Iceland. Of all the places to be trapped when your wife unexpectedly files for divorce. Bummer, hey?
But that’s exactly where Tom Cruise was when his wife of 5 years, Katie Holmes, hit him with a surprise divorce just over a week ago.
The question is, was Katie’s timing and Tom’s unfortunate location – stuck on a film set in one of the most isolated countries in the world, a coincidence or something more sinister?
As the TomKat divorce saga continues, Hollywood analysts (read: gossips) are suggesting it may all have been part of a cunning plan by 33-year-old actress and her people.
We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again. Katie Holmes, you go girlfriend. If anyone’s winning this battle, it’s Joey Potter. Could our old friend from Dawson’s Creek have played this game any better?
Because let’s not forget that the combined $275 million estate and custody of their 6-year-old daughter Suri that’s at stake in this divorce. There are also reputations. We’re talking about two of the biggest stars in the world and in Hollywood, your reputation is everything.
New.com.au reports:
Cruise was losing the publicity war and he knew it. Pictures of Holmes cradling Suri on the streets of New York showed her to be maternal and protective, while daily Scientology exposes depicted him as a dangerous kook.
The floodgates were open and anyone who had a grudge against Cruise or an embarrassing story involving him was suddenly getting a fair hearing. Claims that he cut Kidman off from their children resurfaced.
In a rare flash of anger, Cruise’s lawyer accused Holmes of playing the media at the weekend. “We are letting ‘the other side’ (Katie and her team), play the media until they wear everyone out and then we’ll have something to say,” Field told the BBC.
“It’s not Tom’s style to do this publicly. He is really sad about what’s happening.”
Katie, on the other hand, is all about the publicity.
Last week – just days after the announcement – she made an appearance on the hit TV show Project Runway. Days later, it was announced that her clothing label, Holmes and Yang, would feature at New York Fashion Week.
She’s also been spotted casually looking amazing in the aisles of a supermarket on numerous occasions. (Seriously. Has the girl not heard of Coles online, doesn’t she have people who do this for her?)
Katie is working the media to her advantage. She’s expertly cast herself in the role of protective and doting mother – whereas as Tom, is nowhere to be seen.
Then there are the emerging stories of Scientology that can’t be doing Tom Cruise and his reputation any favors. More from News Limited:
The first trailer for his new thriller, Jack Reacher, was released last week, with the film – the start of a franchise – to hit cinemas in December. Next year will see Cruise star in the sci-fi films Oblivion and All You Need is Kill and begin work on a new Mission: Impossible film and a reboot of Van Helsing.
But his split put all of that at risk. A nasty court fight would without a doubt turn the public against him and drown out any attempts to sell his movies. Mel Gibson’s spectacular fall from grace would have been at the forefront of his publicists’ minds.
More importantly, Holmes had nothing to lose. When Cruise divorced Kidman, she was a rising star and he was at the height of his power. She couldn’t afford to alienate him with stories of what went on in their marriage.
Holmes’s movie career never really started; her biggest role to date was in 2005 as the female lead in Batman Begins but she bowed out of the sequel The Dark Knight and now spends most her time on her fashion line. She could afford to ignore any “you’ll never work in this town again” threats.
[And for more celebrity splits this year....]

Britney Spears and Jason Trawick have split






Comments
71 Comments so far
Thanks so much with this fantastic new web site. I’m very fired up to show it to anyone. It makes me so satisfied your vast understanding and wisdom have a new channel for trying into the world.
loading...
When I woke up to the news Katie Holmes had filed for divorce against Tom Cruise I actually fist-pumped the air and yelled ‘yes’ slightly reminiscent of Tom’s time on Oprah’s couch. On reflection, my 100 per cent joy-filled response puzzled me considering divorce and kids’ parents splitting is not usually met which such sheer happiness. I’m not even an adoring fan of Katie Holmes or a Tom hater, but like most of the public it seems, that was just my natural response. But, this morning I felt my first tinge of sadness when I looked at those photos of Tom, Katie and Suri celebrating father’s day on a boat in Florida just two weeks before the divorce was announced. Tom cuddles Suri and smiles while Katie walks ahead looking almost teary in some shots, knowing what lay ahead. It just broke my heart a little bit to see this little girl enjoying time with her dad in the last moments before her world as she knew it was shattered.
loading...
