Germaine Greer lays into Katie Price, but not Gillard
Australia’s most infamous feminist export Germaine Greer has delivered a speech in which she describes the Prime Minister as a ‘good kid’ but derides Katie Price for selling her womanhood to fame. “We have a terrible situation where young girls look at Katie Price and want that life, the pink wedding dress and the pink carriage… at what cost is that,” Greer said. “I don’t see Katie Price making old bones — unless she has some extraordinary epiphany, takes out those implants, has a steak and chips and starts enjoying her life.” Katie Price retorted on Twitter: “Its interesting what germaine greer has said about me not making ‘old bones’ and my life being a nightmare (sic),” Price wrote. “Well I have 3 beautiful children so i would never say my life is a nightmare. I have regrets, hopes and fears but don’t we all?? Ive taken her advice and maybe the first step to the ‘epiphany’ i apparently need – i had steak and chips tonight xx”
Oscar nominee in trouble for ‘sexist’ ads
French Oscar contender for Best Actor Jean Dujardin (nominated for his role in the silent movieThe Artist) has appeared in racy movie posters for his latest romantic comedy about an adulterous male in France. The only problem is the French advertising regulator ARPP said the posters degraded women and requested them to be removed just days after they went up. The authority said it received four complaints from people offended by the ads and said it believed the posters depicted women as sexual objects. They “present a degrading image of women, because in both cases you do not see the woman’s face … This is certainly presenting an image of women as objects, in this case sexual objects,” said ARPP head Stephane Martin. The slogan for the ad shown here is ‘I’m going into a meeting’. The buzz created in France by the ruling has led some to question whether Dujardin’s Oscar chances had been damaged. Thoughts on the posters?
Former slave’s letter goes viral
Jourdan Anderson was a slave in America’s deep south in the 1800s when he was finally freed and allowed to move on to a life with his family where he worked for income. But his former master Colonel P.H. Anderson wrote and asked for his return which prompted a gloriously acidic reply from Jourdan which was first published in the New York Tribune in 1865. He wrote: “Sir: I got your letter, and was glad to find that you had not forgotten Jourdon, and that you wanted me to come back and live with you again, promising to do better for me than anybody else can. I have often felt uneasy about you. I thought the Yankees would have hung you long before this, for harboring Rebs they found at your house. I suppose they never heard about your going to Colonel Martin’s to kill the Union soldier that was left by his company in their stable. Although you shot at me twice before I left you, I did not want to hear of your being hurt, and am glad you are still living.” He wrote that he was doing ‘tolerably well’ and was keeping a good home for his family on $25 a month. He added: “As to my freedom, which you say I can have, there is nothing to be gained on that score, as I got my free papers in 1864 from the Provost-Marshal-General of the Department of Nashville. Mandy says she would be afraid to go back without some proof that you were disposed to treat us justly and kindly; and we have concluded to test your sincerity by asking you to send us our wages for the time we served you. This will make us forget and forgive old scores, and rely on your justice and friendship in the future. I served you faithfully for thirty-two years, and Mandy twenty years. At twenty-five dollars a month for me, and two dollars a week for Mandy, our earnings would amount to eleven thousand six hundred and eighty dollars. Add to this the interest for the time our wages have been kept back, and deduct what you paid for our clothing, and three doctor’s visits to me, and pulling a tooth for Mandy, and the balance will show what we are in justice entitled to.” Oh snap.
Gina Rinehart kidnap fears and family ‘secrets’
The battle between Australia’s richest person, Gina Rinehart, and her three eldest children has revealed family concerns about kidnap plots, extortion concerns and the possible need to hire bodyguards. It’s estimated Ms Rinehart, having double her wealth earlier this month, is worth around $20 billion and one email revealed in court from daughter Hope said she was worried as her mother was going to be ‘wealthier than Bill Gates’. “I don’t think you understand what it means now that the whole world thinks that you’re going to be wealthier than Bill Gates – it means we’ll all need bodyguards and very safe homes,” daughter Hope Welker wrote. “I don’t have the money to protect myself or my children and it scares me. I should have enough money to have bodyguard, housekeeper and cook [worth up to $225,000]. Even my friends who have nothing compared to your wealth have more staff.”
