Do You Like This Story?
dsk1 Are feminists trying to destroy powerful men?

Dominique Strauss-Kahn and his wife Brigitte Guillemette

Feminists are using sex and sexual abuse claims to remove powerful men from power.

Or so says media commentator Bob Ellis who has copped a hiding on the ABC’s Drum opinion website this morning after his piece which listed a litany of cases where powerful men had been brought undone. But by what; their penises or nasty, plotting women?

It’s a question that has been given ample opportunity to be debated as the news screams headlines about the ‘imminent collapse’ of the sexual assault case against former International Monetary Fund head Dominique Strauss-Kahn, accused of having non-consensual sex with a hotel maid.

Bob Ellis wrote:

“It is all very unjust; and a question arises from it: Is feminism killing the Left, and why does it seem so keen to do so?

Why are deeds long common at office Christmas parties used by women to ruin good men’s careers? Why are left-wing harassers smashed, and right-wing harassers like Bill O’Reilly unharmed by it?

The Strauss-Kahn Moment has arrived, and the question must be asked: has wowser-feminism gone too far?”

The article itself was inflammatory and possibly designed to do nothing but troll for a bite, and we here at MM debated even running a response. And then Rick and Lana got into the following argument on Skype which kind of indicated it was something worth talking about.

Here it is, word for word:

Rick: I literally just said to someone on Twitter, the guy’s a stirrer and should be starved of oxygen. He’s a pro troll…

Lana: I think in all his gross generalisations he makes some not-ridiculous points

Rick: That’s a really dangerous path to go down…

Lana: But exactly what I said at the time of the DSK case [Lana writes: At the time the DSK case was in the news I thought that it was not all cut and dried, that perhaps there was more to the case than Dominic Strauss Kahn forcing himself on some poor defenseless hotel maid, after all he's stayed in many a hotel before and he is clearly not an unintelligent man even if he does not know when to pull up his pants]

Rick: “But, in the new world, Strauss-Kahn and Mark McInnes, who was faced a $37 million law suit, for unconsensual groping, are ruined for what, in my day, occurred in drive-in theatres every night.”
Bob Ellis makes a living saying essentially that men are just doing what they have always done. But that’s precisely the problem. In a world where men make all the rules … what they have always done is not always right or proper.
The case against DSK is not over yet. It’s probs a trumped up charge given recent revelations but I think it not right to draw a bow from there to all cases of ‘hard done by men’.

Lana: And sometimes women use these rules to remove men from power.  I’m not so interested in what Bob Ellis does for a living. I am interested in how women can bring men down by using sex.

Rick: I don’t disagree with the two examples of DSK and Kristy Fraser Kirk. But they are two cases. To then go and paint a larger picture of some feminist plot to take down men in power everywhere does genuine cases of sexual abuse, harm or harrassment a world of disservice and is entirely irresponsible and anti-progress.

Lana: Exactly why I said there are some points that he makes that are not ridiculous

Rick: This isn’t a case of women are bad and men are bad or gays are bad or some group of people are terrible. The bottom line is some people are dicks and some people are not.

What do you think? Is there some feminist conspiracy going on across the world and across centuries to ‘bring down powerful men’? Or are, as Rick says, some people (male and female) just dicks?

View more posts on:

Comments

Comment Guidelines : Imagine you’re at a dinner party. Different opinions are welcome but keep it respectful or the host will show you the door. We have zero tolerance for any abuse of our writers, our editorial team or other commenters. So if you’re rude, mean-spirited, snarky, aggressive, defamatory or bitchy, your comment will be deleted (so will any replies to the original comment – so don’t bother arguing with rude people, instead just hit the ‘alert moderator’ button).
And if you’re offensive, you’ll be blacklisted and all your comments will go directly to spam. Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That’s how we’re going to be – cool. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation…

Use your profile to comment: Or, comment as a guest:
(Max file size is 150kb & jpeg's only - if you need help resizing go here »)

148 Comments so far

  1. Tania

    How ridiculous!

    The woman accusing Struass-Kahn is not part of a feminist conspiracy – I doubt she’d even classify herself as a feminist. She may indeed be a pawn in a political conspiracy to undermine Mr S-K (although given the number of women who’ve come out since saying he sexually harassed/pressured them I have to think he gave them plenty of ammunition…).

    Women have been using sex since time began (um Mata Hari anyone??) – if that is your only power base then that’s what you’re going to use. I would suggest that feminism ie equality for women, and women gaining equal power, would actually decrease the use of ‘sex as a weapon’ (by women at least).

    And Bob, Bob, Bob, I used to love your intellect….now I just feel like you are an old belligerent codger who should shut up so I can remember you in your heyday when you were intelligent and witty and had something useful to say…

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  2. Anonymous

    Ugh! Honestly I really don’t like reading these articles anymore. The same commenters come out to play for a singular issue and everyone just becomes entrenched in their own opinion.

    It makes me feel depressed. I think I’ll just return to my happy little buble in the knowledge that at least I can try to positively influence the people around me.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  3. Flutterby

    In a world where there are no penalties for false accusations you can expect a lot of them. This applies to rape and domestic violence in the family law realm. The saddest thing is it robs to true victims of crime of resources. False allegations are made to the rich and powerful and the average joe, we just hear about the big cases.

    On the international scale, I’m thinking of Julian Assange and the allegations of rape because he had consensual sex without a condom. Domestically, I’m thinking of a young guy accused of rape in the documentary “Every Parent’s Nightmare”.

    Is it a feminist plot? I don’t think so. What I do think is that there are people who are misusing the power that a feminised world has given them.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Free Human Being

      Nailed it

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  4. cosmos42

    I wonder why all of a sudden when the woman in question is found to be a liar/consorter with criminal elements is DKS allowed to be free of house arrest. As if the rape charge is negated by her less than virginal character. Something shifty going on here.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Free Human Being

      Really?

      How about the question of why is it that a MAN can be handcuffed, paraded like a shameful criminal in front of the media (literally physically), put in jail, put in house arrest, forced to resign his position of employment and lose millions of dollars?

      All because a FEMALE accused him of something?

      There is something incredibly perverted about such a course of events.

      Replace man with Negro and female with Caucasian and the world would be spitting chips and racism.