We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again. Katie Holmes, you go girlfriend.
sorry – but that line in te above article is kinda weird/disturbing!
loading...
wow! what a great site. i really appreciate your goo job.
loading...
I don’t give a hoot about the divorce. I’m still sulking because Tom Cruise was cast as Jack Reacher. Truly that has pushed me over the edge!
loading...
Agree totally.
loading...
So many stalwart couples splitting this year!
loading...
Free Katie?
What I want to know is, who is going to free Jack Reacher?
loading...
I don’t think any of them have both oars in the water. Free Suri!
loading...
I love that expression, gold!!!
loading...
I suspect Katie began to plan her exit when Tom came home with that Valkyrie haircut.
loading...
What I don’t agree with is Katie Holmes taking Suri out almost everyday in the past week ( to get icecream, to go shopping etc) in the middle of a massive media frenzy in New York. So intense they had to be accompanied by bodyguards.
What about the massive amount of paparazzi flashing cameras and no doubt heaps of them calling out to her to answer questions about the divorce, all with Suri clutching on to her desperately. Geez, I know she may have been playing the media, but why didn’t it occur to her to keep Suri out of this intense media glare so as not to upset her more.
loading...
“You go girlfriend?” – A little insensitive, don’t you think? I know it’s supposed to be light hearted, but you’re talking about the lives of real people…
loading...
Firstly, I’m concerned that you actually think this is PR. Secondly, if most of your articles are just a copy and paste from the news.com.au site, the least you can do is edit the two paragraphs you have written to check for spelling and grammar errors.
I agree with Lisa, this used to be a really great site, but it’s deteriorated into a copy and paste job with no thought, research, intelligence or insight. It’s such a shame.
loading...
Where does any one get off commenting on the private lives of these people?
Do any of you know them personally? I doubt it.
It’s just through twisted & distorted media commentary that you think’ you know them & even if you did know them do you have any right to comment on how they live their lives if it’s not affecting you?
Sure read the gossip, but don’t presume you know them.
I have known & worked with some one involved here, but I do not presume to have any clue what is going on for them in this difficult situation.
Find something real to talk about.
loading...
Well, thanks for putting everyone straight on what they can and can’t do, mizjayne. Perhaps you’d like to email the staff at Mamamia & give them some feedback on their posts, or is it just the commenters you wanted to have a spray at?
We’re talking about real stuff as well. Earlier in the week we were talking about the murder of a 22 year old Afghan girl. Today we’re talking about the death of an 18 year old boy, abuse in the defence force and tea & coffee. Oh, and Tom and Katie.
loading...
I’m sorry Anna, you’re right, there are other articles, but I am not commenting on them here, I’m commenting on this one.
I’m upset because so many people are making accusations as if what they read in the media means they know what Tom & Katie are like.
Tom & Katie are really the only two who know what has happened & the rest is hearsay.
Have you read some of the comments below?
Katie was mentally unhinged
Tom is loopy & the head of a cult
Where did they meet? Anyone! (who cares?)
Tom will already be trolling for his next wife so he can get a son
Katie only loved the idea of Tom
She’s never been famous, she was just a gold digger.
Katie was very involved in Scientology for years.
If someone was slandering you friend, that they don’t know, wouldn’t you be upset & perhaps comment that it’s none of their business to do so……
loading...
Yep. These two faced criticism on everything from day 1. Rumours of auditions & claims of ugly alien babies from a dead man’s sperm, how could the chick from Dawson’s Creek could land Tom Cruise etc…..Where were all the Katie supporters then? Now she’s left him, suddenly the mags are only showing the glamorous photos of her and being her new best friend. Fickle, deceptive and transparent. I feel sorry for them both. Move on folks.
loading...
I agree- I just feel very sorry for everyone involved. breakdown of a family is always sad and in the sport light it must be even more difficult
loading...
Dear MM,
Please stop with this tripe. I cannot believe you are still running these boring, ridiculous celebrity articles just doing your bit to keep the gossip going.
I’m sure its just a drop in the ocean for you but you’re so close to losing another supporter. I’m sure you’ve seen lately I’m not the only one.