Ms Rinehart had applied to suppress the details of the family court battle – in which her children are trying to have her removed as the head of the family trust, which owns a quarter of Ms Rinehart’s prospecting business. She used a 44 page security report to detail the apparent risks to her and her family’s safety.
Doctors to recommend smacking ban on kids
Smacking should be banned says The Royal Australasian College of Physicians paediatric and child health division president Dr Gervase Chaney. Dr Chaney said the body was reviewing its policy on smacking children and would likely officially support a ban and would then call on the Australian Government to do the same. “There has been good evidence that in countries where it has been banned there is a reduction in child abuse,” he said. “Though many people have used physical discipline, and it is still regarded in most of our society as an acceptable form of parenting, there is no clear delineation between what is acceptable as a smack and what is child abuse.” Britain’s equivalent body also reviewed its policy this month saying ‘today’s smack becomes tomorrow’s punch’. Mr Chaney said it was no longer OK for parents to say ‘it never did us any harm’.
Look what they did to Rachel Weisz…
If you missed the Week in Pics, there’s plenty in here (including a really old Barbie).

British regulators banned this Loreal anti-ageing moisturiser ad featuring actress Rachel Weisz after it received complaints which said the image was misleading. (Click through for a more natural shot of Weisz)
Michelle Obama and Ellen get down on the floor – for push-ups
Ellen has released a sneak peek of today’s episode in which she challenges the United States First Lady Michelle Obama to a push-up contest, as you do. Ms Obama was on the show to promote her healthy eating and fitness lifestyle. Oh, and Michelle won.
What else is in the news and on your mind?










Comments
116 Comments so far
loading...
Still find it hard to believe that smacking is still argued. I was smacked, ‘belted’ sometimes too. ( A lot actually) There was NEVER a time that the reason given for the smack was learned by the smack itself. I just vowed to never let my father see me cry – he gave the beltings, and I always felt demoralised, angry, embarrassed and vengeful afterwards. I recall saying to my mother – you smack me and I will keep doing it ( whatever the it was) over and over again till you have no smacking left in you. I can not think of one instance where it made sense or worked on me. Then the obvious guilt ridden conversation afterwards where my parent would state’ it hurt me more than you’ or ‘ you do understand why I smacked you, don’t you?’
Having raised 5 children, I cannot think of any time smacking them would have fixed a situation. Sure, there have been times in my frustration that I would have like too, but we know it is simply a reactionary behaviour. I have never heard an argument for smacking that makes any sense.
loading...
Avaaz petition about Gina Rinehart and the Fairfax shares:
http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_ginas_mining_media/?cjZfKcb
loading...
I am just pissed off that now I will have to read the SMH through the Rinehart lens, and the The Telegraph through the Murdoch one. It sucks that right wing billionaires want to influence my thinking. I say back off and look after your own family situations first, both these people are a mess, its quite obvious to see. I particularly loathe Murdoch he is a moral wasteland.
loading...
I dont really like Katie Price, but at least she has a sense of humor.
I think she handled the comment well.
loading...
Probably 90% of movie posters are sexist. You usually see men’s faces and can glean something about their character, while women are often disconnected body parts (legs, lips, cleavage or sometimes just a sillhouette) which could belong to any young, slim, beautiful white woman. If you do see their face, they are often skimpily dressed and always immaculately groomed, even if their male counterpart is not.
loading...
If that defines sexist against women, then every womens beauty advert and every womens magazine is sexist against women. Is it only sexist if men see it too. Hmmm.
loading...
If the posters are sexist, I think the movie is too. It’s a movie about an adulterous man – both the concept and the posters are sexist. In this context, I think the posters are ‘appropriate to the movie’. They show precisely as much respect for women as the man does for the women – his wife? Other married women? Don’t know the details, but either way…
loading...
