Your attempts to find excuses for it are sad and display your deep-seated hatred of women. Your issues with female infidelity speak of unresolved personal issues, and your claims that more small children are murdered by women than men are incorrect and unsupported. Your assertion that women are routinely “better off” than men following divorce are also statistically incorrect, and your issues with abortion and the surrounding moral considerations are irrelvant to this case. Statistically, men are more likley to be perpetrators of domestic violence, and women are more likely to be victims. I know that some people like to argue that this is not true, and that there are unreported cases to consider. This argument is incorrect. Men are also more likley to be victims of violence from other men, than from women. Neither is this acceptable. The fact that his partner found it within hersefl to forgive him does not mean that proper crimal action should not be taken. The law was changed to allow law enforcement officers to press charges in domestic cases, because of the prevalence of scared and ashamed women dropping charges once the initial drama had ended. Its part of a pattern you see that perpetuates it otherwise. And finally, I see that you are upset about the length of his incarceration… perhaps there are details you are unaware of that led the lawmakers to feel that a standard sentence was too lenient. As you yourself said… there is a lot of information we have not yet seen.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  5. jb expat

    if chris brown shouldn’t have been allowed to sing at the grammy’s (and he shouldn’t have), then this man should not have received any kind of reward – frankly, I think he should have received more jail time!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • ms one eye

      YES. His sentance is nothing compared to my `new` life. But adaptaion is good and makes us thankful for what we still have. i am breathing and being a little bit stronger every day. there are worse people off than me and thankfully we are still alive. Thankyou everyone for your support. Please be my voice and vent the disgust with the award to the appropriate organisations . i dont have that kind of strength.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  6. ms one eye

    First of all i was never his wife, however i was his partner for many years. Number 2. The eye thief unbeknowns to me had 2 prior assult charges prior to our relationship. No3. We lost 2 babies (only one was admitted in the county court as there was proof of the abuse. No 4. The eye thief was accepted into the cfa without a prior criminal record check (that is mandotary), and had a 12 charges pending. (the assaults on me) Yes, he was brave on the day. And so were the other members of the crew. Howevever, how was he accepteted in the first place. The humane (less) society needs to be more accountable to the organisations that they award medals to. What message does this award send to other victems of violence of their past and their community standing. Do not judge me when you are not in my dark world that was never my choice. And yes, we all have choices. We sometimes believe that people can change and will. This award I believe is entitled, however once in jail, with prior assault charges, should not be recieved.He needs to publicly dissaccociate this award, and allow the true heros to hold their head high. And I am a hero. Thankyou. Ps the gov general, the hon man who awarded these medals and ken lay (the chief commissioner of vic) are all ambassadors for violence against women. How the hell do you think I feel and others that have been in a violent situation and the rest of the community who may be in this situation. Its not about me and my dead eye and babies. Its about truth and morals.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Claire

      Dear ms one eye, thank-you for your post. I’ve spent the last hour thinking of a reply to your post, but I really don’t know what to say. I was really taken back by your honesty and bluntness. I don’t know you, but I do agree with your comment; You are a hero. I wish you a life full of love and respect.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  7. Claire

    Whenever I hear about someone winning a bravery award etc. I pay no attention to it. It means NOTHING once an undeserving person receives one. IMO this man is undeserving; HE KILLED HIS UNBORN CHILD! Giving this man an award casts aspersions on the integrity of all recipients, now and in the past. If someone tells me they’ve received that award, I think and will say ‘So! Big deal. That award’s given to all sorts of s–t people. Remember that guy that killed his unborn baby, that beat his wife repeatedly and so severely that she was blinded in one eye. Yeah, they gave HIM that award. Real brave.’

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  8. anon

    Fair enough being nominated for the award but should have it publicly removed for what he has done.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  9. Daisy

    NO

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  10. lesamia

    Awards for a single act are always going to be provocative as it is hard to disassociate it with a recipient’s general character. In this case the character was abhorrent. The least the awardee could have done to acknowledge his abhorrent behaviour would be to publicly decline the offer out of respect for his wife and to show genuine remorse for his actions.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  11. White ribbon supporter

    Love the comparisons being drawn in various posts with Adolf Hitler and Ivan Milat. Paul Francis McCuskey, looks like you are in good company! Brave indeed.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  12. Rachel

    To me – it’s a bit like the Brownlow medal … ineligible to win if you’ve been suspended during the year.

    The medal is not just about bravery – it’s a symbol that represents something more.

    He should not have received the award.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  13. adoreyoga

    This debate isn’t about bravery. It’s about masculinity. This man wasn’t a coward when he beat his wife and a hero when he rescued the elderly woman. In both cases he was conforming to a warped ideal of masculinity that is rife in some male-dominated spheres, as illustrated by the recent scandals in the military. We reward men for behaving in an ultra masculine way – war hero’s risking all to destroy the enemy, firefighters rushing in to a burning building to rescue old ladies etc. (and before anyone says ‘but where would you be without soldiers and firefighters saving your skin’, I’m not denigrating these achievements). We also permit and normalize violence against women to penetrate every area of popular culture (just visit Collectiveshout.org to see how violent porn is now on T-shirts in our local shops, in music videos and magazine adverts; not to mention the behaviour of sports ‘hero’s’ such as Matthew Johns who has continued to enjoy a TV career after the 2009 assault of a young woman in NZ). What’s a ‘real man’ to do? Nothing excuses domestic violence, but we do need to take some collective responsibility for the way in which this particular brand of misogynistic ‘masculine’ behaviour is rewarded and encouraged.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • JoannaGoanna

      Your comment is fresh from some gender studies indoctrination where any example of what a male does wrong can be illogically construed to representative of the entire gender, unless of course those actions are benevolent ones, coz in that case, it’s dead silence.

      You probably under no circumstances now will accept that your comment could possibly be misandric (that’s the female version of misogynistic).

      Your completely insulting and belittling conflation of masculinity with toxicity of behaviour is real sexism and since when is violence against women ever accepted?

      Violence against women is condemned as only second to violence against children with violence against men coming in at a very late in the day dead last.

      Frankly, as you can tell I’m being, how dare you assume the bravery and heroics it takes to do such altruistic things could be in any form extrapolated to represent the actions of a cowardly lunatic.

      He is being condemned here and everywhere, the problem is he did something good away from his obvious crimes.

      Clearly no one is supporting his actions of violence against women, clearly no one anyone has defended him on this front and the separate issue needs to debated as such not conflated in a twisted ad hominen attack on half a species.

      If you lack the belief that people can tell the difference between a song lyric or a tshirt, or a movie and the willing destruction of human life, then I don’t know how you get out of bed in the morning.

      I get out of bed and never on my way to work do I see a princess, a ninja or a copycat nightmare on elmstreet killer, probably because the cognition of separating reality from fantasy is inherent in humans.

      Thank god.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Kris2040

        Not so much gender studies as Melinda Tankard Reist.