      ….but sexism is A OKAY.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  5. JC

    I am so very tired of people confusing feminism for man hating. Why cannot men or women be held accountable for their behaviour. Why do we still blame the victim, question her motives, question his innocence, find a way to discredit her. Sexual assault and rape is not acceptable behaviour. I have worked with hundreds of survivors of all sorts of abuse in my 20 years of practice and some of the comments below are harmful and hateful. No wonder so many people do not come forward – who could blame them. It feels like being abused all over again not being believed or questioning the experience.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      JC, you comment seems to contradict. On the one hand you suggest an equalist approach, then next you talk about victim blaming, and not believing ‘her’ . Is it not as much a crime to accuse a man wrongly? Yet all we ever hear is how terrible it is if women are not believed. What do you want, to turn our legal system upside down just for this one specific crime, assume guilt and have to prove innocence. This is always the line though, what about the bloke – why always the assumption, if a case is thrown out, that the woman was wronged. How about being happy that the truth came out and an innocent man didnt go to jail.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • I can be anonymous too :P

        Lots of guilty people don’t go to gaol… Sexual assualt is very hard to prove, so by default a lot of guilty people are allowed to walk free.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  6. kk

    I have 2 points.

    1. None of us has any idea about the guilt or innocence of the man (or woman for that matter!) in this case so we would all do well to reserve our judgement.

    2. I’d hate to see any commentators get on the victim-blaming bandwagon. It is well established that false accusations of rape account for about 2% of all rape accusations.

    That is all :)

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • JC

      Thank you kk

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • lapsed lawyer

      Statistics tend to be thrown around fairly freely in this sort of debate. If it’s ‘well established’ could you provide a source? I can’t see why false rape accusations should be any more or less prevalent than any other sourt of crime – that is rare but not unknown and needed to be tested in a court of law.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • kk

        I lie, apparently my stats are a decade old.
        the latest studies say the range varies from 2-10% depending on a variety of factors
        (Lisak et al, 2010)

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Anonymous

          I thought the whole legal framework was built around presumption of innocence, that it was worse to put one innocent man in jail than to let 10 guilty ones go free. Have I missed something?

          And I dont know that there are accurate stats on this issue anyway. There certainly are a lot of women that use accusations to secure AVOs following marriage breakdowns and when battling custody. This never gets tested in court however.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
  7. kylie2

    There’s a huge difference between a drive-in movie and a work place. Both the house keeper in the DSK case and Kristy Fraser Kirk were doing their jobs when powerful men allegedly made sexual advances (or worse) to them.

    While I disagree with “trial by media” I don’t think that feminists should be blamed for pointing out that harassing or attacking women while they work is unacceptable. These are powerful, educated men. They should be held accountable for their actions. I don’t think Mark McInnes even denied his wrong doing.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  8. Anna

    Ive read his article twice now, and definitely agree with Lana. I think where Bob went wrong is using the term ‘feminism’. I agree that there are some women -Kristy fraser Kirk and the maid in the dominic SK case come to mind – that are seeing opportunities to ruin someone/make money/grab fame with silly men that flirt with them – and lets face it – thats all that Mark Mcinnes is guilty of – flirting with the wrong woman, and dominic SK is actually innocent its starting to look like. These are just two cases, but there certainly are women out there that are taking advantage of situations to gain reward, its definitely not feminism though, its almost the opposite. Its almost like PC gone too far – which is definitely whats concerning me with todays society – people can’t say/act how they actually feel for fear of retribution. A man doesn’t need to lose his job for looking at porn, cheating on his wife, parking outside a gay sex club. Its ridiculous, but its not feminism thats causing this overreaction – its an over PC community. And its driven by the mainstream media – do you remember what happened in each of the cases – the men were hounded and hounded in the media until they had to leave/or be sacked from their jobs and hide. its not feminism

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      True, but it seems to only get traction against men in the media. While at the same time, women are marching in the streets saying that they should be able to express their sexuality, be sluts etc, as they wish without being judged. Seems that the divide is getting ever wider.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • JellyBelly

      Wow Anna, DSK wasn’t merely flirting with the woman, the claim is of non consensual sex, you know rape in other words. As for Mark McInnes, his actions were sexual harrasment in the workplace. It was unwanted, unwelcome remarks & gropes! It annoys me that you liken that to mere flirting. Maybe your definition of flirting is very different to mine!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  9. ipomenscarlet

    There’s a huge thread below discussing feminism and I’m not sure where to hit reply. Apologies for starting a new thread.

    Why do I feel feminism is still necessary in Oz?

    I agree women in Australia are incredibly lucky compared with other places and times.

    I also agree that men face lots of challenges and difficulties – particularly boys.

    My favourite Aussie feminist is Leslie Canold and my favourite Yank is Katie Roiphe.

    What they both have in common is that they argue passionately against blaming all men for all problems.

    They both advocate working *with* men – that we are wrong morally and practically if we alienate half the population.

    I love them because they are not extreme. But they do acknowledge that women still have a way to go re equality – in earnings, in representation on boards, in sexual violence, and in domestic violence.

    These things still exist.

    That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t care about man-specific issues too.

    Think of it this way: just because we give money to ovarian cancer charities (that only help women) doesn’t mean we don’t give money to prostate cancer charities too.

    Also, here’s where feminism’s crucial:

    We really are so goddamn lucky in this country. But we share the earth with women in other countries who endure unimaginable horrors. We need to be feminists for them too.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      That is a good reply, thank you. The issue i have with feminism is when you get strips torn off of you for just asking for clarrification – as a man, it can all seem very one sided at times (by its very name).

      Thanks again. Nice to have it put without the venom of those below.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Nico

        Personally, I didn’t feel like I was tearing anything off of anywhere in the previous comments, but I’m sorry if I did. It’s a passionate topic of mine, and the main issue many people have is not understanding that ‘feminism’ itself is not a monolithic movement which determines how people should act/feel/what to say etc, which then often causes hyperbole or confusion such as with equalism vs. feminism vs. ‘masculanism’

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Anonymous

          Point taken, I may have over read your tone. However, it is important that both sides realise that there are needs, pain, suffering, inequaity on both sides of the gender divide – sometimes both sides get blinkers on.