I’m willing to be persuaded that I’m wrong, but I don’t think the posters are necessarily sexist. The old staple character of the adulterous male is no longer about some bloke going around taking advantage of women, the women are willing partners. And men who openly just like having sex with lots of different partners aren’t necessarily sexist – they just like having sex with lots of women. Often, when they’re honest about it, they’re pretty nice company
Minus the adultery part.
But I think the poster is one that I wouldn’t want in public space, just because it’s too sexual – I don’t want kids having that to look at on every bus-stop and the back of every bus, let alone at the movies. Too much information and no context for it for them. Us adults can cope, I think.
loading...
Posters: terrible I would be complaining if I saw them here, I am so over the legs open Vag spread that seems to be everywhere now..
Rachel W: she actually has quite bad skin in real life, she is a beauty and the ad is very misleading. I feel so much better seeing her real face!
Smacking: God help us as parents if they ban smacking, I am all for it in small doses.
loading...
Really? Do you let your husband/partner smack you in small doses? How about your parents – I’m sure there are things even now that you are an adult that they would want to discipline you for?
Is it just ok because kids are smaller? The only thing it teaches them is that it’s ok to hit others!!
loading...
Agree x 1000 with Regina.
What’s the point of smacking? I think all it does is make the smackee (parent…whoever) feel better and let off some steam.
I get annoyed with work colleagues but if I ‘smacked’ them, I’d be off to court for assault. I sometimes have to grab my elderly friend who tries to walk in front of traffic – but would I ‘smack’ her? No!!
Why then is it okay to smack a child. Just because they are small? And cannot answer back by calling the police or a lawyer? When is it okay to smack? Never.
loading...
i’m not a smacker, but this is a flawed comparison. if my husband treated me the way my children sometimes do, i wouldn’t bother smacking him. i’d leave him.
loading...
you didn’t give birth to your husband, you chose him.
loading...
Why would this hurt the actors Oscar chances? He didn’t come up with the idea for the ad.
loading...
It’s just what some critics are saying. I guess their (flimsy) reasoning is that perception is everything and the votes for these awards are already fickle enough!
loading...
Re Les Infideles: it’s not a huge stretch to imagine he has already gone into his ‘meeting’ in this poster…
loading...
You would think with $20billion Gina would be able to buy herself a decent bra that fits her.
I have heard from people who have worked for her that she is ruthless and very tight with her money. She would not be a boss who shares her wealth with her family and her employees.
loading...
If it’s not acceptable to give the wife ‘a little smack’ to keep her in line, why should it be ok to smack our children?
As a teacher & as a parent (& as a child who was smacked) the number of times I’ve seen the following situation is ridiculous:
“Don’t hit your sister/brother/etc!”
SMACK!
Seriously? Police officers aren’t allowed to hit or smack even the most hardened of criminals & the law says it’s still ok to hit our children?
As a child who was smacked, it never taught me dicipline – only fear, shame & resentment towards my parents – the two people who were supposed to love & protect me most in this world.
loading...
I know – I feel like this conversation could have been had 100 years ago “we can’t police what people do in their own homes, if a man wants to discipline his wife, he has that right. It would be impossible to enforce a ban on hitting your wife. The law shouldn’t interfere in family life”
loading...
agree agree agree.
Children seem to be the only people in our society who are legally allowed to be hit – why is that? Is it because they are smaller and defenceless?
How can we teach our little ones not to hit others when we “discipline” them this way ourselves – makes no sense to me.
loading...
Here’s a watercooler topic at my work
http://www.gizmag.com/reconstructing-visual-stimuli/19934/?utm_source=Gizmag+Subscribers&utm_campaign=7275654e20-UA-2235360-4&utm_medium=email
Scientists can record brainwave patterns, then recreate the image a person is looking at.
Soon, you’ll be able to record your whole life AKA Final Cut (the movie with Robin Williams, not the Apple app) style, even go back and check memories! Or if you die, reload your memories into a clone, and live forever!
Possibilities are endless!
We are truely living in the future.
loading...
Yes! I was reading this yesterday. I remember watching a long-form tele intv. with the people doing this and I was blown away. I love the future!
loading...