        And adoreyoga – The Matty Johns thing? Came to light in 2009 but actually happened years ago. Get your facts straight before you start throwing accusations around. He didn’t assault anyone.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
    • Shane

      That is the biggest load of crap I’ve ever read. You’re mixing masculinity up with testosterone fueled aggression, and the word misogynist would have to be the most badly and over used word being bandied around today.

      You obviously have no idea of how men perceive themselves as men and have been listening to some feminine opinion of what men see themselves as.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • redballoon

      There are ‘Men’s Rights’ sites for this sort of rubbish.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  14. Mrs Average

    It doesn’t matter how brave this depraved maniac is. He blinded a woman and killed her unborn baby because he is an animal. There is no way he deserves a medal for doing his job and playing the rescuer in public when we all know he is just a vicious and disturbed animal behind closed doors. If a beast like that can get a hero’s medal, our community is way off course!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  15. anon

    Separate issues. He acted bravely in risking his life to rescue an elderly woman so he gets an award for bravery. He acts criminally in assaulting his wife so he gets locked up.

    The award should stand as should his jail sentence.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      This makes sense to me.

      Should a man who committed brave acts his whole life be exempt from jail for the sole time he murders his wife? No. So it shouldn’t be the case in reverse either.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Anonymous

      he had a prior record that the cfa did not do. How???? Was he ever allowed to be in there to start with. Get your facts right. If that was your mother or brother or pet thatt this man clearly had anger issues, would you want him near your loved ones. Get real. There is a judicial issue here.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  16. Claire

    I’m sorry but I agree with the Royal Humane Society. This article is basically an ad hominem argument. The fact that he risked his life to save the elderly lady shouldn’t be discounted because of other unrelated actions.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • trixie melodian

      So, by that reasoning, you would support a convicted child molester receiving an award for bravery? You would be OK with Denis Ferguson or Darcy Freeman’s dad receiving a bravery award for something they did before they were convicted for the crimes they committed?

      Because this is about more than logical argument. It’s about the big “fuck you” that this decision sends to women living in fear of an abusive partner. It is telling them that as long as their partner keeps his violence nice and private in their home, and acts like a good bloke in public, then society will forgive him anything. And that’s not a message I will ever support.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • hms

        Well said Trixie. Agree completely.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • Vic

        Great response exactly how I would want to articulate my opinion, you should send it to Quentin!

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • trixie melodian

          I kinda did, but with nicer language : )

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
      • Shannon

        To be honest, if a convicted paedophile threw themselves in front of a car in order to push someone else out of harm’s way, or jumped into a raging river with a rope tied around their waist in order to save someone from drowning, or put themselves in the path of a bullet aimed at an innocent person to protect them…I would be happy for them to receive an award for bravery.

        Giving them that award is to say, “Good job for doing something right – this is what we value” not “Good job for being a child molester, we forgive you because you did something good”.

        For me, they are very different things. Commending someone for doing something right doesn’t negate the fact that they have, at another time, done something wrong. I think that making them serve time in jail demonstrates that we don’t think what they did was OK.

        I might agree with you if the receipt of the award was used as a reason to reduce criminal penalty or something. While it may be helpful as evidence of good character for, say, a speeding fine or tax fraud, I doubt it would be so influential for a serious offence such as grievous bodily harm, murder, child molestation, other serious assault, etc.

        But that’s just my opinion and I don’t expect you (or many others) to agree with it.

        I just believe that we should reward the good, punish the bad and that will encourage people to strive to be good.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • trixie melodian

          Thanks for responding so honestly Shannon. IMO if you DO hold to that same principle across the spectrum of crimes, then I completely respect it as a strongly held ethical position.

          It’s just that in my experience, violence against women is often held to a very different standard to other crimes. The same people with the “string ‘im up” attitude towards child sex offenders often backpedal into muttered qualifiers and “why didn’t she just leave him”-type excuses in cases of domestic violence.

          I guess that’s my problem with this situation. Could you imagine the uproar from the Daily Telegraph if this *was* Darcy Freeman’s dad, or Denis Ferguson receiving a medal for bravery? There would be no question that it be revoked.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Shannon

            I see what you mean :) For me, I hold domestic violence to a similar standard as what people perceive as “more serious” crimes. And when I say domestic violence, I mean whether it is perpetrated by a man or a woman (in case anyone is wondering).

            While a hit to the face is, at first glance, “less serious” than say, grievous bodily harm, there is so much more to domestic violence than that. There is the repeated invasion of bodily integrity, the (in many/most cases) psychological abuse, the breach of trust, the exploitation of love (be it for the perpetrator or for the children) and many other things. Domestic violence tends to be a package deal and I think that is one horrible and very serious package. It’s not like getting into a scuffle with someone at a bar, even if the physical injuries are similar.

            But despite that (and as I’ve said below), I think labelling theory has some merit and it is for that reason that I think it is important to allow offenders positive feedback when they do good things, rather than always focusing on the bad, when trying to curb recidivism. Not everyone agrees with that theory, though, and that’s ok :)

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • May!

              I bloody love reading intelligent and respectful debate between MMers like Shannon and Trixie. You guys can come to my dinner party anytime!

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Mia

              What May said!

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Scott b

              Comitting a serious crime already precludes you from many things in years to come. Company law and immigration law both enforce restrictions and exclusions on those who have served custodial sentences.
              One of those is around “positions of trust”.
              For the Royal Humane Society to not see that awarding a medal for bravery places that person in a position of trust in the eyes of the community seems disingenuous.
              If its not within their remit to judge the character of the proposed recipient, they need to amend their process.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
      • Christie Hayes

        Go Trixie, spot on. X

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • Laura

        Great comments from both sides, but Trixie, I can’t agree when you say this presentation suggests society will forgive him of anything.
        He was sentenced to five and a half years imprisonment by a judge (who was acting as a representative of the man’s ‘peers’, in this case wider society).
        Looking at that on balance, one honourary medal for a single brave act versus 5+ years imprisonment for serious battery, I’m left in no doubt as to which act is considered more serious. I suppose it comes down to the question of whether a person’s previous wrongful behaviour should still be considered/have continuing influence on their life once they’ve served their time.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • Z

        SPOT ON!

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • Shazza

        Spot on, Trixie. Such awards are symbolic by nature and they anoint recipients as role models and upstanding citizens. Someone who has broken the law in such a serious way is not deserving of recognition. Would you give a firefighter an award for bravely rescuing people from a fire that he himself had started?

        Okay, the two incidents in this case are not directly related, but the principle holds. He has acted kindly to one woman (as part of his job… perhaps an ego trip…who knows whether he genuinely cared for her life?) and he acted horribly to another woman. The second woman was someone that he had sworn to love and respect. Big fat fail.

        The only way someone who had committed violent crimes should be rewarded for a future actions is if they have shown sincere remorse and worked to attain forgiveness for what they’ve done. I do believe in redemption…But too often in this country macho men act horribly and they are forgiven by society without even having to ask, just because they are strong, popular, talented, rich…whatever. It’s despicable. It is glorifying the strong at the expense of the weak, as though ‘might’ really does equal ‘right.’

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • Anonymous

        Great response Trixie!

