Anne Hathaway is mortified. This is understandable because images of her vagina are currently going viral after it was photographed at the New York premiere of her new film Les Miserable. And nobody wants a viral vagina.
The flashing was inadvertant and came as she got out of the car right before walking the red carpet, prompting media coverage such as this:

Awkward. (note: we have chosen not to publish the original image without pixilation).
In the middle of the press tour for Les Mis, there’s no hiding under the bed until this one passes. Hathaway has been forced to discuss the embarassing incident in this interview on The US Today Show:
“It was obviously an unfortunate incident,” she tells Today in the above interview. “It kind of made me sad on two accounts
. One was that I was very sad that we live in an age when someone takes a picture of another person in a vulnerable moment and rather than delete it, and do the decent thing, sells it.”
Hathaway adds, “And I’m sorry that we live in a culture that commodifies sexuality of unwilling participants, which brings us back to Les Mis, that’s what my character is, she is someone who is forced to sell sex to benefit
her child because she has nothing and there’s no social safety net.”
Of course, the real question here is why Hathaway opted not to wear any panties. (Did she not learn anything from Lindsay Lohan?)
The actress echoed similar sentiments about her response to the mishap in an interview with a reporter from Vanity Fair, which was reported by The New York Daily News.
“I was getting out of the car and my dress was so tight that I didn’t realize it until I saw all the photographers’ flashes,” Hathaway reportedly said. “It was devastating. They saw everything. I might as well have lifted up my skirt for them.”
As the NY Daily News article points out, there are a number of ways Hathaway could have avoided this situation (again: wear underwear), but we agree with Hathaway that it would have been more appropriate for the photographer to just delete the photo. Then again, what would Hollywood be without its sex scandals and nude pictures nowadays?
A few questions here. Do people really do this these days, not wear underwear? Do regular people do it or just celebrities? Did nobody learn ANYTHING from Britney Spears?
Is it not daunting enough to walk a red carpet with hundreds of photographers flashing you without taking the added risk of flashing them back? Are undies really just a nineties relic that nobody wears unless they have their period? Is going Commando the new black?
Discuss.
In the meantime, here are some other red carpet wadrobe malfunctions:

Jennifer Lawrence






Comments
139 Comments so far
Yeah, I’m sure it was really “inadvertent”. Are you KIDDING? How else are not so significant stars going to get publicity these days? Nothing else but ‘flashing’ gets the public attention. Sure shows you what a bunch of perverts we’re turning into.
loading...
I’m sorry, but how is Anne Hathaway a not so significant star?
loading...
I don’t think it would have mattered if she was wearing underwear or not…. This pic still would have been taken and sold! Emma (photo gallery) had underwear on and the pic still was shown everywhere. Frankly, I am with other ppl here – where is the difference between this paparazzi taking and selling this photo and some random guy taking a pic of up a woman’s skirt??? Arrest the bastard and let the press know that selling/buying these photos no matter whom the person is, means that there will be an arrest! And personally whilst I have no issues looking at celebrities, I’d rather perv on the construction crew down the road.
loading...
what is it with people and women’s underwear? No one complains (or very few people do) about bra strap lines. Why a problem with panty lines? For Gods sake, give these ladies a break. Let em cover up with their bikini or briefs underpants.
loading...
its not a vagina, its a vulva. Please learn your own anatomy!
loading...
Call me a cynic, but I think it was totally pre-planned to give publicity to Anne and the movie.
“Can’t buy that kind of publicity”
loading...
Ugh. Until I read this, I had no idea how many people were going around randomly dispensing bodily fluids. Now I never want to sit on a seat again, much less try on a pair of jeans.
loading...
Actually I just saw the uncensored pic on Perez’s site and it’s extremely embarassing. You can clearly see her genitals and what wants to?! No one.
She must have known she’d be photographed and getting out of a car is really tricky in a really tight dress. She’s either very dumb or foolish.
loading...
I think she’s really silly but who really cares.
I have never understood the fuss over Sharon /Stone crossing her legs in that movie! You couldn’t see a thing. Can anyone enlighten me?
loading...
as teenage boy, I pretty quickly learnt the way to adjust the contrast and brightness controls on the telly after that movie came out. Amazing what a bit of incentive does for motivating teenage boys.
loading...
So happens that Anne’s privates were there to pomote their own film.
“Les Mingerables”.
They sang live.
loading...
Crude, unnecessary and very not funny Bradley.
loading...