I didn’t mention it in my original comment (for shame) but also the benefits to the communicationally challenged is AWESOMESAUCE too.
Did you see the clip of the girl considered retarded who began typing complete sentences on a computer?
loading...
I read that ex-slave letter earlier this week…it’s wonderful! (But I did wonder for a moment if it was genuine…)
loading...
I’m a bit “over” the Michelle Obama doing push-ups clip. It has been shown on everything this morning. Sad thing…every time it is shown, you’d swear that you have just tuned in live to watch Geraldo Rivera open the missing safe from the wreck of the Andrea Doria ! All of mock “wow….ain’t this great” is a bit overwhelming.
The President’s wife is fit and healthy. Next, please.
loading...
Agreed. Now if we could just get ‘Iron Man’ Tony to stop, for the love of all things decent.
loading...
Looking at the photo of Angelina & Brad, it really freaks me out how much and with rapid frequency the weight of hollywood actresses changes. It’s so unhealthy. Who said thin is more beautiful? Certainly not any woman or man I know.
loading...
Labelling a smack as ‘child abuse’ is not only intentionally inflammatory, but it is insulting to people who actually suffered real abuse when they were children. I can tell you they are NOT the same.
On another note, man i love Rose Byrne’s outfit, hair and makeup. So gorgeous and unique!
loading...
Hi Jayne. On both accounts….I agree with you 110% !
loading...
I don’t necessarily think you are correct. A smack may not be a 10 on the scale of abuse but it is still abuse. Anything that comes from a bad place is abuse whether it is verbal, stonewalling, physical etc.
loading...
Poor Hope ! You little pampered pet, you ! No personal chef.
Buy yourself a microwave, a frypan and a copy of the Commonsense Cookbook. For further inspiration watch an episode or two of Masterchef.
Problem solvered !
loading...
Bradley! He’s baaaaaaaack!
loading...
Huzzah!!!
loading...
Or buy Mamamia’s inspired cookbook $120 Dollar Food Challenge by Sandra Reynolds. Good food on a budget!
loading...
…..or Google “Recipe of the Day” dot com ?
It’s free, and as poor Hope is feeling the side affects of the GFC…..
loading...
I don’t think Gina Rinehart will be winning Mother of the Year any time soon. She brought her children into the world, it’s up to her to provide them with a good life. If their personal safety is compromised because she’s one of the worlds richest people, she should do something about it, or live with the consequences. Just because her father was a total prick, it doesn’t mean she has to be.
loading...
From what I’ve seen she’s done and doing her utmost to out prick Lang in every way!
loading...
Gina Rhinehart may have bought her children into the world, but I’d disagree that it is up to her to provide them with the good life.
They are all adults. Adults have to earn their living. The silver spoon has been removed and Gina’s offspring are not happy about it .
loading...
Seriously? Gina is worth $20 billion but her children shouldn’t expect a cent from her? Sure they should do something worthwhile with their lives, but are they to cut out of all of the family money? What about Lang’s legacy? In today’s paper Gina’s net worth is quoted as increasing by ‘millions every day’. In this circumstance, what parent could be this incredibly ungenerous, and why? I definitely think the kidnap/ransom scenarios are a genuine concern. So let’s see, if she was to give her children only 0.1% of her net worth (today, that is) – that’s one-tenth of one percent – she would still be handing over $20 million. And she is only going to get richer. Her fortune is truly mind boggling. What the hell is she going to do with the rest of it? Cold.
loading...
Does it say anywhere that her children dont get a cent? I think that they still get a substaintial amount but they want more……have they worked for it? Do they deserve it? Are they going to make the right decisions about how to handle the family trust if they force their mother to give up control. This money was left to them in the trust by their gradndfather for all the grandchildren,and he had enough faith in his daughter to control it, remember one of the children is siding with Gina.
Gina inherited her fortune but she has made very smart decisions and handled the money very well to make it the sum of money it is today.
loading...
I think they are actually entitled to some of that money, they were supposed to inherit it from their grandfather and Gina has stopped that from happening. And with that kind of wealth security would be a concern. I don’t think they’re being entirely unreasonable.
loading...
