UPDATE: Australian health authorities have decided against recommending the removal of breast implants which have been linked to increased rates of rupture and a rare form of cancer.
This comes despite news that France and Venezuela have agreed to foot the bill for women who have been fitted with PIP implants to have them removed.
This from the SMH:
The Therapeutic Goods Administration said last night there was no evidence in Australia of particular problems with the French-made Poly Implant Prothese silicone-gel implants.
The statement came after TGA officials met for three hours with the Australasian College of Cosmetic Surgery yesterday to discuss whether a national warning was needed.
The TGA advised there was no evidence in Australia to support ”increased rupture rate for PIP implants in this country”. TGA national manager Rohan Hammett said: ”The advice from the TGA and clinical experts at this stage is that there is insufficient evidence of a problem with the Australian-supplied implants to warrant routine removal of the implants.”
In its statement, the TGA said it had been advised that about 9054 PIP implants had been used in Australia between 2002 and 2010. The authority had received 45 reports relating to PIP implants, 39 of which related to rupture.
And here’s our original cheat sheet:
Is there a link between breast implants and cancer? That’s the question thousands of women around the world will be asking today after news that the French Government is considering paying for 30,000 women to have their breast implants surgically removed because of fears the implants could be linked to a rare form of cancer.
It’s not just France that’s affected. Women all around the world – including 4500 in Australia – have been fitted with implants made by a company called Poly Implant Prostheses (PIP). That’s 300,000 women in total. And the major concern? The company was shut down last year after being caught using industrial, not medical, silicone in its devices to save money.
To help you understand what’s happening and answer any questions you might have, we’ve put together this cheat sheet.
What’s happening in France?
There’s a criminal investigation underway into the implant manufacturer, Poly Implant Prostheses. French authorities have serious concerns after reports of a high rupture rate of the implants, which were some of the cheapest available. Eight cases of cancer have been reported in patients with PIP implants. This from The Australian:
The French National Cancer Institute has been asked to report by the end of the week on whether the gel can cause cancer, after the implant was linked to the death of one woman and cancer cases in a handful of others. French testing found the implants had a higher-than-average rupture rate.
It’s still not known whether the implant has a direct link to the rare form of cancer – anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) – but patients in France have been told to contact their doctors to check the make of their implants.
Some doctors in France are adamant that all women with the implants should have them removed. This is from the ABC:
Laurent Lantieri, one of France’s best-known cosmetic surgeons and a member of a health department committee on the issue, told Liberation there was no choice but to order the implants’ removal.
“We all agree on the necessity of this decision,” he said.
“We are facing a health crisis linked with a fraud. The entire profession is aware of this. There is no urgency but we no longer have any choice – all these implants must be removed.”
PIP, the company in question, went into liquidation last year and the product was removed from the market. Another company took over control and it’s still not known if that company will be responsible for any legal action.
The president of the now bankrupt company has admitted PIP knowingly used inferior silicone products. Speaking through his lawyer, Jean-Claude Mas said higher quality implants were used for wealthier clients, while industrial-grade silicone was used for other clients.
He said the product “did not formally receive approval, and in this regard there was a violation of regulations”.
“Why did this company use this kind of product? Because it was a corporation with economic objectives and because of corporate management that tried to get the best cost,” he said.
“There was a basic product and a high-end product, for people in the 16th [arrondissement] for example.”
What about in the UK?
In the UK, 250 women – some with ruptured implants and some who are just worried – have launched legal action against the clinics that supplied the implants. The British media are reporting that 10 per cent of the implants are rupturing in their first year. But the UK health authority, MHRA, has told British women they have tested the filler of the PIP implants and found no cause for concern and no association with cancer.
This video is from UK Sky News:
What’s happening in Australia? Should I be concerned?
4500 Australian women were fitted with the implants in question between 2004 and last year, when the product was removed from the market. At the time
But the Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons says those women should not worry. And there’s similar advice from Australia’s medical safety authority, the Therapeutic Goods Association. It says PIP implants supplied in Australia from 2004 until 2010 met international standards and there have been no reports of the cancer in Australian women with implants made by PIP.
More from The Australian:
Australia’s medicines and devices watchdog, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, says it has received reports of 39 devices rupturing inside Australian women since they came on the market seven years ago. However, the TGA tested the PIP devices for strength last year and found the rupture rate was low.