          All I was saying is, when does the time come when it is about all of us? Thansk for the reply Nico, I respect your opinion.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
        • ipomenscarlet

          Thanks anonymous. :)

          Nico, you put it beautifully! Feminism is a really broad movement and it’s a real shame when folks get caught up in the hyperbole. And I’m with you 100% re feeling passionate about it! :)

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Anonymous

            I too do not excuse myself for being passionate about issues relating to men – it is just that I feel there is no voice for mine, no ‘movement’, this is something I too feel very passionate about, and hope us men start standing up for issues that affect us more. Just as with feminism, it does not mean we do not wish equality or action for issues that effect women. It is not an ‘either or’ position. That was my whole point all along.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • ipomenscarlet

              Anonymous, there is definitely a men’s movement – particularly support and advocacy groups for men who’ve been divorced, but that also examine things like developing rites of passage for young men, and looking for ways to deal with the specific issues that men and boys face. Google men’s movement and see what comes up.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
          • Nico

            I am forever ‘that’ person at parties/dinners/with friends/weddings/christenings/etc talking about feminism, generally answering the same questions every time: Yes, I shave my legs, Yes I wear make up, No that doesn’t invalidate my opinions, No I don’t hate men, I know, even though I’m a lesbian, etc etc :)

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
    • Bradley

      I think that I have just found my feminist hero ! Ipomenscarlet, I dips me lid to you. What you have written it the most brilliant thing that I have read on this site for some months.

      MM Team….please take note of this commentator. She is brilliant and we could all learn much from her !

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Anonymous

        Here Here, if feminism was always sold like this, I would even sign up lol

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
    • Ruth

      So very well said. My thoughts exactly, so very much how I wouldnlove to be able to articulate my ideas on the matter. 4yonscreaming tantrum hear for the last hour or kore so my thoughts aren’t articulating much right now. But a perfect attitude and if everyone started thinking that way, what a different worldnwe would live in.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  10. camillapeffer

    I don’t think men are being brought down by anyone’s vagina. Some people just suck. It has nothing to do with your wang or your ya-ya.
    This post also touches on this idea of a ‘bad feminist’. Can there be a ‘bad’ feminist? It’s like when people say there are ‘good’ and ‘bad’ christians, or ‘good’ and ‘bad’ muslims. A person’s morality and actions can be linked to their set of beliefs, but it’s their interpretation of them and not the actual school of thought that is behind a person’s actions. This isn’t to say that all systems of beliefs are neutral though, but the player and the game aren’t mutually exclusive.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  11. ipomenscarlet

    Bob Ellis is a dinosaur well past his use by date.

    Feminism is as necessary now as it ever was.

    But what happened to DSK had little to do with feminism or misogynists like Ellis.

    The really big problem was that the prosecution rushed the case despite obvious problems. And then the media convicted him before any trial had even commenced.

    Why on earth don’t we, the US, and other places solve this horrible problem of innocent men being the victim of malicious claims? In the same way we must protect a woman who alleges she’s been raped by suppressing her name, we should do the same with the accused unless and until he’s actually proven guilty.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      I agree with most everything you said Ipomenscarley, however, ‘feminism is as necessary now as it every was? ‘In Australia? 20 year ago, agree, but now??? I can site an example of male disavantage for every female one you can give in Australia today.

      When do we get to the point when it isnt as necessary out of interest, when we can just look out for eachother, whoever is being mistreated or disadvantaged? Equalists if you will?

      What is the end game for feminists in Australia?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Evey

        Feminists ARE equalists. Feminists want equal rights, not to be treated better or differently or to eclipse men, but to be treated the same.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Anonymous

          why then base an entire ideal of equality on the basis of one gender then??

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
        • Nico

          How dare you, feminism is all about hating men, rargh! they’re everything that’s wrong on this planet! ;)

          I need a tshirt that says ‘it means equality, not eclipsing!’

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Anonymous

            tell me how the very name itself isnt gender biased?

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Nico

              It’s about women gaining equal rights, the same as men. It is a female-based movement and thus, the female-based name.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
        • Bradley

          Strangely, I’m an equalist who is an equalist ! I believe in equality before gender.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
      • Nico

        I have to disagree, feminism is as needed now as it was twenty, thirty years ago.
        The problem is that many people think it is obsolete because they are thinking of the older, second-wave feminism which focused on what were main issues then, but are not so much now. Sure, women are joining the workforce, in the military and playing more sport, now we need to work on proper maternity leave arrangements, fighting on the front line and an equal division of funds. There’s a great phrase, I think it’s along the lines of ‘the glass ceiling has been smashed but now we need to climb through the shards’, there’s still a ways to go yet.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Anonymous

          I knew the list of ‘why we are victims’ would come out sooner than later. I could list as many for men, but whats the point. Surely there comes a time when we are all in it together, watching out for eachother. Or does that time never come, until such time as women are as equal or better off in everything in society?

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Nico

            I wasn’t trying to list ‘why we were victims’, merely pointing out that equality (equality, not being ‘better off’) hasn’t been reached yet, so I still feel a need for feminism.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Anonymous

              As I said, I could list just as many now. Females in Australia are kidding themselves if they still think they are getting the rough end. In third world countries, fairenough, but not in Australia. I would argue the time has come to declare that we all watch out for eachother, rather than base an entire movement on one sex only.

              Note that I am only calling for equality, and even then I get bashed down. It isnt like I am calling for a Masculist movement.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Nico

              …I can’t reply below the anon?
              Anyway.
              It’s redundant to base the argument on ‘third world women have it worse’ because, yes, everyone in the third world has it worse. This is about women in Australia.
              I think the phrase ‘the personal is political’ is extremely relevant here. We are still taught, as women, to police ourselves when out alone at night, to expect to be the main carer for our children and elderly parents, to blame ourselves for sexual assault if we are drunk. Lesbian and transgender women are still treated as second-rate, not only does a lesbian have to worry about harassment due to her choice of clothes, but because of their sexuality, because a woman’s body is still thought of as public property.
              I don’t wish to get too passionate, as I feel I’m wasting my time, anon, but you try going out with your friends at night and ending up harassed by groups of guys who feel like they can comment on your choice of clothing and your sexuality, and then get beaten up when you dare to answer back. That is not equality. And it is not just a tragic one-off, this happens all the time.