Could I love the Obama’s any more? I think not! They are insirational in so many ways. Gina Reinhart could learn a lot from them.
loading...
Bingo!
loading...
So the Gina Reinhart thing is a spoilt rich brat who did nothing for her money withholding money from a spoilt rich brat who did nothing for her money?
loading...
I can’t believe I’m defending Gina, but…much as she isn’t likely to win parent of the year or even Australian of the year any time soon, from what I’ve read about her she is definitely not just a spoilt brat living off daddy’s money. She has increased the value of her holdings many times since she took over the company with some shrewd business moves.
loading...
You know what would fix Gina’s problem? If she gave all her money to me. I would buy a big-ass house and have parties every Friday. You’re all invited!!
loading...
You have to fight … for your constitutional right … to paaaaaaartay.
loading...
And I would buy you a dinosaur Rick
loading...
I want a Griffon!!
loading...
I would buy you a Griffon JJ.
loading...
I want a sloth, like Kirsten Bells one.
loading...
How about I get you Kristen Bell DRESSSED as a sloth?
loading...
RSVP: yes!
loading...
I wish I had to worry about whether or not I could afford a cook…right now I’m concerned about whether or not I can afford food. But I can understand the kids wanting to see the trust administered properly.
I don’t understand the photoshop “before and after” images of Candice Swanepoel…they’re before and afters of totally different shots, how can you possibly gauge the extent to which they are photoshopped? Her body positioning would have changed every 10 seconds. I don’t doubt they *were* photoshopped, but that’s a given. Are they trying to see her curves are photoshopped in? Her ribs out? What?
loading...
Yeah that was my reaction to the shots as well. I couldn’t see that she looked that different apart from a lot more tanned in the ‘after’ ones.
loading...
I agree. She looks very similar in both shots to me, just a lot browner in the after shots.
loading...
I appreciate seeing the sun damage on her though – I look at those glorious natural tans and get very tempted.
loading...
Probably a good job I didn’t win x-lotto last night then if the Gina Rinehart family experience is anything to go by….pretty sure my 6 year old would take me to court she REALLY REALLY REALLY wants a two wheeled scooter, and a pillow pet, and a cook to make her gourmet chicken nuggets and chips, and a house keeper to clean up her room…..
loading...
The whole Rinehart thing is sad, she has all the money but no family that love her, its just awful. Another example of money not buying happiness. I’ll take my bank balance and gorgeous family over that any day
loading...
Oh I love your commen FAB, couldn’t agree more.
loading...
I guess if I was the heiress to a fortune I would be a little frustrated if I was a grown woman/man and didn’t have control of my money. This all seems to be trying to keep total control of her business
loading...
What have Rinehart’s children done to earn that money?
loading...
Why does it matter if they earnt it or not? The trust fund was set up to benefit them, and Mum appears to not be distributing enough of it.
loading...
They were lucky enough to be born into an extremely wealthy family so they should be able to enjoy that wealth!
loading...
Maybe Gina should have given her kids a good flogging then they wouldn’t be such spoilt brats
What a ridiculous situation!
loading...
If my Granddad had left me billions of dollars, but my Mum kept it, chances are I’d be pissed!
The statement is terrible though! Screams spoilt brat!
loading...
Compeltely agree. On the other hand, maybe someone should let them know that earning your own money is much more fulfilling than inheriting it… I realise they’re concerned about security and the (large) associated costs but really.
loading...
Gina Rinehart makes me sick!
loading...
Um why? It’s her children requesting a cook, bodyguard etc
loading...
Ugh, it’s entire family really.
loading...
I really do understand the body guard issue and security.
But why do they need a cook and housekeeper….?
I’m not safe so I can’t cook for myself… ummmm?
loading...
Maybe her cooking is so bad her family needs a bodyguard for protection?
loading...
HA!
loading...