PIP was the world’s third-largest breast implant supplier before it was shut down last year, and about 300,000 women worldwide are estimated to have used the devices.
“The TGA has contacted the French regulatory authority seeking further information about these matters,” a spokeswoman said. The watchdog advises patients with PIP implants who have concerns to contact their breast implant physician.
If you have implants should you panic?
If you have concerns, see your doctor to have your implants checked and sign up to an existing Breast Implant Registry. That’s the advice from the Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons, who said Australian women should not rush to have their implants removed for peace of mind.
The voluntary registry is a database of women with breast implants, put together so the society can distribute information. Last year when the implants were taken off the market the plastic surgery society put out a press release with this info:
The Breast Implant Registry is administered by the Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), is a major public health initiative and a declared quality assurance activity under the auspice of the Commonwealth Government Department of Health and Ageing’s Qualified Privilege Scheme.
The Breast Implant Registry is of significant benefit to patients, surgeons and to the furthering of medical science. The BIR is a centralised and secure body of data linking patient, procedure and prosthesis and thus enabling the collection, documentation and analysis of scientific data relating to breast implants. Registration is voluntary.
“My advice to patients with PIP breast implants is no different from the advice I would give at every surgical consultation… Patients should see their surgeon if there is any discomfort, change or swelling to the breast post operatively. The surgeon can then make an assessment” President Peter Callan said.
Should all women with implants be worried about a link between breast implants and cancer?
Doctors are still trying to find out if there is a link between all implants and this particular form of cancer.
Plastic Surgeons’ Society spokesman Graham Sellars said 80 cases of the cancer in women with implants had been reported worldwide, including seven in Australia. This is from The SMH:
In many cases, the cancer was found in scar tissue around implants after women complained of pain in their breasts. The implants in those affected included both saline and silicone varieties. ALCL is estimated to affect about one in 500,000 women each year.
Dr Sellars said that given an estimated 5 to 10 million women had had implants globally, women should not panic about the risk, but rather talk to their doctors and, if necessary, have their implants checked.
If an implant ruptured, he said it could cause breast tissue to become lumpy and deformed, but he said there was no evidence to suggest a rupture would cause cancer.
A spokeswoman for Australia’s medical watchdog, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, said tests on PIP implants had previously found them to comply with regulations and she said there had been 45 reports of problems with them, including 39 ruptures.
She said there had been no cases of ALCL in women with the PIP implants in Australia and urged anyone with concerns to consult their treating surgeon.
France is considering removing the implants altogether. Why isn’t Australia?
This is a tricky one. While one country is seemingly in panic mode, others are less so. Australia’s medical authority says the PIP implants fitted to Australian women have previously met international standards.
It’s now a case of more information needed.
Do you or anyone you know have implants? Are you concerned?



Comments
31 Comments so far
First of all, everything does not cause caecnr, we don’t know what causes it.Second, there is nothing new about this information and it is not a blood caecnr they are referring to. It is a rare type of lymphoma and we have known about it for years. Having implants does not cause caecnr. Having them does increase risk for this disease, but it is miniscule and hardly newsworthy.SUSIE Q: It is a recent news story today. Entertainment Tonight is even in on it and interviewed a doctor I worked with. They are referring to anaplastic lymphoma which is a very uncommon caecnr.
loading...
The TGA is now advising that the number of ruptured PIP implants reported has risen and that all Australian women with PIP breast implants should see their surgeon to review and discuss how to proceed. (Link to TGA website: http://www.tga.gov.au/)
Is there an absolute imperative for a woman to have the PIP implants removed? No.
Is Australia recommending (like France, Germany and the international plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic surgery organisation IPRAS) that all PIP implants be removed? No.
Is it overkill to recommend that all women undergo surgery to have the PIP breast implants removed or replaced? It comes down to a risk assessment. How much risk do you feel comfortable with? Are the risks of leaving the implants in greater than the risks of removing or exchanging them? And what about the financial cost?
If you’re a healthy woman who can afford to have your PIP implants removed I personally think it’s a sensible idea to do so – if only for your own peace of mind. Don’t panic. Do seek advice. If everything seems fine and you’re not overly worried you may prefer to have an ultrasound and keep monitoring the situation. If you’ve got other reasons to consider a revision of your breast implants (like malposition or capsular hardening) perhaps that will also play into your decision.
