This story started months ago, back when Kevin Rudd was Prime Minister. I’d always intended to interview the leaders of both major parties for Mamamia before the election but I was approached by Fairfax to write separate profiles of Kevin Rudd and Tony Abbott to run in The Sunday Age and the Sun Herald. I was nervous. I thought about saying no. “But I’m not Laurie Oakes” I told them. We know, they said. But we think you bring a fresh perspective. “I’m big on opinion but short on policy detail” I warned them. That’s OK, they said. Most voters are like that. And we have a raft of experienced political journalists to cover the detailed analysis.
So how could I say no? Discomfort zone here I come.
Before our written requests could be made to the offices of Abbott and Rudd, Rudd was gone and Gillard was PM.
So we got out the liquid paper and sent our requests to Abbott and Gillard’s offices, a couple of weeks out from the election being called.
And then we waited. And asked again. And waited. And emailed. And called. And waited. And pestered. I sent texts. I spoke to anyone I could in the busy press offices of both leaders. They promised to get back to me. They didn’t.
I sent more emails pointing out the big circulation of both newspapers and the wide and high-profile reach of Mamamia. It came back that both were more interested in the Mamamia exposure than the newspaper. But still no confirmation.
The original plan had been to run the interviews as cover stories in the newspapers on consecutive Sundays. But time was running out.
I tried to ramp up the pressure by telling Tony’s people Julia had agreed and Julia’s people that Tony had agreed.
Neither had agreed.
We waited some more.
And then came word from Julia’s office: no.
What?
No.
I begged. My editors sent letters. Still no word from Tony’s office. There was only one more Sunday before the election. We were days away from having to ditch the whole idea.
And then last Wednesday afternoon, I get a call from one of Julia’s press reps.
“Can you fly anywhere?”
Yes.
“And are you available in the next couple of days?”
Well….it’s actually my son’s birthday on Friday. That day isn’t ideal.
“Ok, let me see what I can do.”
Lana walks into my office spluttering. “Did you just tell the Prime Minister you can’t interview her on Friday because of your son’s birthday?”
Um, I guess I did. Sort of.
Naturally, the only time available was Friday morning. I’d have to make my way to Melbourne on Thursday in order to jump on the PM’s private plane for a 7:30am flight to Sydney. I could interview her on the plane.
Right.
After angsting a bit about my son’s birthday, I remembered he was only turning 2 and could be easily hoodwinked. Our family tradition of birthday festivities before breakfast could be delayed by 24hours and he’d be none the wiser.
So I flew to Melbourne.
I kept hassling Tony’s office right up until I got on the plane to Melbourne last Thursday afternoon when final word came back from Tony’s office: no. He wouldn’t agree to an interview before the election. Bummer.
As my plane went into a holding pattern over Melbourne and I tried to get my Julia questions together, the newspaper editors of The Sunday Age and The Sun Herald were making their own seperate decisions about how to run my interview given that we wouldn’t be getting Tony.
I headed to my hotel, organised a wake-up call for 5am (I’d read that both Julia and Tony get up every morning at that time so I thought it would get me in the mood) and immersed myself in every news bulletin, current affairs show and piece of political commentary I could find while munching my way through the pizza I ordered from room service and washing it down with chocolate from the minibar.
Small problem: I had no pen. Great journalist. I scrounged around my hotel room and came up with a pencil which I quickly made blunt by writing down my questions. No sharpener.
So I decided to go tech. No choice. I’d brought my iPad with me even though I’m not really sure how to use it yet. I typed my questions on that and hoped for the bloody best.
I finally hit the pillow at midnight and woke up every hour, fretting I’d sleep through my alarm.
Up at 5am, TV on, quick shower and feeling nervous. No time for breakfast.
It wasn’t so much the idea of meeting the leaders that made me fret. I’d met Julia before at a private dinner for female journalists when she was deputy opposition leader and I’d liked her a lot. She was warm, funny, engaging and self-deprecating.
What was making me nervous was the practicalities of it.
I knew my time was very limited. “You’ll get about half an hour during the flight,” her press secretary had told me. That’s not long. We had originally requested an hour for a 2000 word profile.
I also knew that the time could be cut short for any reason and there would be nothing I could do.
I worried about my technology not working.
I worried about not having a pen.
I worried about the fact it’s been 10 years since I wrote a profile.
I worried that I am not a political journalist and would I be able to ‘do’ serious? Would I make a fool of myself?
I worried that I would only have a few hours to write the actual story. Instead of a few days or even weeks that you sometimes get to write a profile.
I worried.
So I arrive at the airstrip near Melbourne airport where the PM’s plane is waiting. I’m late because my driver got lost. Luckily, the PM has not yet arrived so I’m met by her press secretary Russell who ushers me onto the private plane. I’m not asked for ID – just my name by the RAAF flight attendant who writes it down on a clipboard. I consider nicking her pen.
The plane is one of two Prime Ministerial jets – the other is given to Tony Abbott to use for the campaign. They are identical. Both leaders also have the use of another much larger plane for the media which follows them around the country.
The media organisations pay for all the costs associated with using the plane and media buses as well as all accommodation.
Each leader has staff who travel with the media to answer their logistical questions and provide them with access to policy information etc.
As I dragged my bag through the cabin, bashing poor Senator John Faulkner on the shoulder on my way past, I was shown to my seat in the back section of the plane and seated next to Julia’s assistant, a lovely 27 year old woman called Alex.
Do you want to know what the PM’s plane is like?
It’s divided into three sections – the front cabin is where the PM sits. There are 4 large leather airline seats facing each other with a large table in the middle.
The next section is for senior policy advisors, senior staff and senior Labor figures like John Faulkner. Space-wise, it’s a lot like a first class cabin of an aircraft.
The back section is for more junior staff and very occasionally, a journalist. It’s still very roomy. Much roomier than, say, business class.
Breakfast was served soon after we took off. Pancakes or poached eggs? I had the eggs, Alex had the pancakes and I nearly chewed her ear off with questions about the campaign.
She hadn’t been home in a month, hadn’t seen her boyfriend in a month. But she wasn’t complaining. Like everyone around Julia, she seemed relaxed and happy.
She explained that it got much easier once your body stopped fighting the constant travel and not knowing what city you’re in. “I’m just going with it now and it’s much better.”
I was recording the interview on my iphone – a brilliant app called italk – because it’s been so long since I’ve done a formal interview, I don’t have a dictaphone anymore.
I also took my Flip as back-up (is this boring?) because every journalist’s worst fear is your recorder not working (second only not to having no pen). And you don’t get another chance with the PM.
I wolf down my eggs (served with sausages, mushrooms, tomato, toast and a side of fresh fruit and yoghurt), knock back a strong cup of tea and try to gather my thoughts as I watch the flight time tick away. At the start of the flight, I’d been told by Russell that Julia had some work to do and he’d come and get me when she was ready to talk.
I was starting to worry that my half hour would be cut short. Gulp.
Finally, Russell came to get me and I walked through the middle cabin to Julia’s cabin.
We shake hands and I sit next to her with my feet tucked up and my body twisted around to get closer to her. I position my iphone carefully on the arm rest between her and she reaches over to take my ipad to see how it works. Has a play.
She wonders if I’m recording the interview on it and I say no (I didn’t think of doing that) and she says she’s noticed some of her colleagues starting to give their speeches from ipads and that she was going to give it a go soon.
The next half an hour pass very quickly and you can read about that in my interview here.
There were a couple of hitches.
The first came with some serious turbulence. For someone who has previously been struck almost to the point of incapacitation by a fear of flying, let me just say it occurred to me that the universe was trying to tell me something by having me do the most important interview of my career with the Prime Minister of Australia ON A PLANE DURING EXTREME TURBULENCE.