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
    • cdan15

      He is not a hero, however he is someone who performed a brave act to save an elderly woman….He is not a wife beater but someone who severely beat his partner.
      There is an important difference to recognise. Similarly, when a child does something bad, they are not a bad child, but a child who has done something bad. It might be difficult to differentiate that for many people but an act itself, does not define a person. They are so much more than the acts they have done.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  17. trixie melodian

    If you really want to voice your disapproval, make sure you complain to the right people!

    Her Excellency Ms Quentin Bryce, Governor General is the Senior Patron of the Royal Humane Society, and is also active with the White Ribbon Foundation working to end violence against women. I have no doubt Her Excellency would be very interested to hear your views on the matter.

    Contact her via this link:

    http://www.gg.gov.au/contact.php

    Also forward your letter to the Royal Humane Society:

    bravery@rhsa.org.au

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  18. ladybird73

    Careful kids, you’re not allowed to say anything against people who win bravery awards are you?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      That’s exactly what I was thinking. This is why it’s dangerous to act like people who won medals are gods.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  19. Trace

    So sad that he risked his life to save a stranger and yet was criminally brutal to someone he purported to love and vowed to protect.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  20. Z

    My personal opinion is that he doesn’t deserve it. Someone who is truly brave, does not beat his wife. Ever.

    Think of the message this sends. That you can be a thug but still be labeled brave. I think being acknowledged for his bravery is fine, but to be awarded in spite of his violence is weird.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  21. anon for this one

    My mother and also myself were the subjects of many beatings from my father during my childhood. Mum was 7 months pregnant with my sister when she got her first taste. During my early teen years i copped more than a few beatings. Many times the police were called to the family home, in fact so often that they knew me by name. My parents had a super turbulent marriage dad would often leave and we assume be with some one else so many time that when i was 3 months old and my sister was 2 she OD”d on valium the simple fact that we lived in an apartment and knew our neighbours. My sister went next door to the woman who called the police. As no family were in the country to take us we ended up in an orphanage. My parents got back together and the next 15 years were very very rocky. Any way i got therapy and so did my parents and now we are ok. In some ways i am still angry at my mum for never leaving my dad and putting us through what she did. BUT i was not her i did not have 5 children, she did the best she could but it was a very difficult situation.
    What i find interesting is as the years go by i cannot understand why a woman would let this go on. My younger sister ended up in an abusive relationship for a while and it was all i could do to not smack her in the head my self. I don’t have any words of wisdom i just wish that there were more resources for women who need to escape. That no one ever says to these women “oh it was just once maybe he was really mad” or whatever excuse comes to mind when you think someones boyfriend/husband is really nice and YOU can’t imagine them swinging their fists at your friend. I do know two things people can survive anything and if they want they can change. The second is that if anyone ever raised a hand to me i would END them plain a and simple

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Amber

      “In some ways i am still angry at my mum for never leaving my dad and putting us through what she did” – your mother was/is as much a victim as you and your sister. Your father is responsible for the domestic violence in your chodlhood home, not your mother.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • ladybird73

        She can’t help her emotions can she? She’s allowed to be angry even if it’s somewhat misplaced.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Anon for this one

          This reaction is exactly why I am kind of angry at her is that for most people I am forever a victim. You just reinforce this scar by calling me one.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Faybian

            You are not the first I’ve heard express these sentiments. A woman who probably doesn’t know the magnitude of the effect she had on me spoke of the same sort of feelings. It stayed with me and helped me leave an abusive relationship.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
          • Ally

            In social work we use the word survivor, rather than victim. Victim has negative connotations regarding lack of empowerment. Survivor acknowledges the strength of those who have lived through it, while not negating the severity and brutality of many experiences.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Kris2040

              I’ve been trying to think of a better word – I hate it when people say they were a victim of something or other. Survivor is much more apt. And empowering.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Shane

              A rose by any other name.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
      • Anon for this one

        How dare you assume I blame my mother!!!! Also I NEVER EVER will use the word victim to describe myself or my mother. My mother is a champion who did the best she could. In fact she managed to create a relationship with a man she should hate. In doing so I have a relationship with my father quite a good one in fact. He came from a different time and world where women are still lower than dogs and through my mothers strength he is a man today I can happily love as my dad. I sometimes wish she left him so that didn’t feel so connected to these domestic violence stories. But the woman is NEVER EVER to blame in these cases. If there were better resources she would not have felt so trapped I would not have floundered through my teen years thinking all men were waiting for the chance to control your behaviour. I lived I learned through it all but I am not a victim nor is any one in my family especially my mum. That woman is a hero. On the days I feel I am turning into my mum u feel thrilled that I am doing just fine thank you

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • john

          Your right anon, excellent answer, we are all products of our time and our conditioning, what comes from our time, our parents, and our environment shapes and makes us, thats what we have to start with, how far we come, grow,evolve from there depends on many things, to me an ongoing abuse makes a victim in reality, and an ended abuse makes a survivor in reality, its not a word competition, its about the right word for the right circumstances,condition. And its about forgiveness anyway, because that helps us all grow, in fact without it we cant grow really, imagine the person who cant ever be forgiven, and will never be forgiven, imagine a child held to account their entire life for a mistake they made, the damage that would do to the child, what makes anyone think its different for anybody, our whole life is full of mistakes that could bear grudges by others, hopefully we’ve all been forgiven for “our wrongs” and have stopped what “we did wrong” a long time ago, hopefully we’ve actually seen the wrongs and grown into better people, good on you Anon.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Anonymous

            a beautiful reply john.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
          • Anon for this one

            Thanks, i wrote this a while ago and it’s nice to see that people can give opinions and advice without overstating their position,

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
      • Alison

        I can’t believe you could post that. Must be nice in your happy little world where emotions are not conflicted, where sometimes anger and sadness isn’t seeping through every crack it can find. Save your self-righteousness for people who haven’t lived through it. I’m sure Anon – and myself and others who have experienced similar situations – are quite capable of apportioning blame appropriately.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • missamoo

          Thanks Alison i saw red and purple when i got that response. I was musing on the fact that in perhaps it would have been different but i used the wrong word obviously.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
      • missamoo

        Actually if you really want to go into the psychology of it (which i have). My father was brought up by a man who taught him that his mother left because she didn’t love him. That man (my grandfather) was thrown out of home at the age 7 and told to make his way in the world his first job was as paid companion to another child where he was made to sleep in the stables. When he was 13 he faked his age to get a job in Tehran in and telecommunications company. The mother (my grandmother) was married to my grandfather when she was 13 and he was 36. She had 4 children by the age of 18 was divorced at 28. My great great grandparents seriously screwed up their children and so setting up a legacy for me. So yeah i am angry, angry that my beautiful shining mother didn’t take the first hit and get the hell out. That she saw no way out but to stay, that my sister was washing clothes with a stick in a bathtub and still didn’t see her boyfriend was a douche. I don’t blame her for the violence, i am angry at a world that still has this in it. I was trying to be anonymous because my mum is sensitive to people knowing her business. But i won’t hide for anything and certainly not your or ladybird73′s condescension.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  22. Shane

    Can’t anyone separate the two issues? The man risked his life and deserves to be recognised for that. Adolph Hitler was awarded the Iron Cross First Class because of heroic actions in WW1, just because he is the world’s most hated man doesn’t mean that he wasn’t brave.