The Australian Government has set up a 24 hour Breast Implant Information Line – 1800 217 257 – for women to call if they have concerns or enquiries.
Disclaimer: I am a plastic and reconstructive surgeon. I have not personally used PIP breast implants and have not treated patients with PIP implants. This comment does not constitute individual medical advice. Please discuss your individual circumstances with your treating health care professional.
loading...
Hi All
So I have had the PIP implants for almost 2 years now. Very concerning is this latest news. I’ve had no problems with them to date though, in fact I really love them. I’m very worried though, going for an ultrasound soon even though I’ve heard that won’t necessarily pick up on a rupture. I’ll have to seriously consider going through surgery again. Surely someone needs to be held accountable. Is anyone in the same boat? Is anyone considering contacting a lawyer? If there are 4500 of us, we need to band together.. I just have no idea where to start or how to reach others.
loading...
As a plastic/reconstructive surgeon I’m conscious that the media is currently blurring two distinct issues in breast augmentation.
One issue is ALCL (lymphoma), which is a very rare type of cancer that has now been reported to have developed around breast implants in around 80 women worldwide. This cancer is rare – some have compared the risk to that of being hit by lightning – and has developed in women with all different types of breast implants (silicone and saline, smooth and textured). It seems likely that it is the presence of a foreign object in the body that contributes to the development of this rare cancer, but it’s not something we know a lot about. For a while it was believed that this lymphoma was not fatal in women with breast implants, but this is now known not to be true. If you want to avoid ALCL the best way is not to have breast implants.
Breast implants do not increase your risk of breast cancer. ALCL is not breast cancer, it’s a type of lymphoma. Some studies have shown that breast cancer rates are lower in women with breast implants, perhaps because they have less breast tissue. Breast implants do make mammography less sensitive, but there is no evidence that breast implants delay the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Breast cancer is sadly a very common cancer in our community, so some women with breast implants will get breast cancer. So will women without breast implants. There are a variety of lifestyle factors that you can modify to reduce your risk of breast cancer. If you’re interested, check out this article at the Jean Hailes website: http://www.jeanhailes.org.au/health-professionals/medical-observer/1316-lifestyle-and-breast-cancer-risk-2-dec-2011
Some readers express confusion that any woman would undergo surgery that might increase her risk of cancer. I’m confused that anyone would smoke cigarettes or sunbathe – both of these increase your risk of cancer but they’re pretty common activities. Life has risks and women negotiate them and compromise every day of their life. I’m neither pro nor anti breast implants, I’m pro-choice.
The second topical issue in breast augmentation is that of the recalled PIP implants. These implants were manufactured in France and at some point the manufacturer decided to use industrial grade silicone inside the implant, rather than medical grade silicone. The manufacturer didn’t disclose this to anyone and presumably made the decision for cost reasons, regrettably not taking integrity or the safety of their patients into account. These implants have a higher rupture rate than other breast implants, meaning that the shell of the implant develops a hole and the silicone can leak into the tissues.
Leaking silicone is NOT known or thought to create breast cancer, but it’s not ideal for silicone to move around the tissues. I’ve seen unfortunate women who have had real problems with silicone migration, but I believe the current implants are not as problematic as earlier versions (because the silicone in the newer ones is of gummy-bear consistency, not golden-syrup consistency). That said, all implants have a risk of rupture. If you have saline implants that rupture it’s pretty clear when it happens, because one breast suddenly deflates. If you have silicone implants there is no real warning sign. Most women with breast implants do require repeat breast surgery during their lives to correct complications such as capsular contracture, asymmetries, rupture, malposition and infection. A breast implant is not designed for a lifetime of use: http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/diet-and-fitness/short-lifespan-for-breast-implants-20110623-1ggck.html
How can you have a breast augmentation and reduce your risks of complications? Avoiding surgery is a good way of reducing risks, but if you really want to have a breast augmentation then make sure you do your research. Have your surgery done by a qualified surgeon who is experienced in breast augmentation. Ask friends or your GP to recommend someone. Ask questions about what type of implant will be used and keep a record of the type of implant (including the serial number) in your personal health file. Make a list of all your questions before the surgery and ask your surgeon all of them. You can definitely see more than one surgeon before you make your decision.