It’s the ‘even my friends with rich parents who aren’t as rich as you have more staff’ does show a.. certain insight…
But the case is about who controls the billiion dollar family trust fund. It was set up by Gina’s Dad to be run by Gina to BENEFIT HIS GRANDCHILDREN, yet she gives them nothing.
What would you do if you were his grandchildren and billions of dollars, meant for you weren’t forthcoming?
Sure, it’s a ‘file under first first first world problems’ but it easy to see where the animosity is coming from.
loading...
This is a good point. Gina Rinehart is massively rich but she didn’t start from scratch. The first billion is the hardest, I’m discovering.
loading...
You crack me up.
loading...
You’re nearly there Kate. Just a few more weeks…
loading...
I totally thought that photo of Gina Rinehart
in Week of Pics was Mrs Woog from Woogsworld. They could be twins!
I had to look on my computer to understand why you were showing a pic of Mrs Woog (iPhones and iPads don’t show captions).
That probably doesn’t count as a news item – sorry!
loading...
Ouch – I’ve only met Ms Woog once, but she’s a great blogger – I’d never make that mistake (but I’m going to rib her on twitter right now!)
loading...
I….. don’t know how Mrs Woog would feel about that.
loading...
That model does not looked photo shopped.
loading...
Bill Gates: Billions of dollars, massive philanthrapy. Great relationship with his kids.
Warren Buffet: Was richest man in the world, gave $37 billion to the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, great relationship with family.
Gina Rinehart: Billions of dollars, keeps every cent for herself except when she buys media to influence government, goes to sleep worrying she is a single court case from losing all her money to her children.
You can do it right, but you’ve got to be the right sort of person.
loading...
WOW! Massive statements. How do you know about these people’s relationships??
Have heard similar sentiments, but believe most things we hear are PR..
Also interesting, correct me if I’m wrong – Buffet and Gates are self made. Rinehart – heiress. This is just comparing oranges and apple IMO. Can you expect someone who possible didn’t have a great ‘grounding’ themselves, to bring up kids with a great grounding? (not speculating on her upbringing – just raising a possible point)
I’m sure she did the best she could, like the vast majority of mothers.
loading...
Ha! Yes, massive sweeping, probably incorrect, statements!
Never let the truth get in the way of a character assassination, I say.
For the record, Bill & Melinda Gate’s relationship with their children is well documented, as is Warren Buffet’s very interesting relationship with his wife and partner. Even if they don’t get along and it is just PR, no lawsuits in the land of lawsuits surely says something?
loading...
Gates’ oldest kid is 15 – give them time!
loading...
The rationale behind kidnapping is that the person you kidnap has an emotional hold over the person with the money…
Am I wrong to think that this may not be so in this case? And that any kidnap attempt would essentially be a waste of time? Therefore no security is actually required?
#slightlycynical #slightlysilly
loading...
LOL!
loading...
Don’t kidnap me my Mum’s so tight she won’t pay up.
Naaaah Gina would totally pay up because the bad PR could effect her business interests.
#morecynical
#justjoking
loading...
Maybe she is trying to teach her kids the value of money? I know she has massive amounts of money but I’m pretty sure she worked alongside her dad, maybe her kids want all the money but aren’t prepared to work for it. Who knows?
Also Bill Gates said a long time ago that he would be giving most of his money away & not leaving much for his kids.
loading...
Now I was young when it happened, so the details could be wrong, but I’m pretty sure her Dad left all his money to his wife, and Gina sued for all of it.
loading...
Might want to google the court case on that one…..
loading...
Fill me in – what’s the google truth?
loading...
My point is that the case was very well documented at the time. Look it up. Your statements are incorrect.
loading...
LOL. You don’t understand how conversations work, do you?
loading...
Have functioned just fine up until now, AnIdleDad! … let me get this straight, you’re free to spout whatever you want about someone you don’t know, yet someone pointing out that, perhaps, you may be incorrect on something, well that makes THEM deficient, right?!
Shall keep that in mind
loading...
The way it usually works is I say “I’m not sure, but fact #1″, you say “Actually, fact #1 is incorrect, fact #2 is what actually happened”, I say “Very interesting, I stand corrected, thanks!”