              Just Edited to Add: I did bring in the issue of sexuality, which is somewhat separate from ‘mainstream’ feminism, but I think the point of street harassment still stands, particularly in my own personal experiences as, since i am somewhat feminine looking, it starts as ‘normal’ yelling, etc, still horribly common and distressing, and then turns ugly fast when they realise my sexual orientation.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
          • Lulu

            “I could list as many for men,”

            Go right ahead, then.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Anonymous

              sure, you asked.

              Health Care, Medical Research, Suicide, Mental Illness, Substance Abuse, Family Law and Child Custody, Work Life Balance and Choice, Parental Leave, Workplace Accidents and Death, Educational Outcomes, Homelessness, Jail Time and Court Sentencing, … want me to keep going?

              I really really didnt want to start the ‘whos the bigger victim’ bit, I was just saying, shouldnt we all just gun for equality now, to look out for wherever there is injustice. sheeeesh

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Anonymous

              Can you show me a law where women are discriminated against by law?

              I can show you laws that discriminate against men

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
  12. arokh

    I don’t care who screwed who, and frankly I have other social issues witht eh rich anyway and frankly people like DSK deserve to go down (no pun intended here) regardless.

    My problem is that there are some women who’ll use sexual allegations against a man, even if he is innocent. The problem is the media and law ALWAYS side with the woman and leave the poor innocent man the true viticm. Even if, and once, proven that the allegations were lies the man’s reputation is forever ruined, and once the sotrm dies down the woman can go on with her life and basically free of repercusion.

    I’m not saying if DSK is inncoent or not, and frankly don’t care, but there are women out there who are “dicks” and will use sexual harrassment laws to their own ends, and we blokes suffer for it.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • inkabinka

      The problem is the media and law ALWAYS side with the woman

      The law most certainly does not always side with the woman.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Anonymous

        the media most certainly does.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Evey

          You obviously didn’t read the Herald Sun around the time of the Kristy Fraser-Kirk case…

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Anonymous

            come off it, you cant tell me the media does not side with women most every time, especially if they are young and pretty. Look at the treatment of Shapelle Corby vs Scott Rush. She could not be guilty could she… she is a pretty young girl afterall.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Lulu

              You’re not comparing like with like. Corby had marijuana in her bag; Rush had heroin – and it was strapped to his body, so a bit difficult to deny involvement. It’s more appropriate to compare media attitudes towards Rush with the attitudes towards his female co-accused (Renae??? forget her name).

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Anonymous

              Renae was not a pretty straight girl. The media has as much care about her as they do for most men.

              It amazes me all the time, – if you are a pretty girl, the media has untold sympathy. I recall a year ago, a gorgeous blonde Aussie girl fell off a cliff OS (cliff jumping in Croatia I think it was), and the media was all over it.

              A guy from Australia a week later did the exact same thing in the same country, and we barely heard about it. Dont tell me the media does not give ten fold the sympathy for a pretty young girl.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
  13. thisbee_plath

    victim blaming all over again. regardless of what a woman, man or anyone has done in the past, consent is not an ongoing. sexual assault cases always seem to turn into a he said she said argument with the character and sexual history of the woman being examined and dragged through the court. i dont see much difference here. powerful man asserting and abusing the power dependency that exists between someone such as him and a ‘lowly’ maid.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • rainbow

      well said

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Nico

      I wish I never again had to hear, speak, or explain the concept of ‘Victim Blaming’ to someone, because the fact that it even exists, still, NOW, makes me so sad.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • guest

      I don’t really see this as victim blaming. As I understand it, there was evidence of sexual contact but nothing that proved rape. It therefore came down to her word against his that there had been a rape. She has now been shown to have lied generally and also specifically made up stories in the past about being raped. In these circumstances it’s virtually inconceivable that a jury could be convinced beyond reasonable doubt of his guilt. This is specifically about the credibility of the a key witness when this credibility is crucial to the case. Unless you are in favour of a system that reverses the burden of proof in such circumstances I really can’t see what outcome you would prefer. None of this means incidentally that he’s a nice bloke or even that he is innocent only that you can’t get a conviction under our system in these circumstances when you have the key and only witness a clear liar about having been raped. she probably could have lied about many other things and while the case would have been damaged it could still have gone ahead.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  14. Mary Christmas

    If feminists are getting together to destroy powerful men, well, they’re doing a pretty shit job. Frankly, that whole premise is laughable.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Rick Morton

      Bingo!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • JC

      Yes, I am a feminist and won’t tolerate rape or sexual assault so I find the original comments offensive and sickening. God help a women who has been abused in some way try to bring a man down. It is difficult enough getting survivor’s accounts proven in court and perpetrators held accountable. This sort of questioning (women trying to bring men down) is very very dangerous. As a feminist I don’t hate men ( I love them) but I do hate perpetrators be that men or women but as we know the vast majority are men. I don’t make up the stats just reporting them.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  15. Bradley

    Someone crucified on The Drum ?

    It just wouldn’t happen.

    Did Bob Ellis make a generalisation ? Yes. Is he 100% wrong with his sentiment ? No.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  16. Susan

    Bob Ellis – is he just a professional troll or is he stating commonly held views?
    I can’t decide and that bothers me a bit.

    I think I agree with Rick though. It all does come down to the penis issue in the end. You can’t have the sexual assault/encounter without the ready-for-action penis. The owner on the end of it knows what they are risking. Career or sexual encounter? All in all, if they go ahead with the sex they only have themselves to blame. They can so no, can’t they? I agree with Rick, it’s the penis or lack of brains on the end of it that undoes them :P

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Free Human Being

      I’m sorry, I couldn’t quite grasp your opinion.

      Are you saying rich white men who have sex are inviting sexual abuse allegations?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • An Idle Dad

        It’s what they wear Free Human Being. They should know better and dress less sexy.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Free Human Being

          Hehehe.

          :)

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
        • Bradley

          Idle Dad….you are on fire today.

          Yes, those naughty, haughty rich men in their three piece Prada suits !

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
    • Anonymous

      lol, this was the hypocrisy I was talking about earlier. If a man has consensual sex, then expect a downfall that he only has himself (and his dick) to blame for (wtf?). Yet feminists scream about the victim blaming of women – that a women should be able to dress and behave how she wants sexually with no judgement or blame. That spells hypocrisy in my book.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Susan

        Oh dear..

        No one will ever know if the sex was consensual or not which makes the whole Bob Ellis monologue just absurd.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Anonymous

          Oh dear,

          I agree his monologue is absurd – where did I say otherwise?