Where does that sit on the scale of life’s more stressful events, hmmm?
It also occurred to me that it’s a good thing I no longer require medication to get on a plane. Interviewing the Prime Minister when under the effects of Stillnox would have been quite a story in itself.
The second challenge occurred just a few minutes into the interview when the seat-belt sign came on and the flight attendant came around to say “Can you please turn off all electrical devices?”
Um, no I can’t. My questions are on my iPad. My iPhone is recording the interview.
“I’m sorry but you’ll have to.”
Oh Ok, I said and pretended to, hoping that she wouldn’t come back and check.
HOW DID YOU CHOOSE WHAT TO ASK HER ABOUT? AND WHY DIDN’T YOU ASK HER DIFFERENT QUESTIONS?
There have been many comments about the questions I asked Julia during the interview. Many people were appalled that I didn’t dig deeper into policy issues, that I asked about so-called ‘trivial’ matters, that the interview was ‘fluffy’ or even ‘sexist’ because I noted what she was wearing and asked about Botox.
Here’s what you should know.
I made a conscious decision not to make this an interview about policy and I’ll tell you why. Politicians LOVE being asked policy questions because then they can launch into the party line, just as they have done 1000 times before in 1000 other interviews, press conferences and policy announcements.
This sucks up valuable interview time and can leave you with nothing more than you could get from a press release. It’s their job to be as ‘on message’ and uncontroversial as possible which is smart for them but makes for a dull interview if that’s all you ask.
When writing a profile of the PM, I have to make the assumption that anyone reading it is going to have read other interviews and other analysis by other journalists and commentators. I can’t possibly hope to be a one-stop shop.
Every journalist brings a different viewpoint.
My intention was never to do an in-depth analysis of Julia Gillard government policies. But nor did I go in with a ‘fluffy’ or ‘female’ agenda.
I always approach anything I write with the possibly selfish approach of wanting to write something I’d like to read.
And what I wanted to read was something about Julia that was a bit more human. A bit less political. Because in talking about ‘ordinary’ things or even slightly trivial things, you can often learn a lot about how someone thinks. When you talk to politicians or public figures about things they’re NOT asked about every single day, you’re more likely to get a spontaneous, more revealing answer, not just to your question but to the question of who they are, how they think.
It’s a very high pressure situation doing an interview like this – even without the turbulence. You have your list of questions which range from the serious to the superficial. You’re not sure when your interview might be stopped or how many questions you’ll get through. You have to make snap decisions about when to go on an unplanned tangent and when to press on with your list of questions.
It’s exciting but not easy.
Also, after writing up my piece, I have to submit it to an editor – in this case 2 editors at 2 different newspapers. They obviously couldn’t run it all. They chose which bits to cut out and which to run.
Fortunately, I could run the whole thing here on Mamamia but it’s still not the full transcript. No interview you read contains every question asked nor every answer given. I had to cut a lot of content and in deciding what to prune, I mostly got rid of answers I felt I’d read many times before, answers that didn’t add anything new to the picture we already have of Julia Gillard, answers that weren’t particularly interesting or revealing.
As for the ‘fluffier’ questions, I have to say that being interested in things like Botox and her skin does not make me any less interested in her policies about gay marriage for example.
But 20 minutes is not a long time to cover everything. I did my best. Of course when I listened back to the interview there were a million times I wanted to smack myself for either interrupting or not asking a different question.
It’s quite an odd thing because while you’re asking questions, you’re partly listening to the answer, partly trying to observe things like body language and facial expressions and partly thinking about your next question. In this case I was also partly wondering if the plane was going to crash and partly wondering if I was going to get in trouble from the flight attendant for not turning off my electrical devices.
Anyway.
We landed, we shook hands and I was ushered back to my seat while Julia got changed before disembarking. I was told to get into one of the staff cars by Russell who said “Remind them that you’re a journalist” and I did.
As I drove through the streets of Western Sydney in the back of a staff car with Alex and another junior staffer, I balanced my laptop on my knees and tried to upload my interview which – thank God – did actually record.
We arrived at Blacktown RSL for Julia’s campaign announcement and for our photo opportunity. Julia disappeared to get her make-up done and when she emerged half an hour later, she was bursting with energy and good humour. She joked with everyone as she sat for her formal portrait. Her staff plainly adore her – and you can’t say that about all politicians.
It was decided that I’d walk with Julia up to the room where there were hundreds of people gathered along with media to hear her policy announcement about a new bonus for apprentices.
One of her press secretaries held my handbag and Fairfax photographer Andrew Meares ran backwards as we walked – she walks quickly – surrounded by the Australian Federal Police contingent that shadow her everywhere except to the loo. I was standing quite close to Julia and kept accidentally banging my hand on her bottom but fortunately I wasn’t arrested for man-handling the PM.
And then….she was gone. Swept off into the crowd and onto the stage. Meanwhile, I was left to wander back out to the streets of Blacktown to hail a cab and return home to lock myself in the bedroom to file my story. I worked until 2am when the words started blurring on the page and then got up early to do a few more hours before I filed on Saturday morning, just in time for publication.
I never did find a pen.
















Comments
346 Comments so far
Pingback: On the (Rest of the) Net. « The Early Bird Catches the Worm
Mia, no matter what you do there is always going to be someone that disagrees or wants more.
loading...
Mia says that, “I’m big on opinion but short on policy detail.” This is what I started to suspect as I read Mia’s posts on political issues. What a shame and what a lost opportunity for someone with Mia’s influnce. However there are some very bright and capable women out there who are showing other young women the way.
loading...
I think that Mia’s transparency on this is great. I’ve never heard her claim to be a political journalist! It’s great to see that she wades through all the political stuff just like the rest of us. This site makes great use of people with more political knowledge, like Julie Cowdroy, to fill in the gaps. There are many contributors on this site, Mia included, who are bright and capable women. x
loading...
Who do you suggest ? Maybe they should get Fifi Box to interview the PM, and see if she makes it through the interview without injuring herself.
loading...
Love your style MikeyMike – have you thought about forming your very own Funky Bunch?
loading...
to me that is a bit like saying that we should get laurie oakes to write about his sex life!
loading...
Eeew! La la la la la la la la la la !
loading...
Rainbow!! Such a pretty name. Such an evil mind.
loading...
I’d totally read that.
loading...
would the be much to say ewwwwwww……;lol
loading...
I really enjoyed Mia’s interview. I think the people criticising her for asking “fluffy” questions don’t know what they’re talking about. So she noticed that Julia is pretty/has nice nails/wears this-or-that. So what? People notice those things all the time. Mia does not pretend to be a political journalist.
We have political journalists to write in depth about policy, and many of them have been doing a pretty poor job of it thus far – did anyone else notice the coverage in the NATIONAL PRESS about Gillard’s personal life, clothes, etc in the middle of the campaign? That is what is NOT appropriate. A behind the scenes look at Gillard is perfectly entitled to include nails and other such things. Thanks for a fresh perspective, Mia.
loading...
Great article. It was nice to read something about the PM that was a *tiny bit* human. However, I don’t understand the controversy this has caused? As Mia pointed out, she is not a political journalist and was clearly employed to give an alternative account of the PM. If I want hard hitting journalism this is not where I come and is precisely why if I want to canvas this weeks highs and lows, discuss my emotions and lip colour I don’t expect sage advice from the political lift-out of the Age. I’m baffled that people are upset by this! But hey, just my 2 cents
loading...
Mia, I’m thinking Joan from Mad Men is onto something with that oh-so-sexy pen on a necklace thingy…you can get away without the beehive though.
loading...