    We have to take the good with the bad. If a person does something exceptional they should be rewarded, and if the same person commits a criminal act then they equally deserve to be punished.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Vic

      No I cannot separate the two because they came from the same person. This ‘award’ is from the Royal Humane Society and was given to a man who did more unhumane acts then good. Separating the two only shoves the domestic violence in a tiny little corner so the rest of us are not bothered or worried by it. I hope he does change and has remorse but he needs to be accountable and face the consequences of his choices.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Shane

        The guy is in the big house, how much more accountable can he be?

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Vic

          Alot more. Being in the Big House doesn’t mean he has remorse or is trying to make amends and change. Maybe he is in there building even more anger and resentment.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Shannon

            He pleaded guilty and, according to the sentencing judge, appeared to be genuinely remorseful and ashamed of his actions. A guilty plea is generally a recognition that one is accountable for one’s actions. Apparently he had a continuing history of mood disturbance and difficulty managing anger and conflict.

            However, I don’t know what (if anything) he has done to make amends or address the mood/anger issues. If he were genuinely remorseful, I imagine he would be taking advantage of prison rehabilitative programs w.r.t anger management etc.

            But while we don’t know if he is making an effort to change, we also don’t know that he isn’t.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Vic

              Shannon I am no way assuming he is not remorseful or incapable of change on the contrary I hope he does use his time to rehabilitate so another women is not put in danger. I was merely suggesting to shane that jail time does not equate to rehabilitation.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
          • Shane

            Vic,

            The most hated people in Gaol (in decreasing order) are rock spiders, rapists and wife beaters. He’ll be getting his fair share of rough man love in there, it’s no holiday camp.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Barry

              Shane – you’ve come to the wrong place with that opinion. Its bandwagon city here.

              Assault of anyone is wrong and that’s what the courts look after.

              The people handing out awards for bravery are looking at one given situation and nothing more. They aren’t looking into criminal history, how they were brought up or anything outside of a difficult situation where someone put themselves in harms way.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
    • trixie melodian

      What if, as a few other people have suggested, he had been charged with paedophilia? Or if he had shaken his baby to death? Or if he had been dealing drugs to schoolkids? I have no doubt that his medal would have been withdrawn in these cases, so why is beating your wife less of a crime?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Shane

        But he hadn’t done any of those things, he committed assault. There’s a difference between shagging a child and thumping an adult. Henious as it is, assaulting a wife isn’t as bad as everyone is saying. It’s not murder or rape. Of course I’ll get caned for saying this and I’m not diminishing his crime, but why does everyone want to wipe good deeds because they don’t like his bad deeds?

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Kathy W

          ‘assaulting a wife isn’t as bad as everyone is saying’

          So what makes it not bad? The fact that it’s ‘just assault’ and not murder? What part of assault is okay? Have you EVER been assaulted? Have you ever seen broken teeth, black eyes, bare scalp where hair has been ripped out? Have you ever seen children cowering a corner, wetting their pants from fear while their mother is beaten senseless?

          Thank f*ck I’m not married to you.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Shane

            Kathy,

            That’s not what I was alluding to, and yes, I have been beaten senseless, by 4 thugs at the instigation of my alcoholic ex wife. Domestic violence happens both ways.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
        • Vic

          Yikes Shane its more than just assault! The methods used to tourture prisioners of war are very similar to those used by an abusive spouse. Deprivation of rights, brain washing, isolation, not to mention the physical tourture. If these “assaults” he did were to a stranger I bet he would have got more time.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Shane

            Was he found guilty of deprivation of liberty? False imprisonment? If he was, then yeah, he’s a bigger prick than I thought he was.

            Then again, when was the last time you ran into a fire?

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • missamoo

              When i was a12 year old child i would have danced in a fire to stop my dad beating me and my mum.
              Yes domestic violence goes both ways but none of it is ever ok or not as bad as people say it is. Actually it’s worse and until we acknowledge this deep in the heart of our society we will never be free of the stench

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
        • trixie melodian

          Apart from the fact that you just said that what he did “isn’t as bad as everyone is saying”… I mean, seriously, WTF? He blinded her, kicked her in the stomach while she was pregnant, causing her to miscarry, left her in very valid fear for her life and obviously caused massive physical and emotional trauma to her – I’m at a loss to see how that is “not as bad as everyone is saying”. How much worse would you like it to get before it qualifies as “serious”? I’m also stunned that you can possibly suggest that you aren’t “diminishing his crime”. Yes, that’s EXACTLY what you are doing!

          But anyway, apart from that, you have just summed up one of the massive problems we have in this country – violence against women is tolerated (Matthew Newton) slut shaming is acceptable (Kyle Sandilands) and the seriousness of rape is diminished (pretty much the entire NRL). By suggesting that McCuskey’s crime isn’t really all that bad, you have just added your voice to the chorus of people who blame the victims of crime and excuse (or in this case laud) the perpetrators.

          And you can’t have it both ways. Either his good deeds DO cancel out his bad deeds (and that includes him being a child molester or baby murderer) or they don’t. IMO if you are convicted of a violent crime against someone who is vulnerable, then you simply do not qualify for a bravery award.

          And I’m disappointed that the RHS would tarnish their image with such an association.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Shane

            I am trying to say that assault is not as bad as murder or rape. Which bit of that don’t you agree with.

            I never said it wasn’t bad, nor did I say that he shouldn’t be in gaol.

            Get a grip will you?

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • trixie melodian

              You’re deluding yourself if you don’t think your comments diminish the seriousness of violence against women.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Anonymous

              Really depends on the assault doesn’t it …..

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Sigh

              I disagree, assault can be very traumatic too. I got badly assaulted as a teen by a group of girls and relived it mentally for years.
              Then my ex started in on me….
              I can’t compare it to rape, because I managed to get out of a gang rape situation thanks to friends, but I’m sure all of those memories are awful.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Michelle S

              Yes Assault can be as bad as murder or rape. The memories are there for life. The actions affect that person daily for the remainder of their life. This woman is now blind in one eye and is without the child she is meant to be holding in her arms today. He is in fact a murderer as he hit her so hard in the stomach that it resulted in miscarriage. I am truly amazed by your responses

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Shane

              No Melissa, you’re wrong. Murder takes a life forever. Assault gives someone nightmares. I shouldn’t have to mention the severity of rape. Don’t be ridiculous.

              This particular series of assaults is horrid, and indeed caused the death of an unborn child, but equal or worse to taking a life? You’re dreaming.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Anon for this one

              I am a survivor of domestic violence, sexual assault and rape. It will be different for every survivor, but for me the domestic violence was worse than the rape. It can go on for months, years, and repeated attacks not only on your body, but your mental health and psychological state. Which can be catastrophic to the point you think you don’t deserve better. Which is one reason why its difficult to leave.