          ‘You can’t have the sexual encounter without the ready-for-action penis. The owner on the end of it knows what they are risking. Career or sexual encounter? All in all, if they go ahead with the sex they only have themselves to blame.’

          I also find this statement absurd.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
        • Anonymous

          So….if it is proven that the sex was consensual then Ellis’ commentary is not absurd ?

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Susan

            All politics, feminism, power, sexism, media and tongue-in-cheekness aside, I can only go on evidence that I am reasonably sure of, if I want to have an opinion of my own. The only one who can be reasonably assumed to have wanted this encounter is DSK because that’s how male biology works, yes? Unless I can personally speak to him or the maid involved, the rest is unknown to me.

            So, lets blame his penis, or his prada suits or whatever. But why blame feminists?

            One thing is certain for me, be it man or woman, as head of the IMF they should not be having sex with anyone just because they want to. More importantly, he has far greater power in this world than the housemaid and that’s where this all gets a bit unsavoury.

            Did the housemaid seduce him or was she overpowered by him? I don’t know. Consensual or otherwise, it isn’t appropriate. Bob Ellis should know that too and stick to the little known facts about what really happened.

            Or do you agree with Bob?

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Anonymous

              ‘as head of the IMF they should not be having sex with anyone just because they want to’

              WHAT THE???? he is not the Pope. Exactly what career or level of status do you have to get to when sex ‘because you want to’ is banned? Let me know, so I can avoid getting there please.

              If he had concentual sex with a maid, he is an adult, she is an adult – what makes you say this is not on????

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
            • Anonymous

              “sex ‘because you want to’ is banned?”

              I couldn’t reply below Anonymous, so I’m putting it here. You left out the word ‘just’ before ‘because you want to’. It’s a small word, but important, because *your* desire for sex isn’t the only requirement – the other party has to have that desire as well.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
  17. media sucks

    I am surprised that the main stream media has been hoodwinked so well by DSK. He said he would discredit the woman and he has managed ton plant stories in the media, using his connections to place doubt about the victim in any potential jurors mind. It is a common trick of powerful men in trouble.
    Find the source of these attacks against the victim and I bet it leads directly to DSK and his cronies.
    And what’s with his wife standing by him?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      yeah, how could a wife stand by an innocent man, just the false accusation should be enough hey.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • media sucks

        his current story is that they had consensual sex, he admited that part so no he is not innocent.
        she is staying with a guy who admits to having sex with a hotel maid

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Anonymous

          who knows on what grounds he runs his personal life. Maybe they are in an open relationship. If he has done no wrong by the law, who are we to say.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
        • Bradley

          What part of the word “consensual” don’t you get ?

          If DS-K’s wife wishes to stand by him, well, that’s her decision regardless whether you see that as right or wrong.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
    • Free Human Being

      That DSK, how dare he go back in time and force her into dealings with gangs or force her to lie over and over or force her to discuss milking him dry with a criminal.

      Dirty man

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • media sucks

        really? you don’t stop and think where this information may have come from? a man with unlimited wealth payingnpeople off to make up stuff about this woman so people like you get sucked into thinking he is innocent

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Anonymous

          This was part of my point lower down to Rick – why, just because we deem a person to be powerful etc do we assume they are guilty and are just playing the system to get off. Surely they are entitled to the same presumption of innocence as everyone else? The way he was arrested suggests quite strongly that he was treated no different to anybody else.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
        • Free Human Being

          Clearly he is guilty – He is a man.

          …and rich.

          There is only one non-sexist assumption to be made…

          She can not possibly be lying (she is a woman)

          He must be guilty and even if he is found not guilty it absolutely must be because he flexed his MONEY and bought justice as all rich white men do.

          I think we need a system where we can send people to jail based on a public vote, that way it would be much fairer, because those pesky forensic scientists, detectives and investigators are all on his pay role.

          I feel your frustration media sucks

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
    • Bradley

      Stop ! Meditate and listen !

      Have you bothered to even consider for the shortest of nanoseconds that DS-K might actually be innocent of the charge ? Or is that totally out of the realms of all posibilities in your world ?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  18. Ella

    I agree with rick- some people are dicks who sexually abuse others and some people are dicks who falsely accuse others.
    But I hate that we still turn on the victim- from what ive read on this particular case (which I admit isnt a lot) the alleged victims character is being called in to question as she apparently has links to African gangs?!!!
    I was sexually assaulted by a guy that I’d been on one date with, I told my best friend (who knew this guy) and she convinced me that I made it up because I was drunk…then I was at a party he was at and it continued- I was able to eventually make him leave me alone but I was absolutely terrified at the time. My friend told him that I must of freaked out because at the time I was a virgin and apparently immature- the tool forwarded me the email she sent him.
    If something like this were to happen to me again, and the guy was a footballer, living in Melbourne there is absolutely no way I would report it. I know that within minutes of re media finding out they’d be finding a way to access photos of me on fb- find the one where I’m looking the drunkest or wearing a low cut top and suddenly I’d be of ‘questionable character’ too

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      It amazes me, when the man is first accused, throw him to the wolves, no trial needed, he is a man, say no more. When a woman looks to be lying for her own gain, potentially putting an innocent man in jail for years and destroying his life, it is that we are ‘not believing her, or throwing her character into question’.

      HelloFar out, when is a women ever wrong. It isnt that she has links to gangs, it is that she has a) been discussing with said gangs how she can milk the most money from the situation, and b) has been shown to have made up accusations of sexual assult previously. There is probably even more to this doubt – given that it is her own defense throwing up the issues.

      How can a innocent man find justice when so much of the world assumes automatically, WOMEN = VICTIM, MAN = EVIL PREDATOR. And it becomes all so easy for bad women to take advantage of this society view – they know they will be given the benefit of the doubt unless it is obvious beyond doubt that she is making it up.

      Oh, and Ella, as a man I would prefer if you didnt use the term ‘Dick’ to denote a bad person. I am sure to do the same on here using names for female genitals would be treated with outrage.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • An Idle Dad

        I think it’s a case of everyone seeing themselves as victims. While you may be right about the current case (the result isn’t in yet), in other cases women are attacked in exactly the way Ella describes.