As a working journalist and political tragic who has also done many celebrity profiles in her time, I’d say the challenges of high-profile interviews are always the same. Whether it’s Tom Cruise promoting his latest film or the PM talking about his or her vision for the nation, there’s no point wasting time asking them questions they have already answered a million times. Not only can you get those answers elsewhere, but you risk boring your readers stupid with the same material – and crucially, also boring the person you are interviewing. The risk is, they will then switch off, lapse into their rehearsed spiel… and you’ve just killed any chance of building the crucial rapport that might, if you’re lucky, give you fresh material or a novel perspective on which to build an interesting profile.
This is particularly true when you’ve only got a short amount of time with someone who has countless other things on their mind, may be sleep-deprived, and has only just met you.
Certainly, I would have written a different sort of profile if I had a half hour with Julia Gillard. But so would any journalist. We all have our different approaches. I probably would have tried to tie some of the bigger policy themes into the personal insights. But – and this is a big BUT – that takes time. And one of the things that really impressed me about this piece is how quickly Mia turned it around. (Actually, “impressed” is not really the word. The words: “you smart-ass cow” might have crossed my mind.)
Finally, on the all-important issue of The Pen (or Lack Thereof). I laughed with recognition at this (and also at faking a children’s birthday in order to do a big interview). If you’re in this game long enough, it will happen. Your pen will disappear into the depths of your handbag just as you’re shaking hands with Mr Cruise or your digital recorder will simply freeze when you sit down with Ms Gillard. And for those of you who are so scathing about it, consider this: in the 2007 election campaign, at the debate between Treasurer Peter Costello and then Opposition Treasury spokesman Wayne Swan at the National Press Club, Swan was called upon to give his opening remarks first. He then sat down as Costello took the lectern. At that point, the camera clearly caught Swan leaning over to the moderator and mouthing the words: “Have you got a pen?”. The man is now running our country’s accounts!
loading...
Great story about Swan sans pen. Nice one.
loading...
Thanks Christine,
And you’re so right about how every journalist would have written it differently. I’ll go further and say every journalist (including me) would write their OWN story differently as soon as half an hour after filing their piece, let alone if they had the chance to do the interview again.
You just do what you do in the time you have to do it to the best of your ability…..
loading...
I’m not a Mia lover, just a fan of her witty, warm journalistic style. Mia interviewed [and wrote about] the PM as she interviews [and writes about] everyone else. That’s the charm. And the point.
This was the PM as experienced by Mia Freedman. Not the PM interviewed by any (other) journalist. The newspapers asked Mia for Mia’s perspective.
loading...
What I really want to know is how someone as busy as Julia (or the Governor General for that matter) shops for clothes????
loading...
i think they h ave personal shoppers – their assistant would email the sizes, styles, preferred brands etc, and it would all get delivered.
kind of cool but takes some of the fun away i would think!
loading...
I totally asked her assistant about that.
No stylist! No shopper!
Just her and her assistant – they sort it out together.
Same for packing and unpacking and organising all her clothes for the entire campaign.
Her assistant just packs them in suitcases.
I’m not sure what I imagined but not quite that….
It’s never as glamorous as you think……
loading...
mia, would designers send her clothes??
loading...
interesting
loading...
It puzzles me that people would criticise Mia’s clothing – she wore what she felt comfortable in and that’s all that counts (well, unless she had ‘felt comfortable’ in a string bikini…)
Does any one recall what Nelson Mandela used to wear to parliament while he was President? In fact, he wasn’t the only one. The whole parliament was decked out in bright, short-sleeved shirts – not a tie or jacket in sight. Very sensible.
Maybe I’m biased, coming from a ‘casual-dress’ family. My husband and I were going out to a formal dinner recently, and our 4-year-old son, on seeing my husband in a suit (presumably for the first time he can remember), said, “Dad, you look like a hotel worker!”
And the sense that I got from Mia’s interview with our PM was that Julia wouldn’t have minded what Mia was wearing one bit. So why should anybody else take issue?
loading...
Mia,
I loved reading this. I have never really paid any attention to politics until reading the posts you have had on mamamia and I have enjoyed reading each of them.
Thank you and I think you are doing a good job!!!
loading...
I realise Abbott declined an interview – but how about his wife? I’d like to know more about her!
loading...
or even his daughters
loading...
Ah, as a fellow journo… I think I love you! Thanks for your honesty about all those “gulp where the hell is my pen does this work what should I ask WILL S/HE THINK I’M A TOTAL FOOL”-moments
loading...
Ohh Mia, sadly i am a little disappointed. I like your outfit but it’s hardly appropriate to interview our PM in! it lacks something crucial, like maturity, much like your questions.
loading...
Its really interesting me the people saying that Mia’s outfit is wrong to talk to the PM. Kinda reminds me of the way people in the navy were scared of officers, and acted as though they were not really people. It wasn’t a formal event, so why would you have to get all dressed up?
I think it is a great mark of our country that we can have such informality with the head honcho of the place.
loading...
Holy Guacamole! The way people are carrying on about M’s outfit it’s as though she rocked up in a g-string and a Dita Von Teese swinging diamante bra thing!!!!! Seriously – WTF?! Get over it! She was clean, she looked cool and relaxed and young and fresh – what is the problem?! That is all. Good night
loading...
Glad I decided against the nipple tassles. Phew etc
loading...
She just wanted to be herself and thats the best way to be, it was a quick casual interview, why dress up and be something your not. Would Julia think less of her because she was just suited up??
loading...
That’s so rude!
loading...
Just managed to read all the comments here. Lana, you are very busy. Hope you have something soft to punch when you get home…
loading...
Or someone Fluffy to pat…
loading...
And chocolate. And wine…
loading...
Awwww i love you Mia,
I laughed reading this is a good way. I love the way you see the world Mia. You make me feel well normal…the pen thing made me laugh as I think I must of spent like a year of my life looking for a pen lol. I know I have like everyone else a thousand things to do but its always good to get my Mama Mia fix.
Thank you again on your down to earth insight, I thoroughly enjoyed it.
loading...
Mia…this was brilliant. This interview was as it should have been and gives me a better idea of who Julia is when faced with an ‘unknown’ (not personality but persona). She knows how to be Julia Guillard the politician with political journalists. Why would anyone doubt you are a journalist with considerable clout in the most important demographic??
Didn’t you post something a few weeks back about the ‘MamaMia Factor’, something like that…. how sites like this and particularly yours, can sway thinking if not opinion?
As for ‘fluffy’ questions… what the?? Have you all not heard some of the questions asked by political press???
…AND I love how you dressed! You look like a too serious to have to look the part of a serious journalist!!! God I hope you know what I mean by that! You look lovely and cool, like a documentary maker BUT I think that dressing ‘down’ was a deliberate move on your part (oh please, please say yes!) to make everyone else relax their guard.
(I used to be a sports journalist. I made sure I dressed very girlie, with vintage dresses and heels, etc. The coaches and players would then be like “pfft. what does this princess know?” and they would relax, thinking they could coast it. Then I would go in for the kill. I mean, as if anyone knew more than me in this particular field. baboomtish)
loading...
OK.
I am the biggest political tragic I know. Ask Mia. Ask my husband. Ask my sister. Ask anyone who knows me.
But one thing I am not is a political snob. The reason I love the opportunity to write for Mia’s website is because the political pieces here encourage all sorts of people to engage in the national political debate.
Mia Freedman is responsible for giving women all over the nation a voice. She has provided a place for women to have the opportunity to be involved in conversations that otherwise they wouldn’t be.
This piece is excellent. And a few more people are finally interested in politics. And that is rad.
loading...
Thank you Julie.
And thank you for being a key part of my political education and for tossing around ideas with me about this interview before I did it.
You are a pretty damn inspiring woman.
loading...
Julie – you are absolutely right. I really enjoyed this article, but I have especially liked all your contributions to the site, which have been the first to really engage me adn taught me far more about Australian politics than I have had previously in my 34 years!!
loading...