I used to love MM and their thought provoking articles, the women’s issues, the mens issues articles, the world issues, the articles about things most people had never heard of, the articles written by relatable people and so much other great stuff. Now I see celebrity shite, never ending Zoe Foster (nothing against Zoe BTW just a bit overdone on MM for me) and repeated blog war inducing articles.
I know a blog needs to evolve and change but I really think you’ve changed in the wrong way.
loading...
LOL. 13 people opening an article they have no interest in…. who has time for that?
loading...
So anon im going to assume you believe change just magically happens does it? If people dont voice their dislike or concerns how will anyone know there are issues?
13 people agreed and bothered or ‘had the time’ because they probably clicked in here to say something similar.
There are so many other rubbish sites for celeb gossip why mm feels the need to be part of it I don’t know. All I can do is ‘voice’ my distaste and hopefully it is heard.
Now quick run along to news.com celeb section i hear theres a celebs with cellulite gallery! Oooooohhhh! Hot topic..
loading...
Meh, I was just swinging past. I don’t really care what the website publishes.
loading...
Just glad to its been resolved so quickly.
My guess is that Tom Cruise and the Church of Scientology have gone into damage control and wisely decided to resolve the divorce quickly to avoid any further damage to Toms and the Church’s reputation which was being pummelled due to the media firestorm.
Wonder who his next wife will be? I;m thinking he will get married again to have son.
On a side note, I am a huge fan of Lee Child’s Jack Reacher books and I am disappointed that Tom has cast himself as Jack Reacher. Most ridiculous casting ever. I think Chris Hemsworth would have been a great Jack Reacher – he’s got the height, the build and even the dirty blonde hair.
loading...
Tom Cruise as Jack Reacher is just ridiculous. I don’t know that “he cast himself” but as Reacher is 6 ft 5″ and about as broad, little Tom just doesn’t cut it physically. I agree that Chris Hemsworth certainly looks the part.
loading...
Chris Hemsworth as Jack Reacher? Yes please.
loading...
Second that.
loading...
It was all very strange to begin with.
how did they meet? anyone???
I think Katie loved Tom, or the idea of him.
She was cast as wife and mother in his sketchy life show.
but really…what would i know!!
loading...
Your summation makes me think of Charles and Diana’s beginnings. Younger girl in love with the idea of an older, more powerful man which eventually slides into disillusionment. The ‘arrangement’ aspect smacks of familiarity too.
loading...
he’s the one with the most power in the relationship so i feel like she kind of had to do the PR thing so it would be harder for her to be bullied by him and his lawyers. “see me with my daughter and her dad’s no where to be seen” does that make sense? i would fear losing custody if i were her.
to be fair, you always see lots of paparazzi pics of her with her daughter so it’s not just a recent thing so she can get her way.
i wonder if she thought he would help her career. she seemed to be doing more before him. nicole kidman’s career really took off after they split or maybe it was around the same time. i don’t think he would want a wife who is a big a star as he is.
loading...
I still don’t understand how this can be a ‘surprise’ divorce for Tom. Surely he must have known something was going on? You don’t just walk out of your house and into your lawyer’s office surely?
loading...
Of course I do not know Katie personally but from what I’ve seen of her over the years, she does not appear to be a vindictive or nasty person. Therefore, I can only assume she had very good reasons for leaving Tom in this manner. Does someone who has nothing to fear leave like that? In my experience they do not.
loading...
Two biggest stars in Hollywood….Katie Holmes???? Really?????
loading...
ps. I’m happy for her that she got out of her marriage if this is what she wanted but lets be hones, she appears intelligent, you can’t tell me she was unaware of what Tom Cruise was before she married him and what his beliefs were???
loading...
haha that’s exactly what I was coming in to write: “two of the biggest stars in Hollywood”…ummm no.
She isn’t a star and never has been a star. She was on the US equivalent of Winners and Losers and faded away into oblivion. First Daughter and Batman Begins weren’t ever going to win Oscars now were they?
I think the guy’s an absolute nutter but he didn’t benefit from being with her. She however went from being Ms No One Cares to Mrs Cruise We’ll Give You a Part. Let’s be realistic now.
Check out her IMDB profile if you have any doubt.
loading...