              Comments such as yours further validate the belief that many people suffering domestic violence hold- that no-one will believe how horrible it is, that “isn’t as bad as everyone is saying” so they then think maybe they should just put up with it. And if they press charges, maybe he’s only going to jail for a few years, the fear that he/ she will come back and kill you next time is immense.

              The injuries I sustained being assaulted versus being raped are also significantly worse. Both physically and mentally. This woman lost half her vision and her baby. Those things can be completely devastating- and as someone who has lost a baby by natural causes (not from a kick in the stomach), the pain of that loss was one of the worst things I have experienced. And in her case, her husband caused it.

              If you lose an eye, how difficult is it to drive, to work, to regain co-ordination? Close one eye and then have someone throw a ball at you. I can almost guarantee you won’t be able to catch it.

              I’m hoping this might give you a new perspective on how severe domestic violence can be. And if children are watching one of their parents subject to violence… they can sometimes grow up to be abusive themselves, sometimes even worse than what they have witnessed. Its definitely not a crime to be dismissed as not “as bad as everyone is saying.”

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
        • Lou

          Shane, because I think in this case, they’re directly linked. He saved one person’s life, whilst endangering another’s life frequently. There’s no rule that says we have to give out medals for bravery; it’s a human choice. So I guess I think that it is too offensive to give a bravery award to someone who is not brave as a general rule, but as an exception really. Although I really do like Shannan’s post as well, about rewarding good behaviour because it encourages more good behaviour. I use that with young kids though, not sure about adults… I feel that in this case, the pride might go to his head and it will give him and others the message that his actions can be wiped over and ignored. For the sake of women (and men) being abused right now, I’m not sure it is the right message to send to them. Save the bravery awards for those who have done something brave and not done anything to make us second-guess that bravery in another circumstance.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
    • redqueen

      And by doing so you sweep domestic violence under the rug. This guy is a gutless coward regardless of how many people he saves. Real heroes don’t hit women.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Shane

        Who is sweeping domestic violence under the carpet?

        The guy is in gaol. Where he should be.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • trixie melodian

          “assaulting a wife isn’t as bad as everyone is saying”…

          “Who is sweeping domestic violence under the carpet?”

          You are.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Shane

            I am not. I happen to have a family member who’s skull was fractured with a cast iron frying pan. Another family member wore a crystal decanter in the face causing a broken nose, and fractured cheekbone and eye socket and detached retina. A third member lost 6 teeth with a well aimed kick. So don’t give me that crap. Stop twisting what I’m saying and only reading part of it. I’m not diminishing domestic violence. I’m just putting it into perspective against worse crimes like murder, rape and paedophilia.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Faybian

              Shane, there’s a reason that we’re obliged to report families that have active DV to DOCS. It’s considered a form of child abuse, with the effects physical and mental considered serious and far reaching. This is for those kids that are “only witness” to the DV too.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Anonymous

              And those crimes are sentenced accordingly. Seriously, I think it’s a stretch to claim that people are twisting your words. They seem pretty straight forward to everyone except, apparently, you.
              Perhaps you’re aren’t expressing yourself that well?
              No need to be angry at everybody else for that.
              Also, is it really that constructive to “rate” against other people? It seems to me that this is a pretty direct way of diminishing their importance…

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
  23. bill

    OK, now I’ve had just about enough of this weird obsession we have with rewarding people for doing their job. And having worked with the Fire Brigade in the past, I can tell you that in my experience they are a pretty lazy lot that crave attention. They work four days a week, two night shifts that they generally sleep through. they get amazingly high wages for little qualifications and extra money to do things like wear their BA equipment (part of their basic job). they have a great union and a pretty losey work ethic. On top of this, they celebrate obvious scum bags like this one. Our community is twisted.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • MissV

      I agree with the awarding people for doing their jobs. And yes firefighting is a particularly dangerous job but to me, it’s like saying that lifeguards deserve medals. Whilst they deserve recognition, I think bravery awards should be awarded to people who really do show bravery when it’s not expected of them. Things like passerby’s going into burning houses to save someone from their burning home or something like that.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • firies wife

      wow what a load of rubbish… Worked ‘with’ the fire brigade, not in obviously! highly paid? little qualifications? You need to check your facts! The only thing you got right is 2 day 2 night as for sleeping through, not likely for most!

      Yes this guy is scum bag, bottom feeder, don’t disrespect 100′s who work hard!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • anon

        What people don’t know here is that this mongrel dog should not have been in the CFA anyway. Had a mandatory police check been done he wouldn’t have been there. So why give the dog a medal when its based on a lie by him being there. He has taken the shine off his fellow CFA members. The award should go to his victim which isn’t his wife either. Carma will catch up with him. GOOD.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • Anonymous

        Not a load of rubbish, but i do know the facts. However, facts remain this has taken a shine off the women and men in the communuty that choose to in their own time protect the surrounding community. You have missed the point . Mandatary checks were not done. And the victim was disollowed into the ses as she did not meet the medical requirements.

        [comment edited as per Mamamia commenting guidelines]

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
    • Ally

      My husband is a firefighter and I find this extremely offensive.
      Maybe the fire fighters should be too lazy or too busy seeking attention when you ask them to help but then again it is always people like you who are the first to scream for help.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Mish

        The lifesaving, dangerous, selfless work firies do when a call comes in is beyond amazing. I don’t know what they earn but I’m pretty sure they should be earning more. Whether they are sleeping or playing cards during their shift while its quiet is a moot point. They are there on stand by and if my house bursts into flames they are ready to go.

        Bill I’m not sure what they should be doing while they wait… twiddle their thumbs? Also the value of a worker is not determined by his qualifications. I have a long list of qualifications yet I could never do what they do.

        Ally and firies wife I’m very grateful for people like your partners. And on a lighter note slightly jealous, I love a man in a uniform and firies are the best!

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
    • Anonymous

      Totally agree Bill ….

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  24. Earl Grey

    This is one of the problems with awards. Father of the Year Steve Waugh (former cricket captain of Australia) remarked upon getting the award, words to the effect of “I barely see my kids”. Business person of the year awarded to Alan Bond and Christopher Scase. In rushing to award someone for some tiny part of their lives, we ignore the rest of their lives. We overlook people who do a fantastic job, for someone that is in the media’s eye. We award celebrities and ignore the people that actually get the job done. We should do away with awards altogether. They are fundamentally flawed. We should encourage everyone to be the best person they can.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Ebony

      Love and agree with everything you just said!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Z

      Woo! Sing it, sister!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Mish

      On a side note I also think this should be the case for schooling. I’m not sure if this has changed since I was studying but I distinctly remember the school bully (who was highly intelligent) being awarded at assembly numerous times despite being on detention every other day for picking on other kids. It doesn’t set a very good example for younger kids who look up to the person who is always getting awards for his intellect regardless of how he treats others.