I agree Julie. I think Mia’s skill in appealing to a diverse group of people is quite a talent in itself, and I find it hard to think of someone else who is quite as gifted in this as she is. The newspapers were very smart to get her on board with this. Obviously they saw the potential for a non-traditional piece that was a conversation between two social identities with a looser attachment to roles of journalist/interviewee rather than the usual format which can be a bit dry. This piece would have got people reading whose eyes might usually have glazed over after the title. And Wow, if this can get more people interested in the political processes and involved in debate about social issues, rather than people feeling sidelined or powerless then that can only be a great achievement.
One of the things I think is also great about Mia is that she is not afraid to try out new things and give them a go and learn on her feet. Something I really admire. Very brave given she is on the learning curve whilst being hugely in the spot light.
I have to admit I was a surprised about the botox question, but I get what she was trying to get at with the mix. There were some good punches in there too, though with rather robotic responses from Gillard.
I think the whole concept behind this was fantastic. I think it would be great to get more of these less formal conversational style pieces between two people as interviews which flesh out bits of policy and what a person is about. This is dynamic and interesting compared to million times done and dry reporter writing his/her opinion on a politician. The conversational style credits the reader with the ability to make up their own mind also, rather than having it assumed we need to have a journalist always spoon feed it to us. I think the more traditional opinion and analysis pieces are important too but it would be good if newspapers broke it up with a bit more variety like they have done here.
loading...
Mia, great article, gives a different insight to Julia as a person which is important. In the scheme of things.
I haven’t been on for a while now as work has been hectic and we have another little one due soon so it’s been important to get home and help out now more than ever (My wife is twice the size with now as she was during her first pregnancy – She’s worried we’ll be having a monster…is everyone much bigger with subsequent babies?). Anyway, I digress.
What I wanted to say, and I guess this is a reflection of society more than anything, is why is there a need to be so nasty? What happened to manners, politeness, and the ability to look at problems and issues from the point of view of others? QandA last Thursday was, to me (apart from John Elliot and the Transfield fellow), the perfect example of how discussions that are polarizing and challenging on so many fronts should be debated and discussed passionately. I have some pretty firmly held views but I like to think that I listen (and consider) the thoughts and opinions of others….Can’t we all just get along….?
What I am starting to get annoyed at, and I notice more as I get older, is that everyone seems to be focused on “What’s in it for me?” Seriously? How about considering the impact of our actions and of those of our government on others, and on our Children, or if we are childless, how will decisions we make as a country now, effect me in my old age? Anyway, I guess I’m getting disillusioned.
loading...
Yes, bigger with each baby (and worse pelvic floor – sorry).
Good luck with number two…..oh it’s wonderful.
loading...
I think the fact that everyone who disagrees or has an issue with something Mia writes – even if they do so respectfully – is attacked as a troll and told to go away is a reflection of what a boring little place this blog has become.
In regards to this ‘interview’…Pen Anyone? took the words out of my mouth. All I will add is that I think the use of the word ‘interview’ is a bit strong – it’s really more of a girly chat, isn’t it? And maybe that’s what some of the sycophantic MM readers want, but, one week out from an election, it’s not what I want to read about our PM.
loading...
I think Nicole that Mia was pretty clear about this being about a fresh perspective. Hang on, let me quote from one of the first sentences…
““But I’m not Laurie Oakes” I told them. We know, they said. But we think you bring a fresh perspective. “I’m big on opinion but short on policy detail” I warned them. That’s OK, they said. Most voters are like that. And we have a raft of experienced political journalists to cover the detailed analysis.”
I think only the very small minority is told to go away, and it doesn’t seem to be by Mia or by the moderators. I think it has been implied that there are a lot of people posting on here in a negative fashion using multiple names in multiple posts, which is discouraged. I think the comment rules are pretty clear about tone. What is not discouraged is voicing your opinion. Like you have done, and many others have done.
I think if you are using Mamamia to obtain all your information about the election, policies of parties, and traits of the candidates and leaders you will be disappointed by the content. I hope that’s not the case though.
loading...
Beautifully put Adam.
loading...
I really enjoyed this behind the scenes post Mia. Thanks
loading...
Lots of angry little creatures coming out from underneath their bridges today!
If you don’t agree with a point of view that’s fair enough. But if you are so passionately opposed to what is covered on this site then why torture yourselves by participating?
loading...
If Mia were an actual journalist she would have thought through and researched her questions first. She would have been better prepared and chosen an appropriate outfit. She would have had a few pens in her bag. She would have at the very least gone to the front desk and asked for a pen.
But because she’s not a real journalist, we got the interview she did. Hard hitting, policy driven, informative to the point where we are all more comfortable making a decision come August 21, based on the information in the article? Nope. Drivel written to gain clicks and her followers/minions/obsessed to get noticed readers to gush at how witty and fresh it is to have something different to read.
This is an election. I don’t give a stuff what our PM thinks of Botox or who fluffed out her hair in the morning. I give a stuff about how she will change the country and how it will affect us.
Oh and Mia, the comment you made about wearing that top because it looks good in photos – this wasn’t about you. Or it shouldn’t have been. You are not running for PM. The emphasis was supposed to be on Julia. You shouldn’t have put yourself in the position to outshine her even if it was in just a few photos.
Shame on you
loading...
And how exactly would you define an ‘actual journalist’? There are people out there with far less experience than Mia who still call themselves journalists. Heck, I am in my first year of a journalism degree and we are told to refer to ourselves as journalists rather than students when we ring people for interviews.
If you don’t give a stuff about the PM’s hair or thoughts on Botox, go read the SMH- there are plenty of policy-driven articles in there. I personally enjoyed seeing this side of Julia Gillard, it definitely fleshed out the shell of a person that other articles have presented before. There is no need to be nasty and refer to the writing as “drivel”. I’d be interested to see what you would get out of 25 mins with the PM.
loading...
oh, perhaps time for the ask Mia video on why you are a “real” or “actual” journalist Mia.
loading...
We have heard enough about policies and ‘researched questions’. In fact too much I have tuned out and would not be able to process another political article where big wigs are bashing Tony or Julia.
You may not want to read about what she thinks of botox or hair (you also probably didn’t read the whole article as that is not all Mia talked about), but I think it IS refreshing, it IS different. If you want to know policies, look at the millions of websites dedicated to informing you about them, or better yet read every page of the newspaper or turn on Sky News. After information and election overload, Mia’s article was the only one I stopped to read and enjoyed. It’s nice to know that whether you like Julia or not, there are other things that can be discussed other than politics. Mia isn’t Laurie Oakes, she was given an opportunity to have a woman to woman chat with Julia, she had fun with it and as always wrote in a way that was entertaining and light hearted, so that we could see another side to the PM that we haven’t seen yet.
Mia doesn’t claim to be a political journalist. She is an entertaining and funny writer who gives us pieces on topics that are open to be discussed and are relevant to our day and age. I say good on her, I’m relatively new to mamamia and have been visiting everyday and appreciate that for the first time in this election I’ve been entertained by something I’ve read about it. Thanks Mia.
loading...
Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool.
loading...
“Hard hitting, policy driven, informative to the point where we are all more comfortable making a decision come August 21″ – we’ve had plenty of that crap already, maybe too much.
Is it a full moon at the moment, or has someone put nasty-pills in the water supply ?
loading...
Pen,
You’re right. Next time I am asked by my editors to interview the Prime Minister, I will explain I am not an “actual journalist” and I’ll give them your number so you can do it.
What’s your number?
loading...