How can you say he never benefited from being with her? They have a beauiful daughter together. Try not to get caught up with money and success. There are other things people look for in relationships you know!
loading...
The conversation was about her career – not about them being parents
loading...
I think profile/publicity/papparazzi wise, she is ‘a big star’ rather than acting/success…
loading...
Katie didn’t ‘win’ Suri. Children are not things that are ‘won’, and frankly everybody loses when parents fight for custody.
If we accept that Tom Cruise is a wacko head of a cult, then we also have to accept that Katie is a woman who got sucked into a cult within days of meeting him. I do think Tom is a bit nuts, but Katie didn’t seem any more mentally stable whilst she was with him, or frankly even before she met him.
Scientology is nuts, but frankly so are all religions, and like other religious people, the majority of Scientologists are living normal lives. Yes, it’s extremely controlling, but religions are extremely controlling. There are still plenty of places in the world where renouncing Christianity, or even being thought to be a non-believer can result in being shunned by the entire community, and in some cases can even have people fearing for their lives. Prominent athiests receive daily death threats.
Do people forget Tom has 2 other children who appear to be growing into perfectly healthy adults. Why is everyone suddenly so worried about Suri when his other two kids seem just fine?
loading...
Cruise’s other two children are being raised by his sister. Why? Even more reason to give custody of Suri to Katie.
loading...
Tom’s sister lived with Tom for a years after his break-up with Nicole. She looked after the kids then when he was travelling for work so he wouldn’t have to uproot them every time he shot a film. I assume she still does that, but she is not their guardian and they do not live with her full-time.
loading...
I am NOT a Tom Cruise fan by any stretch of the imagination but what I will say is this. After Tom and Nicole split Tom was making a film in NZ. He was often seen about town and also brought his children over to visit him. They were very down to earth and just acted like normal family with him including going to the movies etc. Tom was also very generous and donated quite a lot of money around town and to the schools for various things. So whilst I think he a real weirdo with that Scientology carry on I don’t think he would necessarily be a bad father or hurt his children. In saying that I think he should be allowed part custody ONLY as long as he keeps Suri away from anything to do with Scientology (which is a cult).
loading...
The fact that she had to go to these extremes , as well as call lawyers from a pre paid phone (allegedly) to me, says it all. He has been known to be controlling and if in fact Suri was planned to be shipped off to sea on the Scientology boat as previous articles have discussed, I would have taken the same extreme meAsures to get out. I feel for Katie, if in fact all of these rumors are true, which, we’ll never really know.
loading...
So you would say You go, Guy, if a father felt the same as you describe? Would it be OK for a father to get a secret pre paid phone to help him escape a bad marriage
loading...
Yes, absolutely!
loading...
EXCELLENT. So if a father does the same thing, i.e. stash money away in secret, set up a house interstate, then when the mother is away the father takes his daughter interstate, files for divorce, and refuses to allow the mother to see the child until the mother agrees to pay the father more money in settlement, you would completely understand and endorse men for saying “You go, Guy”. Or doesn’t equality work like that?
loading...
while I believe that every individual case (whether a celebrity or just us average folk) is different, yes, if a man had done this there would be outrage.
double standards anyone.
loading...
Actually, if Brad Pitt did this, got his clan away from Angelina’s raptor claws, I’d stand and applaud … and I am a woman.
loading...
That was who just popped into my mind too!!
Bruce, you come across as quite bitter and angry, which makes me feel like there is some personal history around this issue – do you think that might be influencing you?
I think that if a woman was as bat-shit crazy and heavily involved with Scientology as Tom appears to be, and the father was a seemingly stable person who had done the majority of the hands on raising of the child, then yeah, I’d be on his side too.
loading...
But Katie was a part of Scientology too. She was very, very involved in it for years, and already heavily involved within weeks of getting together with Tom. Stable people don’t generally throw themselves full force into cults.
I’m not sure why you would assume Katie has done the majority of the parenting. Katie’s actually worked more than Tom in the past 5-6 years, just in movies nobody watched.Tom has raised 2 other children who seem perfectly happy and healthy.
loading...
Excellent. Now if Mr. Cruise were to get a PR machine together which I think he could do easily do you think it fine to cast her as a bastard?