So happens that Anne’s privates were there promoting their own film.
Les Mingerables !
loading...
Surely not a vagina – she didn’t open her legs that wide!!! Perhaps just her pubic area or vulva???
loading...
A viral vagina?
I’m so not going there…
loading...
Oh MM! You have forgotten the best ‘wardrobe malfunction’ of all time – Keith Urban flashing his Calvin Klein undies on national TV.
I think in the interests of non-gender biased and balanced reporting you need another male celeb in your photo gallery.
Oh, OK. It’s Friday, I’m tired and I could look at that picture all day, swoon..pretty please.
loading...
What a non-topic!
I rarely wear underwear unless I am wearing stockings (aka tights but can’t say tights incase I get put into the tights as pants crew! Eww)
See what i did there..each to their own!
loading...
Three things:
– she’s a well known celeb, she knows paps are going to be trying for an upskirt if they can, so I’m very surprised she wasn’t paranoid and doing everything she could to avoid this happening if she knew she wasn’t wearing underwear;
– it’s a terrible invasion of privacy that this occured and;
– the paps who took the photo are disgusting creeps, and I don’t understand why they’re not charged under the same laws a non-pap upskirting someone woudl be charged with
loading...
What an incredible amount of publicity for this movie! I didn’t know anything about it until this *scandal*. Interesting…….
loading...
The only disturbing thing is that our society is so god-awfully hung up about women’s bodies that we’re even discussing this. Vaginas offend me no more than elbows.
loading...
I was more shocked that she had pubic hair.
loading...
That’s what I thought as well!
loading...
she’s a grown woman, why wouldn’t she. Not all of us get waxed to within an inch of our lives.
loading...
Obviously not all of us do but it’s not unreasonable to assume that most Hollywood actresses do.
loading...
The majority of women of this generation do (according to my friends who are beauticians, and the men I’ve asked), so that’s one basis for my assumption. Furthermore, she’;s a hollywood actress, which means she’s going to be even more preened and primped than ‘normal’ women – which makes it even more likely she’d be hair free.
loading...
No, but the majority of women her age do, plus as an actress she’s even more likely to take care of her appearance and be buffed and waxed to within an inch of her life. Ps if you haven’t tried it, maybe give it a go. It feels so much better and is so much more sensitive.
loading...
Um why?
loading...
What’s all the fuss about? Underwear really is unnecessary. If I don’t want a line or muffin top impression then the knickers come off. No problem. Photographers should be banned from taking pics at the kind of angle that catches a glimpse of a woman’s private bits. Isn’t this illegal for the general public? Panties smanties.
loading...
I worked with a man who wore the same pair of jeans everyday. He told us many times that he went commando, so therefore isn’t that the same as wearing the same pair of underpants everyday?? It is just so unhygienic!
loading...
Yes, but how many people wear the same pair of jeans every single day?
loading...
I think it’s shit that they published those photos. This is why I wear underwear every day, because if you don’t and it’s windy or you’re getting out of a car awkwardly shit happens and the internet is forever.
loading...
hate underwear… avoid it when ever i can…
loading...
Regardless of what we saw, or did not see, when Anne Hathaway got out of the car: that is one ugly dress! Do these people not look in the mirror before they go out?
The shoes are pretty horrible, as well. It is a shame, Anne is a beautiful woman and usually wears the most amazing clothes.
loading...
Matter of opinion,. I think the dress is amazing!
loading...
If your dress is so tight that it makes wearing a g-string impossible, then maybe you should choose another dress? On the Rachel Zoe Project they often discuss the importance of wearing spanx underneath your dress to eliminate any VPL. I think Anne Hathaway was a client of hers? Or maybe she should just wear Fine Lines underwear. Works for me!
loading...
Or maybe you should be allowed to wear whatever you want and feel amazing and/or comfortable in? Including underwear or no underwear?
loading...
I disagree, tight dresses can be absolutely beautiful and very flattering on the right body type so why should they stop wearing them?
loading...
I considered not wearing undies under my wedding dress because I didn’t have want to have a line, and control underwear makes toilet trips much more complicated! And I can understand not wearing them with a tight dress… But maybe not a short dress!
loading...
Shouldn’t that be her vulva, rather than her vagina, that went viral ?
I always do enjoy a good performance from Anne Hathaway.
loading...
I think Anne was just trying to distract the world from discussing her god-awful shoes.
loading...
On first glance I thought she was wearing some sort of leg brace.
loading...