One of things I really liked about this article is the observations about how JG’s staff acted around their boss. I am interested in those workplace relationships and believe they indicate quite a lot about someone. Also, all those details about the plane, JG’s clothes etc were great. I really appreciate knowing a little bit about what it’s like to take a ride of the PMs plane etc, and those details make it feel real.
loading...
that’s a really good point. you can tell a lot about a person by how they treat their junior staff
loading...
I don’t understand the fuss about the article and why people are upset. It was Mia’s interview, everyone has a different style.
What I was most intrigued by was the pictures in the original copy. The body language was very close and Mia (and I dont mean this in a negative way just a curious way) seemed very “on top” of Julia in those couple photographs. Did anyone else notice that?
loading...
Yes I noticed it to. Looks like Mia can’t hear what Julia is saying.
loading...
Ha…yeah, I was actually struggling to keep up with her!
She was wearing flat shoes and walking very fast!
We were surrounded by AFP and media were running backwards in front of us and flashing their cameras and it was all very surreal and fast.
I couldn’t hear her very well either so I was very close – and that’s why I kept banging her on the bottom!
loading...
Mia, did you feel like you were in the West Wing, even for a moment? (vapid question, sorry)
loading...
I thought this post was very informative. The pen thing did annoy me (and I did a thumbs up on two commenters who said the same thing). I have read all the comments so far (never done that before ) and I’m wondering why people are so cranky with the article and with Mia. Is it jealousy? Or the Tall Poppy thing? Or is everyone super tense about the election?
loading...
Perhaps people had certain expectations of how such an interview might go, given how prolificly and articulately Mia has written about certain topics, and felt let down?
loading...
All the pen talk annoyed me to. But I liked the article and interview.
loading...
i say jealousy. It makes people act out violently, irrationally and abusively – as has been seen all over this post!
The saddest thing is Mia will continue on and do more and bigger and better, while the jealous few will continue to snipe, snip, grab, pull, chop, axe, froth, bubble and slice away at whomever they can see that ’causes’ ‘that bad ‘feeling’ in them, and yet they will likely never develop any insight into their own behaviour or even question their own terrible unhappiness.
Pity them.
loading...
I had the feeling the green-eyed monster was making a visit “dressed up as a troll”
loading...
I think the Tall Poppy syndrome is alive and well in Australia, yep.
loading...
(Sob) …LEAVE… (Sob)… MIA… (Blub)… ALONE !!… (Sob, Sob)
loading...
If anyone has something to say about her you deal with me !!!!
loading...
Ha. Love youse both.
loading...
Smile on my dial
loading...
Oh my. This is better than Jerry Springer.
I do wonder sometimes what people who are very strong conservative types get out of coming on this forum. I’m not saying you have less of a right to be here, or less of a right to your views… but if everything makes you so mad wouldn’t you be better off following another blog? Mia’s views are always consistent. For example… Id’ be shocked to my socks if she posted an anti-abortion post tomorrow. It’s just not how it rolls. So why are you all so up in arms when this blog supports gay marriage etc? Or she does a (great) interview completely consistent with her personality type?
The teapot comment is the best so far though.
loading...
Some conservative-types like to be outraged; it gives meaning to their lives…
loading...
Can’t speak for the general conservatives, they aren’t organised really about stuff like derailing/trolling forums, but the anti-abortion stuff is often deliberately designed to derail the conversation, anti-choice groups jump onto it in an organised way through alerts, for various sites.
loading...
I hear you on that. I think the story on the ‘Australian Vaccination Network’ showed how scarily proactive some of these orgs can be.
loading...
I am what you would call fairly conservative and I get a lot out of the site, even when comments don’t exactly gel with me. But, I respect others opinions and I try not to get all het up about it and leave the attacking by the door. Some people just like to antagonise and stir up trouble though. If you try to leave a considered response usually people respect that.
loading...
Happymum, I don’t think our politics could be more different if we tried, and I have never, ever found anything you say to be offensive.
loading...
Thanks Frankie, I don’t want to ever be offensive even though the passion sometimes takes over.
loading...
I like hearing other views, even if i can’t help but get het up sometimes, please don’t get me wrong from my above comment i think all views are welcome here and add to the interest, how boring if we all agreed! I just don’t like the organised de-railing and trolling on sensitive topics.
loading...
I always enjoy your comments Apples and I too think that organised trolling is just a waste of everyone’s time.
loading...
Yes – I don’t want people to assume that a difference of opinion or whatever is trolling.
loading...
I was thinking the same thing as frankie, Happymum. We have very different politics AND I enjoy reading your perspective. Also politics isn’t everything.
That’s one of the reasons I feel slightly bemused by the commenters who say “everyone” is being shouty, and “everyone” with a different view gets jumped on. Phew – Exaggeration or what?!
Its all in the tone. And your tone is lovely – perhaps you should give lessons.
loading...
I am a regular reader of this blog, however I hardly ever post. I wanted to say that I loved this story and the interview you did on the PM – Well done Mia.
I love the way you write and the humour you bring to every story. I am not sure why this interview got so may negative responses.
The interview was never meant to be a political profile. I thought it was new and refreshing and engaging.
Well done again and keep up the great work !
loading...
I am a woman but I refuse to vote for Julia Gillard just because she is a woman. That to me is simply reverse discrimination. She still has to be worthy of the position to earn my respect and my vote. Besides, what would she understand about any of the issues that many women face today – divorce, raising kids on your own etc? From that perspective, she’s had an easy life. I’d like to see her get ahead with all these challenges in her life. Then she would truly win my vote. I also thought that her retort to the comment that she wasn’t a mum (she replied that John Howard wans’t a mum either), was really silly. No he wasn’t, but he was a parent and understands the challenges of raising children just a little more than she does.
loading...
Women face more issues than motherhood, divorce and so forth. And who is that said we should vote for her just because she is a woman? everyone keeps saying they won’t do that but i am yet to hear from the first person who said we SHOULD do that, or did some people just assume it was so?
We are not all working families. I am not sure who i am voting for but JG does ‘fit’ my challenges in life as a young uni student from a non-wealthy background just like she did (hecs aside).
Fine to say she doesn’t speak to your life experience but she does to some, and for others it doesn’t matter.
I am not a parent but i still contribute to this country, i hate how ‘working families’ dominates politics. Yes it’s important to raise a family, i want to raise one myself some day in a good political climate but don’t forget there are other people out there too.
loading...
Agreed Apples. I have a family, I’m married and have children. And the one thing that really irritated me more than anything was ‘working families’. Because it alienated too many people. Not everyone is the classic dual income, 2 child family. But I’m over that now. I honestly cant think of a better role model for my kids than Julia. She was has worked hard, first in her career in law and now in politics. She has done it all herself. I want my children to grow up in a country where sometimes politically things will happen, not because they’re popular but because its the right thing to do.
loading...
Agree with you both! My husband and I are retired – me from 40 years of teaching & him earlier from same role – and as he is unwell I am his full time carer.
didn’t get a reply, sadly.
When JG first became PM I heard the “working families” from her lips & thought, no!
We are NOT all in that group (now) and respectfully wrote to her asking her to consider stopping the use of it.
loading...
No-one would win my vote because of their gender.
But you’d vote for her if she was divorced and / or a single parent?
Or even just because she was a parent? Or had a hard life?
loading...
You know, hopeless, I’ve heard this kind of argument a bit – that Julia Gillard can’t understand the challenges facing families because she doesn’t have children, and therefore she can’t run the country. But it seems to me that government is involved in a lot of things. If you follow that logic, she would also have to own a small business, run a large company, be long-term unemployed, homeless, have a serious illness or disability, go back to school (or perhaps teach), care for an elderly or ill relative, serve in the Army in Afghanistan, run a farm……
That’s actually asking a bit much of just one person don’t you think? Even a woman?
loading...