Sorry for the exceptionally long comment, but I hope this helps to clarify. As always, don’t take this comment as medical advice, and always discuss any health concerns you have with your GP or a medical specialist.
loading...
A very informative response. Thanks for taking the time to do so.
loading...
Thanks Sqoo, it’s my pleasure, I hope you found it useful.
loading...
Great comment Jill!
loading...
Ah, yes. The good old TGA. The same group that ok’d the implants from Dow Corning for all of those years. Cancer scare aside, for anyone who wants to see what implants can do all you have to do is surf the net and look at the pictures. My mother was one of the women you see in ‘terrible breast implant’ stories in magazines with what’s left of their breasts displayed with their head lopped off in the picture. I think the last one was Marie Claire in May 2006 before she gave up her quest of trying to warn other women because they just don’t listen.
It took my mother 15 years of litigation and after a payout was finally made, the government took their share, then the lawyers, and she was left with just enough to have another reconstruction. And yes, it was vanity. She had a mastectomy in the 80s and was assured by all doctors that they were safe and she wanted to have her breasts back. Doctors still assure us today that all is fine. What they don’t tell you is that your body will attempt to rid itself of any foreign object inserted into it (or protect itself, developing a hard casing around it, the same as you get when you pierce your ears) and that any chemical compound will break down over time which is why they recommend they be replaced every ten years.
That women still have this done is beyond me.
loading...
can you tell your mum for me that i think she is a champion.
i am really sorry she has had such a hard time, and think she is amazing to try to help others.
this whole thing is quite horrifying
loading...
Who’d like to bet a large wad of money that these doctors find a link between all implants and cancer? I would. This is scary…
loading...
I am glad there has been a post on implants I’ve been waiting for an opportunity to say to anyone considering it my advice DON”T DO IT.
This is without the cancer risks this article mentions.
A year and a half ago I had small implants put in at a cost of nearly $14K by recommended plastic surgeon in perth. I did it because I wanted to have perfect C cups that would look great under all clothes without a bra… really my B cups were absolutely fine… but small …. Anyway thought I’d treat myself as I am a professional 30 something woman and hey everyone elses look great….
Got them done.. a little painful / week off work etc. Then after about 3 months one of them started to become encapsulated dispite having massaged them as advised (you do sign off liability that this is a risk of implants) This is when the scar tissue hardens around the implant. I had been very active prior to having implants doing triathons etc. The pain / tightness of having the encapsulation occur meant that I was not comfortable exercising, felt lethargic which meant I put on weight felt less confident, etc etc. So had a physical as well as emotional impact on me.
Anyway the surgeon recommended taking them out cleaning out the scarring and putting them back in (at another cost of approx $4K) but I decided that I could not risk them hardening again so I decided to take them out altogether and write off the physical and mental cost as a big life mistake. Two months ago had them out I had asked the surgeon if he would be taking out the scar tissue to which he responded the once the implant is out it will melt back into the body but because I was worried about how it does that he will take a ‘bit’ out. Anyway as I said had them out two months ago and now I have a huge mass / lump of scar tissue in my left breast giving the natural breast a very odd shape which is painful and having the same effect as when the implant was in there. I am going to have to have more surgery, it will be very invasive as it is all around the top and side under the muscle.
All I can say is that having breast implants might sound straight forward but consider all the potential costs if it goes wrong because it can end up affecting more than your bank account. And really natural breasts are beautiful no matter what size. I now just wish I could have my old natural ones back as they were….
loading...
Sorry to hear your difficult story. Hope you can move on to a future with less pain and I hope this is a lesson for those thinking about it.
loading...
It sounds like you have had a terrible experience. Hopefully you sharing your story may prevent someone else feeling your pain.
loading...
damn, i was kindda thinking about it….
loading...
Hmmm, this may be the only time in my 34 years that I’m happy with my F sized boobs…
loading...
Merry Crissy from one effy to another
loading...
Don’t spose either of you ladies want to donate some breast tissue to a scrawny B cup here would ya? haha Padded bras are my best friend!
loading...
hahaha, and a well engineered bra is my best friend! Takes a lot of construction to keep the funbags in place these days
loading...
I’d give my left scrawny b tit, to have two F sizes, to match my F size arse !!
loading...
scrawny b-cup would be better than an A cup. in a size 12. soooo depressing
loading...