        I still think the media shouldn’t be able to comment or report on sexual complaints or identify anyone in the case.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • Ella

        Did you even read my comment past the first line?! I didn’t say ‘all men are evil and sexually assulting people and perhaps sometimes a women takes advantage of a powerful man’ as you seem to think I did.

        Also, apologies if using the word ‘dick’ offended you- were you as outraged to see Rick (a man) use it? I wouldn’t be offended by you calling me ‘female genitalia’…

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Anonymous

          ‘But I hate that we still turn on the victim- from what ive read on this particular case (which I admit isnt a lot) the alleged victims character is being called in to question as she apparently has links to African gangs’

          That is what I read, and that is what I commented on. And I am too much of a gentleman to call you a c***

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
      • Emilie

        Actually, calling people ‘dicks’ was Rick’s call in the article, not just Ella’s. And I think you’ll find that the C word is used just as offensively. You’re clearly coming out swinging on this issue, but your generalisations are absurd, and we all know it’s easier to bash people under the heading of anonymous.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Anonymous

          oh please, with the anon thing again. Like typing a name in a box makes a difference. And I just point out hypocrisy on this site, often, as I think sometimes MM needs balance. As it seems all too often, a feminist topic will be championed on here, and then an equivalent thing arises for men, and you get an all together different take. This post (and the use of the word Dick) is just one example of this.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Gig

            why don’t you use a screen name? It would make it easier for everyone…

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
    • roserusso

      Your best friend sounds like an immature moron. No offensive. If he made you feel uncomfortable it is not OK. Just because you were a virgin should make no difference, it sounds like your friend was just trying to belittle you. Or make you feel like you have no idea about sex because you haven’t experienced it which is untrue.

      Sounds like your friend was jealous of you and wanted the guy for herself. Why else would she send him an email telling him personal details about you?

      I hope that for yourself you’ve kicked this “friend” to the curb.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Ella

        Thanks rose :) this happened like 5 years ago when we were 18 and no we are certainly not close anymore

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
    • Nico

      I was going to say ‘No offense intended, but that’s a horrid thing for your friend to do’ but I thought about it, and I mean every offense when I say that is a HORRID thing for your friend to do.
      I’m sorry you had to go through that *hugs*

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Ella

        haha you know as soon as someone says ‘no offense’ that what they say is going to be bad… but thanks!
        It’s something we’re never spoken about (because she’s probably forgotten it ever happened and I don’t want to) but I think we will soon because she’s getting married end of next year and I really don’t want to spend $3500 on airfares/accom etc for someone that I have an underlying issue with. She living oversea’s now so our drifting hasn’t been so obvious until this wedding…

        Rose- I never thought of that before but at school she was always the one who guys were in love with (woe is me lol) and this was probably the first guy that she knew that didn’t want her but wanted me instead….

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • roserusso

          That explains a lot Ella. I don’t know the whole situation – only what you’ve said but if it was me I don’t think I’d be forking out money to go to her wedding.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
  19. Sally

    According to several reports in the US, police and investigators still believe the woman was indeed sexually assaulted by Strauss-Kahn as she claims. It’s just that given the fragile nature of rape trials, the fact she lied about other things makes her an unreliable “victim” if the matter goes to court.

    In my opinion the issue isn’t about what women supposedly do and don’t do to bring down powerful men. It’s that even in 2011 alleged rape victims still struggle to have their cases taken seriously, even when the police and other relevant investigators do in fact believe them.

    As for Bob Ellis, he’s a bitter old man who clearly hates women. I say we do our best to ignore him.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Kat

      My limited understanding of the situation is that she lied on her application for asylum in the US because she wad told that the female genital mutilation she had experienced was not sufficient grounds. Clearly this is a complex and nuanced case.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  20. An Idle Dad

    I think the problem with sexual harrassment cases are they are so public, requiring comment from feminists and others.

    The media essentially requires a public declaration of ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’ with no grey area months before anything even goes to trial. Any feminist (or other commentator) who said when the SK story broke “I’ll wait for all the facts to come in before I cast judgement” wouldn’t get published (or asked for a comment again). Only those who completly jump on the SK-hate bandwagon (as Mia did, and she lumped in Arnold Schwarzenegger’s infidelity with SK’s rape for good measure) got airtime.

    The ‘person on the street’ doesn’t get nuanced arguments about feminism and acceptable behaviour in the workplace, or a quality discussion about the need to not attack the victim versus the implications of a false claim of sexual harrasment on a person’s life, they only get from the media headlines like “Feminist Greer says all men should be shot out of cannons” or suggestions that even when men are innocent, they bring it apon themselves because they have a pensis (as I’d say the above article does in the second paragraph, if I were sensitive about the topic ;) ).

    And then we all wonder why feminism has a bad name.

    There are few or no men-hating feminists. It’s just the fight is sometimes so ingrained that the response is knee-jerk, and we end up kneeing ourselves in the face.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Bec

      Idle Dad, you sum up my thoughts perfectly!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Bradley

      Idle Dad….thank you for making this comment. It had to be made.

      Sometimes those leading the charge do more harm than good to their cause with their responses than anyone who they claim is opposing them. This is another one of those cases.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • An Idle Dad

        This is why I like MM comments. I think often, the balance is found down here and not in the article – mostly because the MM dinner party policy keeps things civil-ish.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Rick Morton

          You’d be surprised how often my opinion can change, or at least be broadened, just from reading the comments. I like it.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
    • Faybian

      Hey, come one the whole Arnie debacle, while the world could have lived without knowing the salacious details, was pretty bad.
      Just for the record Germaine Greer does not represent me, for one thing, anyone that reccommends tasting menstrual blood is…..insteresting.
      I do wish that anonymity in these cases was for both parties, or none.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  21. Lulu

    “Lana: And sometimes women use these rules to remove men from power. …. I am interested in how women can bring men down by using sex.”

    Oh, for PITY’S sake, Lana – if a man has broken certain sex rules, then WTF is wrong with him being “brought down”?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anon

      What if he didn’t break any ‘rules’ but is still brought down?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • An Idle Dad

        I think what Lulu is saying is “David Campbell got what he deserved”

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Lulu

          No, I am not – I was thinking of exactly that kind of case, which is why I said *certain* sex rules. Unless you think Milton Orkopolus should also be excused?