If I am wearing a figure hugging dress that is long enough I normally go without. If its not long enough I wear my one and only g string that is completely smooth underneith. finding underwear that doesn’t leave a VPL on a really tight dress can be hard though and thats why they invented stick on strapless underwear! I haven’t had a chance to check them out properly but they look fantastic! like nipple pasties but for your vagina!
loading...
EEwwwww! Pasties for your vagina??
loading...
There goes her Oscar for Les Mis
loading...
However….I do understand that her back botty is a certainty for a Golden Globe !
loading...
Mamamia team, I would like to have read that your perspective was one of ‘each to their own’ in terms of whether or not to wear underwear. Just because Hathaway didn’t wear underwear (perhaps to reduce VPL, perhaps because it felt daring, perhaps because she forgot… whatever…) doesn’t mean she was inviting the camera.
loading...
I agree; I noted a tone of shame in this piece that I didn’t like. So what if she didn’t wear underwear? It’s unfortunate that Anne obviously feels upset by the situation, but she’s an adult who made a decision. You wouldn’t think half the population has vaginas from the hullaballoo everyone’s kicking up.
And for the record, I often don’t wear underwear if a) I’m wearing a tight outfit b) I don’t have any clean undergarments, or c) I just can’t be bothered. That’s my own business and if someone were to cop an eyeful, I would refer them to the above point: get over it.
loading...
I so agree with you, and was just about to post a similar comment. Why should she have to wear undies to avoid “the added risk” of photographers.
Should women wear undies to avoid the “added risk” of being raped.
I really took offence to the tone of this report.
loading...
Okay so hypothetical situation..
I am a celebrity getting ready for a fabulous evening filled with red carpet photos and interviews. I glam myself up, don a fabulous gown and….don’t wear underwear?? Seriously!!
Limousines and sports cars are low to the ground, meaning when you arrive at an event in invariably takes some skill to exit your car without flashing the millions of photographers waiting to catch an ungraceful moment. Why would you now add to this predicament by not wearing underwear!!
You are asking for it!!!
loading...
Jay…just because you do, or don’t, wear something in a particular doesn’t mean that you are “asking for it”.
loading...
Oh, please don’t EVER use the term “asking for it” in relation to anything. Ever. Victim blaming yet again. No matter if she wore underwear or not, she is the victim of a paparazzi who, as she said, instead of deleting the image decided to sell it for profit.
loading...
Is the dissolution of self-determination this season’s black? The concept that you are responsible/accountable for nothing? That your actions can account cannot control your destiny at all.
Not trying to apply this to Anne or what women wear in general, but to say that no-one ever asks for anything is so fatalistic that it depresses me.
loading...
Oh please, don’t ever use the term “asking for it,” are you serious? It’s not like Jay said she deserves to be assaulted because she didn’t wear underwear. Calm down. And do we really want to live in a society where everyone is completely dissolved of any responsibility for their own behaviour.
She chose to get photographed in a “daring” dress without any underwear on, she must have known there is a chance someone could snap her privates. This isn’t her first time doing this, she’s an A list actress who’s done countless red carpet appearances. Of course that doesn’t mean that the paps who did it are not creeps, they are, but that’s the world we live in now.
loading...
What I have found interesting is that the pic supposedly went viral, but I was hard-pressed to find a copy of it anywhere that hadn’t been censored – with pixellating, a black spot, a flower, or even a cat, lol.
And when I finally found one, well, it’s hardly a view of her vagina is it!
Geez, all that fuss about some skin and a little hair!
But yeah, when DID ladies stop wearing undies?
loading...
Totally agree. What is outragous is the fuss over being able to see absolutely nothing!
loading...
Oh please, this isn’t the first time we’ve seen more of her than necessary.
I think she loves the publicity…………
loading...
If I was to take a photo up a woman’s skirt I’d get arrested. Why isn’t someone arresting these pervert photographers.
loading...
One thing I’ve never understood: if a random person on a train started taking photographs up ladies skirts, they would probably be arrested, yet the paparazzi seem to get away with it. Why is it so ?
loading...
I appreciate that with the attention Anne Hathaway is getting over this, it is invasive, and unnecessary.
In my opinion it’s no big deal. And if she wants to not wear undies, that’s her business. It doesn’t need to be sexualised.
I’ll often go commando if I’m wearing a figure hugging dress and it’s a length that means when I sit down there’s no risk of exposing my vajayjay (yeah the correct terminology may be Vulva, but vjayjay or poonanie are more fun from an onomatopoeic pov).