      And this is where I love your statement “We should encourage everyone to be the best person they can.” What a brilliant sentiment.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  25. Julie Fedele

    I agree with those who have said the award should stand, particularly the view of Shannon re: what is this man’s hope of change/rehab if he is forever labelled by his atrocious acts and never commended for his good ones? You may not care about him but I agree it does give a dismal outlook for society as a whole if we cannot consider someone is capable of change. We do not live in a fairytale world where good is good and evil is evil – there are elements of both in everyone and everything. To NOT allow this man his medal would be setting the bad example, not the other way around.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Relish

      It was awarded by the humane society. Please tell me how this man is humane and represents what the society stand for? He is not Humame. Bravery is not beating your wife senseless. Bravery is these who hangs in there, who hugs, who cries, who loves.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Laura

        The society awarding the medals believe that his SINGLE ACT of rescuing a woman was humane. Saving others’ lives comes down to the old “love thy neighbour” principle and DOES represent what the society stands for.
        The society is not saying “This man is a humane person.” They are saying “This particular action of this man, on this particular day, was brave.” That is all that this award stands for.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
    • vic

      ….then reward his acts that demonstrate him changing or making amends (and getting roughed up in jail gives me no indication he is going to change and try to make things right). I would like to see him decline the award out of respect and acknowledgement of what he did to his wife.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  26. 10pm

    let’s create an award of extreme cowardice and you can publicly award it to people like this, and hopefully it will stick longer than any goodwill from the bravery award

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  27. Anonymous

    I think if he did all those things then he should be in jail for 20 years, not 5. But I also don’t think the Humane Society has done anything wrong. As I understand it the award is for something brave he did at work, it doesn’t necessarily mean he is a decent person just that he did something brave at work.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Vic

      Agree, it is a work related thing but the problem with awards is that we tend to then look to these people as heroes and role models. We begin to define them as a person (both professionally and personally) based on their award.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  28. girly

    Not sure if anyone got a response, but this is what I got back to my email to the humane society:

    In response to your e-mail The Royal Humane Society of Australasia has made the following statement:

    The main criterion of the Society is to bestow bravery awards on those who risk their lives to save the lives of others. In the case of Mr McCuskey during the “Black Saturday” bushfires he most certainly did put his life at risk on that day to save the life of another person.

    It has never been the role of the Society to judge award nominees on their probity either prior to or after their act of bravery. The rescuer’s probity is not considered relevant to their actions of bravery unless the rescuer was involved in reckless behaviour initiating the cause of the incident/rescue.

    At a recent meeting of the Court of Directors of the Society it was decided that the award to Mr McCuskey would not be withdrawn.

    The Court of Directors hopes this clarifies the Society’s decision making process in regard to bravery awards.

    Regards,

    Sue Cutler

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Lisa

      Hmm.. I have a slight issue with the letter saying that he “did put his life at risk on that day to save the life of another person”. Yes that is true BUT he took the life of another on a different day. The one of his unborn child. And sadly, could have taken another life of his abused wife. Thankfully she is still alive.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Anonymous

        I think good and bad acts should stand on their own.

        The medal shouldn’t be withdrawn because of his abuse just as his jail sentence shouldn’t be withdrawn because he risked his life to save the old lady.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  29. amyintheworld

    Ooo, I’m really torn on this one… If it was for a single act of bravery, then yes – he should keep it, technically. But I still don’t feel right about it!
    I think JJ said earlier down in the comments that bravery doesn’t equal good. I quite agree (there are plenty of bad people who are brave) but I need to point out that our society does associate bravery with being good. When you hear someone described as being ‘brave’, you usually hear it as a compliment, an in conjunction with other descriptors like ‘kind, loving’ etc.

    Despite the fact that technically he shouldn’t be stripped of his medal, on a moral level, it’s my opinion that he doesn’t deserve it. Personally, I think that beating someone you claim to love nearly to death, blinding them in one eye and contributing to the miscarry of the child they carried, are actions that completely negate one other single good deed.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  30. N1col3

    This is exactly what I’m struggling to deal with at the moment. My mums second husband was invovled in the SES and then later an Ambulance officer.
    Yet he is a convicted pedophile. I recently came across a news article about how he apparently single handedly rescued a family from floods in Mt Isa. I’m sure the people he rescued were grateful but it doesnt change the fact that he is a disgusting monster who terrorised me as a child.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • amyintheworld

      I’m so sorry you’ve been through something so awful.

      Perhaps I’m too moral, but I see this situation again as being one where he might have done some good deeds, but it doesn’t erase the terrible things he did to you. In fact, certain things completely negate the good, just as some good things will negate the bad. But child abuse is too bad in my eyes to be able to pat him on the back for rescuing others…

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Mish

        And the consequence is how people like Nicol3 feel when the man who has hurt them is held up as a hero or role model for other people. How it might make survivors of abuse feel is completely neglected in this kind of award system.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  31. Trog

    Great thought-provoking post, particularly in the wake of the Roberts-Smith saga.

    Despite an award being based on a single act, its bestowment sets up the recipient as a role model in the public eye.

    If someone is held up to be an ongoing role model, then their entire character over time becomes relevant to judging their merit for the award.

    I, for one, wouldn’t twitch if this guy had his award stripped.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  32. MJ

    The medal was awarded for a single act of bravery, which is what he did on that day. While I agree there would be an issue if other medals have in the past been stripped due to crimes like pedophilia and murder but not his crimes, then there would be a huge issue.
    But unless this has happened, as it stands what the spokesperson said makes sense to me – this medal is not awarded to someone for being an all round awesome guy past and present, it’s given for a single act of bravery, which is what he did.

    He’s actually a horrible man and a coward, but his isolated actions on that one day are what the medal is for.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      But he was only brave in a group. He went along with the bravery of is colleagues. As an individual he thinks it’s acceptable to hit and injure a pregnant woman.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • MJ

        But the award isn’t related to anything he does outside of his actions that day, so it’s technically irrelevant.
        Do we really think that people are going to think ‘well.. he beat the shit of his wife to point she’s blind and miscarried, but he’s got that medal so he must be a good guy’. No. The medal is an award for an isolated act. His criminal record and his long term actions and reputation are what will define him from this point on – people will see him for who he is and the awful things he’s done, not that one off day or the medal that he has in the back of his cupboard. Ultimately it means nothing about his individual character. It’s not like an Australian of the year award.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  33. Anon

    He is a disgrace to our society. He deserves more than the jail term he received.
    However, I’ve really had to think about this. As my initial reaction was that yes, he deserved it. Then j read everyones comments and I thought a lot more on where I stand.
    In this lone act he did save a human’s life without any hesitation for his own. I dont think it matters if its your job or not. In this lone act that is bravery and I think he does deserve this award.
    However I don’t think this changes anyone’s feelings towards him as a disgusting wife beater… Very interesting question.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  34. Brave does not equal good.

    Hitler was a “Runner” in WW1 – running from trench to trench to deliver messages – and was decorated for bravery for doing this difficult job, receiving the Iron Cross…he was a brave man, but he turned out to be evil.

    So, let’s not be naive when it comes to the nature of bravery…bravery is not reserved just for the good and just.