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • An Idle Dad

            Maybe I am misreading your comment, but your response seems to indicate you believe the opposite of your original statement (which to me reads as “If man has broken sexual taboos, not the law, then WTF is wrong with bringing him down?”

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Lulu

              I put it badly. What I meant that was that there are certain taboos (generally coinciding with laws) which, if broken, quite justify a bringing down. There are others which are more private, between the man and his partner/s, family, etc etc.

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
    • Bradley

      Thanks Lulu for mentioning the secret word, “if”. “If” implies a degree of beyond reasonable doubt. It doesn’t automatically presume guilt the way that some people do.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  22. Free Human Being

    There are many feminists that hate men – MANY!

    Of course logically, there are many, possibly the majority that do not hate men.

    Clearly though, you don’t have to look very far to find anti-male sentiments.

    So it stands to a quite reasonable possibility that there are many feminists who want to take every opportunity to assume male-guilt and highlight it and reiterate it and post it and comment about it and delete any dissent.

    Go to ANY feminist website right now and you will clearly see a myriad of feminists searching for, hoping for and clutching still to the idea that Dominic Strauss Kahn is guilty.

    Many of the comments include typical “I hope this scum bag doesn’t get away with this” style sexist assumptions.

    ….and sexist assumptions they are, because to assume him to be guilty is sexist, but to assume him to be guilty in the face of several very convincing pieces of hard evidence is downright hateful and ideologically perverted.

    Feminism was supposed to be about equality, which I am all about and I tried hard to get behind feminism, but the reality was that every single feminist website I have ever encountered( and there have been many), has been ….

    ….Feminism is about equality and not man hating…now here is a list of all the bad things men do that we hate and here are all the bad crimes men commit and here are all the reasons men’s rights are wrong and here are all the reasons men should be ashamed.

    Every time!

    In the absence of course of all the bad thing women do.

    For equality to exist men’s and women’s concerns need to be treated equally with respect by both genders for the other’s problems.

    Unfortunately feminists oft take the position that their theoretical patriarchy means all of men’s concerns are invalid because men are taking care of each other through their awesome, untiring omnipresent power.

    Such dismissive disdain for any issues men have is not only insulting, but ignorant and fallacious.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • GeneJeanie

      I agree with you on the point that feminist websites across the world just assumed Dominique SK was guilty and I have not seen a single comment from a known feminist that stated that he wasn’t guilty until the dust settled. They all just assumed him guilty and a bad man. What made men laugh was that several of them scoffed at the idea that he could have been set up, as been a conspiracy, but lauded the idea that he would be conspired to be let off the charges. Cognitive dissonance much?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  23. Melissa

    Dudes like Ellis have always been into woman blaming, but the bit I found particularly inflammatory and offensive was where he described a whole bunch of famous men in history as pederasts (um, da Vinci and Michaelangelo may have been gay, but there’s no evidence they were into kids, and standards were different then, eg, 13 year olds regularly got married off by their parents) and then defends their natural instincts towards pederasty, incest and rape. Rape apologism is almost expected (but not forgiven), but apologising for pederasty and incest. That’s really fucking wrong.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  24. Cami

    “It is all very unjust; and a question arises from it: Is feminism killing the Left, and why does it seem so keen to do so?”

    Why does ‘it’? it? I didn’t know feminism was such a well organised collective. Does feminism get together at secret meetings and decide which Left person to target next? (having austin powers visions of feminist henchwomen sitting around in secret lairs going mwha ha ha down with DSK). If only feminism could be so organised and cohesive….

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Lulu

      “Does feminism get together at secret meetings”

      Yes, of course it does.

      (PS: this week’s code phrase is ‘the owl flies at midnight’, & the secret knock is tum-tum-tumty-tum)

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Sally

      My thoughts exactly.

      And anyway, women’s complaints against bad behaviour and sexual misconduct on the part of men aren’t restricted to those on the “left”. I don’t believe Charlie Sheen’s ultra conservative political views classify him as a leftie. Maybe poor old Bob got Sheen mixed up with his father’s fictional counterpart, President Bartlet from The West Wing

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Nico

      When i became a feminist, they tattooed Emmeline Pankhurst’s face on my forearm, and when a meeting is called, it burns and I apparate to the secret meeting spot.
      ‘The Pankhurst Mark’

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  25. WillaWay

    Umm, for there to be a conspiracy, there has to be a conspiracy…. Where’s the conspiracy across cases? Any of the same people, of the same political orientation involved? Is it a conspiracy when poor people, or unjustly repressed people sometimes get a win and get some dictator tossed? Or is that just a case of justice prevailing? When male leaders get tossed “unfairly” for a non-sex-related reason, is that also a conspiracy from somewhere or other?

    And for there to be a feminist conspiracy, there not only has to be a conspiracy, but, wait for it, some feminists involved!

    The personal and the political always collide. Leaders are also normal men with penises and sexualities. Wherever there is power, there will be people (male and female) trying to get some power, undo existing power, bring down power etc., There’s no conspiracy. It’s a power dynamic. Rules are there to be used and tried, and people will always use them both honestly and dishonestly.

    Why is Bob Ellis so concerned about a few men in power being brought down (if it was just individuals, it couldn’t destroy a political movement), and not about all the true victims of male violence whose cases are never heard? The men in power who were brought down, after all, usually haven’t done a whole hell of a let towards creating a more just society for us all to live in, anyway.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  26. Sometimes Bob Ellis is too smart for his own good….there are clearly 3 or 4 narratives occurring at the same time in his article…some of them are valid, and others are obviously not…

    I think highlighting some of the hypocrisy that surrounds famous men and their sexual proclivities is worth mentioning…as is the use of sexual accusations as a weapon against the rich and famous…but to link them all to some imaginary feminist conspiracy theory is strange…

    Men who use power as an aphrodisiac are deplorable. Women who use their sexuality to take advantage of this are also to blame. I think some of what Bob Ellis says rings true…but when you read Bob Ellis, you have to be aware of his left-wing bias…remove the sentences about the feminist conspiracy against powerful left-wing men, and there’s a core of truth to what he says…but it is clearly a flawed article.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Bradley

      JJ….nobody can “use” anything as an aphrodisiac unless there is someone willing to receive. Remember that the next time you serve oysters.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  27. Danni

    He is wrond, because his hypothesis is based on an inaccuracy. No one on the IMF is ‘left’. Also I would be interested to know what makes the maid a femenist, or is this just how we refer to women who claim sexual abuse?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Danni

      scuse typos!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Bradley

      DS-K is on the IMF. He is hailed as a possible contendor for political office, running on the socialist ticket. Socialism is on the left side of politics.