I’m not a parent, divorced/single/otherwise, but I know the challenges my Mum and I faced as a single parent family, and I know the challenges and problems my friends with kids have. I doubt John Howard would know about that.
loading...
In some ways, I think John Howard had less idea about what it’s like to be a working mother than Julia Gillard.
Julia’s friends, sister and close parliamentary colleagues are all working mothers.
John Howard was from a different era. His wife never worked. His mother certainly didn’t.
Now that his daughter has become a single working mother, I’m sure he would have a far better understanding of these issues than he did when he was Prime Minister.
I think the same reasons are behind Tony Abbott’s changed views on paid parental leave – his wife, staff, colleagues and daughters have taught him a thing or two. Which is a terrific thing.
loading...
Ahem..I would guess that his wife & mother both worked all their lives. They just didn’t get paid for it.
loading...
Yes, Janette was a very active member of the Liberal party and supported it 100%. Just that these women did not get paid for their work.
loading...
I was always under the impression Janette was a quiet power behind the throne so to speak, she and John were quite the team it was always said she was very vocal and active in politics except publicly to maintain a certain image. Anyway just what i’ve read happy to hear otherwise.
I’m curious about Tony Abbott’s wife, from what I read she really is removed from it all and does her own thing?
loading...
Hear hear Sue!
loading...
Touche Sue. You’re right. I should have spelled out that she wasn’t in paid employment outside the home.
loading...
Janette was at home in Sydney with their children while they were still at school. I think she did a great job to maintain the status quo for her young family, in what could have been a very disruptive stressful time for them. I admire her greatly for choosing to do this. And she would have often been living like a single mum with him away so often.
All people form their opinions based on the values that are important to them. It doesnt mean they have no idea about the alternative and dont respect the alternative.
loading...
Very true. I guess if Tony wins the gays can only hope one of his daughters turns out to be a lesbian.
While I do think it’s a very honourable thing to change your mind about something you weren’t previously open to, I think a leader of a country should have enough empathy and compassion to put themselves in someone else’s shoes without having to experience or witness hardship first-hand.
Note, I said ‘leader of a country’. God knows I’ve done a 180 on more than one occasion…
On a separate note, Mia, in my eyes you knocked this one out of the park. Loved the perspective you brought to the interview and found it a real novelty to read such a high-profile piece written in your inimitable voice. Nice one.
Lana…You’re doing a stellar job moderating this post. On most days I envy you. Maybe not today. Keep on keeping on! x
loading...
Thanks Rochelle xxx
loading...
This lovely moderator deserves more comments like Rochelle’s – good on you too Rochelle …kind words x
loading...
Sad fact I know but, I know some people who are voting for Julia just because she is a woman. I think it’s sad that some people have absolutely no idea and because it is compulsory – they vote anyone in without merit.
loading...
That wasn’t her full answer – what she said was, no single politician (or anyone, for that matter) can encapsulate, in their own life experience, the experiences of every single other Australian. I thought it was a good answer.
loading...
Mia, how did you choose your outfit for the interview? Not to be too judgemental but I thought you would wear something more… businesslike. I was surprised to see someone interviewing the PM in a t-shirt.
loading...
i loved your outfit Mia! It was like a modern fashionable young professional Mum outfit!! Plus that colour looked great on you.
loading...
Beth, I did actually think about it a bit although I left for Melbourne at such short notice, my head wasn’t as switched on as it should be when I was riffling through my wardrobe.
I was wearing a leather jacket over my top but I took it off because it was hot in the RSL and also, I know that colour looks better in photographs, editors and photographers prefer it. Also, I wear colour constantly. Not a black girl.
Did think about wearing a ‘proper’ jacket. Decided against it. Actually also considered wearing my Converse on the day with some fitted cargoes (is this too much information??), because I wanted to feel comfortable and grounded when I was in a stressful situation and that is my uniform.
But I put on some boots and my top (not a t-shirt really but cotton and loose yes) with my scarf to jzoooj it up.
loading...
Mia – why do you respond to comments such as this one by Beth? I mean it is such a ridiculous thing for her to want to discuss with you….it definitely requires ‘no response’. It’s like if you go to pick the kids up from school and someone says “I can’t believe you left the house in a tracksuit”…..it’s like “Wha’???”
Also – why do people say things like….”Not to be judgmental BUT…” and then end the sentence in a super judgmental way or “No offence BUT……” your butt looks huge in that dress or “not to be rude but….” you get what I mean!
loading...
ps I “thumbs up’d” myself! Yee haw!
loading...
hehehe
loading...
Thank you for answering Mia, that was a really interesting response. I hadn’t actually considered your comfort with what you were wearing, more the general look you had (and unfortunately bright colours often don’t look as businesslike as dark ones or black). Obviously being comfortable in that type of situation is quite important
And Anais sorry but I didn’t think it was a ridiculous thing to discuss and Mia seemed to think it was important enough to reply to my comment. And so did the 5 people who clicked the ‘thumbs up’ on my comment (unlike you I did not click it for my own comment). And I did say “Not to be TOO judgemental” to acknowledge that I was indeed being judgemental by thinking what I was but I didn’t comment purely to make a judgement but rather to see what Mia’s reasons were for her choice of outfit.
loading...
Thank you Mia!
I find this “behind-the-scenes” info so interesting, and I thought your interview was great.
I think that people have such high expectations of you because they just love you so much. Take it as flattery!
I hope you are proud of the wonderful job you have done.
Laura xx
loading...
Please let me clarify this, you had about 25 minutes to create a rapport, ask questions and cope with turbulence.
So here’s the thing that has me puzzled. It was a human interest piece wasn’t it? Not an in depth political profile, correct?
You DID ask some challenging questions which she CHOSE not to engage with. What else were you supposed to do? Hit her on the head with your i-pad?
I suspect JG enjoyed doing this interview as much as I did reading it.
Which was alot actually.
loading...
Yay for that Sarah – this piece of writing was done after an amazingly short time & under incredibly pressured circumstances – it was right for so many reasons as it has been explained by Mia in her intro & in responses since.
Unsure of motives of “nay Sayers” & “complainants” here … Umm Tall Poppy Syndrome?? …whatever … For me, and for you & so many it was, as in that story of old:
J. U. S. T. R. I. G. H. T
loading...
LOL, now have an image of Mia hitting Julian over the head with her iPad!
loading...
All together reading the interview & this new piece, there were some things I liked and some I didn’t, as other’s have also posted. I found it really funny reading all the minute details about the plane & food (the food made me wonder & laugh because I thought it comical your readers might ask for all those details, like they do the clothes you wear). I thought your questions about gay marriage and your intuition that what she was saying wasn’t ringing true was spot on, and I still feel that she has shelved her beliefs in this regard. There was a human side to it, the most I got out of it in that regard was the incredible quality she has of being unflappable, always (huge inspiration for us all there) and that she doesn’t take everything that people say, or every question people ask PERSONALLY. Massively important, and for me that is a quality that is worthy of admiration and that people can model their behaviour on. This is important in politicians. Lets face it, even though its funny & offers great comedy who wants to be a grumpy arse like Keating & Latham, who appear to be slighted if the wind blows the wrong way. Perhaps the article could have been tighter with regard to the human perspective as the theme, but given the short notice & sleep deprivation & the fact you do have a life & other obligations when this was finally dropped on you, its understandable, and I was glad you offered that side of things.
Finally, I have to say if anything the posting of these articles has given me an indepth knowledge of “thumbs upping” & “how not to post under various aliases”!! Hahahah.
loading...
Bedazzled, loved your last sentence … Yep we sure know about things ‘behind the scenes’ now thanks to some commenters antics don’t we?
loading...
Why is everyone so angry?
loading...
I am wondering the same juliebee.
Have no idea why people have to be so nasty.
loading...