    I can understand the point of view of the Royal Humane Society – they award individual acts of bravery…they are not awarding the person’s social history. Whether you agree with that is a separate issue.

    So, here’s a hypothetical for you. If your child was drowning, and Ivan Millat happened to be on the same beach, swam out in the surf and saved your child…despite knowing he was an evil person, would you thank him for saving your child? Could you acknowledge the act separately from the person?

    I don’t know the answer to that…I suspect I would say to him… “I think you’re a bad man – this changes nothing – but I thank you for saving my child.”

    So, where should the Royal Humane Society draw the line between acknowledgement and judgement? I don’t think it’s an easy question to answer either.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • C

      It’s the public recognition and honor of receiving an award that I call into question. Not his single act of bravery. Yes, you can be grateful for an individual’s act of bravery – even if they’re a convicted criminal with a history of violent crime… BUT you don’t need to publicly honour that person with an award.

      Public recognition and honor for someone who is known to have a record of violent behaviour diminishes the significance of their crime. Yes, the Royal Humane Society can pass judgement on this man and deem him unfit for such a public honor. A judge and jury has already found his actions criminal, so why then can’t the Royal Humane Society take into account this judgement? What more proof do they need that this man is of unfit character to join the ranks of their award recipients?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Jane

        For probably the very same reason, C, that judges instruct juries to disregard previous offences/convictions in relation to criminal cases – that is, each situation is judged on the ‘evidence’ of that specific situation/case only not on their past.

        And yet interestingly, one’s character and service in the community is often used to influence magistrates rulings in reducing penalties (ie. DUIs etc).

        It’s definitely food for thought though…

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
    • May!

      Great comment JJ.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Shannon

      Brave: “ready to face and endure danger or pain; showing courage”.

      Courage: “the ability to do something that frightens one”

      I think he was definitely brave. I also think he definitely deserves to be in jail.

      I think it is dangerous territory when we can’t recognise the good people do because they have also done (very) bad things. If labelling theory of criminology is valid, this would have to make a huge contribution to his rehabilitation prospects.

      If people can only ever see you as an evil person and won’t acknowledge when you do something right, how will you ever break the cycle? You are forced to accept that you are a bad, evil, criminal person and are forced to embrace it because other people won’t let you be anything else.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Liz

      I want to see more of JohnJames. Perhaps a post? I like his writing style and point of view.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  35. Jackie Oh

    Should a peadofile receive an award for all the service provided to the community through the church. Same e-ffing thing. This world has it’s values seriously mixed up sometimes !!! Sick !…just sick !!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  36. girly

    It makes me sick how people who do horrible things to others are protected, even celebrated to avoid being un-PC. This man should be stripped of the bravery award and spend his life in jail for killing his child and permanently injuring that poor woman.

    I wish the police would do more to protect the innocent. My MIL was in a car accident a few weeks ago, and believes she found the car that was involved as it was a hit and run. He was at fault and fled the scene after turning off his headlights.

    My MIL’s car was buckled at the front and she cracked her sternum. When she asked the officer if he questioned the person, he stated ‘you can’t go around accusing people’ but you can leave them for dead at the scene of an accident?

    She said ‘if this was 100 years ago he’d be definitely questioned and punished severely!’ and the officer replies, no sarcasm: ‘well ma’am we live in a great country don’t we!!’ yes a great country where the innocent are punished.

    #endrant.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anon

      The police force has been neutered by the PC brigade.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • justvisiting

      I don’t think its a matter of being “PC” – you need compelling evidence to secure a conviction. And police can’t go around accusing people of serious crimes if they don’t have any evidence.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • girly

        Fair enough.. but nothing is being done, and nothing would be done if we as a community sit back and let the police handle it. She did hear from neighbours he’d been in an accident. The ding was in the same place she’d hit him, there were no plates on the car, same make, model and colour.. same area he’d taken off into.

        I am pretty sure she doesn’t want the police to accuse him as such, just question so she isn’t thousands out of pocket for an accident she wasn’t at fault for!

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Anonymous

          Did she not have insurance?

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
  37. wtf?

    No words :(

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  38. C

    Honoring this man with a bravery award is offensive. It does not respect the gravity of his crime, or the suffering and disability he has caused. It sends a message to Australians that many acts of cowardly violence can be redeemed by one act.

    If you’re interested in registering your thoughts with the Royal “Humane” Society, there email address is:

    bravery@rhsa.org.au

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • C

      I just sent my email off. Amongst other things, I wrote:

      “You devalue the idea of a “Bravery award” when you upheld this man’s claim to one. The Royal Humane Society has turned a blind eye to the serious issue of domestic violence, and overlooks the vulnerable people that true acts of bravery are meant to defend.”

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • girly

      If everyone in this post sends off a complaint, we can strip this monster of his award and stop it happening again.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  39. Michelle S

    What an appalling story. No man who inflicts such physical pain and contributes to the miscarriage of what I am assuming was his own child, should be rewarded with anything more than jail!
    I find it mind boggling that the individuals on the judging panel would hide behind saying it is not their job to judge. It is everyone that has a mother a sister an aunty or a daughter to stand up and declare that domestic violence will not be tolerated. One act of bravery to a stranger does not cancel out many months, maybe years of both physically and mentally abusing someone you should be protecting always.
    The society should feel ashamed of themselves for taking so little interest in such an important issue.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Jane Doe

      I agree with you wholeheartly Michelle.

      What really boggles my mind is that the Royal Humane Society says it’s not their place to judge. Um…. are you serious? It IS your place to judge. The whole point of the award is to look at people’s actions and JUDGE whether they constitute bravery. They have proactively put themselves into a judging role.

      Who judges a person who is apparently getting a award for good merit and bravery on only one event in their life? Shouldn’t it be a more rounded, holistic approach where we look at the ENTIRE character of a person before we decide whether we should congratulate them on doing something good?

      May I also point out that Paul McCuskey’s job was a firefighter. He, as all other firefighters, are well aware of the possible risks and hazards involved in their job. I’m in NO WAY diminishing the job that firefighters do, it’s a very important one, but to be surprised that a bunch of firefighters went all out to save someone? Personally, I thought that is what they’re trained to do.

      And as the woman who was saved, if I was in her position, I think I would almost feel tainted that some man who has a KNOWN record of serially abusing his wife saved me.

      You can not deny the fact that those firefighters saved that womans life. But why weren’t they saving Paul McCuskey’s wife as well?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Guest

        If the parameters of the award are set out as ‘single act of bravery’ with no mention of character then it is not their place to judge. The question is not ‘should he have been awarded this award’ it is ‘should this award’s parameters be changed’. They have awarded this medal correctly as it stands now.