Then anyone else reading the conversation can also benefit.
Saying “Wrong! Look it up!” seems, well, unhelpful.
Just saying.
loading...
I’m mildly curious as to what happened. It’s late and I’m not that fussed to research it. I wish you guys finished your conversation;)
loading...
I truly don’t understand Rinehart’s motivations. She seems hell bent on making as much money as possible, at the expense of so much, but in the process she’s alienated her kids. What’s it all for? Surely one of the reasons to make lots of money is to share it with people you love. And all that money isn’t going to make much difference when she’s elderly with no family to love and support her. And as the saying goes, “you can’t take it with you”. I’d rather have a few less millions and have my family intact.
loading...
Money can’t buy your family back and remember what you are worth isn’t what you have, it’s what you would get if all your assets were sold off.
I’d imagine the vast majority of her wealth isn’t cash in the bank..
Having said that she could still afford to help her family more – but it must be really hard being brought up in the environment of such wealth. Money makes people do weird things – it’s possible her children just wanted more more more, never worked themselves etc etc – possibly she cut off some funds to try and get them to stand on their own feet. This is total speculation.. but when you are that wealthy – it just changes all relationships, from both sides.
loading...
I’d much prefer to be brought up in that environment than in poverty!
loading...
Considering she semi-inherited her money by sueing her step-Mum for all of it, I don’t think ‘family’ is high on her list.
loading...
Do we really want to live in a world where a parent who gives their child a quick smack on the hand or leg is a criminal…?
I personally wouldn’t smack my kids (if I had any), but do we really need to go this far…and how are we going to police what happens behind closed doors anyway?
I would think our existing child abuse laws are already covering those cases where smacking crosses over to abuse and assault?
loading...
I wonder if Guns Rimejart was a smacked… LOL! Look at what autocorrect does to “I wonder if Gina Rinehart was a smacker”. Hahaha Guns Rimejart … I won’t ever be able to think of her as anything else now
loading...
It’s stuck in my head now forever too!
loading...
Gums Rimejart! Hilarious! Actually laughed out loud….!
loading...
I really don’t get why people are so eager to defend the rights of parents to smack their children in this country when all the evidence suggests its detrimental and unnecessary. Adults don’t go around smacking each other, a man can’t smack his wife if she’s been “naughty” yet the most innocent and vulnerable members of our community are still allowed to be smacked by people that are supposed to love and protect them. I just don’t understand it.
loading...
I wasn’t defending smacking as such…but I don’t want to see it become a criminal offence…
I think education is a much better solution in this case…
loading...
Agree Renee!
loading...
Have to agree John James, and where would the line be drawn. If my young child goes to touch something dangerous, that I have warned them not to, I will give them a tap on the hand as well as telling them not to. Is this smacking? I dont do the same to my 7 year old she clearly understands when I say please don’t touch that it is dangerous.
loading...
Yes evidence that multi billions can’t buy you happiness. Three kids all at war with their mother. Doesn’t sound like a happy family to me.
loading...
Miranda Kerr and Cate Blanchett look absoloutely stunning.
Awesome shot of Djokovic
As for the Rineharts well it shows although it’s tough having not enough money, its tough keeping money
loading...
There it is again – all the money in the world does not make you happy. In fact, it seems to lead to even more misery. Too sad for all parties. What actually is the point of amassing so much wealth anyway? It’s not like you can spend $20 billion dollars in a lifetime – can you? It’s interesting that both Clive Palmer and Gina Reinhardt are currently in the news sprouting off about their “excess cash” and how to spend it. I’m sure The RFDS or The Smith Family would appreciate a look in….
loading...
I think 90% of the difference between myself and Rina is that she has some important slips of paper that state she owns intangible items that humans created (like companies).
The other 10% is the millions in cash she’d actually have at her disposal.
loading...
Media ownership issues make me glaze over but man, I can’t get enough of the Gina Rhinehart dramas. It’s Dynasty with an Australian accent.
loading...
Bogan Dynasty!
loading...
I think they call them CUBS – Cashed Up Bogans