Not just nasty, which is unacceptable, but oh-so-smug! Yuck!
loading...
I agree with all of you, am well and truly sick of it and without wanting to sound a bit airy fairy it’s really affecting ‘the vibe’ – hopefully it stops soon.
loading...
Thank you all for your comments about the mood/vibe etc as it’s really been bothering me too. I hope, as it seems you do as well for those who don’t wish to “be here” because they can only be nasty/snide/smug etc is for them to , ahem
(gonna swear now)
Bugger off
please !!
loading...
Bugger off is too kind
loading...
They’re jealous they didn’t get to go on the fancy plane….
loading...
I’m OK with it. Thought it might be a bit polarising.
loading...
right? what I like about the blog is that most people follow the dinner party rules. And are, you know, nice.
loading...
I like this article about the behind the scenes much more than the interview itself. The interview gave me no insight to Julia Gillard the person. She is a very good spin doctor and will spin the party line to the end. I don’t really get her own honest self from the interview and the highly managed campaigning is just shutting the people out from knowing who she really is.
I agree with Latham that we are not seeing the warts and all we should be able to when the journos were shut out of the meeting with Kevin Rudd. I think to be able to see how the Labor party works together can give us insight into how we pick our parties to vote for. I don’t just want to see stage managed interviews and airbrushed articles when this is so important to us as Australians. It is all about what party is going to lead us out of the mess we are in and who will better the nation as a whole. Not who can answer questions in an rehearsed way, but who can give their honest answer how their party will react and act on the issue. I won’t be putting in a blank sheet of paper on election day like Latham, but I think if you don’t have an opinion and you have no idea to vote for, perhaps you should. The people who care will always vote correctly, but those who don’t – will not worry who is in government anyway.
loading...
agreed Happymum. Never liked Latham much but he did have a refreshing perspective on the campaign so far. What a shocking media-managed spectacle it has been. Australians deserve more honesty.
loading...
I love this post Mia. Great, exciting raed. What an amazing experience! Sounds like you did a stellar job.
Also love the ‘I kept accidentally banging my hand on her bottom’. Hilarious.
loading...
Mia you say that Tony Abbott declined an interview. Are you really surprised?
After reading the tone and content of the blog about Tony A I would be sceptical about what slant you would be putting onto the story. I mean some of the swear words you allowed trough and vile was astonishing.
You posted a video by Get Up about so called phrases Tony Abbott has used in the past. Were some of these taken out of context?
Did anybody mention, including yourself, anything about his very generous parental leave? No? Why? Would this have slanted the perception of Tony Abbott to a more favourable light?
Did Get Up mention the paid parental leave? No.
You may delete this comment because I notice that comments that don’t follow the opinion of the author do, but I feel that fairness should be important
loading...
Surely what is relevant is what someone believes NOW not what they said ten years ago. I would love to extract some articles from Cosmolitan when you were editor ten years ago Mia, and see if you still would be entirely comfortable with publishing them now.
loading...
The thing that also annoys me is that when you interviewed Tony Abbot you said his opinions were much more nuanced than you first thought. Surely then the “Get up” quotes are misrepresenting the complexity of his views.
loading...
Just the one name please Helen… !
loading...
I actually like Tony Abbott very much. And we are in regular contact. I wish he had agreed to an interview because I do believe some of his more contentious views about women have changed and continue to change as his daughters get older and he listens to them and the other smart women around him.
It would have been terrific for him (and me) to have the chance to explore and explain how these views have changed……
loading...
I think you’re probably right about him. Look at the impact Malcolm Fraser’s daughter had on him. I never thought he would turn out to be the compassionate and empathetic elder statesman he has become.
loading...
Agreed. Malcolm Fraser is someone to be admired. But I didnt always feel that way. We can thank his daughter for that I’m sure.
loading...
I would have liked Ruddock’s daughter to have had more of an impact on him.
loading...
Good point! me too!
loading...
didn’t she leave the country in disgust over his stance on refugees?
loading...
Its one of life’s (or genetic’s) little mysteries. Like the Costello brothers. Imagine a dinner party at their house!
loading...
Speaking of Rudd’s daughter did you read the article on her in the Good Weekend this weekend? (SMH magazine for readers interstate) I liked the article a lot and made me like Jessica a lot. My favourite part of the story was about how and her husband Albert met. I will re-tell it quickly for anyone who missed it and was interested…(apologies for any mistakes in the re-telling, this is from memory)
They’d known each for 3 years already as he’d been a volunteer campaigner for Rudd. She’d never liked him. Found him to be a bit like what Tony Abbott’s daughter might call a ‘gay churchy loser’. Then one night she got a phone call from Albert saying ‘Turn on the TV and put it up loud’ (after tuning it to a particular channel). She thought it must be a big important political annoucement….but it was the Simpsons. After 5 mins she said “Do you know who you’ve called? He was so embarrased, he’d meant to call his friend Jennifer as he was at the gym and had forgotten his headphones and didn’t want to miss the Simpsons dialogue…This made Jessica start to look at him in a whole different light…..
loading...
hehehe love it!
loading...
I think there are a fair few comments that don’t agree with Mia, in fact a fair few comments that I think are downright rude and that nobody would dare say to someone in public. If your comments are being deleted it may be because you have now commented on this post with at least three different names. We have a policy of one name per thread per IP address – it just helps the other readers make better sense of opinions they read.
loading...
Poor Lana – how many times does she have to say this this week. c’mon people, play fair
loading...
Actually I havn’t used 3 differnet names. I post as myself but the computer is used in a retail shop with 5 other people here.
loading...
And they all happen to comment on mamamia and have the same opinion as you, oh and the same turn of phrase and style of writing too. What a coincidence.
loading...
Do they? We discuss passionately the topic here at work and offer our thoughts on what people are saying to each other. Can’t be more clear than that. I’m not going to investigate which one posted what because as their supervisor, I’m not going to make them feel uncomfortable over this topic.
I’m sure they have forgotten they even posted
loading...
Jeez…I’d be pissed if my employees – with the ok of their supervisor – were using work resources for personal business during retail trading hours.
You must have a very, very understanding boss!
loading...
At my work, we get no Facebook, no internet access…we get inter-store email.
If I feel particularly rebellious, I email other stores and use smiley faces. o.O
However, using internet for personal matters during work hours is technically internal theft, as you are getting paid but not working. The same as standing around chatting is internal theft. So I agree Tali, if any of the ladies under me were stuffing around on Mamamia at work, I’d be pissed too!
loading...
Nice to know I’m not the only hard arse Shannon – and I mean that in the nicest possible way!
loading...
It’s trolling plain and simple. Write something negative and then back that up by “someone else” reinforcing the view. Happens all the time all over the internet.
It’s not the fact that there are dissenting views, which I’m sure there are many (I for one think layering would make me look like a fat cow). It’s the trolling behaviour which is underhanded, people get away with it on sites that aren’t moderated well but that clearly isn’t the case here.
loading...
I would like to say that as a supporter of this site, its owner and employees that my comments are made once, and once only from the same ip address and my name here is always my real first name… Please do not, ever, accuse anyone on issues which may be found untrue and indeed could be regarded as potentially libelous.
I acknowledge that you did not name anyone but I wanted to strongly state where I stand.
I would also be happy from now to include my surname but I suspect that this could end up “blowing up in my face” where trolling, and more are concerned. Some mamamia posters and friends would agree with that as it has already occurred.
So, until the “nasty/negatives” have moved on, I’ll remain ‘Denyse’ my first real name
loading...
I think there are two Denyse’s here (which is confusing). My tip is to go to gravatar & set up a free account. Then its always you. (thank you to whoever put me on to that the other day!)
I also think its a bit over the top accusing of libel…particularly if we are all anonymously posting (Yes, my name really isn’t Madison!).