It’s vanity rather than sexual. And that’s my prerogative. On the sex side, I’ve gone commando more than once to turn on the man I am with at the time – that’s a buzz too.
If wearing jeans, tights or anything trouser based I always slip on a pair of g’s to guard my fanny (now in US Fanny has different meaning to here….) against the trouser fabric
Either way, for those that prefer undies, good for you. To suggest it’s unhygienic to go commando is not founded on fact. A reverse opinion is that it lets your nether regions breathe and reduces the risk of infections due to heat/sweat.
Cotton is to be favoured over synthetic if you do wear them.
Whatever is your preference, live and let live, and let’s mind our own business about what others are doing. It’s their life and body.
loading...
To second what you said… I used to have really really bad problems with thrush (like at least one infection a month, if not 2). As soon as I stopped wearing underwear, no problem. And it’s been like that for 2 years. It was almost miraculous.
I do still wear undies when I’m in a skirt or dress, regardless of length. Where I live it’s too windy to take chances! VPL is better than VV!!!
loading...
carosmile, yes, yes, yes and yes!
loading...
Yep, it is wrong for someone to be exploitative with the photo…but actors know that is what is likely to happen. Bit of wisdom Anne, you don’t need to be likened to Lindsay.
loading...
They don’t wear underwear because it can often ruin the lines of a dress, especially under the bright lights of the red carpet. It’s strictly a fashion thing.
loading...
You forgot the lovely Em’s nipple mishap in your photos!
And regarding the wearing or not of undies…I always wear them, otherwise I constantly feel that I am missing something! Besides there’s the issue of period leaking, discharges etc…where would that go? Don’t fancy having that run down my legs or leaving a stain on my clothes.
loading...
I like Anne Hathaway. I think that she acts well, is funny and very easy on the eye, but I’m cynical about the ‘unwilling participant’ in commodification.
loading...
I’m of two separate opinions on these so called ‘crotch shots’.
A – They’re a massively invasive and sleazy way of selling magazines and newspapers and yes it’s sad that her hoo-haa is now all over dozens of websites.
B – Take away the risk and wear GODDAMN UNDERWEAR!!! Seriously, who doesn’t wear any at a premiere? I don’t get it.
loading...
I think a lot of celebrities probably don’t, when was the last time you saw someone on the red carpet and could see their underwear through their dress or their bra straps? Never. And that’s probably because they don’t wear any so they don’t ruin the line of the dress. It’s a fashion thing. No stylist would let their client walk out on the red carpet with their underwear showing through their dress. They are so particular about things like that.
loading...
Sorry but I smell a very cunning, lets promote my current film, celebrity rat Ms Hathaway! You cannot buy this sort of publicity! She was FAR too quick to make the link to her current work for me to think anything else I am afraid!
loading...
I disagree. This was a day after the photos went viral, and she said this at a planned, sit-down interview. I’m sure that her publicist, manager and who knows how many others have sat down with her and prepared her for ways to deflect the problem and bring it back to the film she is promoting.
The fact that she made the connection in the interview doesn’t make me think “publicity” at all. On top of that, as if Les Mis even needs the publicity from photos like this!
loading...
I wear underwear. But I agree with Anne that it’s unsettling that people think it acceptable to pretty much eye-rape celebrities.
Wanting to be in movies does not equate to wanting to have your every privacy invaded. I don’t agree with the premise that celebrities ask for it.
For that reason I will never buy a copy of Woman’s Day, Famous, or any of the other disgusting gossip rags that simply exist to give us a reason to feel superior to a celebrity.
loading...
These responses make me feel like a granny. I always wear undies. Always.
Can’t believe a celebrity who knows she is going to photographed would go out sans undies. I mean seriously.
Great way to generate publicity for the movie though not that it needed any more publicity.
loading...
Thats the risk you take..
chances are the time you duck out to the shop sans make-up complete with greasy hair and gardening clothes will be the time you bump into your ex with his supermodel look-a-like wife
same here, as a celebrity, the time you go out (to a premiere no less) without undies you will be papped flashing yourself whilst getting out of a car
its a no brainer
loading...
If we were talking about photos of celebrities when they were off-duty like in the street or on holidays or the shops, that’s different.
But when you’re at ‘work’ (for them this is at work) then you put your knickers on and if you don’t you accept what might happen.
loading...