      No one from the left is on the IMF ? Huh ?????

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  28. Evey

    I think Ellis’ article is so deliberately inflammatory and downright hysterical (it’s too long, is held up with a flimsy argument at best, and holds views which my grandfather would describe as outdated), that it’s not worth giving it any airing time at all.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  29. Anonymous

    This site is so feminist biased. You pick and choose news, and trawl the net and media for one off comments from idiots that support the feminist agenda. This guy is clearly a fool – however there are as many delusional hard core feminists (probably many many more), yet we never get articles mocking their sexist commentaries and theories in here.

    As for suggesting that powerful men are undone by their penises. Are you suggesting that Dominique Strauss-Kahn only has himself to blame for being falsely accused of rape? Hello?

    So if a guy has consensual sex with a women, then gets accused of rape, it is somehow his fault because his ‘penis was involved’ as you mention above, as if this is an excuse for being falsely accused?? This is as crazy as blaming women for rape because of what they wear – unbelievable hypocrisy as usual from MM.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Rick Morton

      I think the point of this article is that we can’t even agree in the office, so we’re asking what you guys think as well. Did you read this piece even?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Anonymous

        Sure did.

        You say ‘But by what; their penises or nasty, plotting women?’

        Sounds like an either or to me. Sounds like if it is not a nasty plotting women, then the mans penis is his ondoing. My only point is that, if a person has consensual sex, sure the penis is involved, but why does this become a point of blame, an ‘undoing’ be it for powerful men or otherwise??

        If a powerful man has an affair, one can not therefore blame an outcome like being accused of sexual assult on that affair. This is a parallel to victim blaming of women is it not. That was my point.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Rick Morton

          Interesting point; that’s all you needed to say!

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Anonymous

            fair enough, but I thought it an interesting point to make re MMs treatment of this topic vs your big take on victim blaming aka SlutWalk.

            To take the moral high ground on victim blaming then, but now to somehow make out that powerful men had it coming to them because of their dicks is hypocritical in my eyes.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
            • Rick Morton

              I think you assume that MM is one voice as a site. We disagree, sometimes violently, on almost every conceivable issue. And that’s just around the editorial table! I think disagreement is good; so long as we can put a cogent argument in to back us up. The ‘penis’ line was clunkily worded. It really as referring to unwanted sexual advances. Obviously if the sex is consensual, no genitalia should be to blame ;)

              GD Star Rating
              loading...
  30. roserusso

    Ah, Bob Ellis. Where do I start?

    I don’t agree with his “this is the way men have always been and get used to it” attitude. He did the same thing with the Skype Defence force scandal a few months ago, have a read of that one – http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/56470.html

    “So women, it seems, are tough enough for service on any battlefront but not tough enough to be peeked at in the shower. For the latter they need compassionate leave, counselling in depth, back pay and five parliamentary enquiries”

    He does present another side to the argument but to assume that all women who are sexually assaulted are “wowser-feminists” who’s only aim is to bring powerful men down he is gravely mistaken.

    I’m not saying there aren’t women out there who think this way but it does such a disservice to victims of these crimes which are largely unreported.

    Bob Ellis likes to stir the pot. Doesn’t mean he’s right.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  31. Chelsea

    “Are feminists trying to destroy powerful men?”

    Absolutely. Now that they’re not cooking, cleaning and being chained to the kitchen, they’ve got to find something to do with all their spare time.

    I’m kidding, of course, but you just gotta treat Ellis’ column like the joke that it is.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  32. esohenjayaye

    I think sexual assault is sexual assault – no matter the prominence of either party. Now it may be the DSK didn’t sexually assault the maid. But if he did, he should be jailed because of it. Did you know that less than 1% of rape cases in Australia end in a conviction of the perpetrator? If DSK did assault the maid, I think she should be applauded for her courage in speaking up against a man of wealth and power. If not, at least this case has focused some media attention on sexual assault.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  33. Ruth

    Totally with you on this Rick. There is trouble enough for genuine cases of sexual assault etc to be taken seriously as it is without starting this kind hogwash talk. There are women who will use power of sex to try and manipulate someone, as there is always men who do the same. Though the later hugely outweighs the former. Of all reported sexual assaults, what’s the percentage of cases that turn out to be false? A very tiny amount I am sure. Yet if you listen, still in this day and age, to a lot of men (certainly in my geographic area and on forums) the assault charge is to be treated with ssuspicion until proven otherwise. Same as unplanned pregnancies. It’s very sad and extremely frustrating.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Rick Morton

      Precisely. I have a real problem with undue scepticism on any party until the facts come to light because there is a real concern it can prejudice proceedings or worse, stop people with genuine cases speaking out to begin with.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  34. Deanne Stewart-Mills

    I think Rick has a major point. Its not a conspiracy to bring down powerful men (or women). People in power have always been able to abuse it, so its really a case of the powerful no longer getting away with it.

    A world wide plot to bring down powerful men? Seriously? I don’t think so. I would love to see more women in powerful positions, but who’s to say they would be better at the jobs? (many, probably lol).

    Bob Ellis is definitely a wanker for his comments. Just because it has been ‘accepted’ in the past doesn’t make it right. Time for men to keep there penises in their pants and their hands in their pockets. Just because they have ‘the power’ does not give them the right to abuse it. This applies to women in positions of power too.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • JC

      Agreed but any one who assaults or rapes has power over the other person. I wouldn’t care less whether the abuser was ‘rich and powerful’ or poor I would want the perpetrator held accountable. Not bring him down but justice to take place. Being a feminist does not increase my want for this.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Deanne Stewart-Mills

        I agree JC. I am a feminist, but not a man-hater (I actually like women less than men sometimes!). Your demographic should make no difference to how justice is dished out. Wrong is wrong.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...

So, we have $1000 to give away... oh, would you be interested? Well step right this way.

To go in the draw to win, just LIKE us on Facebook, enter your email address and tell us in 25 words or less why you love reading Mamamia.

Close this popup



Full Terms & Conditions