Also, blogs aren’t democracy’s. I would be hitting that delete button a heck of a lot more than they are currently!
loading...
Hey Lana,
I haven’t ever had an issue with comments being deleted and think these things are completely up to the discretion of the MM team but sometimes I do log on from uni (are the hundreds of computers here the same IP? Because if so I think its really likely that you would have many people from the same IP address.) Just a thought. Your moderation always seems pretty spot on to me anyway.
loading...
Don’t worry Mabol, Lana is very experienced in knowing the diff between common-area computers with the same IP and someone trying to push a (usually angry) agenda.
If you ever have a problem, just drop her an email, she is always happy to check it out.
loading...
that’s good to know – I used to be able to post from my gym (there are 7 there for public use) but can’t now??? The last time i could use it was when I send Lana a thank you after i won a printer- haven’t be able to comment from there since.
loading...
Thanks dramaqueen I will look into that ….but it may be the gym. Even if I delete your comments or block your IP your comment would still go to our spam filter, you wouldn’t “not be allowed to comment” so to speak….But I will check
loading...
I’m sorry but I just can’t believe that you could think it worthwhile to mention that Julia Gillard looks great for her age and that she doesn’t wear make-up. Can’t you see that these kind of comments are perfectly consistent with the culture you complain about that emphasises body image and appearance as the most significant aspect to a woman! Geez!
loading...
Actually, it does more than that. It continues the long tradition in the media of setting women up against each other in a banal competition over their appearance.
loading...
Hey Lily, I really really wish that I had had the chance to do a similar profile of Tony because physical description of your subject is pretty standard, some would say essential, in this kind of interview.
I would have applied the same attitude to descriptions for him as I did for JG.
loading...
I have been reading the elections posts with interest, but not commenting much…something about dinner parties and politics?
Was wondering if you had a list of things a la Madonna that you weren’t allowed to ask?
On a side note, my sister said it was ‘disgusting’ that my husband moved a birthday because of a boys weekend (the ‘boys’ were childhood friends visiting from overseas, for the first time in ten years). Right up until her husband had to miss a birthday due to work. Suddenly it was totally acceptable. Theory is a very, very different thing from practice.
loading...
LFC – you too remembered the dinner party rule – gotta love it – I’m 60 and it was sex, money, religion & politics .. I think!!
loading...
No wonder we have so many chats about the weather!
loading...
No list. I could have asked anything I guess.
In fact I did ask where she stands on ‘leggings-as-pants’.
You’ll be pleased to know she believes leggings are not pants.
loading...
Thanks! That would have been on my ‘no questions’ list. What if one day I get a head injury and decide to wear leggings as pants? And someone has me on record saying I’m against it?
loading...
Pingback: As big as it gets - Pink Ronnie
Does anyone know how she met Tim? Just wondering.
loading...
I think he was working for a hair products company and was selling at the salon where she was having her hair done
loading...
A lot of people are labelling those who have criticised certain points of the article as needing to ‘lighten up’ and ‘stop being so nasty’, and although there have been a number of just plain mean spirited comments (which would probably be there no matter what Mia had written) there are a lot which could be viewed as highly constructive. Please don’t misconstrue constructive criticism with meanness.
I never once expected the article to be a hard hitting piece on the economy or the mining tax etc, but did think it would be an interesting time to maybe find out about Julia’s views on important topics not broached by the mainstream media. i.e asking Julia what she thinks about airbrushing in mags would give an indication on her views on body image, asking if she grew up with pets and if she buys free range eggs would give an idea of her thoughts on animal rights, asking if she recycles would show what she thinks of enviromental concerns…just asking those little questions that would maybe give insight into how she forms opinions.
As someone who conducts interviews on a weekly basis I almost ALWAYS walk away wishing I had asked something different or I realise I missed something. It’s par for the course and I empathise with Mia as it was an extremely high pressure environment.
So while I think Mia did a good job, I think there is nothing wrong with people constructively criticising the piece – that’s how we all get better!
loading...
Great questions Swinging…..really great. Bugger!
loading...
Oh believe me they are easy to come up with when I’m sitting in the comfort of my home and am thinking about them for a few hours rather than on a plane in the wee hours of the morning! As I said I walk away from every interview thinking ‘bugger’!
loading...
As a journalism student I have learnt so much from Mia’s post and your comments swinging were also great! I am so glad to see that you professionals (a) get ignored when trying to get an interview (b) walk away thinking bugger why didn’t I ask that! I will think of this and keep going when I feel like I’m walking into a brick wall.
Thanks
loading...
I agree with you Swinging. The way you have put that is actually very hard to disagree with! I know I would have no problems at all taking criticism from you as you use such fair and thoughtful language and do not go for the jugular. I love disagreements when they are conducted like that; I’ve completely changed my opinion on things as a result of conversations like that.
loading...
Thankyou! That’s exactly what I was trying to convey that while there will always be just plain nasty comments (which would be there whether you wrote about politics or puppies) they shouldn’t be confused with genuine people constructively trying to get another point of view across.
loading...
Don’t worry, my jaw isn’t made of glass…
loading...
Actually I would love to know Julia’s thoughts on animal rights…it’s a subject that only ever seems to be broached with the Greens.
loading...
Very entertaining read, Mia, loved it.
As for those who are being critical about the piece not being ‘hard hitting political journalism’, can I just say, duh! Mia has her style, Laurie Oaks has his. I have mine. You have yours. If we were all the same it would be boring.
loading...
Frankly it’s embarrassing that you would refer to yourself as a journalist.
loading...
You know I think if she had of put one hand on her hip and called herself a teapot they would not have let her on the plane.
loading...
Picturing this now LOL
gotta love the tea reference !!
loading...
Laugh. Out. Loud.
loading...
I KNOW!!! Hasn’t Latham ruined it for a WHOLE PROFESSION?!?
loading...
bahahaha
loading...
Well played, Bowerbird! =P
loading...
It kind of annoys me when half the commentors here jump on every anti Mia comment as it almost diminishes the affect of how rude those original comments usually are but I just have to say something about this one.
How can Mia not be a journalist? She’s worked in the media field her entire career which, for a woman in her 30s, actually spans a long period of time. She’s an editor, a writer, a blogger, and regularly writes opinion pieces for newspapers – not to mention daily pieces on this very blog. .
The defition of a journalist – “A journalist collects and disseminates information about current events, people, trends, and issues”.
I think that sums up Mia perfectly, and I really think your comment is uncalled for.
loading...
Don’t take this the wrong way Mia because it’s actually a complement….but I read the article on The Age website not knowing who wrote it and was surprised when I saw your name. I enjoyed it so much and it was so refreshing to be reading a more relaxed chatty piece, yet one which provided insight.
So after I read it and enjoyed it so much, I went in search of a name to see who was responsible for this great read and saw your name and did a double take! I thought “I didn’t know Mia was given such high profile assignments!”
I thought it was fantastic and hope you get to do many more!
loading...
Loved this article and the perspective you brought to interviewing the PM – very engaging read. Have to say “Julia: Unplugged” was one of the most interesting pieces I’ve seen throughout this election campaign.
loading...
the piece is engaging and interesting…quite frankly I’ve read so many policy pieces that it is easy to forget that those policies will be enacted by the people behind them and I for one want to know more about those people and their life stories…
loading...
yes, Lana does need to calm down a bit doesn’t she?
loading...
I’m calm. I know you are still not so calm about my deleting your comment the other day but I have apologised and I think we should move on.
loading...
A lot of bitchiness on MamaMia today… :S
loading...
Ijust put it down to PET – Pre Election Tension. everyone will be sweet again come 22nd August
loading...
loading...
Yes everyone needs a cup of tea and biscuit.
loading...
I like biscuits
loading...