I’m torn about this. Sure, if you want to wear undies or not, it’s nobody’s business. But you need to be aware that stuff can happen if you’re commando. Like this!
I don’t think it’s the photographer’s role to protect a celebrity. Nor is it the role of magazines or websites. They’re grown ups. Time to take responsibility for your actions!
loading...
I never wear undies, and I’m not going to anytime soon. I’ve never found a pair that are comfortable.
loading...
Don’t you get skid marks on pants? What about jeans – aren’t they rough on your labia? What about when you’ve got your period aren’t you selfconscious of leakage? What about the use of panty liners at the end of your period? Genuine questions.
loading...
No skid marks, lol. I shower at least twice a day. I only wear my clothes once and wash them. I have a period every three months, (the pill), and even then they’re very light, so I’ve never experienced leakage and I’ve never worn a pad or panty liner in my life.
loading...
Rudy Nudy, you Lucky Ducky!!
loading...
I can second what RudyNudy said too.
No problems. I know when my period is coming (the blinding pain is a great indicator) and I keep wearing pads until it’s totally gone. So I wear knickers one week out of every month.
As for the jeans… meh. I wear jeans all day every day to work, and no, it’s not rough at all. (could just be the way I’m shaped though…)
loading...
Skid marks?????
Don’t know about RudyNudy but I for one learnt how to wipe my bottom from a very early age!!!
loading...
That’s why I laughed out loud. I learnt to wipe my bum from a young age too!
loading...
I ALWAYS shower immediately afterwards !
Just having a mental picture of the jeans roughing up the labia ! It’s pretty vicious !
loading...
I have seen the unpixelated picture and you can barely tell she’s not wearing undies, and her thighs are together (a little hard to see in this picture). This picture has also been zoomed in to change the angle.
I used to work as a celebrity gossip columnist, and these pictures get taken because photographers crouch on the ground to get ‘upskirt’ pictures.
The decision to wear underwear or not is a private one for most of us. The decision to publish the pictures…
loading...
I was curious and looked too. All you can see is a little bit of skin and hair. Personally don’t see the big deal, nothing i haven’t seen on myself before. 50% of the population have them and majority of the other 50% have prbably seen them. The media likes to make a big deal about these things when they really aren’t.
loading...
I love that she seizes the opportunity to draw a connection that promotes her movie!!!! And I adore Emma Watson (in the gallery) in sensible undies.
loading...
If people choose not to wear underwear it is none of my freaking business. AND if for some unfortunate reason they should accidently and unintentionally flash me their bits I will simply avert my eyes. I will also not take pictures, point it out to everybody and make it some type of talking point because I don’t enjoy intentionally embarrassing and humiliating people because I’m a decent fucking person.
What is wrong with everybody lately?
loading...
I’m sorry but hygeine is our business. Underwear is designed as a modern uderstanding that germs can be passed on.
Before this amazing medical discovery, people thought you got sick because it was 1) Gods way 2) the Devil’s way 3) the witch doctor was out for the day.
Leaving human residue in a taxi where you sat for example – could cause illness.
I’m not saying people don’t have the right to choose, but we all have the right to ask our health be considered by their choice.
loading...
people who don’t wear undies aren’t usually sitting bare-arsed on anything, they have clothes on! Also I’d be more worried about putting my hand on door handles, touching the ATM, etc etc. That’s where your germs are going to come from.
loading...
That’s not even true. Women started wearing modern under garments as they are known today in France in the 18th century and it was a legal requirement for dancers that had nothing to do with hygiene.
Prior to that undergarmets were mostly pantaloons or skirts that were worn to stop the outer garments getting soiled by bodily secretions in the age where people only washed every other week, sometimes even less.
I don’t see how this is relevent now when people shower often more than once a day and a lot of the time womens hygiene problems with their vagina often come from wearing synthetic underwear that doesn’t allow enough air flow.
Harumph!
loading...
My doctor (female) has encouraged me to make sure I on occassions avoid wearing underwear to give my lady parts space to breathe… underwear is often the cause of thrush outbreaks etc
If ‘human reside’ is being left where you sit and is going through your clothes then there is most likely something going on you should discuss with your doctor.
loading...
Actually, the presence of candida albicans is the cause of thrush, not wearing underwear…
loading...
Yes of course you are completely right but our synthetic underwear gives it the perfect environment to thrive.. which is something to try to avoid since getting Thrush at some point as a woman is as liekly as death and taxes, go cotton ladies!
loading...