I do have a personality. disorder. It’s been getting worse every year for the last 20 years. I now find liars and hypocrites intolerable and I try my best to stamp it out where ever it originates.
Like on this site. Ms. Freedman recently wrote a dissertation on Domestic Violence. All sorts of stats and support networks for females Not one mention of men who suffer from Domestic Violence perpetrated by females. Ms Freedman is a long term committed and devout feminist who said in an interview with Mr. Stephanovic that feminism is about equal opportunity. So why isn’t she demanding that DV against females be ignored so that females have the same opportunity as men. Obviously, if she is not a liar and hypocrite, she must believe that females are never violent to men. Yet all non feminist evidence from every first world occidental country shows that females are more violent to men than the reverse.
Equality for ALL I say. Does that give you some understanding? Would you think my position is fair and reasonable. Do you think that men should not hold females to their own claims for equality? Do you think men oppress females?
loading...
If you made a coherent arguement, I might agree with you, but atm I’m just not sure.
loading...
Whilst I don’t wish to impose on your time, do you think it strange that a female says; “I’m sick of waiting for love” and I can’t understand why men find my attitude unattractive
loading...
Is that you Kit?
loading...
…Seriously?
loading...
No, not fair, is it? Then again, it’s not suspected that Katie is little loopy or (questionably) the head of a cult…
loading...
I would if there was evidence of the child being in danger. Which is what happened here.
loading...
I’m not sure I understand what the danger is. If you are referring to Scientology, what if Ms Holmes leaves Scientology and goes back to Catholicism where they get people to drink pretend human blood and eat pretend human flesh. Would that be damaging to a child?
loading...
Do you need a hug, Bruce?
loading...
No thanks.
loading...
I’m with you on this one Bruce!
Katie knew before being with Tom that he was heavily involved in Scientology (it’s not new information) – How can she be justified in using that to keep Suri away from him?
Also, he has 2 children that were primarily under his care and raised in scientology and there are no reports of a problem with them… So why is everyone jumping on the Katie bandwagon when she wants to keep his daughter away from him??
loading...
Just like he did with nicole hey? Who says she wants to keep his child away from him anyway? They’ve agreed for her to have primary custody and access for him of Suri.
loading...
So, Faybian, If Mr. Cruise stepped one letter out of line with their agreement why would you think that Ms Kidman is too pathetic to lift up the phone and contact her lawyers to defend her relationship with her adopted children?
loading...
Well if the situation were reversed and Katie was the monster then yes, but that’s not what’s happening here..
loading...
I really don’t like the “you go girl!” and “run Katie, run!” coverage of the TomKat divorce. I’m not exactly sure why it makes me feel uncomfortable, because I recognise that Cruise seems like quite a controlling and intense person and the Church of Scientology is a pretty shady organisation.
loading...
I know what you mean. I think it’s because, in reality, there is absolutely no evidence of anything previously wrong in the marriage – apart from gossip/speculation, they seemed pretty happy – no evidence of mistreatment by him to her or Suri….it’s all heresay in gossip mags, no one actually involved has come forward and said that he’s a terrible person, it’s just this massive mob mentality that’s kicked in, with everyone jumping on the bandwagon.
It’s distasteful when you think it’s a marriage breakdown involving a small child….. there’s a lot of assumption going on.
And before anyone jumps on my comment – I’m not a Cruise fan either, and have been just as morbidly fascinated with what’s going on as anybody else, but it doesn’t mean that I feel good about getting caught up in it.
loading...
How is it possible that we’ve not seen a shot of Tom yet?
loading...
There have been shots of Tom published, just not here. He’s been photographed hopping on and off his private plane and in a helicopter since the split.
loading...
Well played Katie Holmes. Well played.
loading...
I completely agree. She out-manouvered him. Excellent chess-work. He’s been the master of PR spin for eons.
loading...
What PR spin is that? As far as I am aware, no one knows anything about Mr. Cruise or his family because he keeps private matters private. E.g. just like this time, when Ms Kidman wanted out the ONLY comment Mr. Cruise made was – Nicole knows exactly why we are divorcing” and I never saw one photo of him. But would it also be GREAT if a father did the same? Since you are cheering it what difference would gender make?
loading...