        I disagree we should look for a rounded approach when congratulating someone for doing something good. The entertainment industry would never award anyone anything ever again. There are plenty of awards that take into account character (the AFL Brownlow for example does by excluding people with on field reports), there is a place for awards based on excellence alone. Some Nobel Prize winners are history’s biggest shits. They still deserve the prize. I’m sure there are other bravery character based awards. There is a place for this one.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  40. Ellie

    Never ever ever should anyone be rewarded for committing violence against another human being. And I think it’s worse when the person doing the violence ‘loves’ you, and wants you to forgive them. While it is easy for me to say this, because I have never been harmed by my partner, it is dreadfully worse for the person who is getting hurt because they start to doubt themselves and question their selves as being the fault, and deserving the punishment. How can anyone be rewarded for the psychological harm?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  41. Janina Lear

    I find this story extremely distressing and almost ashamed of the society we live in. It is his job to save the woman in the fire, that is what he signed up for. Beating a woman he professed to love negates the hero side of saving the other woman.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  42. Guest

    If the medal is for a stand alone act without the context of character then yes. I can see how ‘character’ could end up being mishandled, so much of character is subjective, even though this incident may be largely agreed upon as awful. You either were brave in that moment or you weren’t. The rest of your life is not in question.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Kris2040

      The medal is for what he did to save another person in the line of duty. If it had been for work in domestic violence prevention and he was then found to be beating his wife, I think it’s fair to strip him of the award. But the award isn’t for anything to do with that, so it should still stand.

      While being a wife beater does indeed make him a complete arsehole, it doesn’t mean he’s entirely evil, or undeserving of recognition for doing something excellent.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Faybian

        I agree the most with this one. No one is all good or evil. There are always shades of grey, as much as it pains me to admit it in this case.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  43. Dinah

    It is stories like this that influence women to remain in abusive relationships. How can they expect to be protected and believed?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Leelu

      I can personally attest to not being believed by my own ‘close’ friends. The shame is still put back onto the victim. This is the attitude within our society that needs to change. I have helped other women since escaping. I have witnessed a small town judge order a woman to move back to her abuser’s area or relinquish her children as she did not get ‘permission’ from her abuser to leave the area with their children. This was despite repeated AVO breaches and a court psychologist statement having determined that the man should not have access to the children. This subject needs to be intelligently explained for its subtle abuse intricacies and then saturated through media. Awareness is key.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Anonymous

      I think the problem is that people think that someone must be all good or all bad. For some reason people seem to have trouble wrapping their heads around the idea that men who otherwise seem very nice can still be assholes to their wives when no one is watching.
      .

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  44. Phee

    He murdered his unborn child

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Cg

      You can’t murder them before they’re born, Phee. He just ‘terminated’ or ‘aborted’ it in a violent fashion. Remember – before they’re born they’re not human.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Kails

      ….Agree with this sentiment. Isnt there a new law in place that can charge you for the death of an unborn child ? I think its something like the “unborn victims law” or something…..therefore he is not only a coward but guilty of manslaughter too.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Jess

      I think it depends on how far along the pregnancy is.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  45. carla

    i feel sick

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  46. Leelu

    The ‘Royal Humane Society’ … now that is irony!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  47. lucia

    he should burn in hell. full stop

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  48. Leelu

    So he is a murderer.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Cg

      No, not a murderer, Leelu. The fetus wasn’t human, it has no rights and it’s none of our business whether it lives or not – that is for the parents to decide. If he didn’t want it to live he should have encouraged his wife to terminate. He went about it all wrong but his crime isn’t violence towards an innocent baby, it’s a crime purely against his wife.

      But back to the article … I don’t know … mostly no. But no amount of bravery awards can change what he really is – a vile, cowardly b*stard.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Leelu

        Okay, I get what you are saying…I believe in pro choice, and I understand legalities. However, emotionally…

        If you have lost a child in the womb through a violent act aimed at your child in the womb, you still lose a child. I know a woman who had her stomach kicked while pregnant. He knew WHO he was trying to ‘get rid of’.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Faybian

          Unfortunately, it’s not semantics. Those same laws that allow us to abort a foetus without being charged with murder, also allow people to violently terminate a pregnancy, some with intent. You can’t have it both ways.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • sweetsparrow

            New rights protecting the unborn are coming into effect in Western Australia……

            http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/western-australia/fetal-homicide-laws-to-be-introduced-in-western-australia/story-e6frg14c-1226281446135

            OFFENDERS who kill an unborn child by assaulting a pregnant mother or by dangerous driving face a life sentence under historic new laws.

            The laws will, for the first time, recognise an unborn baby as a human life.

            The Sunday Times can reveal that Attorney-General Christian Porter is drafting the new laws and will introduce them into State Parliament later this year.

            Under present laws, an unborn baby has no legal status and is not recognised by the courts.

            But Mr Porter said the new fetal homicide laws would create a new criminal code offence of causing death or grievous bodily harm to an unborn child.

            Based on a law already in force in Queensland, it would carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

            Offenders who kill or intend to kill an unborn baby by assaulting a mother will face mandatory life imprisonment – the same as a murder charge in all but exceptional circumstances.

            See Perth Now for full article dated February 25th 2012.

            Can we have it both ways?

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Astrochicky

              Laws are still draft. Tricky area. Wait and see.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Shane

              Doesn’t anyone see the problem with laws that protect the unborn? It won’t be long before women will be prevented having abortions due to this law.

              We can’t, as protectors of women’s rights, allow abortion yet at the same time punish someone who causes the termination of the feotus. It’s completely nonsensical.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Faybian

              Shane, I’m with you on this.
              I wasn’t aware of the Qld law (oh the shame, I live in Qld) either.
              I imagine it would be a very tricky piece of legislation, with viability of the foetus involved etc.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
          • Shannon

            In Queensland at least, killing an unborn child is a crime and carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment (s313, Criminal Code). The key is “unlawful assault” – if someone unlawfully assaults a pregnant woman causing the baby not to be born alive, they commit a crime. Abortion, on the other hand, when performed in line with the law is not “unlawful assault” and so does not lead to criminal liability.

            Edit: Whoops, didn’t realise this was brought into discussion immediately above in reply to Sweetsparrow. But still, it does explain how it can work re: criminality of abortion.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
      • Naomi Cartledge

        My thoughts are with you ms, and I hope that you have loving family and friends to support you during this awful time. I’m so sorry about the loss of your babies. It is an awful reality to live with. My heart goes out to you.
        It is not relevant whether you were legally married or not. You should have been safe in the knowledge that the father of your babies loved you and would be protective of you – for ever!
        I find it reprehensible that this man was awarded anything, let alone a bravery award. All bullies are cowards. There’s nothing brave about assaulting anyone, particularly a pregnant woman.
        Be assured, that there are many in the community who are as repulsed as I am, and we will not cease until assaulting women and kids is as socially repugnant as driving while drunk!
        Please take care and and take heart in the knowledge, that this person is the criminal and should be stripped of this award. I was pleased to read in today’s Sun Herald, that the Attorney General, Nicola Roxon is strengthening the Laws that relate to Domestic Violence!

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  49. nicolamurray

    The first few lines of this artical made my heart stop!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

So, we have $1000 to give away... oh, would you be interested? Well step right this way.

To go in the draw to win, just LIKE us on Facebook, enter your email address and tell us in 25 words or less why you love reading Mamamia.

Close this popup



Full Terms & Conditions