Im the same, but hey they are still boobs. Trying on bikinis was crap today ha but you move on
loading...
wish I could honey – my sisters are both a/b cupped with long legs and I get 2 F’s unless I starve myself and then maybe they go to a full C cup… anyway, should be very gratefull as they work and they are feeding my second child and once I stop breastfeeding I know they’ll shrink and droop a little bit more… My little sister can wear ANYTHING and just pop a bandaid over her nipples… I sit and watch in envy… meanwhile I turn away from anything padded and look at disgust at my over-the-shoulder-boulder-holders… at least they work, at least they work, at least they work….
loading...
Good heavens! A pharmaceutical/medical supplier manufacturing sub-standard/unsafe goods with the intent of defrauding people for gain? Unscrupulous people deliberately putting profit before the wellbeing of consumers? How can this be?
Could it possibly be similar to the aspartame scam, the fluoride scam, the Vioxx scam, the mercury and live viruses in vaccines scam? Nah, they’re just all conspiracy theories. Nothing to see here, move along…….
loading...
Except that according to the pharmaceutical company conspiracy theories this story would never have reached the light of day. Yes, pharmaceutical companies make money. Yes, they have made mistakes. But if they are truly so powerful and evil how are we even hearing about this?
loading...
I never said they are all powerful and evil. I said follow the money trail because money is what makes this world go around. Perhaps, instead of shooting the messenger when someone comes along with different information, it’s in your best interests to investigate it thoroughly before you shoot the messenger.
If you actually do check out the opposing camp properly and still disagree, do it politely and walk away, rather than stridently trying to silence the other. If Elvis is still alive, it’s not a conspiracy – just a man faking his own death for reasons of his own and it makes a good story. If September 11 was carried out by anyone other than a bunch of Arabs with box cutters, it’s a conspiracy of monumental proportions, because it changed the world dramatically for the worse. The author of that conspiracy theory piece was just plain silly to include nonsense along with serious issues, in my opinion.
In the case of breast implants and yes – vaccinations – it is wise to explore all available information rather than writing for an emotional reaction.
loading...
Sorry, where did I shoot the messenger? Where was I impolite?
And if you aren’t saying that pharmaceutical companies are powerful and evil (read: hyperbole for immoral) I’m not really sure what are are saying.
Anyway, won’t engage in this any longer. Totally not worth it.
loading...
Belle, the ‘shooting the messenger’ comment wasn’t aimed at you in particular. You did imply though that there can’t be much wrong if the public is informed of wrongdoing. The company was caught in the act, and publicity was inevitable.
As a relative newcomer to this site, I’m just pissed off at the know-it-all attitude of quite a few posters and over the top attacks on the character of the woman who speaks of the downside of accepted vaccination programs. I’d never heard of Meryl Dory until reading these articles here, but I have first hand knowledge of what can happen when it goes wrong, and it pains me to read so many young people reacting in such an arrogant way to someone who presents the other side of the coin. There’s been so much fear, loathing and belligerence aimed at that woman that it’s becoming a rather nasty and dangerous element, especially seeing she’s intending to speak at an open venue. The tone of some posters is almost like a potential lynch mob.
There’s a culture here it seems, of a herd mentality, and anyone voicing a different point of view is either shot down quickly with ridicule or their valid points are swallowed in a sea of trivia.
If the aim is to discuss light-hearted subjects with humour for a bit of fun, that’s fine. However, when serious subjects are on the table for discussion and debate, the gang of regulars quickly move in to reinforce their shared views and effectively silence others. So many posters are so totally confident that they’re right about many tricky and complex subjects! One gets the feeling that a couple of decades more life experience will have them looking back and saying “How could I have been so stupid?”.
Hanging a ‘Conspiracy Theory” label on subjects where one only has access to mainstream media reports is not clever, and neither is having faith in so-called scientific evidence when that evidence is paid for by vested interests.
loading...
Holy moly…
loading...
I’ll be sending this article to friends who are considering breast implants.. looks like the potential risks def outweigh the benefits!
loading...
It’s not just the 4500 women known to have received them in Australia, what about the thousands of women who travel to Thailand for implants? What did they get??
loading...
So France is very seriously considering removing implants from 30,000 women and Australia says ‘don’t worry about it?’
I don’t have implants, but I find this concerning.
loading...